Search

Your search keyword '"Lewis, Sophie"' showing total 537 results
Start Over Author "Lewis, Sophie" Publication Year Range Last 10 years
537 results on '"Lewis, Sophie"'

10. Professionally led support groups for people living with advanced or metastatic cancer: a systematic scoping review of effectiveness and factors critical to implementation success within real-world healthcare and community settings

Author

Li, Zhicheng, Laginha, Kitty-Jean, Boyle, Frances, Daly, Michele, Dinner, Fiona, Hirsch, Pia, Hobbs, Kim, Kirsten, Laura, Mazariego, Carolyn, McAuley, Ros, O’Brien, Mary, O’Reilly, Amanda, Taylor, Natalie, Tobin, Lisa, Lewis, Sophie, and Smith, Andrea L

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

18. Reply to Comment by Mandel et al. on “Numerically Bounded Linguistic Probability Schemes Are Unlikely to Communicate Uncertainty Effectively”

Author

King, Andrew D, Perkins‐Kirkpatrick, Sarah E, Wehner, Michael F, and Lewis, Sophie C

Subjects
extreme events, climate change, attribution, communication, Atmospheric Sciences, Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience, Environmental Science and Management
Abstract

We thank the Comment's authors for their considered critique of our paper. We respond to their main criticisms and hope that this discussion motivates further consideration of communication strategies for event attribution analyses.

Published
2021

20. Toward Calibrated Language for Effectively Communicating the Results of Extreme Event Attribution Studies

Author

Lewis, Sophie C, King, Andrew D, Perkins‐Kirkpatrick, Sarah E, and Wehner, Michael F

Subjects
Basic Behavioral and Social Science, Behavioral and Social Science, Climate Action, extreme events, climate change, attribution, communication, Atmospheric Sciences, Physical Geography and Environmental Geoscience, Environmental Science and Management
Abstract

Extreme event attribution studies attempt to quantify the role of human influences in observed weather and climate extremes. These studies are of broad scientific and public interest, although quantitative results (e.g., that a specific event was made a specific number of times more likely because of anthropogenic forcings) can be difficult to communicate accurately to a variety of audiences and difficult for audiences to interpret. Here, we focus on how results of these studies can be effectively communicated using standardized language and propose, for the first time, a set of calibrated terms to describe event attribution results. Using these terms and an accompanying visual guide, results are presented in terms of likelihood of event changes and the associated uncertainties. This standardized language will allow clearer communication and interpretation of probabilities by the public and stakeholders.

