23 results on '"Grosso, Silvia"'
Search Results
2. Multiple episodes of Plasmodium malariae despite antimalarial treatment: “Quartana te teneat”?
- Author
-
Rizzo, Alberto, primary, Grosso, Silvia, additional, Faggion, Ivano, additional, Gigantiello, Anna, additional, Salari, Federica, additional, Niero, Fosca, additional, Passerini, Simone, additional, Mariani, Chiara, additional, Antinori, Spinello, additional, and Gismondo, Maria Rita, additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Non-nursing tasks as experienced by nursing students: Findings from a phenomenological interpretative study
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, Gnech, Denise, Pittino, Daniel, Capretta, Franco, Cossalter, Ornella, Tonet, Saverio, Pais dei Mori, Luigi, and Grosso, Silvia
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Nursing students' involvement in shift-to-shift handovers: Findings from a national study
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, Grassetti, Luca, Destrebecq, Anne, Mansutti, Irene, Dimonte, Valerio, Altini, Pietro, Bevilacqua, Anita, Brugnolli, Anna, Dal Ponte, Adriana, De Biasio, Laura, Fascì, Adriana, Grosso, Silvia, Mantovan, Franco, Marognolli, Oliva, Nicotera, Raffaela, Randon, Giulia, Tollini, Morena, Canzan, Federica, Saiani, Luisa, Zannini, Lucia, Terzoni, Stefano, and Gonella, Silvia
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Groove pancreatitis
- Author
-
VALENTINI, Giovanni, primary, SURACE, Monica, additional, GROSSO, Silvia, additional, VERNETTO, Annalisa, additional, SERRA, Anna M., additional, ANDRIA, Immacolata, additional, and MAZZUCCO, Dario, additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Chagas disease prevalence among migrants from El Salvador in Milan: a cross- sectional study of an often-overlooked population.
- Author
-
Beltrami, Martina, Grande, Romualdo, Giacomelli, Andrea, Sabaini, Federico, Biondo, Lidia, Longo, Margherita, Grosso, Silvia, Oreni, Letizia, Fadelli, Sara, Galimberti, Laura, Ridolfo, Anna Lisa, and Antinori, Spinello
- Subjects
CHAGAS' disease ,DISEASE prevalence ,COUNTRY of origin (Immigrants) ,SEX (Biology) ,IMMIGRANTS - Abstract
Chagas disease (CD) is considered to be highly endemic in El Salvador, where its prevalence is estimated to be 1.3–3.7%. Although more than 40,000 migrants from El Salvador are currently living in Europe (particularly in Spain and Italy), there are few data regarding the prevalence of CD in this population. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of CD among Salvadorans living in Italy. A cross-sectional serological survey of CD among Salvadorans living in the metropolitan area of Milan was carried out between October 2017 and December 2019. The participants' blood samples were tested for Trypanosoma cruzi antibodies using two different serological assays. The collected demographic data included their biological sex, province of origin, the type of housing in their country of origin, and family history of CD. Of the 384 subjects who voluntarily participated in the study, five (1.3%, most coming from La Paz) were positive to both serological assays and therefore conclusively diagnosed as having CD. Five other subjects had discrepant serological results but were not positive to a third assay. Three of the five subjects with a diagnosis of CD completed medical staging, one of whom had chronic disease (digestive and cardiac involvement). The prevalence of CD among Salvadorans living in Milan is similar to that estimated by the WHO in 2010. Although they are often overlooked in CD surveys, Salvadoran migrants should be included in CD control programs in countries in which the disease is not endemic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Prevalence and reasons for non‐nursing tasks as perceived by nurses: Findings from a large cross‐sectional study
- Author
-
Grosso, Silvia, primary, Longhini, Jessica, additional, Tonet, Saverio, additional, Bernard, Ines, additional, Corso, Jacopo, additional, Marchi, Denis, additional, Dorigo, Laura, additional, Funes, Gianluca, additional, Lussu, Massimo, additional, Oppio, Nicolas, additional, Grassetti, Luca, additional, Pais Dei Mori, Luigi, additional, and Palese, Alvisa, additional
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Groove pancreatitis: a case report with a brief review of this diagnostic challenge
- Author
-
VALENTINI, Giovanni, primary, SURACE, Monica, additional, GROSSO, Silvia, additional, VERNETTO, Annalisa, additional, SERRA, Anna M., additional, ANDRIA, Immacolata, additional, and MAZZUCCO, Dario, additional
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Nursing students’ interprofessional educational experiences in the clinical context: findings from an Italian cross-sectional study
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, Gonella, Silvia, Brugnolli, Anna, Mansutti, Irene, Saiani, Luisa, Terzoni, Stefano, Destrebecq, Anne, Zannini, Lucia, Grassetti, Luca, Dimonte, Valerio, Canzan, Federica, Altini, Pietro, Bevilacqua, Anita, Dal Ponte, Adriana, De Biasio, Laura, Fasci, Adriana, Grosso, Silvia, Mantovan, Franco, Marognolli, Oliva, Nicotera, Raffaela, Randon, Giulia, and Tollini, Morena
- Subjects
Male ,media_common.quotation_subject ,interprofessional cooperation ,Interprofessional Relations ,Context (language use) ,clinical learning ,Nursing ,interprofessional education ,nursing students ,student perception ,teamwork ,Likert scale ,03 medical and health sciences ,Nursing care ,Young Adult ,0302 clinical medicine ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Nurse education ,Education, Nursing ,media_common ,Teamwork ,030504 nursing ,business.industry ,Learning environment ,Research ,Multilevel model ,General Medicine ,Problem-Based Learning ,Interprofessional education ,Cross-Sectional Studies ,Italy ,Linear Models ,Female ,Students, Nursing ,0305 other medical science ,business - Abstract
ObjectiveTo explore nursing students’ interprofessional educational (IPE) experiences during their most recent clinical rotation and to explore the factors supporting IPE experiences.DesignNational cross-sectional study on data collected in 2016.Setting95 Bachelor of Nursing Sciences programmes; 27 Italian Universities.ParticipantsStudents who (a) were attending or just completed their clinical rotations lasting at least 2 weeks in the same unit, and (b) willing to participate in the study.Primary and secondary outcomesFirst to measure the occurrence of IPE experiences in the most recent clinical rotation; the secondary outcome was to discover factors associated with IPE occurrence.MeasuresThe primary outcome was measured using questions based on a 4-point Likert scale (from 0=‘never’ to 3=‘always’). Explanatory variables were collected at both individual and regional levels with items included in the same questionnaire.Results9607 out of 10 480 students took part in the study. Overall, 666 (6.9%) perceived not having had any IPE experience, while 3248 (33.8%), 3653 (38%) and 2040 (21.3%) reported having experienced IPE opportunities ‘only a little’, to ‘some extent’ or ‘always’, respectively. From the multilevel analysis performed using the generalised linear mixed model, factors promoting the occurrence of IPE experiences were mainly set at (a) the clinical learning environment level (high: learning environment quality, self-directed learning encouragement, learning opportunities, quality of safety and nursing care and quality of tutorial strategies); and (b) the regional level, where significant differences emerged across regions. In contrast, male gender was negatively associated with the perception of having had IPE experiences.ConclusionsA large number of nursing students experienced either ‘never’ or ‘only a little’ IPE opportunities, thus suggesting that nursing education tends to remain within the nursing profession. Limiting students’ interprofessional exposure during education can prevent future collaborative approaches that have been shown to be essential in providing best patient care. In order to increase IPE exposure, it is necessary to develop strategies designed both at the singular unit and regional levels.
- Published
- 2019
10. [The quality of life as perceived by older people. Results of a phenomenological study]
- Author
-
Grosso, Silvia, Ambrosi, Elisa, Benagli, Carla, Mortari, Luigina, and Canzan, Federica
- Subjects
Aged, 80 and over ,Male ,narrazioni ,Age Factors ,anziani, qualità di vita, ricerca qualitativa, narrazioni ,ricerca qualitativa ,Attitude ,qualità di vita ,Quality of Life ,Humans ,Female ,anziani ,Qualitative Research ,Aged - Abstract
Elderly Quality of life (QoL) is vulnerable because of the decline in physical and mental capacity, discharge from work, rupture of the family and isolation. Many QoL Scales are made for adults: there is little research investigating how older people perceive QOL.This study aims to explore and understand the perceptions that older people have about their QOL.A qualitative research hermeneutics-phenomenological was done. Narratives were analyzed by mixed method phenomenological-grounded (Mortari, 2007).16 elderly were interviewed (aged between 80 and 93 years), residents in their home. The analysis of the interviews confirm that QoL is a multidimensional concept that encompasses several components of life. There were 7 shared themes, reflecting the experience of well-being in older people living at home. The dimensions are: living relationships that drive away loneliness, fill the time with activities that follow their own interests, accept themselves as elderly person, choose how and where to live, think about death.The results of the study show that older people perceive QOL as made of multiple components and variables. Elderly are focused on the remaining capacities, on the acceptance of the positive aspects of their lives rather than on what they can no longer do. This study help to identify some social and health strategies to guarantee the best way to live the last part of life.INTRODUZIONE. La qualità di vita (QoL) degli anziani è vulnerabile a causa del declino delle capacità fisiche e mentali, dell’uscita dal lavoro, della frantumazione della famiglia e dell’isola- mento. Molti strumenti che la rilevano sono costruiti per adulti: poche ricerche indagano come le persone anziane intendono la propria QOL. SCOPO. Questo studio ha l’obiettivo di esplorare e comprendere le percezioni delle persone anziane riguardo la QOL. METODO. È stata condotta una ricerca qualitativa, fenomenologico-ermeneutica. Le narra- zioni sono state analizzate attraverso il metodo fenomenologico-grounded (Mortari, 2007). RISULTATI. Sono stati intervistati 16 anziani (età compresa tra 80 e 93 anni), residenti a domicilio. L’analisi conferma che la QOL è un concetto multifattoriale e multidimensionale, che racchiude in sé diverse componenti della vita. Dalle interviste, sono emersi 7 temi condivisi e ricorrenti, che riflettono l’esperienza di benessere nelle persone anziane che vivono a domicilio. Le dimensioni emerse sono: vivere relazioni che allontanino la solitudine, occupare il tempo con attività che assecondano i propri interessi, accettarsi come persona anziana, poter scegliere come e dove vivere, riflettere sulla propria morte. CONCLUSIONI. I risultati dello studio mostrano che gli anziani percepiscono la QOL formata da più componenti e variabili. Gli anziani si focalizzano sulle capacità residue, sull’accettazione degli aspetti positivi della propria vita piuttosto che su quello che non riescono più a fare o che manca. Questo studio può aiutare ad individuare alcune strategie sociali e sanitarie da applicare per garantire agli anziani il modo migliore di vivere l’ultima parte della vita.
- Published
- 2018
11. Lo strumento italiano di misurazione della qualità dell'apprendimento clinico degli studenti infermieri
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, Grassetti, Luca, Mansutti, Irene, Destrebecq, Anne, Terzoni, Stefano, Altini, Pietro, Bevilacqua, Anita, Brugnolli, Anna, Benaglio, Carla, Ponte, Adriana Dal, Biasio, Laura De, Dimonte, Valerio, Gambacorti, Benedetta, Fascì, Adriana, Grosso, Silvia, Mantovan, Franco, Marognolli, Oliva, Montalti, Sandra, Nicotera, Raffaela, Randon, Giulia, Stampfl, Brigitte, Tollini, Morena, Canzan, Federica, Saiani, Luisa, and Zannini, Lucia
- Subjects
Clinical learning - Published
- 2017
12. [The Italian instrument evaluating the nursing students clinical learning quality - The Clinical Learning Quality Evaluation Index for nursing students]
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, Grassetti, Luca, Mansutti, Irene, Destrebecq, Anne, Terzoni, Stefano, Altini, Pietro, Bevilacqua, Anita, Brugnolli, Anna, Benaglio, Carla, Dal Ponte, Adriana, De Biasio, Laura, Dimonte, Valerio, Gambacorti, Benedetta, Fasci, Adriana, Grosso, Silvia, Mantovan, Franco, Marognolli, Oliva, Montalti, Sandra, Nicotera, Raffaela, Randon, Giulia, Stampfl, Brigitte, Tollini, Morena, Canzan, Federica, Saiani, Luisa, and Zannini, Lucia
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Psychometrics ,Reproducibility of Results ,Nursing ,Education ,Italy ,Surveys and Questionnaires ,Humans ,Learning ,Female ,Clinical Competence ,Education, Nursing ,Retrospective Studies ,Students, Nursing ,Students - Published
- 2017
13. Multilevel National Analysis of Nursing Students’ Perceived Opportunity to Access Evidence‐Based Tools During Their Clinical Learning Experience
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, primary, Gonella, Silvia, additional, Grassetti, Luca, additional, Destrebecq, Anne, additional, Mansutti, Irene, additional, Terzoni, Stefano, additional, Zannini, Lucia, additional, Altini, Pietro, additional, Bevilacqua, Anita, additional, Brugnolli, Anna, additional, Dal Ponte, Adriana, additional, De Biasio, Laura, additional, Fascì, Adriana, additional, Grosso, Silvia, additional, Mantovan, Franco, additional, Marognolli, Oliva, additional, Nicotera, Raffaela, additional, Randon, Giulia, additional, Tollini, Morena, additional, Canzan, Federica, additional, Saiani, Luisa, additional, and Dimonte, Valerio, additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Opportunity to discuss ethical issues during clinical learning experience
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, primary, Gonella, Silvia, additional, Destrebecq, Anne, additional, Mansutti, Irene, additional, Terzoni, Stefano, additional, Morsanutto, Michela, additional, Altini, Pietro, additional, Bevilacqua, Anita, additional, Brugnolli, Anna, additional, Canzan, Federica, additional, Ponte, Adriana Dal, additional, De Biasio, Laura, additional, Fascì, Adriana, additional, Grosso, Silvia, additional, Mantovan, Franco, additional, Marognolli, Oliva, additional, Nicotera, Raffaela, additional, Randon, Giulia, additional, Tollini, Morena, additional, Saiani, Luisa, additional, Grassetti, Luca, additional, and Dimonte, Valerio, additional
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. [Validation of the Italian Clinical Learning Environment Instrument (SVIAT):BRstudy protocol]
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, Destrebecq, Anne, Terzoni, Stefano, Grassetti, Luca, Altini, Pietro, Bevilacqua, Anita, Brugnolli, Anna, Benaglio, Carla, DAL PONTE, Adriana, De Biasio, Laura, Dimonte, Valerio, Gambacorti, Benedetta, Fasci, Adriana, Grosso, Silvia, Mansutti, Irene, Mantovan, Franco, Marognolli, Oliva, Montalti, Sandra, Nicotera, Raffaela, Perli, Serena, Randon, Giulia, Stampfl, Brigitte, Tollini, Morena, Canzan, Federica, Zannini, Lucia, and Saiani, Luisa
- Subjects
Education, Nursing ,Evaluation Studies as Topic ,Italy ,Learning ,Psychometrics ,Self Report ,Nursing ,Education - Abstract
Validation of the Italian Clinical Learning Environment Instrument (SVIAT): study protocol.Nursing students obtain most of their university credits in internship environments whose quality can affect their clinical learning. Several tools are available to measure the quality of the clinical learning environment (CLE) as perceived by students: these instruments developed in other countries, were validated in Italian but do not discriminate those CLEs capable (or not) to promote significant clinical learning.To validate an instrument to measure the capability of the CLE to generate clinical learning; the secondary aim is to describe the learning environments as perceived by nursing students according to individual course site and tutorial models adopted.The study will be developed in three phases: a) instrument development and pilot phase, b) validation of the psychometric properties of the instrument and c) description of the CLEs as perceived by the students including factors/item confirmed in the validation process. Expected outcomes. A large validation, with more than 8,000 participating students is expected; the construct under lying will be confirmed through exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis and will report high internal consistency; the instrument will report also a high test-retest and inter-rater reliability; in addition, the instrument will demonstrate predictive ability by discriminating those units able (or not) to activate effective learning processes.
