Search

Pancreatic adenosquamous carcinoma (PASC) is a rare variant of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The usual treatment for metastatic or recurrent PASC is systemic chemotherapy in accordance with the PDAC treatment strategy. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy, especially the benefit of recent combination therapies, in patients with metastatic or recurrent PASC.We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of 116 patients with metastatic or recurrent PASC treated with first-line chemotherapy between April 2001 and December 2017 at 24 Japanese institutions.Combination chemotherapies included gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GnP, n = 28), fluorouracil/leucovorin + irinotecan + oxaliplatin (FFX, n = 10), gemcitabine + S-1 (GS, n = 10), and others (n = 9). Monotherapies included gemcitabine (n = 51) and S-1 (n = 8). The median overall survival (OS) was 6.5, 7.3, and 4.3 months for the whole cohort, the combination therapy group, and the monotherapy group, respectively. Multivariate analysis indicated that combination therapy showed a better trend in OS than monotherapy (hazard ratio = 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.38-1.20). GnP or FFX were selected in 58.7% of patients after FFX was approved in Japan, and revealed a median OS, median progression-free survival, and objective response rate of 7.3 months, 2.8 months, and 26.9% in GnP and 7.2 months, 2.3 months, and 20.0% in FFX respectively.This study suggests that combination therapy may be more effective than monotherapy. GnP and FFX showed similar and clinically meaningful efficacy for patients with metastatic or recurrent PASC.

Purposes The spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has affected socioeconomic and healthcare systems in many countries. Accordingly, many individuals may have canceled their annual health-check programs, including esophagogastroduodenoscopy, which would have resulted in lower numbers of newly diagnosed patients with gastric cancer in comparison to other times. Methods Questionnaires were distributed to 62 hospitals every week from May 2020 to August 2020 (total 744) through mailing lists of the Stomach Cancer Study Group of the Japan Clinical Oncology Group. The number of patients with gastric cancer and hospital systems during the COVID-19 pandemic were surveyed. Results In total, 74% (551 out of 744) of the questionnaires were answered and analyzed. In early May, approximately 50% of hospitals had to restrict surgical slots due to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, they gradually loosened the restrictions thereafter. The number of gastrectomies was

Background Undifferentiated carcinoma (UC) of the pancreas has been considered a highly aggressive malignancy. However, only a few studies have systematically described the clinical course of UC patients. The aim of this study was to clarify the prognosis and construct a prognostic model for patients with unresectable UC. Methods This study was conducted at 17 institutions in Japan, and a total of 55 patients were analyzed. Results The median overall survival (OS) of patients with unresectable UC was 3.95 months. In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards (CPH) model, age ≥65 years, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥2, and C-reactive protein (CRP) >10 mg/L were independent prognostic factors for OS (age ≥65 years: hazard ratio [HR], 2.732; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.353–5.515; ECOG PS ≥ 2: HR, 7.866; 95% CI, 1.981–31.241; CRP >10 mg/L: HR, 1.956; 95% CI, 1.013–3.775). Based on the β coefficients from the CPH model, the prognostic scores were defined as follows: age ≥65 years (3 points), ECOG PS ≥ 2 (6 points), and CRP >10 ml/L (2 points). The final prognostic model was the sum of the points. The derived prognostic model stratified patients into high-risk (score ≥4) and low-risk (score 0–3) groups, with significant differences in OS (1.45 vs. 8.19 months, respectively; p Conclusions The prognostic model stratified patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. These findings suggest that this model can serve as a tool for patient information and decision-making with regard to the therapeutic strategy for UC.

Background White globe appearance (WGA) is a small white lesion with a globular shape identified during magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging. However, the association between WGA and synchronous multiple gastric cancer (SMGC) remains unclear. Methods Consecutive patients who underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric cancer (GC) between July 2013 and April 2015 at our institution were eligible for this study. We excluded patients with a history of gastric tumor or gastrectomy. Patients who had more than 2 GCs in their postoperative pathological evaluation were classified as SMGC-positive, and patients who had at least 1 WGA-positive GC were classified as WGA-positive patients. The primary outcome was a comparison of the prevalence of WGA in patients classified as SMGC-positive and SMGC-negative. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the following variables: WGA, age, sex, atrophy, and Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) status. Results There were 26 and 181 patients classified as SMGC-positive and SMGC-negative, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that WGA-positive classification (50% vs. 23%, P=0.008) and male sex (88% vs. 66%, P=0.02) were significant factors associated with SMGC classification, while age ≥65 years (81% vs. 81%, P>0.99), severe atrophy (46% vs. 46%, P>0.99), and H. pylori positivity (69% vs. 65%, P=0.8) were not. In the multivariate analysis, only WGA-positive classification (odds ratio 2.78, 95% confidence interval 1.16-6.67; P=0.02) was a significant independent risk factor for SMGC. Conclusions Our exploratory study showed the possibility of WGA as a predictive factor for SMGC. In cases of WGA-positive gastric cancer, careful examination might be needed to diagnose SMGC.

S-1 plus docetaxel is the standard postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for patients with stage III gastric cancer in Japan, which has increased the use of docetaxel. One of the most common adverse events of docetaxel, which is widely used to treat several malignancies, is fluid retention. Conversely, the most worrisome cause of ascites in patients who receive adjuvant chemotherapy is recurrence. Sometimes, the differential diagnosis of ascites is difficult if ascitic cytology is negative. In this study, we presented the case of a patient with massive ascites that appeared during adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus docetaxel.

