Search

ObjectiveTriple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous disease with poor prognosis. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are a promising predictor for breast cancer prognoses but their reliability regarding progression-free survival (PFS) is controversial. We aim to verify their predictive value in TNBC.MethodsIn present prospective cohort study, we used the Pep@MNPs method to enumerate CTCs in baseline blood samples from 75 patients with TNBC (taken at inclusion in this study) and analyzed correlations between CTC numbers and outcomes and other clinical parameters.ResultsMedian PFS was 6.0 (range: 1.0-25.0) months for the entire cohort, in whom we found no correlations between baseline CTC status and initial tumor stage (P=0.167), tumor grade (P=0.783) or histological type (P=0.084). However, among those getting first-line treatment, baseline CTC status was positively correlated with ratio of peripheral natural killer (NK) cells (P=0.032), presence of lung metastasis (P=0.034) and number of visceral metastatic site (P=0.037). Baseline CTC status was predictive for PFS in first-line TNBC (P=0.033), but not for the cohort as a whole (P=0.118). This prognostic limitation of CTC could be ameliorated by combining CTC and NK cell enumeration (P=0.049).ConclusionsBaseline CTC status was predictive of lung metastasis, peripheral NK cell ratio and PFS in TNBC patients undergoing first-line treatment. We have developed a combined CTC-NK enumeration strategy that allows us to predict PFS in TNBC without any preconditions.

Background: Infectious meningitis/encephalitis (IM) is a severe neurological disease that can be caused by bacterial, viral, and fungal pathogens. IM suffers high morbidity, mortality, and sequelae in childhood. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) can potentially improve IM outcomes by sequencing both pathogen and host responses and increasing the diagnosis accuracy. Methods: Here we developed an optimized mNGS pipeline named comprehensive mNGS (c-mNGS) to monitor DNA/RNA pathogens and host responses simultaneously and applied it to 142 cerebrospinal fluid samples. According to retrospective diagnosis, these samples were classified into three categories: confirmed infectious meningitis/encephalitis (CIM), suspected infectious meningitis/encephalitis (SIM), and noninfectious controls (CTRL). Results: Our pipeline outperformed conventional methods and identified RNA viruses such as Echovirus E30 and etiologic pathogens such as HHV-7, which would not be clinically identified via conventional methods. Based on the results of the c-mNGS pipeline, we successfully detected antibiotic resistance genes related to common antibiotics for treating Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Group B Streptococcus. Further, we identified differentially expressed genes in hosts of bacterial meningitis (BM) and viral meningitis/encephalitis (VM). We used these genes to build a machine-learning model to pinpoint sample contaminations. Similarly, we also built a model to predict poor prognosis in BM. Conclusions: This study developed an mNGS-based pipeline for IM which measures both DNA/RNA pathogens and host gene expression in a single assay. The pipeline allows detecting more viruses, predicting antibiotic resistance, pinpointing contaminations, and evaluating prognosis. Given the comparable cost to conventional mNGS, our pipeline can become a routine test for IM. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains an incurable disease, and approximately 25% of patients with HER2+ early breast cancer still relapse after adjuvant trastuzumab-based treatment. HER2 is a validated therapeutic target that remains relevant throughout the disease process. Recently, a number of novel HER2 targeted agents have become available, including lapatinib (a small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor of both HER2 and the epidermal growth factor receptor), pertuzumab (a new anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody) and ado-trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1, a novel antibody-drug conjugate), which provide additional treatment options for patients with HER2+ MBC. The latest clinical trials have demonstrated improved outcome with treatment including pertuzumab or T-DM1 compared with standard HER2 targeted therapy. Here we review the clinical development of approved and investigational targeted agents for the treatment of HER2+ MBC, summarize the latest results of important clinical trials supporting use of these agents in the treatment of HER2+ MBC, and discuss how these results impact therapeutic options in clinical practice.

