Search

Empirical determination of the limit of detection. Defined oncogenic driver and background SNVs (a), oncogene and tumor suppressor indels (b), and oncogenic fusions (c) were titrated to specified VAFs, and multiple replicates were measured to determine the 95% LOD. (d) Cell lines comprising defined gene amplifications were titrated to bracket the expected LOD, and the 95% LOD was determined from statistical detection models as per the CLSI Classical Approach.

Genes on the Guardant360 panel.

Supplemental Methods, Supplemental References, Supplemental Figure Legends, Figure S1-13, Table S1-5 and S14

Digital Sequencing analytical performance metrics summary table.

cfDNA variants associated with resistance to on-label targeted therapies across six cancer types

Purpose: To analytically and clinically validate a circulating cell-free tumor DNA sequencing test for comprehensive tumor genotyping and demonstrate its clinical feasibility.Experimental Design: Analytic validation was conducted according to established principles and guidelines. Blood-to-blood clinical validation comprised blinded external comparison with clinical droplet digital PCR across 222 consecutive biomarker-positive clinical samples. Blood-to-tissue clinical validation comprised comparison of digital sequencing calls to those documented in the medical record of 543 consecutive lung cancer patients. Clinical experience was reported from 10,593 consecutive clinical samples.Results: Digital sequencing technology enabled variant detection down to 0.02% to 0.04% allelic fraction/2.12 copies with ≤0.3%/2.24–2.76 copies 95% limits of detection while maintaining high specificity [prevalence-adjusted positive predictive values (PPV) >98%]. Clinical validation using orthogonal plasma- and tissue-based clinical genotyping across >750 patients demonstrated high accuracy and specificity [positive percent agreement (PPAs) and negative percent agreement (NPAs) >99% and PPVs 92%–100%]. Clinical use in 10,593 advanced adult solid tumor patients demonstrated high feasibility (>99.6% technical success rate) and clinical sensitivity (85.9%), with high potential actionability (16.7% with FDA-approved on-label treatment options; 72.0% with treatment or trial recommendations), particularly in non–small cell lung cancer, where 34.5% of patient samples comprised a directly targetable standard-of-care biomarker.Conclusions: High concordance with orthogonal clinical plasma- and tissue-based genotyping methods supports the clinical accuracy of digital sequencing across all four types of targetable genomic alterations. Digital sequencing's clinical applicability is further supported by high rates of technical success and biomarker target discovery. Clin Cancer Res; 24(15); 3539–49. ©2018 AACR.

Driver alteration prevalence in the cfDNA cohort versus in TCGA

Quantitative precision of Digital Sequencing results. (a) SNV VAFs in 375 consecutive SNV control runs. (b) Indel and fusion VAFs (left y-axis) and CNA copy number (right y-axis) in consecutive CFI control runs. (c) Variation distribution of DS results in 375 consecutive analyses of a single SNV control lot (blue) and multiple consecutive lots of indel (red), fusion (grey), and CNA (orange) controls.

Detailed results of Digital Sequencing and clinical ddPCR comparison. Results shown in individual 2x2 tables for each biomarker tested. *Note, all discordances were below DFCI ddPCR's reportable range. Detailed clinical information for each is presented in Supplemental Table 3.

Discordant results between Digital Sequencing and clinical ddPCR. Details of the cases discordant between DS and Dana-Farber Clinical Laboratory's ddPCR results with orthogonal follow-up data. *Note, while approved specifically for T790M+ NSCLC, osimertinib has been reported to have clinical activity in T790-wild type patients as well; however, osimertinib efficacy in T790M-wild type patients resistant to 1st generation EGFR TKIs is unclear.

Purpose: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing provides a noninvasive method for obtaining actionable genomic information to guide personalized cancer treatment, but the presence of multiple alterations in circulation related to treatment and tumor heterogeneity complicate the interpretation of the observed variants.Experimental Design: We describe the somatic mutation landscape of 70 cancer genes from cfDNA deep-sequencing analysis of 21,807 patients with treated, late-stage cancers across >50 cancer types. To facilitate interpretation of the genomic complexity of circulating tumor DNA in advanced, treated cancer patients, we developed methods to identify cfDNA copy-number driver alterations and cfDNA clonality.Results: Patterns and prevalence of cfDNA alterations in major driver genes for non–small cell lung, breast, and colorectal cancer largely recapitulated those from tumor tissue sequencing compendia (The Cancer Genome Atlas and COSMIC; r = 0.90–0.99), with the principal differences in alteration prevalence being due to patient treatment. This highly sensitive cfDNA sequencing assay revealed numerous subclonal tumor-derived alterations, expected as a result of clonal evolution, but leading to an apparent departure from mutual exclusivity in treatment-naïve tumors. Upon applying novel cfDNA clonality and copy-number driver identification methods, robust mutual exclusivity was observed among predicted truncal driver cfDNA alterations (FDR = 5 × 10−7 for EGFR and ERBB2), in effect distinguishing tumor-initiating alterations from secondary alterations. Treatment-associated resistance, including both novel alterations and parallel evolution, was common in the cfDNA cohort and was enriched in patients with targetable driver alterations (>18.6% patients).Conclusions: Together, these retrospective analyses of a large cfDNA sequencing data set reveal subclonal structures and emerging resistance in advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res; 24(15); 3528–38. ©2018 AACR.

