Search

To evaluate the effect of a multidisciplinary team in the management of patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) undergoing pulmonary thromboendarterectomy (PTE) (Figure A). From 1997 to 2022, 306 patients underwent PTE for CTEPH. In 2011, a multidisciplinary team was assembled to systematically evaluate, select, and manage patients for PTE based on hemodynamic profile, anatomic scar accessibility, and comorbidities. The cohort was divided into an early era of 62 cases (20%) prior to 2011 and 244 cases (80%) thereafter (recent era). Baseline demographics and hemodynamic profiles were similar between eras, with mean age 53±14 years. More early-era patients were in New York Heart Association class III/IV (64% vs. 40%); however, pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were similar. Recent-era patients had shorter circulatory arrest times (36 vs. 42 min) and more tricuspid valve repairs (22% vs. 3%). Recent-era patients had lower hospital mortality (3% vs. 12%), fewer hospital morbidity, including less prolonged ventilation (32% vs. 59%) and less need for dialysis (1.6% vs. 21%), and shorter length of stay (16 vs. 21 days). Difference in mortality was sustained long-term (12% vs. 30% at 6 years, Figure B). Recent-era patients had lower residual mean pulmonary artery pressures (26 vs. 33 mmHg) and lower residual PVR (2.7 vs. 4.2 Wood units). Establishing a multidisciplinary CTEPH team allows more accurate identification of patients most likely to benefit from PTE surgery, which leads to more complete resolution of pulmonary hypertension and improved survival. A team-based approach for patient selection and perioperative management of these complex patients should be considered standard of care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The rates of pulmonary embolism (PE) are high among lung transplant (LT) recipients. Management is challenging because of elevated bleeding risks and inadequacy of conventional PE risk stratification tools. New percutaneous large bore mechanical thrombectomy catheters are being increasingly used effectively to debulk thrombus and restore flow immediately. We describe the use of mechanical thrombectomy (MT) in 8 LT recipients. All patients were diagnosed with intermediate/high-risk proximal PE involving the allograft and underwent successful MT within 30 hours of diagnosis. Estimated blood loss was between 200 and 450 cc, with 3 patients requiring blood transfusions. Improvement in heart rate and oxygenation was seen in all 8 patients after the procedure. In the 30 days after MT, 7 of 8 patients survived. One patient died from major bleeding occurred 16 days after MT and 5 days after venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenator decannulation. Mechanical thrombectomy may provide a feasible management strategy in select LT recipients with pulmonary embolism., (Copyright © 2023 International Society for the Heart and Lung Transplantation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Abstract: Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) remains significantly underdiagnosed in patients with a history of pulmonary embolism. These patients complain of persistent shortness of breath and present with hypoxemia despite proper anticoagulation. Further investigation reveals evidence of right ventricular dysfunction on echocardiogram, which progresses to right heart failure. CTEPH is associated with a significant increase in patient morbidity and mortality if left untreated. This article offers an approach for the timely recognition of this condition, in addition to suggesting a management protocol with an emphasis on the role of interventional radiology and balloon pulmonary angioplasty., (Copyright © 2022 American Academy of Physician Assistants.)

Background Certain echocardiographic parameters may serve as early predictors of adverse events in patients with hemodynamically compromising pulmonary embolism (PE). Methods and Results An observational analysis was conducted for patients with acute pulmonary embolism evaluated by a Pulmonary Embolism Response Team (PERT) between 2014 and 2020. The performance of clinical prediction algorithms including the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index and Carl Bova score were compared using a ratio of right ventricle and left ventricle hemodynamics by dividing the pulmonary artery systolic pressure by the left ventricle stroke volume. The primary outcome of in-hospital mortality, cardiac arrest, and the need for advanced therapies was evaluated by univariate and multivariable analyses. Of the 343 patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 215 had complete data. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure/left ventricle stroke volume was a clear predictor of the primary end point (odds ratio [OR], 2.31; P =0.005), performing as well or better than the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (OR, 1.43; P =0.06) or the Bova score (OR, 1.28; P =0.01). Conclusions This study is the first study to demonstrate the utility of early pulmonary artery systolic pressure/left ventricle stroke volume in predicting adverse clinical events in patients with acute pulmonary embolism. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure/left ventricle stroke volume may be a surrogate marker of ventricular asynchrony in high-risk pulmonary embolism and should be prognostically evaluated.