Background: This head-to-head study compared a 3-week versus 4-week schedule of nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Methods: Patients with HER2-negative mBC were enrolled and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive nab-paclitaxel for a 3-week schedule (125 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) or a 4-week schedule (same dose on days 1, 8, and 15) until disease progression or treatment intolerance. Patients with intolerable toxicities were allowed to receive a maintenance regimen after benefiting from nab-paclitaxel. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Ninety-four patients were included in the analysis (n = 47 in each arm). A longer median PFS (mPFS) was observed in the 3-week versus the 4-week schedule in the overall population (not reached vs. 6.8 months; hazard ratio [HR] = 0.44; P = .029). Patients in the 2 arms had a similar overall survival (28.0 vs. 25.8 months), objective response rate (51.1% vs. 48.9%), and disease control rate (93.6% vs. 80.9%). The 3-week schedule was associated with a lower rate of toxicity-related treatment discontinuation (8.5% vs. 29.8%) and dose delays (6.4% vs. 23.4%). Conclusion: This study demonstrated the better antitumor activity and safety profile of a 3-week over 4-week nab-paclitaxel schedule in HER2-negative mBC, suggesting that a 3-week schedule may be a better treatment regimen in clinical practice (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04192331). This study compared a 3-week versus 4-week schedule of nab -paclitaxel in patients with metastatic breast cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC) heavily pretreated with anthracycline and taxanes. Methods: In this single-arm, phase II study, patients with HER2-negative MBC previously treated with anthracycline and taxanes as second- to fifth chemotherapy received PLD (Duomeisu®, generic doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome) 40 mg/m2 every 4 weeks until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or completion of six cycles. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), and safety. Results: Of 44 enrolled patients (median age, 53.5 years; range, 34–69), 41 and 36 were evaluable for safety and efficacy, respectively. In total, 59.1% (26/44) of patients had ≥ 3 metastatic sites, 86.4% (38/44) had visceral disease, and 63.6% (28/44) had liver metastases. Median PFS was 3.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.3–4.1) and median OS was 15.0 months (95% CI 12.1–17.9). ORR, DCR, and CBR were 16.7%, 63.9%, and 36.1%, respectively. The most common adverse events (AEs) were leukopenia (53.7%), fatigue (46.3%), and neutropenia (41.5%), with no grade 4/5 AEs. The most common grade 3 AEs were neutropenia (7.3%) and fatigue (4.9%). Patients experienced palmar-plantar-erythrodysesthesia (24.4%, 2.4% grade 3), stomatitis (19.5%, 7.3% grade 2), and alopecia (7.3%). One patient displayed a left ventricular ejection fraction decline of 11.4% from baseline after five cycles of PLD therapy. Conclusion: PLD (Duomeisu®) 40 mg/m2 every 4 weeks was effective and well-tolerated in patients with HER2-negative MBC heavily pretreated with anthracycline and taxanes, revealing a potentially viable treatment option for this population. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry: ChiCTR1900022568. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Circulating tumor cell (CTC) count have prognostic role for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). No clear biomarkers can guide selection of chemotherapy (CT) or endocrine therapy (ET) in 1st-line setting of hormone-receptor positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative (HR + HER2 - ) MBC. The present study investigated the prognostic role CT or ET according to the CTC count in HR + HER2 - MBC., Methods: We consecutively collected the data of 53 HR + HER2 - MBC patients who received 1st-line CT or ET, who had CTC count detected by our peptide-based nanomagnetic CTC isolation system (Pep@MNPs) from January 2014 to December 2015. The clinicopathological characteristics according the CTC count and 1st-line ET vs. CT were compared. Follow-up was conducted every 6 months. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A Cox regression analysis was conducted to determine the prognostic roles of CTC and 1st-line therapy of ET vs. CT for PFS and OS., Results: The median CTC count of the 53 patients was 2 (range, 0-18). The clinicopathological characteristics of the patients in the CTC count <2 group and the CTC count ≥2 group were similar. The patients with a CTC count <2 had a significantly longer PFS than those with a CTC count ≥2 (P=0.005, hazard ratio =4.138, 12.1 vs. 7.1 months). The patients who received CT had a significantly longer PFS than those who received ET (P=0.041, hazard ratio =2.721, 9.9 vs. 7.2 months). In the CTC count ≥2 group, the patients who received CT had a significantly longer PFS than those who received ET (P=0.048, hazard ratio =2.475, 8.7 vs. 6.3 months). In the CTC count <2 group, there was no significant difference in PFS between the CT and ET groups (P=0.071). Additionally, the CTC count had no significant effect on OS (P=0.116, hazard ratio =2.391, 54.2 vs. 34.2 months)., Conclusions: The present study showed that CTC count determined by the Pep@MNP system confirmed the prognostic value in the HR + HER2 - MBC patients. And it might be helpful in choosing a 1st-line treatment of CT or ET for HR + HER2 - MBC patients., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://atm.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/atm-22-3797/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2022 Annals of Translational Medicine. All rights reserved.)