Mutual exclusivity statistics for cfDNA alterations in lung adenocarcinoma, breast cancer, and colorectal cancer

Per-sample mutation burden distribution by tumor type. Per-sample adjusted mutation count relative to other samples within clinical indication. Green bars indicate the 95th percentile.

Quantitative accuracy of Digital Sequencing. Quantitative correlation between expected and observed VAFs for SNVs (a) and CNAs (b) in the analytical validation studies. (c) DS copy number calls compared to those reported in the Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE).

Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood and peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) are used to determine comprehensive cancer genetics and germline genomics for precision medicine. To evaluate the use of urine samples as a noninvasive alternative to blood samples, we performed a comprehensive characterization of urine DNA as an alternative to PBMC DNA for germline genomics. Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed in PBMC and total urine DNA in six normal subjects to compare the quality and comprehensiveness of the genomic data. There was no significant difference between the sequencing data obtained from PBMC and urine DNA upon comparing the variant calling, percent reads passing Phred score Q30 (p>0.05, paired t-test), and coverage of human genome. Similar to plasma cfDNA, mononucleosomal-sized DNA was the most predominant species present in urine cfDNA. Samples from three hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients were further analyzed for insert sizes by NGS, which demonstrated predominantly mononucleosomal-sized DNA fragments, with a series of peaks occurring with 10-bp periodicity, in both urine and plasma cfDNA. With shallow WGS, the genome coverage overlap was 53-61%, and by increasing the depth of coverage the overlap increased from 60% to 74%. Interestingly, 8-10% of the genome covered in plasma DNA was not detected in urine DNA, and 4-8% of the genome covered in urine DNA was not covered in plasma DNA. Next, we compared the detectability of three HCC-associated genetic mutations in the matched urine and plasma DNA obtained from 76 HCC patients including mutations at TP53 codon 249 (TP53 249T), CTNNB1 exon 3 regions 32-37 (CTNNB1 32-37), and hTERT promoter region position 124 (hTERT 124). We observed higher levels of the TP53 mutation, similar levels of CTNNB1 mutation, and lower levels of the TERT mutation in urine cfDNA compared to plasma ctDNA. This suggests a potential for urine as a potential noninvasive source for ctDNA analysis, and a combination of both urine and plasma ctDNA may increase the overall sensitivity of ctDNA detection. In conclusion, our data suggest that (1) total urine DNA can replace PBMC DNA for providing comprehensive genomic sequencing data and (2) urine can complement blood for liver cancer liquid biopsy, precision medicine, and potential applications in other cancers. Citation Format: James V. Vowles, Amy K. Kim, James P. Hamilton, Selena Y. Lin, Fwu-Shan Shieh, Harry Luu, Gabrielle Villafana, Chi-Tan Hu, Ying-Hsiu Su. Urine for noninvasive liquid biopsy for germline and somatic mutations [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 722.

