Search

Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMT) are a widely expressed class of enzymes responsible for catalyzing arginine methylation on numerous protein substrates. Among them, type I PRMTs are responsible for generating asymmetric dimethylarginine. By controlling multiple basic cellular processes, such as DNA damage responses, transcriptional regulation, and mRNA splicing, type I PRMTs contribute to cancer initiation and progression. A type I PRMT inhibitor, GSK3368715, has been developed and has entered clinical trials for solid and hematologic malignancies. Although type I PRMTs have been reported to play roles in modulating immune cell function, the immunologic role of tumor-intrinsic pathways controlled by type I PRMTs remains uncharacterized. Here, our The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset analysis revealed that expression of type I PRMTs associated with poor clinical response and decreased immune infiltration in patients with melanoma. In cancer cell lines, inhibition of type I PRMTs induced an IFN gene signature, amplified responses to IFN and innate immune signaling, and decreased expression of the immunosuppressive cytokine VEGF. In immunocompetent mouse tumor models, including a model of T-cell exclusion that represents a common mechanism of anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) resistance in humans, type I PRMT inhibition increased T-cell infiltration, produced durable responses dependent on CD8+ T cells, and enhanced efficacy of anti–PD-1 therapy. These data indicate that type I PRMT inhibition exhibits immunomodulatory properties and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) to induce durable antitumor responses in a T cell–dependent manner, suggesting that type I PRMT inhibition can potentiate an antitumor immunity in refractory settings.

Supplementary Figure from Inhibiting Type I Arginine Methyltransferase Activity Promotes T Cell–Mediated Antitumor Immune Responses

Supplementary Table from Inhibiting Type I Arginine Methyltransferase Activity Promotes T Cell–Mediated Antitumor Immune Responses

Protein arginine methyltransferases (PRMT) are a widely expressed class of enzymes responsible for catalyzing arginine methylation on numerous protein substrates. Among them, type I PRMTs are responsible for generating asymmetric dimethylarginine. By controlling multiple basic cellular processes, such as DNA damage responses, transcriptional regulation, and mRNA splicing, type I PRMTs contribute to cancer initiation and progression. A type I PRMT inhibitor, GSK3368715, has been developed and has entered clinical trials for solid and hematologic malignancies. Although type I PRMTs have been reported to play roles in modulating immune cell function, the immunologic role of tumor-intrinsic pathways controlled by type I PRMTs remains uncharacterized. Here, our The Cancer Genome Atlas dataset analysis revealed that expression of type I PRMTs associated with poor clinical response and decreased immune infiltration in patients with melanoma. In cancer cell lines, inhibition of type I PRMTs induced an IFN gene signature, amplified responses to IFN and innate immune signaling, and decreased expression of the immunosuppressive cytokine VEGF. In immunocompetent mouse tumor models, including a model of T-cell exclusion that represents a common mechanism of anti–programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) resistance in humans, type I PRMT inhibition increased T-cell infiltration, produced durable responses dependent on CD8+ T cells, and enhanced efficacy of anti–PD-1 therapy. These data indicate that type I PRMT inhibition exhibits immunomodulatory properties and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) to induce durable antitumor responses in a T cell–dependent manner, suggesting that type I PRMT inhibition can potentiate an antitumor immunity in refractory settings.

