Search

Your search keyword '"Navarro, Laetitia M."' showing total 157 results
Start Over Author "Navarro, Laetitia M." Publication Year Range Last 10 years
157 results on '"Navarro, Laetitia M."'

1. Genetic diversity goals and targets have improved, but remain insufficient for clear implementation of the post-2020 global biodiversity framework

Author

Hoban, Sean, Bruford, Michael W., da Silva, Jessica M., Funk, W. Chris, Frankham, Richard, Gill, Michael J., Grueber, Catherine E., Heuertz, Myriam, Hunter, Margaret E., Kershaw, Francine, Lacy, Robert C., Lees, Caroline, Lopes-Fernandes, Margarida, MacDonald, Anna J., Mastretta-Yanes, Alicia, McGowan, Philip J. K., Meek, Mariah H., Mergeay, Joachim, Millette, Katie L., Mittan-Moreau, Cinnamon S., Navarro, Laetitia M., O’Brien, David, Ogden, Rob, Segelbacher, Gernot, Paz-Vinas, Ivan, Vernesi, Cristiano, and Laikre, Linda

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

2. Framing challenges and polarized issues in invasion science: toward an interdisciplinary agenda.

Author

Guareschi, Simone, Mathers, Kate L, South, Josie, Navarro, Laetitia M, Renals, Trevor, Hiley, Alice, Antonsich, Marco, Bolpagni, Rossano, Bortolus, Alejandro, Genovesi, Piero, Jere, Arthertone, Madzivanzira, Takudzwa C, Phaka, Fortunate M, Novoa, Ana, Olden, Julian D, Saccó, Mattia, Shackleton, Ross T, Vilà, Montserrat, and Wood, