Search

Metachronous metastasis occurs many years later in cases of hormone-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer, with the most common sites being the lymph nodes, bones, liver, lungs, and brain. The late recurrence of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer is attributed to prolonged adjuvant therapy and the high expression of dormancy-associated genes, allowing cancer cells to survive for decades without proliferating. It is a form of chronic breast cancer that remains asymptomatic, with no clinical signs of progression or recurrence. Estrogen receptor-negative breast cancers, on the other hand, have no long-term tumor dormancy due to their fast growth and low expression of dormancy-related genes. Adrenal gland metastasis, particularly as an oligometastatic presentation, is exceedingly rare, and optimal treatment strategies remain elusive. In this report, we present a case demonstrating long-term survival after treatment of adrenal gland metastasis, accompanied by a comprehensive literature review. At the age of 48, our patient was diagnosed with invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast. Treatment included breast-conserving surgery, radiotherapy, and adjuvant hormone therapy. Ten years later, she developed a solitary left adrenal metastasis. Treatment included laparoscopic adrenalectomy and a change in hormonal therapy. Our patient is currently still asymptomatic with no evidence of disease. Her overall survival of over 20 years is exceptional. Resection of the adrenal metastasis combined with systemic hormonal therapy represents the recommended approach for this metachronous metastasis. In the contemporary context, antihormonal therapy in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitors should be considered. The present case underscores the necessity of establishing a lifelong (inter)national cancer registry to document rare recurrences systematically. Such a registry would provide insights into the prevalence of uncommon scenarios and offer invaluable data on proposed treatments, facilitating the development of uniform treatment strategies., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2025, Verboven et al.)

Cell therapies, including tumor antigen-loaded dendritic cells used as therapeutic cancer vaccines, offer treatment options for patients with malignancies. We evaluated the feasibility, safety, immunogenicity, and clinical activity of adjuvant vaccination with Wilms' tumor protein (WT1) mRNA-electroporated autologous dendritic cells (WT1-mRNA/DC) in a single-arm phase I/II clinical study of patients with advanced solid tumors receiving standard therapy. Disease status and immune reactivity were evaluated after 8 weeks and 6 months. WT1-mRNA/DC vaccination was feasible in all patients, except one. Vaccination was well tolerated without evidence of systemic toxicity. The disease control rate and overall response rate among a total of 39 evaluable patients were 74.4% and 12.8%, respectively. Median overall survival (OS) was 43.7 months among 13 patients with glioblastoma multiforme, 41.9 months among 12 patients with metastatic breast cancer, and 48.8 months among 10 patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma, comparing favourably with historical controls reported in the literature. OS was longer in patients with stable disease at 8 weeks and disease control at 6 months versus patients without disease control at either time point. Disease control and higher OS were associated with antigen-specific type 1 CD4 + and/or CD8 + T-lymphocyte responses, mainly induced by WT1-mRNA/DC vaccination. Antigen-nonspecific type 2 CD8 + T-cell responses were common before WT1-mRNA/DC vaccination but did not show any association with clinical outcome. Collectively, these data indicate that WT1-mRNA/DC vaccination is feasible, safe, and immunogenic and shows clinical activity in patients with advanced solid tumors, suggesting that it has the potential to help improve their survival., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Antwerp University Hospital/University of Antwerp (EC 10/40/266) and the Belgian Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (FAGG 08 − 0005) and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01291420) and EudraCT (2011-000547-24). The sponsor’s protocol code was CCRG 11 − 001. All participants provided informed written consent in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: VFVT and ZNB are coinventors of a now-elapsed patent covering the messenger RNA electroporation technique (Improved Transfection of Eukaryotic Cells with Linear Polynucleotides by Electroporation, WO/2003/000907)., (© 2025. The Author(s).)

Cytokines, chemokines, and (angiogenic) growth factors (CCGs) have been shown to play an intricate role in the progression of both solid and haematological malignancies. Recent studies have shown that SARS-CoV-2 infection leads to a worse outcome in cancer patients, especially in haematological malignancy patients. Here, we investigated how SARS-CoV-2 infection impacts the already altered CCG levels in solid or haematological malignancies, specifically, whether there is a protective effect or rather a potentially higher risk for major COVID-19 complications in cancer patients due to elevated CCGs linked to cancer progression. Serially analysing immune responses with 55 CCGs in cancer patients under active treatment with or without SARS-CoV-2 infection, we first showed that cancer patients without SARS-CoV-2 infection ( n = 54) demonstrate elevated levels of 35 CCGs compared to the non-cancer, non-infected control group of health care workers ( n = 42). Of the 35 CCGs, 19 were common to both the solid and haematological malignancy groups and comprised previously described cytokines such as IL-6, TNF-α, IL-1Ra, IL-17A, and VEGF, but also several less well described cytokines/chemokines such as Fractalkine, Tie-2, and T cell chemokine CTACK. Importantly, we show here that 7 CCGs are significantly altered in SARS-CoV-2 exposed cancer patients ( n = 52). Of these, TNF-α, IFN-β, TSLP, and sVCAM-1, identified to be elevated in haematological cancers, are also known tumour-promoting factors. Longitudinal analysis conducted over 3 months showed persistence of several tumour-promoting CCGs in SARS-CoV-2 exposed cancer patients. These data demonstrate a need for increased vigilance for haematological malignancy patients as a part of long COVID follow-up.