Purpose: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) sequencing provides a noninvasive method for obtaining actionable genomic information to guide personalized cancer treatment, but the presence of multiple alterations in circulation related to treatment and tumor heterogeneity complicate the interpretation of the observed variants.Experimental Design: We describe the somatic mutation landscape of 70 cancer genes from cfDNA deep-sequencing analysis of 21,807 patients with treated, late-stage cancers across >50 cancer types. To facilitate interpretation of the genomic complexity of circulating tumor DNA in advanced, treated cancer patients, we developed methods to identify cfDNA copy-number driver alterations and cfDNA clonality.Results: Patterns and prevalence of cfDNA alterations in major driver genes for non–small cell lung, breast, and colorectal cancer largely recapitulated those from tumor tissue sequencing compendia (The Cancer Genome Atlas and COSMIC; r = 0.90–0.99), with the principal differences in alteration prevalence being due to patient treatment. This highly sensitive cfDNA sequencing assay revealed numerous subclonal tumor-derived alterations, expected as a result of clonal evolution, but leading to an apparent departure from mutual exclusivity in treatment-naïve tumors. Upon applying novel cfDNA clonality and copy-number driver identification methods, robust mutual exclusivity was observed among predicted truncal driver cfDNA alterations (FDR = 5 × 10−7 for EGFR and ERBB2), in effect distinguishing tumor-initiating alterations from secondary alterations. Treatment-associated resistance, including both novel alterations and parallel evolution, was common in the cfDNA cohort and was enriched in patients with targetable driver alterations (>18.6% patients).Conclusions: Together, these retrospective analyses of a large cfDNA sequencing data set reveal subclonal structures and emerging resistance in advanced solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res; 24(15); 3528–38. ©2018 AACR.

Purpose: To analytically and clinically validate a circulating cell-free tumor DNA sequencing test for comprehensive tumor genotyping and demonstrate its clinical feasibility. Experimental Design: Analytic validation was conducted according to established principles and guidelines. Blood-to-blood clinical validation comprised blinded external comparison with clinical droplet digital PCR across 222 consecutive biomarker-positive clinical samples. Blood-to-tissue clinical validation comprised comparison of digital sequencing calls to those documented in the medical record of 543 consecutive lung cancer patients. Clinical experience was reported from 10,593 consecutive clinical samples. Results: Digital sequencing technology enabled variant detection down to 0.02% to 0.04% allelic fraction/2.12 copies with ≤0.3%/2.24–2.76 copies 95% limits of detection while maintaining high specificity [prevalence-adjusted positive predictive values (PPV) >98%]. Clinical validation using orthogonal plasma- and tissue-based clinical genotyping across >750 patients demonstrated high accuracy and specificity [positive percent agreement (PPAs) and negative percent agreement (NPAs) >99% and PPVs 92%–100%]. Clinical use in 10,593 advanced adult solid tumor patients demonstrated high feasibility (>99.6% technical success rate) and clinical sensitivity (85.9%), with high potential actionability (16.7% with FDA-approved on-label treatment options; 72.0% with treatment or trial recommendations), particularly in non–small cell lung cancer, where 34.5% of patient samples comprised a directly targetable standard-of-care biomarker. Conclusions: High concordance with orthogonal clinical plasma- and tissue-based genotyping methods supports the clinical accuracy of digital sequencing across all four types of targetable genomic alterations. Digital sequencing's clinical applicability is further supported by high rates of technical success and biomarker target discovery. Clin Cancer Res; 24(15); 3539–49. ©2018 AACR.

Background: Translational research and enrollment in clinical trials are limited by the rarity of individual mutations and lack of sufficient tissue for comprehensive testing. To address these limitations, we developed GuardantOMNI (OMNI), a highly sensitive 500-gene cfDNA sequencing test requiring as little as 2 mL of plasma and designed for broad genomic detection of somatic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and small indels in 497 genes, copy number amplifications (CNAs) in 106 genes, and fusions in 21 genes. Additionally, the OMNI panel enables assessment of tumor mutational burden (TMB), and DNA damage and mismatch repair, with coverage of over 30 genes associated with the DDR pathway. Here we present the first analytical validation study of OMNI. Methods: Analytical performance was assessed as per Nex-StoCT Working Group guidelines using precharacterized cell lines and healthy normal donor-derived samples. Qualitative and quantitative orthogonal confirmation was provided by exome sequencing, microarrays, and data from published compendia. Results: Seventy-three validation and 150 development plasma samples were processed for this study, using both 5ng and 30ng cfDNA input levels, and all samples passed sequencing QC metrics established prior to testing. Reportable ranges for SNVs were ≥0.04% variant allele fraction (VAF), ≥0.02% for indels, ≥2 supporting molecules for fusions, and ≥2.18 copies for CNAs. Cell line-based dilution studies demonstrated 95% limits of detection (LoD) of 0.24-0.6% VAF for SNVs (depending on known cancer association), 0.4-0.8% for non-homopolymeric indels (depending on clinical relevance), 0.1-0.2% for fusions, and 2.2-2.9 copies for 90% of CNA genes targeted. Comparison of diluted cell line and healthy donor samples to orthogonal sequencing and published genotype data demonstrated accuracies of 98.7% for SNVs, 97.2% for indels, and 100% for CNAs and fusions across the reportable range. The analytical false-positive rate per sample measured across 24 healthy donors was 0.25 for SNVs, 0.04 for indels, and 0 for CNAs and fusions, with positive predictive values (PPVs) of 97.5% for SNVs, 98% for indels, and 100% for CNAs and fusions. Quantitative correlation of allele fraction with confirmatory methods was high (r2 > 0.99). Conclusions: To our knowledge, OMNI is the largest comprehensive ctDNA cancer gene panel available. It detects alterations in genes under study in over 98% of current clinical trials with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy similar to currently available targeted ctDNA sequencing tests. OMNI has the potential to accelerate clinical trial enrollment, research and discovery with a single, noninvasive blood sample. Citation Format: Elena Helman, Carlo Artieri, James V. Vowles, Jennifer Yen, Tracy Nance, Marcin Sikora, Joshua Gourneau, Mohit Goel, Stefanie Mortimer, Darya Chudova, Justin Odegaard, Richard B. Lanman, AmirAli Talasaz. Analytical validation of a comprehensive 500-gene ctDNA panel designed for immuno-oncology and DNA damage research [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2018; 2018 Apr 14-18; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5603.

