Search

The 2019 Association of Pathology Chairs Annual Meeting included a discussion group sponsored by the Senior Fellows Group (former chairs of academic departments of pathology who have remained active in Association of Pathology Chairs) that was focused on serving as temporary pathology chair. Such positions include "acting chair" (service while the permanent chair is on leave or temporarily indisposed), "interim chair" (service after departure of the prior chair and before a new chair is appointed), "term-limited chair" (usually one nonrenewable term of less than 5 years), and "terminal chair" (permanent chair being asked to stay until a successor is appointed). Discussion group panelists represented each of these positions and included the perspective of 3 former deans about the rationale for making such appointments. The potential benefits and risks of serving in these roles were discussed. Issues addressed included acting as "caretaker manager" or "change-agent leader"; whether such service and experience would enhance or harm one's chances to become a permanent chair of that or another department; the effect of such service on academic productivity; the influence of department and institutional factors on the position; the range of authority provided, particularly in addressing significant problems affecting the department's future; and the impact of time served in these various positions. The "lame-duck" effect of prolonged service as "terminal chair" was also discussed. The observations and advice provided by the panelists and audience discussion are reported and may be useful for those considering service as temporary chair in pathology as well as other academic leadership positions.

Glomerular deposition of monoclonal IgM, frequently in the form of intracapillary pseudothrombi, can be seen in Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) and type I cryoglobulinemia (CG). They are typically associated with plasma cell or B-lymphoid neoplasms, particularly lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL). While infection is a frequent trigger of mixed (type II and III) CG, its association with type I CG is uncommon. We report two cases in which striking lambda-chain-restricted IgM deposits and acute kidney injury (AKI) occurred in the setting of known or suspected systemic infections, with prompt resolution on treatment of the infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Context.--Graft-versus-host disease of the gastrointestinal tract is a common complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplant associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Accurate diagnosis can be difficult and is a truly clinicopathologic endeavor. Objectives.--To assess the diagnostic sensitivity of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease using the 2015 National Institutes of Health (NIH) histology consensus guidelines and to analyze histologic findings that support the guidelines. Design.--Patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplants were identified via a retrospective search of our electronic medical records from January 1, 2005, to January 1, 2011. Endoscopies with available histology were reviewed by 2 pathologists using the 2015 NIH guidelines. The clinical diagnosis was used as the gold standard. A nontransplant set of endoscopic biopsies was used as a control. Results.--Of the 250 total endoscopies, 217 (87%) had a clinical diagnosis of gastrointestinal graft-versus-host disease. Use of the NIH consensus guidelines showed a sensitivity of 86% and a specificity of 65%. Thirty-seven of 58 (64%) cases with an initial false-negative histopathologic diagnosis were diagnosed as graft-versus-host disease on our review. Conclusions.--Use of the NIH histology consensus guidelines results in a high sensitivity and specificity, thereby decreasing false-negatives. Additionally, use of the NIH guidelines aids in creating uniformity and diagnostic clarity. Correlation with clinical and laboratory findings is critical in evaluating the differential diagnosis and to avoid false-positives. As expected, increased apoptosis with decreased inflammation was associated with a pathologic diagnosis of graft-versus-host disease and supports the NIH guidelines. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2017-0054-0A, Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is a common complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. (1-6) Graft-versus-host disease develops [...]

Electron microscopy is a mainstay in the analysis of renal biopsies, where it is typically employed in a correlative fashion along with light and immunofluorescence microscopy. Despite the development of a growing armamentarium of molecular and biochemical analytic methods as well as new immunostains with a widening panel of immunoreactants, electron microscopy remains crucial to the diagnosis of a number of disorders involving the renal glomerulus, vasculature, and tubulointerstitial compartment. The number of renal biopsies continues to grow and the indications for these biopsies continue expanding together with our understanding of disease processes. Proper collection of biopsies and careful analysis of data emanating from diagnostic modalities, clinical information, imaging, gross and microscopic tissue analysis, including a wide range of ancillary studies, represent the essential paradigm for generating detailed diagnoses with clinical significance. This communication offers a guide to the pre-analytic and analytic process for renal biopsy examination, discusses diagnostic keys and pitfalls for an important category of renal diseases (immune complex disorders), and provides an introduction to a useful adjunct diagnostic method (ultrastructural immunolabeling). Renal pathologists should render expert diagnoses that guide patient management, provide prognostic information and lead to targeted new therapeutic interventions that are currently available. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]