Published
2019

22. EXPLAINING EXTREME EVENTS OF 2016 : From A Climate Perspective

Author

Herring, Stephanie C., Christidi, Nikolaos, Hoell, Andrew, Kossin, James P., Schreck, Carl J., Stott, Peter A., Webb, Robert S., Werner, Francisco E., Knutson, Thomas R., Kam, Jonghun, Zeng, Fanrong, Wittenberg, Andrew T., Brainard, Russell E., Oliver, Thomas, McPhaden, Michael J., Cohen, Anne, Venegas, Robert o, Heenan, Adel, Vargas-Ángel, Bernardo, Rotjan, Randi, Mangubhai, Sangeeta, Flint, Elizabeth, Hunter, Susan A., Oliver, Eric C. J., Perkins-Kirkpatrick, Sarah E., Holbrook, Neil J., Bindoff, Nathaniel L., Tett, Simon F. B., Falk, Alexander, Rogers, Megan, Spuler, Fiona, Turner, Calum, Wainwright, Joshua, Dimdore-Miles, Oscar, Knight, Sam, Freychet, Nicolas, Mineter, Michael J., Lehmann, Caroline E. R., Martins, Eduardo S. P. R., Coelho, Caio A. S., Haarsma, Rein, Otto, Friederike E. L., King, Andrew D., van Oldenborgh, Geert Jan, Kew, Sarah, Philip, Sjoukje, Vasconcelos, Francisco C., Cullen, Heidi, Jézéquel, Aglaé, Yiou, Pascal, Radanovics, Sabine, Vautard, Robert, Sippel, Sebastian, El-Madany, Tarek S., Migliavacca, Mirco, Mahecha, Miguel D., Carrara, Arnaud, Flach, Milan, Kaminski, Thomas, Otto, Friederike E. L., Thonicke, Kirsten, Vossbeck, Michael, Reichstein, Markus, Yuan, Xing, Wang, Linying, Wood, Eric F., Funk, Chris, Davenport, Frank, Harrison, Laura, Magadzire, Tamuka, Galu, Gideon, Artan, Guleid A., Shukla, Shraddhanand, Korecha, Diriba, Indeje, Matayo, Pomposi, Catherine, Macharia, Denis, Husak, Gregory, Nsadisa, Faka Dieudonne, Imada, Yukiko, Shiogama, Hideo, Takahashi, Chiharu, Watanabe, Masahiro, Mori, Masato, Kamae, Youichi, Maeda, Shuhei, Sun, Qiaohong, Miao, Chiyuan, Zhou, Chunlüe, Wang, Kaicun, Qi, Dan, Yuan, Xing, Wang, Shanshan, Hu, Zeng-Zhen, Qian, Cheng, Wang, Jun, Dong, Siyan, Yin, Hong, Burke, Claire, Ciavarella, Andrew, Dong, Buwen, Freychet, Nicolas, Lott, Fraser C., Tett, Simon F. B., Sun, Ying, Hu, Ting, Zhang, Xuebin, Wan, Hui, Stott, Peter, Lu, Chunhui, Christidis, Nikolaos, Manomaiphiboon, Kasemsan, Ciavarella, Andrew, Stott, Peter A., Hope, Pandora, Lim, Eun-Pa, Hendon, Harry, Wang, Guomin, Lewis, Sophie C., Mallela, Jennie, Grose, Michael R., Black, Mitchell, Risbey, James S., Uhe, Peter, Hope, Pandora K., Haustein, Karsten, Mitchell, Dann, Stott, Peter A., Christidis, Nikos, Herring, Stephanie C., Hoell, Andrew, Kossin, James P., and Schreck, Carl J.

Published
2018

28. Are we informing our patients correctly? Evaluation of perioperative counselling for paediatric intestinal stoma formation: a national study.

Author

Roberts, Rebecca, Burdall, Oliver, Bohr, Claire, Kennard, Hilary, Lewis, Sophie, Harris, Lauren, Cusick, Eleri, Hill, Brenda, McCullagh, Majella, van Rensburg, Carla, Thomas, Erica, O'Connor, Brendan, Smith, Christeen, Shell, Deborah, Richardson, Louise, Sharrard, Alison, Scudamore, Liz, McDowell, Susan, Dick, Karen, and Tullie, Lucinda

Subjects
ENTEROSTOMY, SURGICAL stomas, CHILD patients, PEDIATRIC surgery, SOCIAL impact, ILEOSTOMY
Abstract

Purpose: Adequate preoperative information is known to improve patient outcomes. We aimed to evaluate perioperative education for paediatric patients and families undergoing intestinal stoma formation. Methods: UK paediatric surgery centres were invited to recruit patients aged 6–16 years with a stoma in situ or reversed within the last 2 years. Patient and parent questionnaires were posted for potential participants. Results: Eighty-three patient/parent dyads returned questionnaires. Median age was 11.5 years (range 4.1–17.8), with 48% (n = 40) formed electively. Parents rated how well-informed they felt perioperatively out of 10 (0 poorly, 10 highly informed). Parents were better informed about surgical issues and stoma care than psychological and social impacts (7.45 vs 6.11; p < 0.0001). 54% reported surgical complications but significantly fewer patients listed these amongst the worst things about having a stoma (24.4%) when compared with psychosocial issues: distress from bag leaks (90.8%; p < 0.0001), self-consciousness (54.1%; p = 0.0001), and restricted activity (40.2%; p = 0.03). Conclusion: Parents felt well-informed for medical and practical aspects but less well-informed of psychological and lifestyle impacts of having a stoma. Surgical complications were less important to patients than the impact on daily life. Increased psychosocial information would enable families to be better prepared for life with a stoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

33. Introduction

Author

Bismark, Marie, primary, Willis, Karen, additional, Lewis, Sophie, additional, and Smallwood, Natasha, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

41. Postscript

Author

Bismark, Marie, primary, Willis, Karen, additional, Lewis, Sophie, additional, and Smallwood, Natasha, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

44. Leadership and teams

Author

Bismark, Marie, primary, Willis, Karen, additional, Lewis, Sophie, additional, and Smallwood, Natasha, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results