Background: Breast cancer has, due to its high incidence, the highest mortality of cancer in women. The most common molecular type of breast cancer is the luminal subtype, which expresses estrogen and progesterone receptors and is typically treated with surgery and adjuvant endocrine therapy (ET). Estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), encoded by the estrogen receptor-1 (ESR1) gene, is expressed in approximately 70% of all breast cancers, and ET represents a major treatment modality in ERα-positive cancers. However, resistance to different ET evolves frequently, leading to disease progression or recurrence in ER+ breast cancer. Acquired mutations in the Ligand Binding Domain (LBD) of the ERα referred as ESR1 mutations; could be selected by ET itself leading to resistance over the course of ET therapy., Objective: The goal of this review is to estimate the effect of Aromatase Inhibitors (AIs), Tamoxifen (TAM) and Fulvestrant (FUL) on the development of ESR1 mutations in hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer., Methods: A systematic review of qualitative studies published between January 1st, 2007 and March 1st, 2019 was conducted using the PubMed and Thomas Reuters Web of Science databases. Search terms included ESR1 mutations, estrogen receptor, breast cancer, recurrent, metastatic disease, aromatase inhibitors, fulvestrant and tamoxifen. Only full-text studies in English concerning the development of ESR1 mutations and their outcomes on disease progression were included. Selection of studies was performed using predefined data fields, taking study quality indicators into consideration. Inclusion criteria of the study populations were: Ghoncheh et al. (2016) [1] female patients above 18 years; Nielsen et al. (2011) [2] Estrogen-receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer in the advanced setting; Reinert et al. (2017) [3] previous exposure to endocrine therapy including SERDs (preferably Fulvestrant), SERMs (preferably Tamoxifen) or Aromatase Inhibitors., Results: The current review enrolled 16 articles, including 4 multicentre double blinded RCTs and 12 cohorts and comprising a total of 2632 patients. The overall incidence rate of the ESR1 mutation was 24% (95% CI: 18%-31%). We observed that D538G was the most frequent ESR1 mutation. Several studies showed that prior endocrine therapy (AIs, TAM, FUL) could result in an ESR1 mutation and therapy resistance leading to disease progression or recurrence. Different mechanisms had been implied to explain the underlying ET resistance. One of the key findings of this work is the significant difference in ESR1 mutation incidence between patients with and without AI therapy (OR: 9.34, 95% CI: 3.28-26.62, P ≤.001)., Conclusion: ESR1 mutations are not uncommon phenomenon in patients with hormone-sensitive advanced breast cancer. There is a significant higher incidence rate of ESR1 mutations in patients with previous AI-containing therapeutic regimens, compared to those who received non-AI containing regimes. These ESR1 mutations could lead to the development of complete endocrine resistance to AI, whereas only partial resistance is seen in case of TAM or FUL., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: A sentinel Node (SN) has replaced axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in patients with clinically node negative axilla (cN0). SN after Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is feasible but not accurate in clinically node positive (cN1-3) patients. The goal of this study is to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of SN in cN0 breast cancer after NACT. A secondary endpoint is to determine if ALND can be avoided after NACT regardless of the pre-treatment clinical staging of the axilla, in case of a normalization of the 18 F-fluoro-2-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography scan (PET-CT scan)., Design: A single institution prospective study regarding the negative predictive value of the SN in breast cancer after NACT was conducted in the Multidisciplinary Breast Clinic of the Antwerp University Hospital from 29/03/2010 until 01/12/2015 (Study number: B30020108368). Inclusion criteria for study participation were: breast cancer, age above 18 years, female, tumor stages T2-T4 N0-3 or T1N1-N3. All patients were staged by a mammography, ultrasound of the axilla, MRI of the breast, PET-CT scan and bone scintigraphy. They received NACT consisting of 12 cycles of paclitaxel or 4 cycles of docetaxel followed by dose dense doxorubicin or epirubicin/cyclofosfamide or vice versa as a standard initial treatment. After 6 weeks, a PET-CT scan was performed for early tumour response evaluation. At the day of operation, a 99 mTC-labelled nanocolloid was used to identify the SN. During the surgery the SN were removed separately together with a complete ALND., Results: A total of 150 patients were enrolled in our study of which 129 were eligible for analysis. 53 patients had a positive SN of which 32 have a positive axillary lymph nodes (ALN), positive predictive value (PPV) was 60%; 76 patients had a negative SN of which 6 had a positive ALN (NPV 92%). The sensitivity is 84% and the specificity 76% with a false omission rate (FOR) of 8%. In total 45 patients ALN were clinical negative and no suspect lymph nodes were seen on ultrasound, MRI and PET-CT scan) and 45 patients had negative a SN, with no ALN and 2 patients had a positive SN of which 1 patients had axillary involvement (NPV 100%). The FOR of cN1: 5%, cN2: 37%, cN3 33%. A total of 22 patients out of 84 patients (26%) of which 15/49 cN1 (30%), 6/23 (26%) cN2, 1/12 (8%) have after 6 weeks of chemotherapy and normalization on PET-CT scan. A total of 17 patients had a negative SN and ALN. The FOR was in this group was 0%., Conclusion: A SNB should become the standard after NACT if case of a cN0. If after NACT the PET CT has normalized, no ALND should be performed if the SN is negative., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: The subcutaneous (SC) formulation of trastuzumab represents an alternative to the intravenous (IV) infusion in the treatment of patients with HER2-positive metastatic and early breast cancer. We compared the two formulations in terms of time and cost differential., Study Desing: We conducted a time, motion and cost assessment study in a lean operating day care oncology unit to determine and compare the time and costs of trastuzumab SC versus IV administration in patients with HER2-positive breast cancer. Outcomes were the mean costs and the mean dedicated time of the health care professional (HCP) and patient chair time. Direct observation methodology was applied to collect data and statistical analysis was performed., Results: The total preparation and administration time for trastuzumab IV was 4.07 times longer than the total time required for the trastuzumab SC administration. The total patient time spent in the day care oncology unit (in minutes) was 71% shorter with using SC administration. IV administration costs € 50.4 ($54,89) more in HCP time and consumable supplies and €162.53 ($177.00) of drug wastage. SC administration was associated with a total time saving of 53.7min for the HCPs and 122.5min for the patients. The administration of trastuzumab SC was translated in a cost saving of €212.93 ($231.73) per patient episode compared to trastuzumab IV, which could lead to a total potential saving of €3,832.74 ($4,171.06) over a full course of treatment (18 cycles) CONCLUSION: SC administration of trastuzumab was associated with a substantial reduction in active HCP time, patient chair time, unit time, and overall cost. These time and cost could be used to increase capacity within existing resources in a lean operating day dare oncology unit., (Copyright © 2017. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Trastuzumab has become standard of care in the treatment of early and metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer. Initially trastuzumab could only be administered intravenously (IV), however since a few years there is also a subcutaneous (SC) formulation. The efficacy and the safety profile of both formulations is the comparable. The administration logistics however have an impact on the patients, the health care professionals (HCPs), the hospital and the government. The preference for the patients (89%) and the HCPs (77%) is in favour of the SC formulation. The patient chair time per cycle, as defined by the time between entry and exit of infusion chair, is between 53 and 122 minutes shorter for SC administration. Also, the time actively dedicated by the HCP on preparation and administration SC, is between 17 and 50 minutes shorter per cycle. These time savings may increase the capacity of an oncological day clinic and reduce waiting lists. An additional benefit is that the use of SC formulation reduces the consumables and the waste. When the SC form was given at home instead of in the hospital the safety profile remained the same, but the satisfaction rate improved further for both the patients and the HCPs. The next and final step will be potentially to invest in teaching the patients to self-administer the medication. The home administration and the education of the patients and the HCPs will have a cost price and it will be interesting to see how the hospital financial authorities and the government will deal with this situation in the time of budgetary restrictions.

