Search

A silver molecular ink platform formulated for screen, inkjet, and aerosol jet printing is presented. A simple formulation comprising silver neodecanoate, ethyl cellulose, and solvent provides improved performance versus that of established inks, yet with improved economics. Thin, screen-printed traces with exceptional electrical (<10 mΩ/□/mil or 12 μΩ·cm) and mechanical properties are achieved following thermal or photonic sintering, the latter having never been demonstrated for silver-salt-based inks. Low surface roughness, submicron thicknesses, and line widths as narrow as 41 μm outperform commercial ink benchmarks based on flakes or nanoparticles. These traces are mechanically robust to flexing and creasing (less than 10% change in resistance) and bind strongly to epoxy-based adhesives. Thin traces are remarkably conformal, enabling fully printed metal-insulator-metal band-pass filters. The versatility of the molecular ink platform enables an aerosol jet-compatible ink that yields conductive features on glass with 2× bulk resistivity and strong adhesion to various plastic substrates. An inkjet formulation is also used to print top source/drain contacts and demonstrate printed high-mobility thin film transistors (TFTs) based on semiconducting single-walled carbon nanotubes. TFTs with mobility values of ∼25 cm 2 V -1 s -1 and current on/off ratios >10 4 were obtained, performance similar to that of evaporated metal contacts in analogous devices.

The aim of this study was to compare the seasonal variation in performance of a faecal immunochemical test for haemoglobin (FIT) and a guaiac test (gFOBT) for colorectal cancer screening. From June 2009 to May 2011, 18,290 screening participants (50-74 years old) performed OC-SENSOR quantitative FIT (1 sample) and Hemoccult II gFOBT (3 stool samples with 2 spots/sample). Referral for colonoscopy required a minimum of one positive spot (gFOBT), or a positive FIT [cut-off 150 ng haemoglobin/mL buffer (i.e. 30 μg haemoglobin/g feces)]. The performance of tests for detection of advanced neoplasia was compared according to seasons using Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) curves, at various FIT cut-off values. The positivity rate of FIT was significantly lower in the summer compared with other seasons (2.3% versus 3.0%, p = 0.03), whilst the positivity rate of gFOBT increased in the autumn (1.8% versus 1.5%, p = 0.11). FIT was clinically more effective than gFOBT over the four season-specific ROC curves. At the cut-off concentration used in the study, the season-specific FIT/gFOBT ratios for true positive rates were: 2.8 (Autumn), 2.5 (Winter), 3.0 (Spring), 3.7 (Summer), and for false positive rates: 1.2 (Autumn), 1.5 (Winter), 1.8 (Spring), 0.9 (Summer). Therefore, in this study with this cut-off concentration and in spite of lower positivity rate in summer, the seasonal variations of performance of OC-SENSOR FIT led to improved gain in specificity in the summer, without a decrease in gain in sensitivity compared with gFOBT., (© 2014 UICC.)