Lenvatinib is a standard molecular targeted agent for the first-line treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. Here, we report a case of colitis induced by Lenvatinib treatment in a patient with hepatocellular carcinoma. A 78-year-old man previously treated with Lenvatinib for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma was admitted to our hospital complaining of right lateral abdominal pain without diarrhea. Our endoscopic findings showed multiple ulcers and erosions on his ascending colon, and he was diagnosed with colitis induced by Lenvatinib treatment. After the discontinuation of Lenvatinib, his colitis improved, and he resumed Lenvatinib at a lower dose. Colitis is a rare adverse event of Lenvatinib, and this is the first detailed report of colitis induced by Lenvatinib with endoscopic findings.

Background Our phase II trial (FABRIC study) failed to verify the efficacy of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) with a familial or personal history of pancreatic, breast, ovarian or prostate cancer, which suggested that a family and personal history may be insufficient to determine response to platinum-based chemotherapy. Methods This ancillary analysis aimed to investigate the prevalence of germline variants of homologous recombination repair (HRR)-related genes and clarify the association of germline variants with the efficacy of GEMOX and patient outcome in PDAC patients. Of 45 patients enrolled in FABRIC study, 27 patients were registered in this ancillary analysis. Results Of the identified variants in HRR-related genes, one variant was considered pathogenic and eight variants in six patients (22%) were variants of unknown significance (VUS). Objective response to GEMOX was achieved by 43% of the seven patients and tended to be higher than that of patients without such variants (25%). Pathogenic/VUS variant in HRR-related genes was an independent favorable factor for progression-free survival (hazard ratio, 0.322; P = 0.047) and overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.195; P = 0.023) in multivariable analysis. Conclusions The prevalence of germline variants in PDAC patients was very low even among patients with a familial/personal history of pancreatic, breast, ovarian or prostate cancer. Patients with one or more germline variants in HRR-related genes classified as pathogenic or VUS may have the potential to obtain better response to GEMOX and have better outcomes.

Background Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GnP) has been a standard treatment for unresectable pancreatic cancer (uPC); however, the current treatment status and usefulness in older adults with uPC remain unclear. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the patient background and compare the efficacy and safety of GnP versus other treatments in older adults with uPC. Patients and Methods In this prospective observational study, we enrolled 233 eligible patients aged ≥76 years with pathologically proven, clinically uPC, and no history of chemotherapy from 55 Japanese centers during September 2018-September 2019. The main endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Geriatric assessments were performed upon registration and after 3 months. To adjust for confounders, we conducted propensity score-matched analyses. Results GnP, gemcitabine alone (Gem), best supportive care, and other therapies were administered to 116, 72, 16, and 29 patients, respectively. In the propensity score-matched analysis, 42 patients each were selected from the GnP and Gem groups. The median OS was longer in the GnP group than in the Gem group (12.2 vs. 9.4 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.37-1.13). The median PFS was significantly longer in the GnP group than in the Gem group (9.2 vs. 3.7 months; HR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.23-0.64). The incidence of severe adverse events was higher with GnP than with Gem; however, the difference was not significant. Conclusion GnP is more efficacious than Gem in patients aged ≥76 years with uPC despite demonstrating a higher incidence of severe adverse events.

172 Background: Anti-EGFR antibody is recommended as one of the standard treatments in patients with RAS wild-type advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Few reports have evaluated low-frequency subclones of alterations in EGFR signaling pathway genes in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) during anti-EGFR treatment in prospective cohort of advanced CRC patients. Methods: Key inclusion criteria of this study was as follows: 20 years old and over, performance status 0 to 2, metastatic or recurrent CRC (adenocarcinoma), RAS wild-type CRC diagnosed by PCR-rSSO using tumor tissue, no prior use of anti-EGFR antibody. Plasma samples were prospectively collected at pre-treatment, at 4, 10 weeks, every 10 weeks thereafter, and at the end of the anti-EGFR treatment. With QX200 Droplet Digital PCR platform, we analyzed hotspot mutations of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA and copy number (CN) variant of HER2 and MET using plasma samples of pre- and post-treatment as well as during treatment (limited to patients with any gene alterations at pre- and post-treatment). Results: Total 50 patients were registered in this study, but 3 patients were excluded because inclusion criteria were not met. Finally, 47 patients were included in full analysis set. In 15 patients (31.9%), genetic alterations including KRAS (G12G13: 10.1%, A59Q61: 2.2%), NRAS (G12G13: 2.2%, Q61: 2.1%), BRAF (V600: 6.4%) , PIK3CA (E545: 4.3%, H1047: 4.3%) , and HER2 (amplification: 6.5%) were detected in pre-treatment samples. Analysis of pre-treatment samples showed that response rates of patients with any gene alterations (N = 13) and that without any gene alterations (N = 29) were 30.8% and 58.6%, respectively (p = 0.095). When the cut-off of variant allele frequency (VAF) was set as 0.5% in patients with any gene mutations, the response rates for cases with VAF ≥0.5% (N = 6) and those with VAF < 0.5% (N = 7) were 0% and 57.1%, respectively (p = 0.049). Among 41 patients with detectable target lesions by CT scan, there was significant difference in percentage of best tumor shrinkage between patients with gene alterations and those without gene alterations (32.1% vs 10.5%, p = 0.037), when cut-off VAF of any gene mutations was set as 0.5% and cut-off CN of HER2 or MET was set as 4 at pre-treatment. Due to dynamics of each gene alteration in cfDNA during treatment, mutations of KRAS A59Q61, NRAS Q61, and MET amplification were characterized as acquired alterations which were newly detected after the administration of anti-EGFR antibodies. Conclusions: Our study demonstrated the clinical relevance of minor mutant subclones in EGFR signaling pathway genes in plasma for predicting response to anti-EGFR treatment. Although sample size of this study was small, preferable threshold for distinguishing responders from non-responders may be 0.5% as VAF of these gene mutations. Clinical trial information: 000034923 .

