Search

Person-centred care (PCC) is an essential component of high-quality healthcare across professions and care settings. While research is emerging in subacute nutrition services more broadly, there is limited literature exploring the person-centredness of nutrition care in rehabilitation. This study aimed to explore person-centred nutrition care (PCNC) in rehabilitation units, as described and actioned by patients, support persons and staff. Key factors influencing PCNC were also explored. An ethnographic study was undertaken across three rehabilitation units. Fifty-eight hours of field work were completed with 165 unique participants to explore PCNC. Field work consisted of observations and interviews with patients, support persons and staff. Data were analysed through the approach of reflexive thematic analysis, informed by PCC theory. Themes generated were: (1) tensions between patient and staff goals; (2) disconnected moments of PCNC; (3) the necessity of interprofessional communication for PCNC; and (4) the opportunity for PCNC to enable the achievement of rehabilitation goals. PCNC was deemed important to different stakeholders but was at times hindered by a focus on profession-specific objectives. Opportunities exist to enhance interprofessional practice to support PCNC in rehabilitation. Future research should consider the system-level factors influencing PCNC in rehabilitation settings. Understanding what matters to patients in rehabilitation was reported as essential in person-centred nutrition care (PCNC), however varying degrees of this were observed in practice, with tensions exposed between the priorities of patients and staff. Collaborative goal setting is needed to enact PCNC, placing the patient at the centre of the process, rather than focusing on pre-determined, profession-specific agendas. However, reorientating this process must coincide with consideration of influencing systems, service priorities and cultures. Nutrition and mealtime-related goals of patients should be communicated not only within clinical teams, but also with dietetic support staff to better inform interprofessional practice and PCNC. Opportunities exist to better connect nutrition and dietetic services with the broader goals and objectives of rehabilitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: One definition of research co-production is a collaboration between researchers and healthcare professionals throughout a research process to facilitate knowledge translation and improve the clinical impact of research findings. In this paper, we present a case study of clinical research co-production and reflect on how the process was facilitated between researchers and healthcare professionals. Type of program or service: Development of a novel transdisciplinary assessment for implementation in an acute stroke unit (ASU). Methods: Researchers and healthcare professionals integrated perspectives and co-produced a novel transdisciplinary assessment. Team-based activities were guided by a logic model, including task analysis and simulation testing. A logframe matrix was used to plan implementation strategies to mitigate potential risks. Results: Research co-production was fundamental to integrating multiple perspectives to develop an effective, novel transdisciplinary assessment for patients with stroke. Preliminary data demonstrated that the transdisciplinary approach could save up to 103 minutes per patient in assessment time. Lessons Learnt: As the project evolved, the three most important factors for research co-production were 1) the right people to integrate critical disciplinary and pragmatic perspectives; 2) a project leader who was inclusive of perspectives held by researchers and healthcare professionals, and 3) structured and non-biased team discussions using a theoretical tool. We recommend these three factors be considered in future research co-production in healthcare settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Patient centred care (PCC) positively influences individual and organisational outcomes. It is important that dietitians working in rehabilitation units are supported to deliver PCC because effective rehabilitation is a collaborative and patient centred process. The objective of this scoping review was to explore the literature available regarding the delivery of dietetic PCC, with patients undergoing rehabilitation in subacute inpatient units. Methods: PubMed, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase and Scopus were searched for relevant published literature. Searches for grey and unpublished literature were also completed. Studies were eligible for inclusion and data extraction if they demonstrated the delivery of PCC by qualified dietitians, through individual consultations with adult patients undertaking subacute rehabilitation. Results: Overall, 675 studies were identified and six were included in the review. From the literature available, documentation was lacking regarding conceptualisation and delivery of patient centred nutrition care, with only one study providing quality indicators for patient centred dietetic services. Elements of PCC cited were mostly limited to phrases such as, 'individualised care', 'tailored advice', 'follow‐up' and 'team collaboration'. Conclusions: This scoping review identified a considerable gap in the literature regarding the delivery of dietetic PCC in subacute rehabilitation units. Contemporary descriptions of PCC show that the delivery of care which is truly patient centred is far more comprehensive than individualising interventions or organising ongoing services. This raises the question: is the delivery of nutrition care in subacute rehabilitation unit's patient centred? [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Purpose: The modified Rankin Scale (mRS) is the most widely used primary outcome measure in acute stroke trials. However, substantial interobserver variability impairs outcome assessment as well as reduces power of clinical trials. Guided by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, we developed a comprehensive, hierarchical assessment tool (miFUNCTION) to address the shortcomings of the modified Rankin Scale and deliver a more thorough understanding of disability following stroke. Methods: The initial construct validity of miFUNCTION was established in a pilot study of patients at an outpatient stroke prevention clinic that had been diagnosed with stroke within 60 days. To further assess criterion validity, miFUNCTION was compared against the modified Rankin Scale and other outcome measures within the Endovascular Treatment for Small Core and Anterior Circulation Proximal Occlusion With Emphasis on Minimizing CT to Recanalization Times (ESCAPE) trial. Logistic regression analysis with miFUNCTION as an outcome was used to demonstrate the beneficial effect of endovascular treatment. Results: The pilot study showed moderate inter-observer agreement (k = 0.585, p < 0.005) but near perfect correlation between miFUNCTION and modified Rankin Scale (ρ = 0.821, p < 0.05). The correlation of miFUNCTION and modified Rankin Scale was near perfect again in the ESCAPE trial (ρ = 0.944). Effect size of the multivariable models using modified Rankin Scale (adjusted odds ratio: 3.45, 95% confidence interval: 2.05–5.78) and miFUNCTION (adjusted odds ratio: 3.32, 95% confidence interval: 1.99–5.55) as an outcome measure for the ESCAPE trial patients was similar. Conclusions: miFUNCTION is strongly associated with the degree of disability following stroke both in an outpatient setting and a clinical trial. Further work remains to assess sensitivity to change and to improve the inter-observer reliability of the scale. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]