Search

Background The optimal surgical staging procedure of the axilla in patients who convert from a clinically positive (cN+) to a clinically negative node status (ycN0) through neoadjuvant chemotherapy is still controversial. Widely diverse techniques such as full Axillary Lymph Node Dissection (ALND), Targeted Axillary Dissection (TAD), Targeted Lymph Node Biopsy (TLNB) and Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy alone (SLNB) are given preference in different international guidelines. So far, no comparative data on the oncological outcome or the morbidity of the different procedures are available. Further research is needed to safely de-escalate the extent of axillary surgery in this patient group. Trial design The AXSANA study is an international prospective cohort study including cN+ patients converting to ycN0 status and treated with different axillary staging techniques according to the standard at their treating institution. The study is initiated by the EUBREAST network. The trial includes patients with cT1-4c tumors, who present initially with axillary lymph node metastasis and are scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. According to an amendment in 2020 the inclusion of patients with highly suspicious nodes without minimally invasive biopsy is allowed. All patients converting to ycN0 status undergo follow-up for 5 years irrespectively of the ypN status. Primary endpoints: Invasive disease-free survival, axillary recurrence rate and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). HRQoL are evaluated using four standardized questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C 30, EORTC QLQ BR 23, Lymph ICF and SOC-13) at baseline and after 1, 3 and 5 years after surgery. Secondary endpoints are the feasibility and performance of different axillary staging techniques (detection rate, number of removed lymph nodes and association with complications, arm morbidity and quality of life, operating time and use of clinical and economic resources); impact of learning curve, and the detailed mapping of surgical and oncological treatment standards in different countries. The impact on different regional treatment strategies (radiotherapy, ALND) in patients with ypN0(i+), ypN1(mi) and ypN1 is assessed. Current status of the study: On June 30th 157 study sites from 15 countries are open for recruitment (Austria 2, Czech Republic 1, Finland 1, Germany 112, Greece 3, Italy 1, Norway 1, Poland 3, Portugal 5, Romania 2, Russia 1, Sweden 4, Switzerland 4, Spain 6, Turkey 11). 620 patients have been included in the study. Among patients who converted to ycN0 status, 144 have been scheduled for ALND, 157 for TAD and 49 for SLNB. The study is still open for further international study sites. Funding: AGO-B, Claudia-von Schilling Foundation, Ehmann Foundation, AWOgyn, Merit Medical, Endomagnetics, Mammotome Target accrual: 3000 patients worldwide Citation Format: Thorsten Kühn, Steffi Hartmann, Elmar Stickeler, Jana de Boniface, Oreste Gentilini, Sarah Fröhlich, Franziska Ruf, Marc Thill, Michael Hauptmann, Guldeniz Karadeniz Cakmak, Isabel Rubio, Maria Luisa Gasparri, Michaelis Kontos, Eduard-Alexandru Bonci, Laura Niinikoski, Rosa Di Micco, Dawid Murawa, David Pinto, Florentia Peintinger, Christine Solbach, Matilda Appelgren, Jens-Uwe Blohmer, Michael Weigel, Gabriele Kaltenecker, Michael Schrauder, Janine Simons, Marjolein Smidt, Ellen Schlichting, Lukas Dostalek, Alexander Sergeevich Emelyanov, Elisabeth Thiemann, Semra Gunay, Sybille Loibl, Maggie Banys-Paluchowski. AXSANA - EUBREAST 3 (axillary surgery after neoadjuvant treatment): An international prospective multicenter cohort study of the EUBREAST study group to evaluate different surgical methods of axillary staging (sentinel lymph node biopsy, targeted axillary dissection, axillary dissection) in clinically node-positive breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT04373655) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2021 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2021 Dec 7-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT1-04-04.

Background Targeted axillary dissection (TAD), the combination of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and targeted lymph node biopsy (TLNB), can reduce the false negative rates of sentinel node biopsy alone dramatically in breast cancer patients, who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). However methods for TAD are still under investigation. Methods Magseed®, a non-radioactive magnetic marker was used to mark the biopsied positive TLN after NAC. The SLNB with the standard technetium-based method and the selective TLNB with Magseed® localization were performed in 40 patients. The TLNs were identified with the Sentimag® probe and excised in all patients. Specimen x-ray was performed to confirm the Magseed® within the prior to NAC biopsied and clipped lymph node. Results The TLN identification rate was 100% (40/40), the SLN identification rate was 82.5% (33/40), the concordance rate between the TLN and the SLN was 65% (26/40). Complications according Magseed® deployment or identification could not be observed. Conclusion Magseed® is a reliable and feasible marker for the identification of TLNs after NAC., Highlights • TLNB is an accurate method for the identification of marked lymph nodes after NAC. • Selective excision of TLNs is feasible. • Magseed® allows a non-radioactive, wireless marking of TLNs.