533 Background: Patients with advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) have a poor prognosis, and high unmet medical needs still exist for the treatment of this disease. Nivolumab has shown its effectiveness against multiple cancer types, especially those with PD-L1 expression. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in BTC patients with a combined positive score (CPS) ≥ 1 who were refractory or intolerant to the standard of care (SOC): gemcitabine, cisplatin and tegafur/gimeracil/oteracil (S-1). Methods: This was a single-arm, multicenter, open-label, prospective phase II study. Key eligibility criteria were as follows: having unresectable or recurrent BTC (intrahepatic bile duct cancer, extrahepatic bile duct cancer, gallbladder cancer, or ampullary cancer); being refractory or intolerant to SOC; having adequate hepatic, renal and hematological function; and having a CPS ≥ 1 in central assessment. Patients received nivolumab (480 mg, every 4 weeks) until disease progression, clinical deterioration, or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by the central review according to RECIST 1.1. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: A total of 84 patients were enrolled between Mar 11, 2020 and Mar 15, 2021, of them 12 received one regimen and 72 received two or more regimens. The median follow-up period was 6.90 months. ORR per central assessment was 10.7% (CR: 3.6%, PR: 7.1%), and ORR per investigator assessment was 15.5% (CR: 2.4%, PR: 13.1%). The median PFS per central and investigator assessment was 1.02 (95% CI 0.95–1.77) months and 2.48 (95% CI 1.87–2.83) months, respectively. The median OS was 6.90 (95% CI 5.26–9.20) months. The median duration of response per central and investigator assessment was not reached (range 2.8–13.0+) and 10.15 (range 2.0–12.8+) months, respectively. The 1-year survival rate was 25.3% (95% CI 15.4–36.4). The most frequent treatment-related adverse events were pyrexia (19.0%), pruritus (16.7%), and decreased appetite (13.1%). Conclusions: Nivolumab may have some activity with a durable response and a manageable safety profile in heavily treated BTC patients with CPS ≥ 1. Clinical trial information: JapicCTI-205097 .

Background and study aims Curability of colorectal tumors is associated with resection depth and layer in endoscopic resection. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) has not undergone sufficient histopathological evaluation. We conducted a pilot study to compare the effectiveness, including resection depth and layer, of UEMR and conventional endoscopic mucosal resection (CEMR). Patients and methods This study was a single-center, retrospective study. Patients with colorectal lesions were treated by UEMR or CEMR between January 2018 and March 2020. Eligible patients were selected from included patients in a 1:1 ratio using propensity score matching. We compared the resection depth and layer and treatment results between the UEMR and CEMR groups. Results We evaluated 55 patients undergoing UEMR and 291 patients undergoing CEMR. Using propensity score matching, we analyzed 54 lesions in each group. The proportion of specimens containing submucosal tissue was 100 % in both groups. The median thickness of the submucosal tissue was significantly greater in the CEMR group than in the UEMR group [1235 µm (95 % confidence interval [CI], 1020–1530 µm) vs. 950 µm (95 % CI, 830–1090 µm), respectively]. However, vertical margins were negative in all lesions in both groups. Conclusions Our findings suggest that the median thickness of submucosal tissue in the UEMR group was about 1,000 μm. Even though the resection depth achieved with UEMR was more superficial than that achieved with CEMR, UEMR may be a treatment option, especially for colorectal lesions ≤ 20 mm in diameter without suspicious findings of submucosal deeply invasive cancer.

