Search

In this paper, we examine team ball sports to investigate how the likelihood of weaker teams winning against stronger ones, referred to as underdog achievement, is influenced by inherent randomness factors that affect match outcomes in such sports. To address our research question, we collected data on match scores and computed corresponding team rankings from major international competitions for 12 popular team ball sports: basketball, cricket, field hockey, futsal, handball, ice hockey, lacrosse, roller hockey, rugby, soccer, volleyball, and water polo. Then, we developed an underdog achievement score to identify the sports with the highest occurrences of weaker teams prevailing over stronger ones, and we designed a randomness model consisting of factors that contribute to unexpected match outcomes within each sport. Our findings indicate that soccer is among the sports in which a weaker team is most likely to win. Through principal component analysis (PCA) and correlation analysis, we demonstrate that our randomness model can explain such a phenomenon, showing that the underdog achievement can be attributed to numerous factors that can randomly influence match outcomes.

We are interested in assessing the use of neural networks as surrogate models to approximate and minimize objective functions in optimization problems. While neural networks are widely used for machine learning tasks such as classification and regression, their application in solving optimization problems has been limited. Our study begins by determining the best activation function for approximating the objective functions of popular nonlinear optimization test problems, and the evidence provided shows that~SiLU has the best performance. We then analyze the accuracy of function value, gradient, and Hessian approximations for such objective functions obtained through interpolation/regression models and neural networks. When compared to interpolation/regression models, neural networks can deliver competitive zero- and first-order approximations (at a high training cost) but underperform on second-order approximation. However, it is shown that combining a neural net activation function with the natural basis for quadratic interpolation/regression can waive the necessity of including cross terms in the natural basis, leading to models with fewer parameters to determine. Lastly, we provide evidence that the performance of a state-of-the-art derivative-free optimization algorithm can hardly be improved when the gradient of an objective function is approximated using any of the surrogate models considered, including neural networks.

Interactive real-time rigid body simulation is a crucial tool in any modern game engine or 3D authoring tool. The quest for fast, robust and accurate simulations is ever evolving. PBRBD (Position Based Rigid Body Dynamics), a recent expansion of PBD (Position Based Dynamics), is a novel approach for this issue. This work aims at providing a comprehensible state-of-the art comparison between Position Based methods and other real-time simulation methods used for rigid body dynamics using a custom 3D physics engine for benchmarking and comparing PBRBD (Position Based Rigid Body Dynamics), and some variants, with state-of-the-art simulators commonly used in the gaming industry, PhysX and Havok. Showing that PBRBD can produce simulations that are accurate and stable, excelling at maintaining stable energy levels, and allowing for a variety of constraints, but is limited in its handling of stable stacks of rigid bodies.

Derivative-free optimization (DFO) consists in finding the best value of an objective function without relying on derivatives. To tackle such problems, one may build approximate derivatives, using for instance finite-difference estimates. One may also design algorithmic strategies that perform space exploration and seek improvement over the current point. The first type of strategy often provides good performance on smooth problems but at the expense of more function evaluations. The second type is cheaper and typically handles non-smoothness or noise in the objective better. Recently, full-low evaluation methods have been proposed as a hybrid class of DFO algorithms that combine both strategies, respectively denoted as Full-Eval and Low-Eval. In the unconstrained case, these methods showed promising numerical performance. In this paper, we extend the full-low evaluation framework to bound and linearly constrained derivative-free optimization. We derive convergence results for an instance of this framework, that combines finite-difference quasi-Newton steps with probabilistic direct-search steps. The former are projected onto the feasible set, while the latter are defined within tangent cones identified by nearby active constraints. We illustrate the practical performance of our instance on standard linearly constrained problems, that we adapt to introduce noisy evaluations as well as non-smoothness. In all cases, our method performs favorably compared to algorithms that rely solely on Full-eval or Low-eval iterations., Comment: 33 pages, 10 figures (20 subfigures), revised version

In this work, we propose different formulations and gradient-based algorithms for deterministic and stochastic bilevel problems with conflicting objectives in the lower level. Such problems have received little attention in the deterministic case and have never been studied from a stochastic approximation viewpoint despite the recent advances in stochastic methods for single-level, bilevel, and multi-objective optimization. To solve bilevel problems with a multi-objective lower level, different approaches can be considered depending on the interpretation of the lower-level optimality. An optimistic formulation that was previously introduced for the deterministic case consists of minimizing the upper-level function over all non-dominated lower-level solutions. In this paper, we develop new risk-neutral and risk-averse formulations, address their main computational challenges, and develop the corresponding deterministic and stochastic gradient-based algorithms.

Managing all the mobility and transportation services with autonomous vehicles for users of a smart city requires determining the assignment of the vehicles to the users and their routing in conjunction with their speed. Such decisions must ensure low emission, efficiency, and high service quality by also considering the impact on traffic congestion caused by other vehicles in the transportation network. In this paper, we first propose an abstract trilevel multi-objective formulation architecture to model all vehicle routing problems with assignment, routing, and speed decision variables and conflicting objective functions. Such an architecture guides the development of subproblems, relaxations, and solution methods. We also propose a way of integrating the various urban transportation services by introducing a constraint on the speed variables that takes into account the traffic volume caused across the different services. Based on the formulation architecture, we introduce a (bilevel) problem where assignment and routing are at the upper level and speed is at the lower level. To address the challenge of dealing with routing problems on urban road networks, we develop an algorithm that alternates between the assignment-routing problem on an auxiliary complete graph and the speed optimization problem on the original non-complete graph. The computational experiments show the effectiveness of the proposed approach in determining approximate Pareto fronts among the conflicting objectives.

Stochastic alternating algorithms for bi-objective optimization are considered when optimizing two conflicting functions for which optimization steps have to be applied separately for each function. Such algorithms consist of applying a certain number of steps of gradient or subgradient descent on each single objective at each iteration. In this paper, we show that stochastic alternating algorithms achieve a sublinear convergence rate of $\mathcal{O}(1/T)$, under strong convexity, for the determination of a minimizer of a weighted-sum of the two functions, parameterized by the number of steps applied on each of them. An extension to the convex case is presented for which the rate weakens to $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{T})$. These rates are valid also in the non-smooth case. Importantly, by varying the proportion of steps applied to each function, one can determine an approximation to the Pareto front.

Using tail bounds, we introduce a new probabilistic condition for function estimation in stochastic derivative-free optimization which leads to a reduction in the number of samples and eases algorithmic analyses. Moreover, we develop simple stochastic direct-search and trust-region methods for the optimization of a potentially non-smooth function whose values can only be estimated via stochastic observations. For trial points to be accepted, these algorithms require the estimated function values to yield a sufficient decrease measured in terms of a power larger than 1 of the algoritmic stepsize. Our new tail bound condition is precisely imposed on the reduction estimate used to achieve such a sufficient decrease. This condition allows us to select the stepsize power used for sufficient decrease in such a way to reduce the number of samples needed per iteration. In previous works, the number of samples necessary for global convergence at every iteration $k$ of this type of algorithms was $O(\Delta_{k}^{-4})$, where $\Delta_k$ is the stepsize or trust-region radius. However, using the new tail bound condition, and under mild assumptions on the noise, one can prove that such a number of samples is only $O(\Delta_k^{-2 - \varepsilon})$, where $\varepsilon > 0$ can be made arbitrarily small by selecting the power of the stepsize in the sufficient decrease test arbitrarily close to $1$. The global convergence properties of the stochastic direct-search and trust-region algorithms are established under the new tail bound condition.

Two-level stochastic optimization formulations have become instrumental in a number of machine learning contexts such as continual learning, neural architecture search, adversarial learning, and hyperparameter tuning. Practical stochastic bilevel optimization problems become challenging in optimization or learning scenarios where the number of variables is high or there are constraints. In this paper, we introduce a bilevel stochastic gradient method for bilevel problems with nonlinear and possibly nonconvex lower-level constraints. We also present a comprehensive convergence theory that addresses both the lower-level unconstrained and constrained cases and covers all inexact calculations of the adjoint gradient (also called hypergradient), such as the inexact solution of the lower-level problem, inexact computation of the adjoint formula (due to the inexact solution of the adjoint equation or use of a truncated Neumann series), and noisy estimates of the gradients, Hessians, and Jacobians involved. To promote the use of bilevel optimization in large-scale learning, we have developed new low-rank practical bilevel stochastic gradient methods (BSG-N-FD and~BSG-1) that do not require second-order derivatives and, in the lower-level unconstrained case, dismiss any matrix-vector products.

In machine learning (ML) applications, unfair predictions may discriminate against a minority group. Most existing approaches for fair machine learning (FML) treat fairness as a constraint or a penalization term in the optimization of a ML model, which does not lead to the discovery of the complete landscape of the trade-offs among learning accuracy and fairness metrics, and does not integrate fairness in a meaningful way. Recently, we have introduced a new paradigm for FML based on Stochastic Multi-Objective Optimization (SMOO), where accuracy and fairness metrics stand as conflicting objectives to be optimized simultaneously. The entire trade-offs range is defined as the Pareto front of the SMOO problem, which can then be efficiently computed using stochastic-gradient type algorithms. SMOO also allows defining and computing new meaningful predictors for FML, a novel one being the Sharpe predictor that we introduce and explore in this paper, and which gives the highest ratio of accuracy-to-unfairness. Inspired from SMOO in finance, the Sharpe predictor for FML provides the highest prediction return (accuracy) per unit of prediction risk (unfairness).

