Search

Highlights • We investigated trends in ASM prescriptions with children in Japan during 2013–2019. • Valproic acid, carbamazepine, and levetiracetam were most commonly prescribed. • A decline in valproic acid and carbamazepine prescriptions was observed. • An increase in levetiracetam prescriptions was observed. • ASM prescription in Japan has shifted toward the use of recently available ASMs., Temporal trends in prescriptions of anti-seizure medicines (ASMs) for children, including newer ASMs, are unclear. We investigated ASM prescription trends for pediatric outpatients in Japan. The MDV analyzer® was used to analyze the MDV database containing de-identified hospital administrative data. Administrative data as of June 2021 including pediatric outpatients (0–17 years) with epilepsy, visiting 123 acute diagnostic procedure combination hospitals during 2013–2019, were used. Annual ASMs prescription trends were calculated, based on proportions. The Cochran–Armitage trend test evaluated the proportion of prescriptions for each ASM. ASMs most often prescribed were valproic acid, carbamazepine, and levetiracetam, regardless of sex. In girls, the proportion of valproic acid and carbamazepine prescriptions decreased from 37.93% to 26.84%, and from 24.80% to 15.78%, respectively (p

We aimed to clarify the prescription trend of ADHD drugs in Japanese pediatric outpatients. From January 2012 to December 2018, we evaluated the trends of prescribing methylphenidate-osmotic-controlled release oral delivery system (OROS), atomoxetine, and guanfacine as monotherapy. In boys, methylphenidate-OROS and atomoxetine prescriptions decreased from 46.5 % to 37.2 % and 18.6 % to 15.6 %, respectively. Prescriptions of guanfacine increased from 0.0 % to 12.3 %. In girls, the methylphenidate-OROS prescriptions was not significantly different (37.0 % to 26.4 %); however, atomoxetine decreased from 23.1 % to 16.3 %, and guanfacine increased from 0.0 % to 12.8 %. Methylphenidate-OROS and atomoxetine prescriptions changed to guanfacine between 2012 and 2018.

Background Some 200 patients, including those with Alzheimer's disease and other types of dementia, stay year-round in Yokohama – Houyuu Hospital. They undergo computed tomography (CT) neuroradiological examination at least once or twice a year. For this study, the accumulative data, including clinical and neuroradiological, were analyzed. Methods Differential diagnoses of Alzheimer's disease were performed in accordance with the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria. The 56 patients (15 men, 41 women) included in this study underwent in-hospital observation on average for 4.4 years (range: 1–10 years). The patients were classified into four groups according to the age of disease onset. The CT findings were summarized for each group and then compared among the groups to determine if there were any differences related to age of onset and, if so, to identify and analyze them. Results (1) The duration of deceased cases' total clinical course (in years) compared among the four groups. In general, the degree of dementia was more severe among those with earlier disease onset. (2) In cases admitted within 2 years from onset (n =14), the suspected initiating focus of cortical atrophy occurred in the frontal lobe (n = 6), the temporal lobe (n = 6), or the fronto-temporal lobes (n = 2). (3) Although CT findings generally showed that the more severe cases had earlier onset, serial CT examinations in each case showed widely different pathologies in degree, nature and manner of progression, regardless of group classification. (4) The earliest sites of brain atrophy, sites of its severest involvement within the brain, and neuroradiological development of the cerebral cortex pathology in combination with hemispheric white matter, lateral ventricles, and third ventricles varied among the four groups and between case within each group. Alzheimer's disease could not be subclassified simply by the age of clinical onset. Conclusion Cases of so-called Alzheimer's disease, as observed through continued clinical follow-up and serial CT examinations, appear so diverse in symptomatology and radiological pathomorphology that it is difficult to consider them a single nosological entity. The pathology of Alzheimer's disease has to be reconsidered in accordance with the variety observed in the sequential development of neuroradiological findings. The pathology must be reconstructed in terms of topographical dimensions and chronological developments. The diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease appears to be not so simple based on any conventional diagnostic operational standards.