The additive or synergistic sustained antitumour effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy has previously been reported. We investigated the efficacy of nivolumab plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy versus placebo plus oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as first-line therapy for patients with HER2-negative, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer.We did a randomised, multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2-3 trial (ATTRACTION-4) at 130 centres (hospitals, cancer centres, and medical centres) across Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan. We enrolled patients aged 20 years and older with previously untreated (except for neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy completed ≥180 days before recurrence), HER2-negative, unresectable, advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (regardless of PD-L1 expression), at least one measurable lesion per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours guidelines (version 1.1), and a baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to chemotherapy every 3 weeks (intravenous oxaliplatin 130 mg/mBetween March 23, 2017, and May 10, 2018, 724 patients were randomly assigned to treatment: 362 patients to the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 362 to the placebo plus chemotherapy group. At the time of data cutoff on Oct 31, 2018, with a median follow-up of 11·6 months (IQR 8·7-14·1), median progression-free survival at a prespecified interim analysis was 10·45 months (95% CI 8·44-14·75) in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 8·34 months (6·97-9·40) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·68; 98·51% CI 0·51-0·90; p=0·0007). At the time of data cutoff on Jan 31, 2020, with a median follow-up of 26·6 months (IQR 24·1-29·0), median overall survival at the final analysis was 17·45 months (95% CI 15·67-20·83) in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and 17·15 months (15·18-19·65) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (HR 0·90; 95% CI 0·75-1·08; p=0·26). The most common treatment-related grade 3-4 adverse events were neutrophil count decreased (71 [20%] of 359 patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group vs 57 [16%] of 358 patients in the placebo plus chemotherapy group) and platelet count decreased (34 [9%] vs 33 [9%]). Treatment-related serious adverse events of any grade were observed in 88 (25%) patients in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group and in 51 (14%) in the placebo plus chemotherapy group, of which the most common was decreased appetite (18 [5%] vs ten [3%]). Six treatment-related deaths occurred: three in the nivolumab plus chemotherapy group (one each of febrile neutropenia, hepatic failure, and sudden death) and three in the placebo plus chemotherapy group (one each of sepsis, haemolytic anaemia, and interstitial lung disease).Nivolumab combined with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival, but not overall survival, in Asian patients with untreated, HER2-negative, unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer, and could potentially be a new first-line treatment option for these patients.Ono Pharmaceutical and Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Colonic diverticular bleeding often recurs and requires hospital readmission. This study aimed to examine the relationship between the rate of readmission and the number of hospitalizations due to colonic diverticular bleeding. We retrospectively studied 98 patients first admitted between January 2008 and July 2017 for the treatment of colonic diverticular bleeding. We investigated the subsequent number of hospitalizations due to colonic diverticular bleeding and classified the patients into 3 groups:those admitted for the first time (first group), those admitted for the second time (second group), and those admitted for the third time or later (third group). Generally, the readmission rate increased as the number of hospitalizations increased (P0.01). The 1-year readmission rates were 11.6%, 23.2%, and 34.2% in the first, second, and third groups, respectively. The 2-year readmission rates were 15.1%, 50.1%, and 62.4% in the first, second, and third groups, respectively. The 3-year readmission rates were 21.7%, 50.1%, and 74.9% in the first, second, and third groups, respectively. Thus, the number of hospitalizations due to colonic diverticular bleeding could be a predictive factor for readmission. We also classified the patients into 2 additional groups:those who had been readmitted (readmission group) and those who had not (no readmission group). Furthermore, we examined background and therapeutic factors, and found hypovolemic shock on admission to be an independent risk factor (odds ratio 14.1). Preventive treatments for such high-risk patients should be considered.

Background Undifferentiated carcinoma (UC) of the pancreas is a rare subtype of pancreatic cancer. Although UC has been considered a highly aggressive malignancy, no clinical studies have addressed the efficacy of chemotherapy for unresectable UC. Therefore, we conducted multicenter retrospective study to investigate the efficacy of chemotherapy in patients with UC of the pancreas. Methods This multicenter retrospective cohort study was conducted at 17 institutions in Japan between January 2007 and December 2017. A total of 50 patients treated with chemotherapy were analyzed. Results The median overall survival (OS) in UC patients treated with chemotherapy was 4.08 months. The details of first-line chemotherapy were as follows: gemcitabine (n = 24), S-1 (n = 12), gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (n = 6), and other treatment (n = 8). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.61 months in the gemcitabine group, 2.96 months in the S-1 group, and 4.60 months in the gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel group. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel significantly improved PFS compared with gemcitabine (p = 0.014). The objective response rate (ORR) was 4.2% in the gemcitabine group, 0.0% in the S-1 group, and 33.3% in the gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel group. Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel also showed a significantly higher ORR compared with both gemcitabine and S-1 (gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel vs. gemcitabine: p = 0.033; gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel vs. S-1: p = 0.034). A paclitaxel-containing first-line regimen significantly improved OS compared with a non-paclitaxel-containing regimen (6.94 months vs. 3.75 months, respectively; p = 0.041). After adjustment, use of a paclitaxel-containing regimen in any line was still an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio for OS, 0.221; 95% confidence interval, 0.076–0.647; p = 0.006) in multiple imputation by chained equation. Conclusions The results of the present study indicate that a paclitaxel-containing regimen would offer relatively longer survival, and it is considered a reasonable option for treating patients with unresectable UC.

The patient, a man in his 80s, presented with diarrhea following one year of treatment for non-small cell lung cancer with Nivolumab. CT results showed discontinuous wall thickening of the large bowel and cholangitis. Blood and stool culture tests ruled out immune-related adverse events and identified Edwardsiella tarda;bacterial colitis was diagnosed in the patient. This case confirmed that basic examination should not be neglected, and culture tests should be performed.

A family/personal history of breast, ovarian, or pancreatic cancer is a useful predictive marker for response to platinum-based chemotherapy in treating patients with pancreatic cancer. These cancers, and prostate cancer, are known as BRCA-related malignancies. We evaluated the efficacy of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin (GEMOX) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer with a family/personal history of these cancers. Chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer with a family history of pancreatic/breast/ovarian/prostate cancer or a personal history of breast/ovarian/prostate cancer were included. Patients received fixed dose-rate gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) and oxaliplatin (100 mg/m2) every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was 1-year survival, and the threshold and expected values were set at 30 and 50%, respectively. The target sample size was determined to be 43, with a one-sided alpha value of 5% and power of 80%. A total of 45 patients were enrolled. Among the first 43 enrolled patients, the 1-year survival rate was 27.9% [90% confidence interval (CI) 17.0–41.3], which did not meet the primary endpoint. Median overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rates were 7.6 months (95% CI 6.0–10.7), 4.0 months (95% CI 2.0–4.6), and 26.7% (95% CI 14.6–41.9), respectively, in all registered patients. The GEMOX regimen was generally tolerated; the most common grade three or higher adverse events were hematological toxicities. GEMOX did not show the expected efficacy in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer with a family or personal history of pancreatic/breast/ovarian/prostate cancer. Selection of GEMOX based on family/personal history is not recommended. UMIN000017894.