- Published
- 2016
16. Strumento di Valutazione Italiano degli Ambienti di Tirocinio per gli studenti infermieri (SVIAT): Protocollo di validazione
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, Destrebecq, Anne, Terzoni, Stefano, Grassetti, Luca, Altini, Pietro, Bevilacqua, Anita, Brugnolli, Anna, Benaglio, Carla, Dalponte, Adriana, De Biasio, Laura, Dimonte, Valerio, Gambacorti, Benedetta, Fasci, Adriana, Grosso, Silvia, Mansutti, Irene, Mantovan, Franco, Marognolli, Oliva, Montalti, Sandra, Nicotera, Raffaela, Perli, Serena, Randon, Giulia, Stampfl, Brigitte, Tollini, Morena, Canzan, Federica, Zannini, Lucia, and Saiani, Luisa
- Subjects
Assessment instrument ,Validation ,Clinical learning ,Clinical learning environment ,Nursing students ,Nursing (all)2901 Nursing (miscellaneous) - Published
- 2016
17. Opportunity to discuss ethical issues during clinical learning experience.
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, Gonella, Silvia, Destrebecq, Anne, Mansutti, Irene, Terzoni, Stefano, Morsanutto, Michela, Altini, Pietro, Bevilacqua, Anita, Brugnolli, Anna, Canzan, Federica, Ponte, Adriana Dal, De Biasio, Laura, Fascì, Adriana, Grosso, Silvia, Mantovan, Franco, Marognolli, Oliva, Nicotera, Raffaela, Randon, Giulia, Tollini, Morena, and Saiani, Luisa
- Subjects
ANALYSIS of variance ,CHI-squared test ,CLINICAL medicine ,COLLEGE students ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,ETHICS committees ,EXPERIENCE ,NURSING ethics ,NURSING students ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,SCHOOL environment ,AUTODIDACTICISM ,SEX distribution ,STATISTICS ,STUDENTS ,DATA analysis ,CROSS-sectional method ,CLINICAL education ,DATA analysis software ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics ,BACCALAUREATE nursing education ,INFERENTIAL statistics ,ODDS ratio ,KRUSKAL-Wallis Test - Abstract
Background: Undergraduate nursing students have been documented to experience ethical distress during their clinical training and felt poorly supported in discussing the ethical issues they encountered. Research aims: This study was aimed at exploring nursing students' perceived opportunity to discuss ethical issues that emerged during their clinical learning experience and associated factors. Research design: An Italian national cross-sectional study design was performed in 2015–2016. Participants were invited to answer a questionnaire composed of four sections regarding: (1) socio-demographic data, (2) previous clinical learning experiences, (3) current clinical learning experience quality and outcomes, and (4) the opportunity to discuss ethical issues with nurses in the last clinical learning experience (from 0 – 'never' to 3 – 'very much'). Participants and research context: Participants were 9607 undergraduate nursing students who were attending 95 different three-year Italian baccalaureate nursing programmes, located at 27 universities in 15 Italian regions. Ethical considerations: This study was conducted in accordance with the Human Subject Research Ethics Committee guidelines after the research protocol was approved by an ethics committee. Findings: Overall, 4707 (49%) perceived to have discussed ethical issues 'much' or 'very much'; among the remaining, 3683 (38.3%) and 1217 (12.7%) students reported the perception of having discussed, respectively, 'enough' or 'never' ethical issues emerged in the clinical practice. At the multivariate logistic regression analysis explaining 38.1% of the overall variance, the factors promoting ethical discussion were mainly set at the clinical learning environment levels (i.e. increased learning opportunities, self-directed learning, safety and nursing care quality, quality of the tutorial strategies, competences learned and supervision by a clinical nurse). In contrast, being male was associated with a perception of less opportunity to discuss ethical issues. Conclusion: Nursing faculties should assess the clinical environment prerequisites of the settings as a context of student experience before deciding on their accreditation. Moreover, the nursing faculty and nurse managers should also enhance competence with regard to discussing ethical issues with students among clinical nurses by identifying factors that hinder this learning opportunity in daily practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2019
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Strategie per prevenire le attività 'non infermieristiche': risultati di uno studio descrittivo.