Background: Patients with breast cancer (BC) may develop locoregional recurrence alone or with distant metastases. Results of previous studies discussing the benefit of local surgery among patients with chest wall disease were controversial. Whether surgical reduction for chest wall disease could influence survival outcome is still a question. The objective of this study was to compare overall survival (OS) in patients with recurrence involving the chest wall who did or did not undergo surgical reduction after previous treatment of the primary BC to explore the role of surgical reduction., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed BC patients with chest wall as the first recurrent/metastatic site selected between January 2012 and December 2018 to explore whether surgical reduction for chest wall disease could influence OS. Clinicopathological data, including age at initial diagnosis, TNM stage, the pathological parameters, and treatment were recorded and analyzed. OS was primarily described using the Kaplan-Meier estimator for each group, with the statistical significance between groups being tested by the log-rank test., Results: A total of 198 patients with a median age of 48 years (range, 22-73 years) were analyzed. Chest wall as the only site of recurrence occurred in 139 patients (70.2%), and the other 59 (29.8%) patients had other metastatic sites. There were 88 patients who underwent surgical reduction for chest wall recurrence. The median OS was significantly longer for the patients who had chest wall disease reduction than for those who did not {194.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 140.4-247.9 months] vs. 102.7 months (95% CI: 79.7-125.7 months), respectively, P=0.001}. From multivariate analysis, surgical reduction was an independent factor significantly influenced OS (HR =0.52, 95% CI: 0.33-0.81, P=0.004). Subgroup analyses showed that OS was statistically longer in the chest wall disease surgical reduction group than in the no reduction group with respect to hormone receptor (HR) negative (-), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative (-), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), disease-free survival (DFS) >24 months, and chest wall disease only., Conclusions: BC patients with chest wall recurrence could benefit from surgical reduction with a prolonged OS. In a certain selected group, surgical reduction may be warranted., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://gs.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/gs-22-246/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2022 Gland Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Breast cancer (BC) with chest wall metastasis (CWM) usually shows rich neovascularization. This trial explored the clinical effect of apatinib on human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced BC involving CWM., Methods: This trial involved four centers in China and was conducted from September 2016 to March 2020. Patients received apatinib 500 mg/d [either alone or with endocrine therapy if hormone receptor-positive (HR+)] until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint., Results: We evaluated 26 patients for efficacy. The median PFS (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) were 4.9 [range: 2.0-28.5; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 2.1-8.3] months and 18 (range: 3-55; 95% CI: 12.9-23.1) months, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 42.3% (11/26), and the disease-control rate was 76.9% (20/26). In the subgroup analysis, HR+ patients compared with HR-negative patients had significantly improved mPFS of 7.0 (95% CI: 2.2-11.8) months vs. 2.3 (95% CI: 1.2-3.4) months, respectively (P=0.001); and mPFS in patients without or with chest wall radiotherapy was 6.4 (95% CI: 1.6-19.5) months vs. 3.0 (95% CI: 1.3-4.6) months, respectively (P=0.041). In the multivariate analysis, HR+ status was the only independent predictive factor for favorable PFS (P=0.014)., Conclusions: Apatinib was highly effective for BC patients with CWM, especially when combined with endocrine therapy. PFS improved significantly in patients with HR+ status who did not receive chest wall radiotherapy. However, adverse