Background and study aim The “resect and discard” strategy is a new paradigm for the management of small colorectal polyps that reduces the cost and effort related to pathological diagnosis after polypectomy. This retrospective study aimed to clarify the clinical outcome of the “resect and discard” strategy for small colorectal polyps. Patients and methods The clinical records were reviewed from 501 consecutive patients who underwent the “resect and discard” strategy for colorectal polyps smaller than 10 mm at our hospital between January 2008 and December 2010. All colorectal lesions were evaluated onsite under magnifying narrow-band imaging after careful conventional white-light imaging. In cases of low grade adenoma predicted with high confidence, colonoscopists selected the “resect and discard” option without formal histopathology. The mid-term outcomes were evaluated to validate the curability of the “resect and discard” strategy. Results The present study included 501 consecutive patients with 816 lesions. The mid-term outcomes were examined for 476 (95 %) patients who received follow-up for at least 1 year after undergoing the “resect and discard” strategy. The median observation period was 83 months (range 12 – 117 months). No patient died from colorectal cancer related to the procedure, resulting in a disease-specific survival rate of 100 %. There were no local and/or distant recurrences detected during follow-up. Conclusions The “resect and discard” strategy for small colorectal polyps under strict preoperative diagnosis achieves excellent mid-term outcome.

Although oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 every 3 weeks was approved for advanced gastric cancer in Japan, data regarding S-1 plus oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 (SOX130) are limited in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer. We investigated the feasibility and safety of SOX130 in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma, no previous chemotherapy, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0–1 were treated with SOX130. The primary endpoint was the 3-cycle completion rate, defined as the proportion of patients who completed the first three cycles with ≥ 80% relative dose intensity of oxaliplatin. Twenty-five patients were enrolled from April 2015 to 2016. The 3-cycle completion rate was 72.0% (90% confidence interval: 53.8–86.1), which was higher than the predetermined threshold rate of 50%. With the median number of cycles being 6 (range, 1–19+), grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 10 patients (40%). Major grade 3 adverse events were anorexia (24%), thrombocytopenia (16%), and neutropenia (12%). No febrile neutropenia or treatment-related deaths occurred. Among 12 patients with measurable lesions, the overall response rate was 58.3%. Median progression-free and overall survival were 5.7 months (95% confidence interval 2.9–8.5) and 13.1 months (95% confidence interval 7.4–19.0), respectively. Results indicated that SOX130 was feasible in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Background and study aims Combined use of thienopyridine derivatives and other antithrombotic agents is reported to be a risk factor for postoperative bleeding after gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, risk associated with a single thienopyridine derivative has not been evaluated. In this study, we aimed to evaluate bleeding risks of gastric ESD without discontinuation of a single thienopyridine derivative agent. Patients and methods This multicenter, prospective, observational cohort study included patients who had undergone implantation of a coronary artery stent and who were taking a combination of aspirin antiplatelet therapy and a thienopyridine derivative agent. Enrolled patients discontinued aspirin and underwent gastric ESD without the discontinuation of a single thienopyridine derivative agent. The primary endpoint was the major bleeding complication rate after gastric ESD. Results Eleven patients were enrolled in this study from April 2015 to November 2016 after written informed consent was obtained. Among them, 1 patient, who had undergone surgery for a primary cardiac tumor before ESD, was excluded from the study. Ten patients underwent gastric ESD for neoplasms. En-bloc resections were achieved in all cases without intraoperative bleeding complications. Two patients experienced postoperative bleeding although neither case required a blood transfusion (95 % CI 2.5 – 55.6 %). Conclusion En-bloc resections were possible although the postoperative bleeding rate tended to be higher in gastric ESD without discontinuation of a single thienopyridine derivative agent. Additional preventive measures are mandatory to carry out safe gastric ESD in such settings.

AIM To determine whether S-1 induces hepatic steatosis in patients being treated for pancreatic cancer. METHODS This retrospective study evaluated 22 patients who received oral S-1 as a first-line treatment for pancreatic cancer between January 2008 and July 2015 at the Ishikawa Prefectural Central Hospital. Patients underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) scans before chemotherapy and within 3 mo from the start of treatment. CT numbers of the liver and spleen were measured before and after S-1 administration. Steatosis was diagnosed when the ratio of the CT number of the liver to that of the spleen (liver/spleen ratio) was < 0.9. RESULTS Median patient age was 68 years (range, 48-85 years), and median body mass index was 21 kg/m2 (range, 18-27 kg/m2). Of the 22 patients, six (27%) regularly consumed alcohol, and five (23%) had liver metastases. The mean ratio of CT number of the liver to the spleen was significantly higher before administration of S-1 (1.27 vs 1.09, P = 0.012) compared with after. Of the 22 patients, five (23%) had hepatic steatosis and 17 (77%) did not. The pretreatment demographic and clinical characteristics of these two groups showed no significant differences. The relationship between liver/spleen ratio and alanine transaminase activity in these patients. A statistically significant inverse correlation was observed (r = -0.417, P < 0.027). CONCLUSION Of the 22 patients with pancreatic cancer, five (23%) experienced S-1 induced hepatic steatosis. Care should be taken during S-1 treatment of patients with pancreatic cancer.