Supplementary Figures S1-S6

PDF file - 276K

Frequency of recurrent mutations in the AML cohort

Recent results from clinical trials with the BRAF inhibitors GSK2118436 (dabrafenib) and PLX4032 (vemurafenib) have shown encouraging response rates; however, the duration of response has been limited. To identify determinants of acquired resistance to GSK2118436 and strategies to overcome the resistance, we isolated GSK2118436 drug-resistant clones from the A375 BRAFV600E and the YUSIT1 BRAFV600K melanoma cell lines. These clones also showed reduced sensitivity to the allosteric mitogen-activated protein/extracellular signal–regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitor GSK1120212 (trametinib). Genetic characterization of these clones identified an in-frame deletion in MEK1 (MEK1K59del) or NRAS mutation (NRASQ61K and/or NRASA146T) with and without MEK1P387S in the BRAFV600E background and NRASQ61K in the BRAFV600K background. Stable knockdown of NRAS with short hairpin RNA partially restored GSK2118436 sensitivity in mutant NRAS clones, whereas expression of NRASQ61K or NRASA146T in the A375 parental cells decreased sensitivity to GSK2118436. Similarly, expression of MEK1K59del, but not MEK1P387S, decreased sensitivity of A375 cells to GSK2118436. The combination of GSK2118436 and GSK1120212 effectively inhibited cell growth, decreased ERK phosphorylation, decreased cyclin D1 protein, and increased p27kip1 protein in the resistant clones. Moreover, the combination of GSK2118436 or GSK1120212 with the phosphoinositide 3-kinase/mTOR inhibitor GSK2126458 enhanced cell growth inhibition and decreased S6 ribosomal protein phosphorylation in these clones. Our results show that NRAS and/or MEK mutations contribute to BRAF inhibitor resistance in vitro, and the combination of GSK2118436 and GSK1120212 overcomes this resistance. In addition, these resistant clones respond to the combination of GSK2126458 with GSK2118436 or GSK1120212. Clinical trials are ongoing or planned to test these combinations. Mol Cancer Ther; 11(4); 909–20. ©2012 AACR.

Disruption of epigenetic regulation is a hallmark of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but epigenetic therapy is complicated by the complexity of the epigenome. Herein, we developed a long-term primary AML ex vivo platform to determine whether targeting different epigenetic layers with 5-azacytidine and LSD1 inhibitors would yield improved efficacy. This combination was most effective in TET2mut AML, where it extinguished leukemia stem cells and particularly induced genes with both LSD1-bound enhancers and cytosine-methylated promoters. Functional studies indicated that derepression of genes such as GATA2 contributes to drug efficacy. Mechanistically, combination therapy increased enhancer–promoter looping and chromatin-activating marks at the GATA2 locus. CRISPRi of the LSD1-bound enhancer in patient-derived TET2mut AML was associated with dampening of therapeutic GATA2 induction. TET2 knockdown in human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells induced loss of enhancer 5-hydroxymethylation and facilitated LSD1-mediated enhancer inactivation. Our data provide a basis for rational targeting of cooperating aberrant promoter and enhancer epigenetic marks driven by mutant epigenetic modifiers.Significance:Somatic mutations of genes encoding epigenetic modifiers are a hallmark of AML and potentially disrupt many components of the epigenome. Our study targets two different epigenetic layers at promoters and enhancers that cooperate to aberrant gene silencing, downstream of the actions of a mutant epigenetic regulator.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 813

BackgroundAlthough immunotherapy produced dramatic clinical responses in a certain population of cancer patients, tumor cells can employ a variety of immunosuppressive measures to limit the immunotherapeutic efficacy. This highlights a great need to develop novel strategies to expand the clinical benefits of immunotherapy to a broader population of cancer patients. PRMTs have been described as vital regulators of immune responsive pathways in several cell types, but the immunoregulatory role of Type I PRMTs in the tumor microenvironment remains poorly understood.MethodsIn this study, we analyzed the correlation between Type I PRMT expression levels with the clinical outcome or immune signature. Gene expression changes were evaluated in a panel of immunogenic and non-immunogenic cancer cell lines with Type I PRMT inhibitor treatment. The antitumor and immunological effects of Type I PRMT inhibitor were evaluated in combination with checkpoint blockade in a panel of syngeneic tumor models.ResultsUsing TCGA dataset analysis, increased mRNA expression levels of several Type I PRMTs were associated with poor clinical response and decreased immune infiltration in melanoma patients. Particularly, tumors with high expression of PRMT1, the major Type I PRMTs, displayed significantly reduced relapse-free survival (HR=1.891, p=0.038), and were associated with lower cytolytic score (logFC=-0.875, p=1.49e-08) and lower lymphocyte infiltration score (logFC=-0.783, p=0.00077). RNA-seq results showed that interferon signaling was significantly altered after Type I PRMT inhibitor treatment in 10 of 15 cell lines analyzed, with most related genes showing increased expression. In addition, VEGFA was downregulated by 25% or more in 7/8 human and 3/5 mouse cancer cell lines, and a moderate decrease in chromatin accessibility at the Vegfa promoter was observed in ATAC-seq data. Furthermore, Type I PRMT inhibitor combined with anti-PD1 treatment significantly extended the survival of tumor-bearing mice and delayed tumor growth in a panel of immunocompetent mouse models. Mechanistically, Type I PRMT inhibitor significantly increased the apoptotic sensitivity of tumor cells to autologous tumor-reactive T cells in vitro and the infiltration of total T cells (CD3+) in 3 of 4 tested tumor models and cytotoxic T cells (CD8+) in two tested tumor models in vivo.ConclusionsTaken together, these data indicated that Type I PRMT inhibition exhibits immunomodulatory properties and synergizes with immune checkpoint blockade to induce durable antitumor responses in a T cell dependent manner. This study provides a rationale to combine Type I PRMT inhibitor with immune checkpoint blockade to maximize clinical benefits in cancer patients.AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank past and present members of the MDACC TIL lab for tumor/TIL processing and banking.

