Search

Topical photodynamic therapy (PDT) for selected nonmelanoma skin cancer using 5-aminolevulinic acid (ALA) or methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) has yielded high long-term complete response rates with very good cosmesis. Pain during light activation of the photosensitizer can be a serious adverse event. A 2-step irradiance protocol has previously been shown to minimize ALA-PDT pain.To determine the irradiance-dependent pain threshold for MAL-PDT, to adapt the 2-step protocol to a light-emitting diode (LED) light source, and assess clinical response.In this prospective study, 25 superficial basal cell carcinoma (sBCC) received an initial irradiance by laser at 40 or 50 mW/cm², or LED at 35 mW/cm² followed by an irradiance at 70 mW/cm² for a total of 75 J/cm². Pain levels were recorded for both irradiance steps. Efficacy was assessed at 6, 12, or 24 months.Pain was mild in the 40/70 mW/cm² laser cohort. Three instances of irradiance-limiting pain occurred at 50/70 mW/cm². Pain was minimal in the 35/70 mW/cm² LED cohort. Clinical response rates were 80% in the 50/70 mW/cm² laser cohort and 90% in the 35/70 mW/cm² LED cohort.Topical PDT can be effectively delivered to sBCC with minimal treatment-related pain by a 2-step irradiance protocol.

Background: Standard of care for abscess management includes image-guided percutaneous drainage and antibiotics. However, cure rates vary between patients and there is growing concern for antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Photodynamic therapy (PDT), which utilizes light-activated dyes to generate cytotoxic reactive species, could complement the standard of care by sterilizing the abscess at time of drainage., Purpose: The goal of this study was to perform a first in humans Phase 1 clinical study evaluating safety and feasibility of PDT with methylene blue (MB) at the time of percutaneous abscess drainage. This was accomplished through an open-label dose escalation study, with duration of light delivery escalated from 5-30 minutes., Materials and Methods: We performed MB-PDT in 18 subjects undergoing percutaneous abscess drainage. Following standard of care drainage, 1 mg/mL MB was delivered for 10 minutes. MB was aspirated, and 1% lipid emulsion infused to homogenize light dose at the cavity wall. An optical fiber was advanced to the approximate center of the abscess for 665 nm laser illumination at 20 mW/cm 2 ., Results: MB-PDT at the time of abscess drainage was safe and feasible in all cases, with no evidence of fat embolism due to lipid emulsion or adverse reaction to MB observed. No study-related adverse or serious adverse events were encountered, and the procedure was well tolerated by all subjects. While the study was not designed or powered to determine efficacy, time to resolution of clinical symptoms was significantly decreased in subjects receiving higher fluences (p=0.028). Additionally, drainage catheter output post-procedure was decreased in subjects receiving higher fluences (ρ=-0.18), although this difference was not significant (p=0.43)., Conclusion: MB-PDT is a safe and feasible adjunct to image-guided percutaneous abscess drainage. Clinical measures indicate a dose-dependent response to PDT, motivating future Phase 2 studies evaluating the efficacy of MB-PDT in this patient population.