A 73-year-old female was admitted to our hospital with abdominal pain and diarrhea. Computed tomography detected distension of the small intestine. A palmar erythema, multiple oral ulcers, and desquamation of the fingers appeared after hospitalization. Small-bowel endoscopic images showed multiple ulcers. We attributed this case to infection with Yersinia pseudotuberculosis based on the changes in Y. pseudotuberculosis antibody titers throughout the course of the illness. This report is valuable, as it illustrates the endoscopic characteristics of a Y. pseudotuberculosis infection with skin lesion and ileus, which may enable us to deepen the pathologic understanding of this disease.

4123 Background: Gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GN) demonstrated a significant improvement of OS over gemcitabine alone (G) in the MPACT trial for metastatic pancreatic cancer. However, since patients aged 75 years or older was less than 10% in the trial, data for the efficacy and safety of GN in that population have been limited. Methods: We prospectively enrolled patients who were 76 years or older if they had pathologically proven, clinically unresectable pancreatic cancer and no prior history of chemotherapy. Treatment regimen was based on physicians' choice. The primary endpoint was OS and secondary endpoints included PFS, objective response, and safety. Geriatric assessments including G8, IADL, CCI and Mini-COG were performed at the time of registration and 3 months after. To adjust confounding factors in the comparison of GN and G, propensity score-matched analyses were performed. Results: We enrolled 233 eligible patients from 55 centers in Japan between September 2018 and September 2019. GN, G, other therapy, and BSC were administered to 116, 72, 29 and 16 patients, respectively. With propensity scores adjusted for age, sex, clinical stage, ECOG PS, CA19-9, and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, 42 patients each in GN and G were compared. Patients characteristics in the matched pair were well-balanced; median age, 79/79 years; ECOG PS 0, 43/36%; stage IV, 69%/64%. With a median follow-up of 14.8 months and 50 observed deaths, OS in GN showed a longer tendency than that in G: 12.2 vs. 9.4 months in median with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.37-1.13; p= 0.120). PFS in GN was significantly longer than that in G: 9.2 vs. 3.7 months in median with a HR of 0.38 (95% CI, 0.23-0.64; p= 0.0002). The objective response rates were 29% and 11% ( p= 0.082), and the disease control rates were 81% and 61% ( p= 0.088), respectively. Decline of G8 scores at 3 months was observed in 35% and 28% of patients in GN and G, respectively ( p= 0.610), and that in IADL scores was observed in 61% and 37%, respectively ( p = 0.194). GN had higher incidence of adverse events than G though all were not statistically significant: grade 4 neutropenia (23%/8%); grade 3-4 malaise (13%/8%), fatigue (15 %/10%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (5%/0%). The incidence of the other adverse events was comparable between GN and G: grade 4 leucopenia (3%/5%) and thrombocytopenia (0%/3%); grade 3-4 nausea (3%/5%), vomit (3%/5%) and febrile neutropenia (0%/0%). Treatment discontinuation due to adverse events was more often in GN than G (39%/14%). Conclusions: Our data suggests GN is more efficacious than G even in patients aged 76 years or older, although GN have higher incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events and tends to decrease geriatric assessment scores. Clinical trial information: UMIN000034265.

Rationale: Anti-PD-1 antibody is the standard therapy for treatment-resistant gastric cancer, but only a limited number of patients respond. Additionally, cases of hyper-progressive disease (HPD) in which tumor growth accelerates after anti-PD-1 antibody administration have been reported; however, the biological mechanism has not been elucidated. Patient concerns: In the present case, metastatic gastric cancer was treated with the anti-PD-1 antibody, nivolumab, as third-line treatment. Diagnosis: After the initiation of nivolumab therapy, a rapidly enlarging para-aortic lymph nodes were observed leading to the diagnosis of HPD. Interventions: Multiplex immunohistochemistry was used to examine immune cells infiltrating in the primary tumor and in liver metastasis which were obtained before nivolumab treatment, and in lymph node metastasis which presented with HPD after nivolumab therapy. Outcomes: In the primary tumor, helper T (Th) cells, cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs), regulatory T (Treg) cells, and PD-L1-negative macrophages were observed. On the other hand, in metastatic lymph nodes presenting with HPD, PD-L1-positive macrophages prominently increased, while Treg cells, CTLs, and Th cells decreased. PD-L1 expression was not observed in gastric cancer cells among the three specimens. Lessons: The findings suggest the possibility that PD-L1-positive M2 macrophage might contribute to acceleration of tumor growth with anti-PD-1 therapy in the present case.

