Search

ZusammenfassungDas Trockene Auge stellt eine heterogene Erkrankung der Augenoberfläche dar. Das Krankheitsbild hat multifaktorielle Ursachen und geht normalerweise mit einer Erhöhung der Osmolarität des Tränenfilms und mit Entzündungsprozessen der Gewebe der Augenoberfläche einher. Die Bedeutung der Entzündung beim Trockenen Auge geht nicht zuletzt auch aus der aktuellen Definition des Dry Eye Workshops (DEWS) hervor. Das Verständnis der Pathomechanismen und therapeutischen Möglichkeiten für diese Entzündungsprozesse ist daher für das Management des Trockenen Auges von zentraler Bedeutung. Der Beitrag fasst den aktuellen Kenntnisstand zum Thema „Entzündung und Trockenes Auge“ zusammen und versucht, praktische Empfehlungen für die Diagnostik, Verlaufskontrolle und die Anwendung der aktuell verfügbaren Therapieoptionen für die dem Trockenen Auge zugrunde liegenden Entzündungsprozesse zu geben.

Dry eye disease (DED) is a heterogenous disease of the ocular surface. Multiple pathogenetic factors are responsible for the disease process, but DED is generally linked to an increase in the osmolarity of the tear film and to inflammation of the ocular surface. The significance of inflammatory processes in DED is highlighted in the most recent definition of dry eye in the Dry Eye Workshop (DEWS). It is therefore critically important for the management of dry eye disease to understand the pathomechanisms and therapeutic options for the treatment of inflammatory processes. This review summarizes our current knowledge on Inflammation associated with DED and provides practical recommendations for the diagnosis and monitoring of the disease, as well as the use of currently available therapeutic options to counteract inflammation in DED.Das Trockene Auge stellt eine heterogene Erkrankung der Augenoberfläche dar. Das Krankheitsbild hat multifaktorielle Ursachen und geht normalerweise mit einer Erhöhung der Osmolarität des Tränenfilms und mit Entzündungsprozessen der Gewebe der Augenoberfläche einher. Die Bedeutung der Entzündung beim Trockenen Auge geht nicht zuletzt auch aus der aktuellen Definition des Dry Eye Workshops (DEWS) hervor. Das Verständnis der Pathomechanismen und therapeutischen Möglichkeiten für diese Entzündungsprozesse ist daher für das Management des Trockenen Auges von zentraler Bedeutung. Der Beitrag fasst den aktuellen Kenntnisstand zum Thema „Entzündung und Trockenes Auge“ zusammen und versucht, praktische Empfehlungen für die Diagnostik, Verlaufskontrolle und die Anwendung der aktuell verfügbaren Therapieoptionen für die dem Trockenen Auge zugrunde liegenden Entzündungsprozesse zu geben.

Over the last decade several novel surgical treatment options and devices for glaucoma have been developed. All these developments aim to cause as little trauma as possible to the eye, to safely, effectively, and sustainably reduce intraocular pressure (IOP), to produce reproducible results, and to be easy to adopt. The term "micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS)" was used for summarizing all these procedures. Currently MIGS is gaining more and more interest and popularity. The possible reduction of the number of glaucoma medications, the ab interno approach without damaging the conjunctival tissue, and the probably safer procedures compared to incisional surgical methods may explain the increased interest in MIGS. The use of glaucoma drainage implants for lowering IOP in difficult-to-treat patients has been established for a long time, however, a variety of new glaucoma micro-stents are being manufactured by using various materials and are available to increase aqueous outflow via different pathways. This review summarizes published results of randomized clinical studies and extensive case report series on these devices, including Schlemm's canal stents (iStent®, iStent® inject, Hydrus), suprachoroidal stents (CyPass®, iStent® Supra), and subconjunctival stents (XEN). The article summarizes the findings of published material on efficacy and safety for each of these approaches.

Lutz E Pillunat,1 Carl Erb,2 Auli Ropo,3 Friedemann Kimmich,4 Norbert Pfeiffer5 1Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, 2Augenklinik am Wittenbergplatz, Berlin, Germany; 3Santen Europe, Helsinki, Finland; 4eyecons, Pfinztal, 5Department of Ophthalmology, Mainz University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany Background: Efficacy, tolerability and safety of the novel preservative-free fixed combination of tafluprost 0.0015%/timolol 0.5% (Taptiqom®) were investigated in an observational study in Germany.Objective: To assess efficacy, tolerability and safety of the preservative-free fixed combination of tafluprost 0.0015%/timolol 0.5% in a real-life setting.Methods: Intraocular pressure (IOP) was recorded for each eye at baseline (any previous therapy or untreated) and 4–16 weeks after changing medical treatment to or initiating treatment with the preservative-free fixed combination of tafluprost 0.0015%/timolol 0.5%. Change in IOP was evaluated over the study period for all patients and for specific pretreatment subgroups. Clinical signs such as conjunctival hyperemia and lid-parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF) were recorded using standardized comparative photographs. Corneal staining, subjective symptoms and local comfort were measured using a four-step scale. All adverse events were recorded.Results: Among 1,157 patients enrolled, 1,075 patients were treated with the preservative-free fixed combination as the only medication at the final visit. Medical treatment was initiated in 741 patients because of an insufficient IOP-lowering effect of the prior medication. In 343 patients, medication was changed because of tolerability issues. The preservative-free fixed combination lowered IOP significantly in the subgroup of naïve patients, all subgroups with prior monotherapy and patients with prior fixed combinations: naïve patients: −8.9 mmHg, alpha-2-agonists: −6.4 mmHg, beta-blockers: −5.7 mmHg, carbonic anhydrase inhibitors: −5.2 mmHg, prostaglandins: −4.7 mmHg, fixed-combination prostaglandins/timolol: −2.4 mmHg. At the final visit, clinical signs and subjective symptoms were improved in patients with prior medical therapy. Local comfort was rated as “very good” or “good” by 89.1% of patients at the final visit. Only few adverse events occurred during the treatment period.Conclusion: The preservative-free fixed combination of tafluprost 0.0015%/timolol 0.5% was effective, well tolerated and showed a good safety profile. Keywords: fixed combination, tafluprost, timolol, glaucoma, preservative-free medication, preservatives

Over the last decade several novel surgical treatment options and devices for glaucoma have been developed. All these developments aim to cause as little trauma as possible to the eye, to safely, effectively, and sustainably reduce intraocular pressure (IOP), to produce reproducible results, and to be easy to adopt. The term “micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS)” was used for summarizing all these procedures. Currently MIGS is gaining more and more interest and popularity. The possible reduction of the number of glaucoma medications, the ab interno approach without damaging the conjunctival tissue, and the probably safer procedures compared to incisional surgical methods may explain the increased interest in MIGS. The use of glaucoma drainage implants for lowering IOP in difficult-to-treat patients has been established for a long time, however, a variety of new glaucoma micro-stents are being manufactured by using various materials and are available to increase aqueous outflow via different pathways. This review summarizes published results of randomized clinical studies and extensive case report series on these devices, including Schlemm’s canal stents (iStent®, iStent® inject, Hydrus), suprachoroidal stents (CyPass®, iStent® Supra), and subconjunctival stents (XEN). The article summarizes the findings of published material on efficacy and safety for each of these approaches.