We propose a new class of rigorous methods for derivative-free optimization with the aim of delivering efficient and robust numerical performance for functions of all types, from smooth to non-smooth, and under different noise regimes. To this end, we have developed Full-Low Evaluation methods, organized around two main types of iterations. The first iteration type is expensive in function evaluations, but exhibits good performance in the smooth and non-noisy cases. For the theory, we consider a line search based on an approximate gradient, backtracking until a sufficient decrease condition is satisfied. In practice, the gradient was approximated via finite differences, and the direction was calculated by a quasi-Newton step (BFGS). The second iteration type is cheap in function evaluations, yet more robust in the presence of noise or non-smoothness. For the theory, we consider direct search, and in practice we use probabilistic direct search with one random direction and its negative. A switch condition from Full-Eval to Low-Eval iterations was developed based on the values of the line-search and direct-search stepsizes. If enough Full-Eval steps are taken, we derive a complexity result of gradient-descent type. Under failure of Full-Eval, the Low-Eval iterations become the drivers of convergence yielding non-smooth convergence. Full-Low Evaluation methods are shown to be efficient and robust in practice across problems with different levels of smoothness and noise.

In the application of data clustering to human-centric decision-making systems, such as loan applications and advertisement recommendations, the clustering outcome might discriminate against people across different demographic groups, leading to unfairness. A natural conflict occurs between the cost of clustering (in terms of distance to cluster centers) and the balance representation of all demographic groups across the clusters, leading to a bi-objective optimization problem that is nonconvex and nonsmooth. To determine the complete trade-off between these two competing goals, we design a novel stochastic alternating balance fair $k$-means (SAfairKM) algorithm, which consists of alternating classical mini-batch $k$-means updates and group swap updates. The number of $k$-means updates and the number of swap updates essentially parameterize the weight put on optimizing each objective function. Our numerical experiments show that the proposed SAfairKM algorithm is robust and computationally efficient in constructing well-spread and high-quality Pareto fronts both on synthetic and real datasets.

In the application of machine learning to real-life decision-making systems, e.g., credit scoring and criminal justice, the prediction outcomes might discriminate against people with sensitive attributes, leading to unfairness. The commonly used strategy in fair machine learning is to include fairness as a constraint or a penalization term in the minimization of the prediction loss, which ultimately limits the information given to decision-makers. In this paper, we introduce a new approach to handle fairness by formulating a stochastic multi-objective optimization problem for which the corresponding Pareto fronts uniquely and comprehensively define the accuracy-fairness trade-offs. We have then applied a stochastic approximation-type method to efficiently obtain well-spread and accurate Pareto fronts, and by doing so we can handle training data arriving in a streaming way.

In this paper, we suggest two ways of calculating interpolation models for unconstrained smooth nonlinear optimization when Hessian-vector products are available. The main idea is to interpolate the objective function using a quadratic on a set of points around the current one and concurrently using the curvature information from products of the Hessian times appropriate vectors, possibly defined by the interpolating points. These enriched interpolating conditions form then an affine space of model Hessians or model Newton directions, from which a particular one can be computed once an equilibrium or least secant principle is defined. A first approach consists of recovering the Hessian matrix satisfying the enriched interpolating conditions, from which then a Newton direction model can be computed. In a second approach we pose the recovery problem directly in the Newton direction. These techniques can lead to a significant reduction in the overall number of Hessian-vector products when compared to the inexact or truncated Newton method, although simple implementations may pay a cost in linear algebra or number of function evaluations., Comment: 18 pages, 12 figures

Optimization of conflicting functions is of paramount importance in decision making, and real world applications frequently involve data that is uncertain or unknown, resulting in multi-objective optimization (MOO) problems of stochastic type. We study the stochastic multi-gradient (SMG) method, seen as an extension of the classical stochastic gradient method for single-objective optimization. At each iteration of the SMG method, a stochastic multi-gradient direction is calculated by solving a quadratic subproblem, and it is shown that this direction is biased even when all individual gradient estimators are unbiased. We establish rates to compute a point in the Pareto front, of order similar to what is known for stochastic gradient in both convex and strongly convex cases. The analysis handles the bias in the multi-gradient and the unknown a priori weights of the limiting Pareto point. The SMG method is framed into a Pareto-front type algorithm for the computation of the entire Pareto front. The Pareto-front SMG algorithm is capable of robustly determining Pareto fronts for a number of synthetic test problems. One can apply it to any stochastic MOO problem arising from supervised machine learning, and we report results for logistic binary classification where multiple objectives correspond to distinct-sources data groups., Comment: 31 pages, 14 figures