Search

The success of long-term host–virus partnerships is predicated on the ability of the host to limit the destructive potential of the virus and the virus's skill in manipulating its host to persist undetected yet replicate efficiently when needed. By mastering such skills, herpesviruses persist silently in their hosts, though perturbations in this host–virus equilibrium can result in disease. The heterochromatin machinery that tightly regulates endogenous retroviral elements and pericentromeric repeats also silences invading genomes of alpha-, beta-, and gammaherpesviruses. That said, how these viruses disrupt this constitutive heterochromatin machinery to replicate and spread, particularly in response to disparate lytic triggers, is unclear. Here, we review how the cancer-causing gammaherpesvirus Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) uses the inflammasome as a security system to alert itself of threats to its cellular home as well as to flip the virus-encoded lytic switch, allowing it to replicate and escape in response to a variety of lytic triggers. EBV provides the first example of an infectious agent able to actively exploit the inflammasome to spark its replication. Revealing an unexpected link between the inflammasome and the epigenome, this further brings insights into how the heterochromatin machinery uses differential strategies to maintain the integrity of the cellular genome whilst guarding against invading pathogens. These recent insights into EBV biology and host–viral epigenetic regulation ultimately point to the NLRP3 inflammasome as an attractive target to thwart herpesvirus reactivation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Treatment options for Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-cancers are limited, underscoring the need for new therapeutic approaches. We have previously shown that EBV-transformed cells and cancers lack homologous recombination (HR) repair, a prominent error-free pathway that repairs double-stranded DNA breaks; instead, EBV-transformed cells demonstrate genome-wide scars of the error-prone microhomology-mediated end joining (MMEJ) repair pathway. This suggests that EBV-cancers are vulnerable to synthetic lethal therapeutic approaches that target MMEJ repair. Indeed, we have previously found that targeting PARP, an enzyme that contributes to MMEJ, results in the death of EBV-lymphoma cells. With the emergence of clinical resistance to PARP inhibitors and the recent discovery of inhibitors of Polymerase theta (POLθ), the polymerase essential for MMEJ, we investigated the role of POLθ in EBV-lymphoma cells. We report that EBV-transformed cell lines, EBV-lymphoma cell lines, and EBV-lymphomas in AIDS patients demonstrate greater abundance of POLθ, driven by the EBV protein EBNA1, compared to EBV-uninfected primary lymphocytes and EBV-negative lymphomas from AIDS patients (a group that also abundantly expresses POLθ). We also find POLθ enriched at cellular DNA replication forks and exposure to the POLθ inhibitor Novobiocin impedes replication fork progress, impairs MMEJ-mediated repair of DNA double-stranded breaks, and kills EBV-lymphoma cells. Notably, cell killing is not due to Novobiocin-induced activation of the lytic/replicative phase of EBV. These findings support a role for POLθ not just in DNA repair but also DNA replication and as a therapeutic target in EBV-lymphomas and potentially other EBV-cancers as EBNA1 is expressed in all EBV-cancers. IMPORTANCE Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) contributes to ~2% of the global cancer burden. With a recent estimate of >200,000 deaths a year, identifying molecular vulnerabilities will be key to the management of these frequently aggressive and treatment-resistant cancers. Building on our earlier work demonstrating reliance of EBV-cancers on microhomology-mediated end-joining repair, we now report that EBV lymphomas and transformed B cell lines abundantly express the MMEJ enzyme POLθ that likely protects cellular replication forks and repairs replication-related cellular DNA breaks. Importantly also, we show that a newly identified POLθ inhibitor kills EBV-cancer cells, revealing a novel strategy to block DNA replication and repair of these aggressive cancers. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Herpesviruses establish latency to ensure permanent residence in their hosts. Upon entry into a cell, these viruses are rapidly silenced by the host, thereby limiting the destructive viral lytic phase while allowing the virus to hide from the immune system. Notably, although the establishment of latency by the oncogenic herpesvirus Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) requires the expression of viral latency genes, latency can be maintained with a negligible expression of viral genes. Indeed, in several herpesviruses, the host DNA sensor IFI16 facilitated latency via H3K9me3 heterochromatinization. This silencing mark is typically imposed by the constitutive heterochromatin machinery (HCM). The HCM, in an antiviral role, also silences the lytic phase of EBV and other herpes viruses. We investigated if IFI16 restricted EBV lytic activation by partnering with the HCM and found that IFI16 interacted with core components of the HCM, including the KRAB-associated protein 1 (KAP1) and the site-specific DNA binding KRAB-ZFP SZF1. This partnership silenced the EBV lytic switch protein ZEBRA, encoded by the BZLF1 gene, thereby favoring viral latency. Indeed, IFI16 contributed to H3K9 trimethylation at lytic genes of all kinetic classes. In defining topology, we found that IFI16 coenriched with KAP1 at the BZLF1 promoter, and while IFI16 and SZF1 were each adjacent to KAP1 in latent cells, IFI16 and SZF1 were not. Importantly, we also found that disruption of latency involved rapid downregulation of IFI16 transcription. These findings revealed a previously unknown partnership between IFI16 and the core HCM that supports EBV latency via antiviral heterochromatic silencing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is one of nine human herpesviruses that persist latently to establish permanent residence in their hosts. Periodic activation into the lytic/replicative phase allows such viruses to propagate and spread, but can also cause disease in the host. This lytic phase is also essential for EBV to cause infectious mononucleosis and cancers including B lymphocyte-derived Burkitt lymphoma and immunocompromise-associated lymphoproliferative diseases/lymphomas as well as epithelial cell-derived nasopharyngeal-cell carcinoma. In the absence of anti-EBV agents, however, therapeutic options for EBV-related diseases are limited. In earlier work, we discovered that, through the activities of the viral protein kinase that is conserved across herpesviruses and two cellular proteins ATM and KAP1, a lytic cycle amplification loop is established - and that disruption of this loop disables the EBV lytic cascade. We therefore devised a high throughput screening assay, screened a small molecule compound library, and identified seventeen candidates that impair the release of lytically-replicated EBV. The identified compounds will i) serve as lead compounds or may be modified to inhibit EBV and potentially other herpesviruses and ii) be developed into anti-cancer agents as functions of KAP1 and ATM are tightly linked to cancer. Importantly, our screening strategy may also be used to screen additional compound libraries for anti-herpesviral and anti-cancer drugs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lytic activation from latency is a key transition point in the life cycle of herpesviruses. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) is a human herpesvirus that can cause lymphomas, epithelial cancers, and other diseases, most of which require the lytic cycle. While the lytic cycle of EBV can be triggered by chemicals and immunologic ligands, the lytic cascade is only activated when expression of the EBV latency-to-lytic switch protein ZEBRA is turned on. ZEBRA then transcriptionally activates other EBV genes and together with some of those gene products ensures completion of the lytic cycle. However, not every latently-infected cell exposed to a lytic trigger turns expression of ZEBRA on, resulting in responsive and refractory subpopulations. What governs this dichotomy? By examining the nascent transcriptome following exposure to a lytic trigger, we find that several cellular genes are transcriptionally upregulated temporally upstream of ZEBRA. These genes regulate lytic susceptibility to variable degrees in latently-infected cells that respond to mechanistically distinct lytic triggers. While increased expression of these cellular genes defines a pro-lytic state, such upregulation also runs counter to the well-known mechanism of viral nuclease-mediated host shut-off that is activated downstream of ZEBRA. Furthermore, a subset of upregulated cellular genes is transcriptionally repressed temporally downstream of ZEBRA, indicating an additional mode of virus-mediated host shut-off through transcriptional repression. Thus, increased transcription of a set of host genes contributes to a pro-lytic state that allows a subpopulation of cells to support the EBV lytic cycle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]