Search

It has proven difficult to establish robust evidence for significant clinical benefits of medical treatment in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). For ursodeoxycholic acid, clinical practice guidelines only offer vague recommendations, leading to a situation of variable prescription rates depending on local reimbursement policies and physician preference. The difficulty in drug development in PSC is partly related to a poor understanding of critical disease processes with failure to identify relevant mechanisms of action of putative drugs. The variable disease course, both intra-individually and between individuals, and the lack of robust definitions of what success looks like for clinical trials in PSC have also contributed to the negative outcomes of trials performed. In this review article, we will discuss these uncertainties and challenges, building on key previous and ongoing clinical trials. Despite the lack of consensus for ideal phase II and phase III study designs, several trials for diverse compounds are currently ongoing, indicating a shift from therapeutic nihilism toward hope for people with PSC. While waiting for robust efficacy data for drugs currently being tested, the current lack of effective interventions should not motivate the prescription of compounds to people with PSC based on low-quality evidence., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: The first monoclonal antibody biosimilar to be used in clinical practice is the tumour necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor Remsima® (CT-P13). The drug is approved for all indications as the originator infliximab (Remicade®) although clinical efficacy has been demonstrated only in rheumatic diseases. Since the fall of 2013, Remsima® has been available in Norway and from January 2014, it has been the drug of choice when initiating biological treatment in biologics naïve patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, many gastroenterologists have been greatly concerned about the extrapolation of indication. Switching between Remsima® and the innovator product is another issue that has been discussed. Key Messages: Good efficacy, tolerability and safety were demonstrated in a prospective observational study of IBD patients with moderate to severe disease activity. After 14 weeks of treatment there was a significant reduction in the Harvey Bradshaw index in patients with Crohns disease (CD) and reduction in the partial Mayo score and simple clinical colitis activity index in patients with ulcerative colitis. In both patient groups, there was also a significant reduction in fecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein (CRP). In another observational study, IBD patients on maintenance treatment with Remicade® were switched to Remsima®. By comparing values before and after switch, no changes in activity indices, CRP or calprotectin were observed. However, a significant increase in infliximab trough levels was shown in the CD group. No unexpected adverse events occurred after switching., Conclusions: Based on our experience in Norway, Remsima® seems to be efficacious and well tolerated in IBD. The increasing use of Remsima® in clinical practice has also contributed to significant cost savings on the health budget. Results from the NOR-SWITCH study will be available during 2016 and will hopefully contribute to answer some of the important questions that have been raised following the introduction of biosimilars as a treatment option for IBD and other immune-mediated inflammatory diseases., (© 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel.)