Disruption of epigenetic regulation is a hallmark of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but epigenetic therapy is complicated by the complexity of the epigenome. Herein, we developed a long-term primary AML ex vivo platform to determine whether targeting different epigenetic layers with 5-azacytidine and LSD1 inhibitors would yield improved efficacy. This combination was most effective in TET2mut AML, where it extinguished leukemia stem cells and particularly induced genes with both LSD1-bound enhancers and cytosine-methylated promoters. Functional studies indicated that derepression of genes such as GATA2 contributes to drug efficacy. Mechanistically, combination therapy increased enhancer–promoter looping and chromatin-activating marks at the GATA2 locus. CRISPRi of the LSD1-bound enhancer in patient-derived TET2mut AML was associated with dampening of therapeutic GATA2 induction. TET2 knockdown in human hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells induced loss of enhancer 5-hydroxymethylation and facilitated LSD1-mediated enhancer inactivation. Our data provide a basis for rational targeting of cooperating aberrant promoter and enhancer epigenetic marks driven by mutant epigenetic modifiers. Significance: Somatic mutations of genes encoding epigenetic modifiers are a hallmark of AML and potentially disrupt many components of the epigenome. Our study targets two different epigenetic layers at promoters and enhancers that cooperate to aberrant gene silencing, downstream of the actions of a mutant epigenetic regulator. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 813

Lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is a histone modifying enzyme that suppresses gene expression through demethylation of lysine 4 on histone H3. The anti-tumor activity of GSK2879552 and GSK-LSD1, potent, selective irreversible inactivators of LSD1, has previously been described. Inhibition of LSD1 results in a cytostatic growth inhibitory effect in a range of acute myeloid leukemia cell lines. To enhance the therapeutic potential of LSD1 inhibition in this disease setting, a combination of LSD1 inhibition and all-trans retinoic acid was explored. All-trans retinoic acid is currently approved for use in acute promyelocytic leukemia in which it promotes differentiation of abnormal blast cells into normal white blood cells. Combined treatment with all-trans retinoic acid and GSK2879552 results in synergistic effects on cell proliferation, markers of differentiation, and, most importantly, cytotoxicity. Ultimately the combination potential for LSD1 inhibition and ATRA will require validation in acute myeloid leukemia patients, and clinical studies to assess this are currently underway.