- Author
-
Grosso, Silvia, Tonet, Saverio, Bernard, Ines, De Marchi, Denis, Dorigo, Laura, Funes, Gianluca, Gandin, Paolo, Lussu, Massimo, Oppio, Nicolas, Tissot, Stefania, dei Mori, Luigi Pais, and Palese, Alvisa
- Subjects
CLINICAL medicine ,CONFIDENCE intervals ,RESEARCH methodology ,HUMAN multitasking ,EVALUATION of medical care ,NURSES ,NURSING practice ,PROFESSIONAL peer review ,QUESTIONNAIRES ,SCALE analysis (Psychology) ,OCCUPATIONAL roles ,TASK performance ,NURSES' associations ,DESCRIPTIVE statistics - Abstract
Copyright of L'Infermiere is the property of IPASVI - Italian Nursing Association and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)
- Published
- 2019
19. Multi‐level analysis of national nursing students' disclosure of patient safety concerns.
- Author
-
Palese, Alvisa, Gonella, Silvia, Grassetti, Luca, Mansutti, Irene, Brugnolli, Anna, Saiani, Luisa, Terzoni, Stefano, Zannini, Lucia, Destrebecq, Anne, Dimonte, Valerio, Morsanutto, Michela, Canzan, Federica, Altini, Pietro, Bevilacqua, Anita, Ponte, Adriana, Biasio, Laura, Fascì, Adriana, Grosso, Silvia, Mantovan, Franco, and Marognolli, Oliva
- Subjects
CONFIDENCE intervals ,EXPERIENCE ,LEARNING strategies ,MEDICAL quality control ,PSYCHOLOGY of nursing students ,PATIENT safety ,POPULATION geography ,SELF-evaluation ,STUDENTS ,SURVEYS ,DISCLOSURE ,PSYCHOLOGY of Undergraduates ,CLINICAL supervision ,EVALUATION of human services programs ,INDEPENDENT variables ,ODDS ratio - Abstract
Context: Error reporting is considered one of the most important mediating factors for patient safety (PS). However, reporting errors can be challenging for health care students. Objectives: The aims of the study were: (i) to describe nursing students' opportunity to report errors, near misses or PS issues that emerged during their clinical learning experience; and (ii) to explore associated factors of the process of reporting itself. Methods: A national survey was conducted on 9607 (91.7%) undergraduate nursing students. The endpoint was to have reported PS issues in the last clinical learning experience (from 0 'never' to 3 'always'). Explanatory variables were set individual, nursing programme and regional levels. Results: A total of 4004 (41.7%) nursing students reported PS issues from 'never/rarely' to 'sometimes'. In the multi‐level analysis, factors increasing the likelihood of reporting events affecting PS have been mainly at the nursing programme level: specifically, higher learning opportunities (odds ratio [OR] = 3.040; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.667–3.466), self‐directed learning opportunities (OR = 1.491; 95% CI, 1.364–1.630), safety and nursing care quality (OR = 1.411; 95% CI, 1.250–1.594) and quality of tutorial strategies OR = 1.251; 95% CI, 1.113–1.406). By contrast, being supervised by a nurse teacher (OR = 0.523; 95% CI, 0.359–0.761) prevented the disclosure of PS issues compared with being supervised by a clinical nurse. Students attending their nursing programmes in some Italian regions showed a higher likelihood (OR from 1.346 to 2.938) of reporting PS issues compared with those undertaking their education in other regions. Conclusions: Nursing students continue to be reticent to report PS issues. Given that they represent the largest generation of future health care workers, their education regarding PS should be continuously monitored and improved; moreover, strategies aimed at developing a non‐blaming culture should be designed and implemented both at the clinical learning setting and regional levels. Palese et al. disclose that many nursing students do not discuss safety issues that emerge during their clinical practice, highlighting environmental features that discourage such reporting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. La qualità di vita raccontata dagli anziani. Risultati di una ricerca fenomenologica.