The management of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) remains a major clinical issue, despite progress achieved in diagnosis and therapy. Preoperative or neoadjuvant therapy has gained interest since breast cancer has been regarded as a systemic disease. Comparing adjuvant versus neoadjuvant treatment, the neoadjuvant approach offers the advantage of downstaging the disease and testing the efficacy of therapy administered to patients. A large number of clinical trials have attempted to define the optimal neoadjuvant treatment, but little attention has been paid to the sequence of chemotherapy. Moreover, the integration of antibodies against Human Epidermal Receptor-2 (HER-2) and other biological therapies that may improve the long-term control of breast cancer patients, have a special clinical interest. In this review, we will discuss these topics attempting to answer the questions why, when and which regimen to use for patients with LABC. Especially, the introduction of the platina derivatives in neoadjuvant trials with their exceptional high pathological complete response rates are challenging to rethink the optimal treatment options in early and locally advanced breast cancer., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Verrucous carcinoma of the vulva is extremely rare. It is a slow growing, low malignant variant of a squamous cell carcinoma with a cauliflower appearance. Women with lichen planus have an increased risk of developing vulval cancer., Case Presentation: A 79-year-old woman consulted for vulval itching. On clinical examination, a 3-cm large verrucous clitoral cancer in an area of lichen planus was seen. Based on her last clinical examination, the growth was estimated to be 1 cm 2 per month with an invasion depth after 6 months of 5 mm. A tumor developing in an area of lichen planus appears to have more aggressive features. This is the first time that the growth of a verrucous carcinoma has been documented in an area of lichen planus., Conclusions: Clinicians and patients should be aware of the aggressive behavior of cancers developing in areas of lichen planus and adjust their surgical management together with the follow-up strategy.