Epigenetic regulators are recurrently mutated and aberrantly expressed in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Targeted therapies designed to inhibit these chromatin-modifying enzymes, such as the histone demethylase lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) and the histone methyltransferase DOT1L, have been developed as novel treatment modalities for these often refractory diseases. A common feature of many of these targeted agents is their ability to induce myeloid differentiation, suggesting that multiple paths toward a myeloid gene expression program can be engaged to relieve the differentiation blockade that is uniformly seen in AML. We performed a comparative assessment of chromatin dynamics during the treatment of mixed lineage leukemia (MLL)-AF9-driven murine leukemias and MLL-rearranged patient-derived xenografts using 2 distinct but effective differentiation-inducing targeted epigenetic therapies, the LSD1 inhibitor GSK-LSD1 and the DOT1L inhibitor EPZ4777. Intriguingly, GSK-LSD1 treatment caused global gains in chromatin accessibility, whereas treatment with EPZ4777 caused global losses in accessibility. We captured PU.1 and C/EBPα motif signatures at LSD1 inhibitor-induced dynamic sites and chromatin immunoprecipitation coupled with high-throughput sequencing revealed co-occupancy of these myeloid transcription factors at these sites. Functionally, we confirmed that diminished expression of PU.1 or genetic deletion of C/EBPα in MLL-AF9 cells generates resistance of these leukemias to LSD1 inhibition. These findings reveal that pharmacologic inhibition of LSD1 represents a unique path to overcome the differentiation block in AML for therapeutic benefit.

SummaryEpigenetic dysregulation has emerged as an important mechanism in cancer. Alterations in epigenetic machinery have become a major focus for targeted therapies. The current report describes the discovery and biological activity of a cyclopropylamine containing inhibitor of Lysine Demethylase 1 (LSD1), GSK2879552. This small molecule is a potent, selective, orally bioavailable, mechanism-based irreversible inactivator of LSD1. A proliferation screen of cell lines representing a number of tumor types indicated that small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) is sensitive to LSD1 inhibition. The subset of SCLC lines and primary samples that undergo growth inhibition in response to GSK2879552 exhibit DNA hypomethylation of a signature set of probes, suggesting this may be used as a predictive biomarker of activity.

Epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressor genes, mediated by aberrant DNA hypermethylation and repressive histone modifications, is a hallmark of acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Novel epigenetic therapies are emerging, but single-agent approaches targeting only one category of epigenetic marks have limited therapeutic activity. We show that combinatorial treatment strategy targeting epigenetic modifications of both promoter and enhancer elements can improve therapeutic intervention. As current cell lines do not accurately represent the heterogeneous nature of AML, we established an ex vivo culturing system enabling us to propagate primary AML specimens long enough to test epigenetic therapeutics (48 specimens expanded 4-6 weeks; 6 specimens expanded >12 months; 39 specimen fail to expand). We tested 52 expandable primary AMLs with a combination therapy utilizing the DNA demethylating agent 5-Azacytidine (5-Aza) and a novel small molecule inhibitor against LSD1, a histone demethylase that removes enhancer-associated marks (mono-/di-methylated histone H3 lysine 4; H3K4me1/2). In order to avoid DNA damage-induced cytotoxicity, we applied a non-DNA damaging dose of 5-Aza (≤ 200 nM). 5-Aza treatment had modest inhibition of cell growth for the majority of cases, but did not appreciably alter cell viability. Treatment with the LSD1 inhibitor (LSD1i) substantially impaired cell growth and survival of ~80% (p To gain insight into mechanism, we performed a genome-wide integrative analysis of the DNA methylome (Enhanced Reduced Representation Bisulfite Sequencing), LSD1 occupancy sites (ChIP-sequencing) and gene expression profiling (RNA-sequencing) in a TET2mut patient-derived AML sample. Single-agent LSD1i treatment led to induction of genes associated with myeloid differentiation. Even though 5-Aza induced substantial hypomethylation, there was only a minor effect on gene expression. However, combination therapy did induce greater de-repression of genes, in particular those where 5-Aza induced hypomethylation at promoters and at LSD1-occupied enhancers. Combination treatment especially potentiated induction of differentiation genes, suggesting potential anti-leukemia stem cell effects. Accordingly, combination therapy resulted in impaired colony formation potential (p=0.007). Moreover, limiting dilution analysis in NSG mice demonstrated significant impairment of leukemia-initiating cells (p=0.0025) after 5-Aza+LSD1i combination therapy when compared to either drug alone. To determine what genes mediate the effect of combination therapy, we studied genes preferentially induced by 5-Aza+LSD1i. GATA2, a transcription factor involved in hematopoietic differentiation, was more potently induced by combination therapy in primary AML samples vs. either drug alone. We found LSD1 occupied at the GATA2 distal hematopoietic enhancer and verified by using quantitative ChIP analysis that inhibition of LSD1 induced an increase of H3K4me2 and H3K27ac, a mark that reflects enhancer activation. Overexpression of GATA2 using viral transduction in two patient-derived AML cases caused partial differentiation and attenuated leukemia growth. These results indicated that cellular responses to combination therapy are in part mediated by induction of GATA2. In summary, our results provide a novel link for therapeutic approaches targeting redundant epigenetic silencing of tumor suppressors via cooperative enhancer and enhancer-promoter activation. Disclosures Duy: GlaxoSmithKline: Research Funding. Mohammad:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Smitheman:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Guzman:Cellectis: Research Funding. Kruger:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Creasy:GlaxoSmithKline: Employment. Levine:Novartis: Consultancy; Qiagen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Melnick:Janssen: Research Funding.