- Author
-
Grosso, Silvia, Ambrosi, Elisa, Benagli, Carla, Mortari, Luigina, and Canzan, Federica
- Published
- 2018
21. Un ritorno ai "reparti scuola"? Le unità dedicate alia formazione (DEU).
- Author
-
Randon, Giulia, Bortolami, Elena, and Grosso, Silvia
- Published
- 2017
22. [The Italian instrument evaluating the nursing students clinical learning quality].
- Author
-
Palese A, Grassetti L, Mansutti I, Destrebecq A, Terzoni S, Altini P, Bevilacqua A, Brugnolli A, Benaglio C, Dal Ponte A, De Biasio L, Dimonte V, Gambacorti B, Fasci A, Grosso S, Mantovan F, Marognolli O, Montalti S, Nicotera R, Randon G, Stampfl B, Tollini M, Canzan F, Saiani L, and Zannini L
- Subjects
- Adult, Female, Humans, Italy, Male, Psychometrics standards, Reproducibility of Results, Retrospective Studies, Clinical Competence standards, Education, Nursing standards, Learning, Students, Nursing, Surveys and Questionnaires standards
- Abstract
. The Clinical Learning Quality Evaluation Index for nursing students., Introduction: The Italian nursing programs, the need to introduce tools evaluating the quality of the clinical learning as perceived by nursing students. Several tools already exist, however, several limitations suggesting the need to develop a new tool., Aim: A national project aimed at developing and validating a new instrument capable of measuring the clinical learning quality as experience by nursing students., Methods: A validation study design was undertaken from 2015 to 2016. All nursing national programs (n=43) were invited to participate by including all nursing students attending regularly their clinical learning. The tool developed based upon a) literature, b) validated tools already established among other healthcare professionals, and c) consensus expressed by experts and nursing students, was administered to the eligible students., Results: 9606 nursing in 27 universities (62.8%) participated. The psychometric properties of the new instrument ranged from good to excellent. According to the findings, the tool consists in 22 items and five factors: a) quality of the tutorial strategies, b) learning opportunities; c) safety and nursing care quality; d) self-direct learning; e) quality of the learning environment., Conclusions: The tool is already used. Its systematic adoption may support comparison among settings and across different programs; moreover, the tool may also support in accrediting new settings as well as in measuring the effects of strategies aimed at improving the quality of the clinical learning.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. [Back to units for nursing students' education? The Dedicated Education Units (DEU)].
- Author
-
Randon G, Bortolami E, and Grosso S
- Subjects
- Education, Nursing standards, Humans, Italy, Nursing Education Research, Clinical Competence standards, Education, Nursing organization & administration, Students, Nursing
- Abstract
. Back to units for nursing students' education? The Dedicated Education Units (DEU)., Introduction: The reorganization and rationalization of resources and cost containment in health care put a strain on the sustainability of practical training of student nurses. The Dedicated Education Units (DEU), where ward staff, in collaboration with university teachers, receive large numbers of students, integrating the caring and teaching missions, are a possible answer., Aim: To describe the main characteristics of DEUs., Methods: A literature search was conducted in Pubmed with the following key-words Dedicated Education Unit, Education Unit and Nursing Education, up to January 30, 2017., Results: Several models of DEU were identified with differences in contexts, professional roles involved, type of organizations (number of students, length of practical training). The students perceive a welcoming climate that promotes learning and allows time and space for reflection; they develop a professional group identity and learn to recognize and implement the presponsibilities related to the professional role. The students express satisfaction for the relationship with professionals involved in their education due to the clear definition of roles and responsibilities, of their learning needs and feel supported in the connections of theory and practice. The DEU, receiving large number of students optimize the use of resources., Conclusions: The DEU represent one of the possible models of organization of the practical training, able to ensure a high quality learning environment. The practical implications of its implementation in the italian context on skills acquisition and sustainability need a thorough assessment.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.