Search

Background The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a useful frailty marker for predicting clinical outcomes in patients undergoing invasive therapy. However, the clinical impact of CFS after transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair in patients with mitral regurgitation (MR) remains unclear. This study aimed to elucidate the association between the baseline frail status defined by the CFS and clinical outcomes with or without postprocedural MR ≥2+ (post‐MR ≥2+) after transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair. Methods and Results Based on a Japanese multicenter registry (OCEAN [Optimized Catheter Valvular Intervention]‐Mitral), data from 2078 patients with MR who underwent transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair were analyzed. The patients were classified into 5 groups: CFS 1 to 3, 4, 5, 6, and ≥7. The procedural and clinical outcomes and post‐MR ≥2+ were compared among the groups. All‐cause mortality for up to 2 years was explored using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Although the rates of acute procedural success and post‐MR ≥2+ were similar, all‐cause mortality at 2 years was significantly increased across the 5 CFS categories (15.5%, 23.8%, 27.7%, 34.6%, and 48.8%, respectively, P

Background Limited data are available about clinical outcomes and residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair in the large Asian‐Pacific cohort. Methods and Results From the Optimized Catheter Valvular Intervention (OCEAN‐Mitral) registry, a total of 2150 patients (primary cause of 34.6%) undergoing transcatheter edge‐to‐edge repair were analyzed and classified into 3 groups according to the residual MR severity at discharge: MR 0+/1+, 2+, and 3+/4+. The mortality and heart failure hospitalization rates at 1 year were 12.3% and 15.0%, respectively. Both MR and symptomatic improvement were sustained at 1 year with MR ≤2+ in 94.1% of patients and New York Heart Association functional class I/II in 95.0% of patients. Compared with residual MR 0+/1+ (20.4%) at discharge, both residual MR 2+ (30.2%; P

BACKGROUND: The extent of cardiac damage and its association with clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) for degenerative mitral regurgitation remains unclear. This study was aimed to investigate cardiac damage in patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation treated with TEER and its association with outcomes. METHODS: We analyzed patients with degenerative mitral regurgitation treated with TEER in the Optimized Catheter Valvular Intervention-Mitral registry, which is a prospective, multicenter observational data collection in Japan. The study subjects were classified according to the extent of cardiac damage at baseline: no extravalvular cardiac damage (stage 0), mild left ventricular or left atrial damage (stage 1), moderate left ventricular or left atrial damage (stage 2), or right heart damage (stage 3). Two-year mortality after TEER was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Out of 579 study participants, 8 (1.4%) were classified as stage 0, 76 (13.1%) as stage 1, 319 (55.1%) as stage 2, and 176 (30.4%) as stage 3. Two-year survival was 100% in stage 0, 89.5% in stage 1, 78.9% in stage 2, and 75.3% in stage 3 (P=0.013). Compared with stage 0 to 1, stage 2 (hazard ratio, 3.34 [95% CI, 1.03–10.81]; P=0.044) and stage 3 (hazard ratio, 4.51 [95% CI, 1.37–14.85]; P=0.013) were associated with increased risk of 2-year mortality after TEER. Significant reductions in heart failure rehospitalization rate and New York Heart Association functional scale were observed following TEER (both, P<0.001), irrespective of the stage of cardiac damage. CONCLUSIONS: Advanced cardiac damage is associated with an increased risk of mortality in patients undergoing TEER for degenerative mitral regurgitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]