Search

Public health strategies for malaria in endemic countries aim to prevent transmission of the disease and control the vector. This historical analysis considers the strategies for vector control developed during the first four decades of the twentieth century. In 1925, policies and technological advances were debated internationally for the first time after the outbreak of malaria in Europe which followed World War I. This dialogue had implications for policies in Europe, Russia and the Middle East, and influenced the broader international control agenda. The analysis draws on the advances made before 1930, and includes the effects of mosquito-proofing of houses; the use of larvicides (Paris Green) and larvivorous fish (Gambusia); the role of large-scale engineering works; and the emergence of biological approaches to malaria. The importance of strong government and civil servant support was outlined. Despite best efforts of public health authorities, it became clear that it was notoriously difficult to interrupt transmission in areas of moderately high transmission. The importance of combining a variety of measures to achieve control became clear and proved successful in Palestine between 1923 and 1925, and improved education, economic circumstances and sustained political commitment emerge as key factors in the longer term control of malaria. The analysis shows that the principles for many of the present public health strategies for malaria have nearly all been defined before 1930, apart from large scale usage of pesticides, which came later at the end of the Second World War. No single intervention provided an effective single answer to preventing transmission, but certainly approaches taken that are locally relevant and applied in combination, are relevant to today's efforts at elimination.

We have uncovered 80 medical files corresponding to original cases of Chagas' disease used for the classical description of the acute and cardiac forms of the disease. Sixty of them were diagnosed cardiac forms of the disease. The detailed clinical description of these 60 files is in excellent agreement with the nosography of progressive heart disease given by Chagas in his original 1922 paper. The reports we had access to, characterize a novel form of cardiac disease, dominated by progressive AV block, enlargement and displacement of the heart and sudden death, in relatively young adults including juveniles. In contrast to that remarkable clinical description, the assertion made by Chagas that this set of clinical signs was the consequence of an earlier infection by Trypanosoma cruzi rests on weak evidence, due to the difficulty to identify the parasite in most patients. Moreover, the association of thyroid dysfunction with cardiac disease emphasized by Chagas cannot be deduced from the files we have examined. Finally, the main reason why the disease had not been recognized for long as a defined clinical entity, is likely the absence of markedly distinctive clinical signs compared to most other parasitic diseases, poor sanitary conditions and the probable lack of clinical skills of the rare doctors working in the area where the disease was described., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)