Cancers 13(7), 1565 (2021). doi:10.3390/cancers13071565 special issue: "Special Issue "Clinical Trials in Breast Cancer" / Special Issue Editor: Prof. Dr. Gilles Freyer, Guest Editor", Published by MDPI, Basel

Background: Mammography screening programs in Europe revealed a 25–30% breast cancer mortality reduction in women between 50 and 74 years. Early cancer detection and less radical treatment in dedicated multidisciplinary breast centers have improved breast cancer care. Breast population-based screening (persons are individually identified and personally invited to attend screening) is intended to detect breast cancer at an early stage to enable lower mortality rates. Methods: The status of implementation of cancer screening programs among European countries, quality parameters and possible differences will be reviewed. Results: Implementation of the recommended maximum age range was adopted in most programs. Almost all the European countries established digital mammography as the method of screening instead of screen-film mammography. Inequalities in implementation of cancer screening in the European Union have been observed. Conclusion: Improvement of data quality and mortality registries linked to the screening programs are needed.

Axillary surgery has undergone considerable changes in recent years, especially in relation to patients who undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Due to constantly decreasing rates of recurrence and death from breast cancer, modern surgical strategies aim at de-escalating the extent of local treatment and avoiding unnecessary procedures. This relates especially to lymph node surgery which is associated with considerable morbidity. In patients who initially present with clinically node-negative disease, sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is increasingly performed after NACT. The determination of the post-NACT nodal status does not only spare patients from additional surgery but also allows the assessment of pathologic complete response which is increasingly becoming an important tool for treatment planning. Since more than 70% of these patients have a ypN0 status after NACT, future trials will aim to identify patients who might be spared any axillary surgery after NACT. In patients who initially present with positive lymph nodes, the success rates of SLNB in terms of detection and accuracy are less favorable compared to those in patients who undergo primary surgery. The clinical significance of this is unclear. To reduce unnecessary axillary dissection in patients with cN1ycN0 status, prospective outcome data after SLNB without further lymph node removal are urgently needed. Improvements in surgical technique by localizing positive nodes at the time of diagnosis and removing them in a targeted surgical procedure (targeted axillary dissection) are under evaluation. Risk assessment and patient selection (including gene expression profiles) might be other ways of safely omitting axillary dissection.

Background Prepectoral implant placement is an innovative option for breast reconstruction, due to multiple advantages over subpectoral implant placement. The adoption of various ADMs and meshes supports the utilization of the prepectoral technique. Methods 200 breasts were reconstructed with prepectoral implant placement after nipple-sparing mastectomy in a one-stage direct-to-implant procedure. The implants were completely covered and fixed with porcine ADMs (Strattice™ or Artia™), or with synthetic meshes (TIGR®). The pectoralis major muscle was not detached at all and kept intact entirely. Results Minor complications included minimal nipple necrosis without further intervention and complete healing in 14 breasts (7.0%). Major complications comprised implant loss due to skin necrosis and wound infection in 7 breasts (3.5%), and hematoma with revision surgery in 8 breasts (4.0%). At a mean follow-up of 36 months cosmetic results were excellent and good in 180 breasts (90.0%), sufficient in 13 breasts (6.5%) and insufficient in 7 breasts (3.5%). Breast animation deformity and implant displacement could not be observed, while implant rotation was documented in 5 breasts (2.5%). Capsular contractures grade III or IV could not be observed neither in patients with previous radiotherapy nor in patients with radiotherapy to the reconstructed breast. Conclusions The single-stage direct-to-implant prepectoral implant placement after NSM with complete coverage of the implant with ADM or synthetic mesh represents a novel and feasible technique for breast reconstruction. This technique provides an alternative to the subpectoral implant placement with excellent cosmetic results avoiding the disadvantages of the subpectoral implant placement.