The manuscript discusses the application of CT pulmonary angiography, ventilation-perfusion scan, and magnetic resonance angiography to detect acute pulmonary embolism and to plan endovascular therapy. CT pulmonary angiography offers high accuracy, speed of acquisition, and widespread availability when applied to acute pulmonary embolism detection. This imaging modality also aids the planning of endovascular therapy by visualizing the number and distribution of emboli, determining ideal intra-procedural catheter position for treatment, and signs of right heart strain. Ventilation-perfusion scan and magnetic resonance angiography with and without contrast enhancement can also aid in the detection and pre-procedural planning of endovascular therapy in patients who are not candidates for CT pulmonary angiography.

Inferior vena cava (IVC) filter has been used to manage patients with pulmonary embolism and deep venous thrombosis. Its ease of use and the expansion of relative indications have led to a dramatic increase in IVC filter placement. However, IVC filters have been associated with a platitude of complications. Therefore, there exists a need to examine the current indications and identify the patient population at risk. In this paper, we comprehensively reviewed the current indications and techniques of IVC filter placement. Further, we examined the various complications associated with either permanent or retrievable IVC filters. Lastly, we examined the current data on filter retrieval.

Radiation therapy (RT) for patients with cancer in Jordan began with a small individual effort and has now grown to be one of the most prominent treatment centers in the Middle East. Currently, there are 4 different centers that provide RT not only for the people of Jordan but also for citizens of other neighboring Arab countries. Because Jordan is a developing country, it still faces problems with the insufficient number of RT machines available and their supporting staff (physicists and technologists among others). In this article, we shed light on the history and current status of radiation oncology in Jordan and discuss the challenges we face.

Treatment strategies for complex patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) are often debated given patient heterogeneity, multitude of available treatment modalities, and lack of consensus guidelines. Although multidisciplinary Pulmonary Embolism Response Teams (PERT) are emerging to address this lack of consensus, their impact on patient outcomes is not entirely clear. This analysis was conducted to compare outcomes of all patients with PE before and after PERT availability. We analyzed all adult patients admitted with acute PE diagnosed on computed tomography scans in the 18 months before and after the institution of PERT at a large tertiary care hospital. Among 769 consecutive inpatients with PE, PERT era patients had lower rates of major or clinically relevant nonmajor bleeding (17.0% vs 8.3%, p = 0.002), shorter time-to-therapeutic anticoagulation (16.3 hour vs 12.6 hour, p = 0.009) and decreased use of inferior vena cava filters (22.2% vs 16.4%, p = 0.004). There was an increase in the use of thrombolytics/catheter-based strategies, however, this did not achieve statistical significance (p = 0.07). There was a significant decrease in 30-day/inpatient mortality (8.5% vs 4.7%, p = 0.03). These differences in outcomes were more pronounced in intermediate and high-risk patients (mortality 10.0% vs 5.3%, p = 0.02). The availability of multidisciplinary PERT was associated with improved outcomes including 30-day mortality. Patients with higher severity of PE seemed to derive most benefit from PERT availability., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Management of intermediate and high risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) is challenging. The role of multidisciplinary teams for the care of these patients is emerging. Herein, we report our experience with a pulmonary embolism response team (PERT). We conducted a retrospective chart review on all patients admitted to the Cleveland Clinic main campus who required activation of the (PERT) from October 1, 2014 to September 1, 2016. We extracted data pertaining to clinical presentation, bleeding complications, and pre- and post-discharge imaging. Patients were classified as low, intermediate or high risk PE. Descriptive and continuous variables were collected and analyzed. There were 134 PERT activations. PE was confirmed by CT-PA in 118 patients. Fifteen (13%) patients were classified as low risk, 80 (68%) intermediate risk PE and 23 (19%) high risk PE. Fourteen (12%) patients were treated with catheter directed rtPA, 6 (5%) received full dose (100 mg rtPA), 16 (13%) received systemic half-dose (50 mg rtPA), 6 (5%) underwent a surgical embolectomy and 4 (3%) underwent mechanical thrombectomy. 65 (55%) patients received anticoagulation only, and 8 (7%) patients were managed conservatively without any anticoagulation or advanced therapy. 11 (9%) patients died while during the hospitalization. Fourteen patients had major bleeding events. There were no bleeding events among patients who received systemic low dose or full dose rtPA. A multidisciplinary approach to cases of intermediate risk and high risk PE can be implemented successfully. We saw a relatively low rate of bleeding events with use of rtPA.