Although oxaliplatin 130 mg/mPatients with unresectable or recurrent gastric adenocarcinoma, no previous chemotherapy, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0-1 were treated with SOX130. The primary endpoint was the 3-cycle completion rate, defined as the proportion of patients who completed the first three cycles with ≥ 80% relative dose intensity of oxaliplatin.Twenty-five patients were enrolled from April 2015 to 2016. The 3-cycle completion rate was 72.0% (90% confidence interval: 53.8-86.1), which was higher than the predetermined threshold rate of 50%. With the median number of cycles being 6 (range, 1-19+), grade 3 or 4 adverse events occurred in 10 patients (40%). Major grade 3 adverse events were anorexia (24%), thrombocytopenia (16%), and neutropenia (12%). No febrile neutropenia or treatment-related deaths occurred. Among 12 patients with measurable lesions, the overall response rate was 58.3%. Median progression-free and overall survival were 5.7 months (95% confidence interval 2.9-8.5) and 13.1 months (95% confidence interval 7.4-19.0), respectively.Results indicated that SOX130 was feasible in Japanese patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Background The aim of the study was to clarify the frequency of colorectal neoplasm (CRN) complicating superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and the need for colonoscopy. Methods We retrospectively reviewed 101 patients who had undergone initial endoscopic resection (ER) for superficial ESCC. Control group participants were age- and sex-matched asymptomatic subjects screened at our hospital over the same period of time. Advanced adenoma was defined as an adenoma ≥10 mm, with villous features, or high-grade dysplasia. Advanced CRN referred to advanced adenoma or cancer. We measured the incidence of advanced CRN in superficial ESCC and controls, and we compared the characteristics of superficial ESCC patients with and without advanced CRN. Results In the superficial ESCC group, advanced CRNs were found in 17 patients (16.8%). A history of smoking alone was found to be a significant risk factor of advanced CRN [odds ratio 6.02 (95% CI 1.30-27.8), P=0.005]. Conclusion The frequency of synchronous advanced CRN is high in superficial ESCC patients subjected to ER. Colonoscopy should be highly considered for most patients who undergo ER for superficial ESCC with a history of smoking, and is recommended even in superfi cial ESCC patients. Keywords Advanced adenoma, colonoscopy, colorectal neoplasm, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma Ann Gastroenterol 2016; 29 (3): 318-324

Background and Aim White globe appearance (WGA) is a small white lesion with a globular shape that can be identified by magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (M-NBI). WGA was recently reported as a novel endoscopic marker that can differentiate between gastric cancer (GC) and low-grade adenoma. However, the usefulness of WGA for differentiating GC from non-cancerous lesions (NC), including those of gastritis, is unknown. Methods To compare the prevalence of WGA in GC and NC, we carried out a prospective study of 994 patients undergoing gastroscopy. All patients were examined for target lesions that were suspected to be GC. When a target lesion was detected, the presence or absence of WGA in the lesion was evaluated using M-NBI, and all target lesions were biopsied or resected for histopathological diagnosis. Primary endpoint was a comparison of WGA prevalence in GC and NC. Secondary endpoints included WGA diagnostic performance for diagnosing GC. Results A total of 188 target lesions from 156 patients were analyzed for WGA, and histopathological diagnoses included 70 cases of GC and 118 cases of NC. WGA prevalence in GC and NC was 21.4% (15/70) and 2.5% (3/118), respectively (P < 0.001). WGA diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for detecting GC were 69.1%, 21.4%, and 97.5%, respectively. Conclusions WGA prevalence in GC is significantly higher than that in NC. Because WGA is highly specific for GC, the presence of WGA is useful to diagnose GC.

We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis to evaluate the efficacy of systemic chemotherapy for unresectable combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma. We enrolled 36 patients with pathologically proven, unresectable combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma treated with systemic chemotherapy. The log-rank test determined the significance of each prognostic factor. Elevated alpha-fetoprotein, carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels were observed in 58.3%, 16.7% and 38.9% of patients, respectively. First-line chemotherapy included platinum-containing regimens consisting of gemcitabine/cisplatin (n = 12) and fluorouracil/cisplatin (n = 11), sorafenib (n = 5) and others (n = 8). The median overall and progression-free survival times were 8.9 and 2.8 months, respectively, with an overall response rate of 5.6%. Prognostic factors associated with negative outcomes included poor performance status, no prior primary tumor resection, a Child-Pugh class of B, and elevated carcinoembryonic antigen levels with a hazard ratio of 2.25, 2.48, 3.25 and 2.84 by univariate analysis, respectively. The median overall survival times of the gemcitabine/cisplatin, fluorouracil/cisplatin, sorafenib and other groups were 11.9, 10.2, 3.5 and 8.1 months, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the overall survival of patients within the sorafenib monotherapy group was poor compared with platinum-containing regimens (HR: 15.83 [95% CI: 2.25-111.43], P = .006). All 7 patients in the sorafenib group had progressive disease, including 2 patients with second-line therapy. In conclusion, the platinum-containing regimens such as gemcitabine/cisplatin were associated with more favorable outcomes than sorafenib monotherapy for unresectable combined hepatocellular and cholangiocarcinoma.