Genetic devices that directly detect and respond to intracellular concentrations of proteins are important synthetic biology tools, supporting the design of biological systems that target, respond to or alter specific cellular states. Here, we develop ribozyme-based devices that respond to protein ligands in two eukaryotic hosts, yeast and mammalian cells, to regulate the expression of a gene of interest. Our devices allow for both gene-ON and gene-OFF response upon sensing the protein ligand. As part of our design process, we describe an in vitro characterization pipeline for prescreening device designs to identify promising candidates for in vivo testing. The in vivo gene-regulatory activities in the two types of eukaryotic cells correlate with in vitro cleavage activities determined at different physiologically relevant magnesium concentrations. Finally, localization studies with the ligand demonstrate that ribozyme switches respond to ligands present in the nucleus and/or cytoplasm, providing new insight into their mechanism of action. By extending the sensing capabilities of this important class of gene-regulatory device, our work supports the implementation of ribozyme-based devices in applications requiring the detection of protein biomarkers.

Guardant360 is a cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) test that genotypes all guideline-recommended solid tumor somatic genomic treatment targets from a single non-invasive blood draw. The new version, v2.10, was redesigned to enhance sensitivity and specificity across 73 cancer-related genes. It detects all four major variant classes (single nucleotide variants, SNVs, in all 73 genes; indels in 23 genes; gene amplifications, CNAs, in 18 genes; and fusions in 6 genes). Analytical performance was assessed throughout the reportable range via multiple serial dilution studies of orthogonally-characterized contrived and patient samples. Analytical specificity was assessed by calculating the false positive rate in pre-characterized healthy donor sample mixtures serially diluted. Positive predictive value (PPV) was estimated as a function of allelic fraction/copy number from pre-characterized samples and prevalence-adjusted using a cohort of 2,585 consecutive clinical samples. Confirmation was performed using ddPCR. Analytical specificity was 100% for SNVs, fusions, and CNAs and 96% for indels across 25 defined samples. Relative to Guardant360v2.9, v2.10 demonstrated 20-50% increase in fusion molecule recovery. Retrospective in silico analysis of 2,585 consecutive clinical samples demonstrated a 15% increase in actionable fusion detection, a 6%-15% increase in actionable indel detection (excluding newly reportable indels), and a 3%-6% increase in actionable SNV detection. AlterationsReportable Range95% Limit of DetectionAllelic Fraction / Copy NumberAnalytical SensitivityAllelic Fraction / Copy numberPPVSNVs≥0.04%0.25%≥0.25%>99.9%≥0.25%98.7%0.05–0.25%63.8%99.9%≥0.25%98.4%0.05–0.25%67.8% Guardant360 analytical performance characteristics based on standard cfDNA input (30ng). Analytical sensitivity/limit of detection estimates are provided for clinically actionable variants and may vary by sequence context and cfDNA input. PPV is estimated across entire reportable panel space (PPV was 100% for clinically actionable variants). Conclusion: Guardant360 v2.10 comprehensively detects all adult solid tumor guideline-recommended somatic genomic variants with unparalleled sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity. Citation Format: James Vowles, Justin Odegaard, Stefanie Mortimer, Stephen Fairclough, Marcin Sikora, Diana Abdueva, Reza Mokhtari, Arthur Baca, AmirAli Talasaz. Analytical validation of Guardant360 v2.10 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5705. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5705