Search

Matthew Feldman,* Sarah Marmol,* Jason Margolesky Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA*These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Jason Margolesky, Department of Neurology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1150 NW 14th St, Miami, FL, 33136, USA, Email jhmargolesky@med.miami.eduAbstract: Parkinsonism refers to the clinical combination of bradykinesia, rigidity, tremor, and postural instability. Parkinsonism is often neurodegenerative, but it can be secondary or iatrogenic, as in drug-induced parkinsonism (DIP), which is the topic of this review. We review the pathophysiology of DIP, differentiate DIP and idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (PD), list culprit medications in the development of DIP, discuss the diagnosis of DIP as well as the motor and nonmotor signs and symptoms that can help with differentiation of DIP and PD, and detail the management of DIP.Keywords: drug-induced parkinsonism, neuroleptic-induced parkinsonism, Parkinson’s disease

Background:Atypical antipsychotic drug use by schizophrenia patients in Estonia increased from 32% in 2004 to 61% in 2009. Aims:To assess the prevalence of neuroleptic-induced movement disorders in the Estonian institutionalized population of schizophrenia patients twice over a period of eight years, before and after introduction of atypical antipsychotic drugs using DSM-IV criteria. Methods:DSM-IV criteria and specific rating scales were used to evaluate the prevalence of neuroleptic-induced movement disorders among 72 patients who participated in the study in 2009 compared to 99 patients who participated in 2001. Results:Despite increased use of atypical antipsychotics in the study population (up to 30% from 20%), the proportion of movement disorder-free population remained the same over 8 years – 38.9% in 2001 versus 38.4% in 2009. There were significant intra-individual fluctuations. Use of a typical antipsychotic resulted in an almost seven times higher risk of tardive dyskinesia after 8 years. Doses of antipsychotic drugs had no effect on the severity of neuroleptic-induced movement disorders. Conclusions:Unfortunately, in 18% of patients the switch of medication from typical to atypical did not change the overall prevalence of neuroleptic-induced movement disorders in the group. The long-term benefit of atypical antipsychotics requires further research in patients who are treated with antipsychotics for years. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]