We evaluated the efficacy and safety of a modified FOLFIRINOX regimen for chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. Patients with untreated metastatic pancreatic cancer (MPC) received modified FOLFIRINOX (intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, irinotecan 150 mg/m2, 5-FU infusion 2400 mg/m2 over 46 h, no bolus 5-FU). The primary endpoints were overall survival and the incidence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia. No patients received prophylactic pegfilgrastim. Sixty-nine pts. were enrolled from 39 institutions in Japan. The median overall survival was 11.2 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 9.0–]. The median progression-free survival was 5.5 months (95% CI 4.1–6.7). The response rate was 37.7% (95% CI 26.3–50.2), and the disease control rate was 78.3% (95% CI 66.7–87.3). The incidence of grade 3 or higher neutropenia was 47.8%. Serious adverse events occurred in six patients (8.7%). All AE proportions were less than those in the previous Japanese full-dose phase II study. One patient died due to interstitial pneumonia related to treatment. This is the first prospective study of modified FOLFIRINOX in Asia. Modified FOLFIRINOX in this study has an improved safety profile with maintained efficacy in MPC without prophylactic pegfilgrastim.

Background A family and personal history of breast (B), ovarian(O), and pancreatic(P) cancer was reported to be a predictive marker in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. We planned a prospective phase II trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy in this population. Method Eligible patients had chemotherapy-naive metastatic PA, had one or more of the followings: 1) at least one family history of P/B/O/prostate (PR) cancer in a first-degree relative, 2) at least two family members with history of P/B/O/PR cancer within third-degree relatives, and 3) at least one personal history of B/O/PR cancer.Patient suitable for FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel were ineligible unless patient refuse those regimens. Patients received gemcitabine 1000mg/m2and oxaliplatin 100 mg/m2 every two weeks (GEMOX). The primary endpoint was the one-year survival rate and 44% were desired. The sample size was calculated to be 43 pts, with a one-sided alpha of 5% and a power of 80%. Results A total of 45 pts were enrolled. First 43 pts were included in primary analysis. One-year survival rate was 27.9 [90%CI;17.0-41.3]% and didn’t met pre-planned boundary. Response rate was 27.9%. Tendency of prolonged survival was observed in patients with two or more family histories of P/B/O/PR cancer (HR 0.65, 95%CI [0.34-1.23]). Family history or personal history with B/O/PR cancer tended to be associate with better response and prolonged survival. In this study, patient with family history of pancreatic cancer seemed to be associate with poor response. The most common adverse events of grade 3 or higher were neutropenia (36%), leukopenia (27%), thrombocytopenia (23%) and elevated level of ALT (20%). Treatment related death was not observed. Conclusion GEMOX did not show expected efficacy in patients with metastatic PA with family history or personal history of P/B/O/PR cancer.

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is problematic with regard to en bloc and curable resection rates. Advancements in endoscopic techniques have enabled novel endoscopic approaches such as endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), which has overcome some EMR problems, and has become the standard treatment for gastrointestinal tumors. However, ESD is technically difficult. Procedure time is longer and complications such as intraoperative perforation and bleeding occur more frequently than in EMR. Recently various traction methods have been introduced to facilitate ESD procedures, such as clip with line, external forceps, clip and snare, internal traction, double scope, and magnetic anchor. Each method must be used appropriately according to the anatomical characteristics. In this review we discuss recently proposed traction methods for ESD based on the characteristics of various anatomical sites.

Background and study aim: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is more difficult to perform for colorectal tumors, but the use of traction to facilitate direct submucosal layer visualization is a promising method to reduce procedure times and complication rates. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the clip and snare method (CSM) with a prelooping technique (PLT) for colorectal tumors. Patients and methods: A total of 140 colorectal tumors were treated: 17 using the CSM with PLT; 123, used as controls, by standard ESD without these techniques. Therapeutic efficacy and safety were retrospectively assessed. Results: All tumors were successfully resected en bloc using the CSM with PLT. Multisegment resection was found in four tumors in the control group. There was a significant difference in the procedure time between the patients in the CSM with PLT group and the control group (45.6 vs. 70.1 minutes; P = 0.047). There were no significant differences in the complication rates (5.9 % vs. 8.1 %; P = 1.00). Conclusions: The CSM with PLT was effective and safe in this study.

e15077 Background: Clinical use of ctDNA has been become an important criterion for patient care. The transfer of this knowledge and technology from top clinical labs to local hospitals is still distant. With the goal of a robust, precise, simple and cost-effective genomic test, we designed a prospective study featuring high-sensitive mutation screening of ctDNA from RAS-wild mCRC with digital PCR (dPCR) technology. This approach allows detection of 85 hotspot mutations of KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA, which are present in approximately 60% of CRC, and is clinically important information for anti-EGFR treatment. Methods: 18 “ RAS-wildtype” mCRC patients, initially diagnosed with PCR-rSSO (RASKET) using CRC FFPE samples, were recruited. After extracting ctDNA from patient plasma, dPCR analysis was conducted with LBx Probes. Results: Mutations in KRAS, NRAS, BRAF and PIK3CA, were detected in 5 samples ( KRAS in 3 samples, NRAS in 1 sample, BRAF in 1 sample, and PIK3CA in 2 samples). In a patient undergoing treatment with panitumumab, two different KRAS clones were detected, indicating possible clonal evolution under drug pressure. Interestingly, we also encountered another patient who had never received anti-EGFR antibodies, but who tested RAS mutation-positive at a level below the detection sensitivity of PCR-rSSO. Conclusions: Our dPCR screening with ctDNA was able to identify mutations successfully in a previously-diagnosed “ RAS-wild” mCRC group. Based on these results, we designed the following test, which with

4111Background: FOLFIRINOX is considered one of the standard chemotherapy regimens for chemotherapy-naive pts. with MPC, but carries an unfavorable adverse event (AE) profile, especially in Japanes...