events were serious and should be carefully monitored from the beginning of apatinib treatment., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (Copyright ©2021Chinese Journal of Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare the efficacy of platinum- and non-platinum-based regimens as first-line treatment for advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and analyze the relationship between their efficacy and BRCA gene status., Methods: Retrospectively analyze clinical data of 220 patients diagnosed pathologically with advanced TNBC and treated at the Department of Breast Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital from 2013 to 2018 and evaluate the efficacy of chemotherapy. A total of 114 patients had BRCA1 / 2 gene tested by next generation sequencing (NGS) using peripheral blood, and we analyzed the correlation between their efficacy and BRCA1 / 2 gene status., Results: Non-platinum-based chemotherapy (NPCT) was administered to 129 and platinum-based chemotherapy (PBCT) to 91 study patients. The clinical benefit rate (CBR) and median progression-free survival (PFS) were not statistically different between NPCT and PBCT groups. The median overall survival (OS) was 30.0 and 22.5 months for PBCT and NPCT group, respectively [P=0.090, hazard ratios (HR)=0.703]. BRCA status was assessed in 114 patients, 14 of whom had deleterious germline BRCA1 / 2 ( gBRCA ) mutations (seven in each group). In PBCT group, the CBR was 85.7% and 35.1% for patients with and without deleterious gBRCA mutations, respectively (P=0.039). The median PFS were 14.9 and 5.3 months and median OS were 26.5 and 15.5 months for patients with and without deleterious gBRCA mutations, respectively (P=0.001, P=0.161, respectively). Patients in PBCT group had significantly greater rates of grade 3-4 anemia (5.5% vs . 0%) and thrombocytopenia (8.8% vs . 0%), whereas palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia (12.4% vs . 0%) and peripheral neuropathy (8.6% vs . 1.1%) occurred more frequently in NPCT group., Conclusions: Platinum-based regimens are more effective in patients with deleterious gBRCA mutations, but no difference in patients without BRCA gene mutations, so non-platinum is an option in patients without BRCA gene mutations considering the toxicity and side effect. And we recommend that patients with advanced TNBC should have BRCA gene test., (Copyright © 2020 Chinese Journal of Cancer Research. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Paclitaxel (T) plus gemcitabine (G) is an active concomitant combination for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, the efficacy of sequential administration of these two drugs is unclear. This randomized phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of T and G administered either as a concomitant or as a sequential regimen in patients with MBC., Methods: Patients with MBC (n=66) were randomized to either receive 6 cycles of concomitant T and G or 4 cycles of T followed by 4 cycles of G, as first line chemotherapy. With no progression, the arms would switch to maintenance with paclitaxel. Progression free survival (PFS) was defined as the primary endpoint; secondary endpoints were the overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and toxicity. In total, 33 patients were randomized to the concomitant or sequential arms. Patient characteristics were well balanced. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 6 for the concomitant arm and 8 for the sequential arm., Results: No significant difference was observed in terms of PFS, ORR, and OS. Only 13 (39.4%) patients progressed in the sequential arm. Although there was no significant difference between the two arms (p=0.056),the sequential arm had a remarkable trend of longer PFS than the concomitant arm. Toxicities were manageable and similar in both arms.The incidence of neutropenia was significantly higher in the concomitant arm (90.9%) than in the sequential arm (60.6%). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was not significantly different between the two arms., Conclusions: Concomitant and sequential treatment with paclitaxel and gemcitabine had no significant difference in terms of PFS.