Clinical observations about lack of survival benefit after extensive axillary surgery and biological discordance between primary breast tumors and axillary lymph nodes raise the question of the actual metastatic potential of axillary nodal disease. The exploration of intratumoral heterogeneity and detection of genomic differences between the primary and lymph nodes indicate some similarity between the number of mutations in synchronous axillary node metastases and those in the primary lesion, suggesting a favorable prognosis. The hematogenous route of metastasis needs to be considered in findings of different subclones between nodal and distant metastases. Modern tools such as whole-genome sequencing applied in multiple tumor areas may guide more precisely the extent of axillary surgery. (C) 2018 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg

// Sarah Kammerer 1, 2 , Armin Sokolowski 1, 9 , Hubert Hackl 3 , Dieter Platzer 1 , Stephan Wenzel Jahn 4 , Amin El-Heliebi 5 , Daniela Schwarzenbacher 6 , Verena Stiegelbauer 6 , Martin Pichler 6, 7 , Simin Rezania 1, 2 , Heidelinde Fiegl 8 , Florentia Peintinger 4 , Peter Regitnig 4 , Gerald Hoefler 4 , Wolfgang Schreibmayer 1, 2 , Thomas Bauernhofer 2, 6 1 Molecular Physiology Group, Institute of Biophysics, Medical University of Graz, Austria 2 Research Unit on Ion Channels and Cancer Biology, Medical University of Graz, Austria 3 Division of Bioinformatics, Biocenter, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria 4 Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Graz, Austria 5 Institute of Cell Biology, Histology and Embryology, Medical University of Graz, Austria 6 Division of Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Austria 7 Department of Experimental Therapeutics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA 8 Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical University of Innsbruck, Austria 9 Present address: Division of Prosthodontics, Restorative Dentistry, Periodontology and Implantology, Medical University of Graz, Austria Correspondence to: Thomas Bauernhofer, email: thomas.bauernhofer@medunigraz.at Keywords: KCNJ3, GIRK1, biomarker, estrogen receptor positive breast cancer, RNA in situ hybridization Received: June 04, 2016 Accepted: October 26, 2016 Published: November 08, 2016 ABSTRACT Numerous studies showed abnormal expression of ion channels in different cancer types. Amongst these, the potassium channel gene KCNJ3 (encoding for GIRK1 proteins) has been reported to be upregulated in tumors of patients with breast cancer and to correlate with positive lymph node status. We aimed to study KCNJ3 levels in different breast cancer subtypes using gene expression data from the TCGA, to validate our findings using RNA in situ hybridization in a validation cohort (GEO ID GSE17705), and to study the prognostic value of KCNJ3 using survival analysis. In a total of > 1000 breast cancer patients of two independent data sets we showed a) that KCNJ3 expression is upregulated in tumor tissue compared to corresponding normal tissue ( p < 0.001), b) that KCNJ3 expression is associated with estrogen receptor (ER) positive tumors ( p < 0.001), but that KCNJ3 expression is variable within this group, and c) that ER positive patients with high KCNJ3 levels have worse overall ( p < 0.05) and disease free survival probabilities ( p < 0.01), whereby KCNJ3 is an independent prognostic factor ( p

Neoadjuvant systemic therapy is being used increasingly in the treatment of early-stage breast cancer. Response, in the form of pathological complete response, is a validated and evaluable surrogate end point of survival after neoadjuvant therapy. Thus, pathological complete response has become a primary end point for clinical trials. However, there is a current lack of uniformity in the definition of pathological complete response. A review of standard operating procedures used by 28 major neoadjuvant breast cancer trials and/or 25 sites involved in such trials identified marked variability in specimen handling and histologic reporting. An international working group was convened to develop practical recommendations for the pathologic assessment of residual disease in neoadjuvant clinical trials of breast cancer and information expected from pathology reports. Systematic sampling of areas identified by informed mapping of the specimen and close correlation with radiological findings is preferable to overly exhaustive sampling, and permits taking tissue samples for translational research. Controversial areas are discussed, including measurement of lesion size, reporting of lymphovascular space invasion and the presence of isolated tumor cells in lymph nodes after neoadjuvant therapy, and retesting of markers after treatment. If there has been a pathological complete response, this must be clearly stated, and the presence/absence of residual ductal carcinoma in situ must be described. When there is residual invasive carcinoma, a comment must be made as to the presence/absence of chemotherapy effect in the breast and lymph nodes. The Residual Cancer Burden is the preferred method for quantifying residual disease in neoadjuvant clinical trials in breast cancer; other methods can be included per trial protocols and regional preference. Posttreatment tumor staging using the Tumor-Node-Metastasis system should be included. These recommendations for standardized pathological evaluation and reporting of neoadjuvant breast cancer specimens should improve prognostication for individual patients and allow comparison of treatment outcomes within and across clinical trials.