Lysine specific demethylase 1 (LSD1) is a histone H3K4me1/2 demethylase found in various transcriptional co-repressor complexes. LSD1 mediated H3K4 demethylation can result in a repressive chromatin environment that silences gene expression and has been shown to play a role in hematopoietic differentiation. LSD1 is also overexpressed in multiple tumor types. These studies implicate LSD1 as a key regulator of the epigenome that modulates gene expression through post-translational modification of histones and its presence in transcriptional complexes. The current study describes the anti-tumor effects of a novel, irreversible, GSK LSD1 inhibitor (GSK2879552) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). GSK2879552 is a potent, selective, mechanism-based inhibitor of LSD1. Screening of over 150 cancer cell lines revealed that AML and SCLC cells have a unique requirement for LSD1. While GSK2879552 treatment did not affect the global levels of H3K4me1 or H3K4me2, local changes in these histone marks were observed near transcriptional start sites of genes whose expression increased with LSD1 inhibition. Treatment of AML cell lines with GSK2879552 increased cell surface expression of CD11b and CD86, markers associated with a differentiated immunophenotype. Six days of GSK2879552 treatment resulted in potent anti-proliferative growth effects in 19 of 25 AML cell lines representing a range of AML subtypes. Treating for longer time periods revealed sensitivity in all AML cell lines. AML blast colony forming ability was also inhibited in 4 of 5 bone marrow samples derived from primary AML patient samples. The effects of LSD1 inhibition were further characterized in vivo using a mouse model of AML induced by transduction of mouse hematopoietic progenitor cells with a retrovirus encoding MLL-AF9 and GFP. Primary AML cells were transplanted into a cohort of secondary recipient mice and were treated upon engraftment. After 17 days of treatment, control mice had 80% GFP+ cells in the bone marrow whereas treated mice had only 2.8% GFP positive cells (p Growth inhibition was also observed in a subset of SCLC cell lines. GSK2879552 treatment of mice engrafted with SCLC lines resulted in greater than 80% tumor growth inhibition. Studies using patient derived primary SCLC showed similar efficacy demonstrating the growth inhibition of SCLC with an LSD1 inhibitor extended beyond cell lines. Together, these data demonstrate that pharmacological inhibition of LSD1 may provide a promising treatment for AML and SCLC. A Phase I clinical trial using GSK2879552 was initiated in March, 2014. All studies were conducted in accordance with the GSK Policy on the Care, Welfare and Treatment of Laboratory Animals and were reviewed by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee either at GSK or by the ethical review process at the institution where the work was performed. Citation Format: Kimberly Smitheman, Monica Cusan, Yan Liu, Michael Butticello, Melissa Pappalardi, James Foley, Kelly Federowicz, Glenn Van Aller, Jiri Kasparec, Xinrong Tian, Dominic Suarez, Jess Schneck, Jeff Carson, Patrick McDevitt, Thau Ho, Charles McHugh, William Miller, Scott Armstrong, Christine Hann, Neil Johnson, Ryan G. Kruger, Helai P. Mohammad, Shekhar Kamat. Inhibition of LSD1 for the treatment of cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 3513. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-3513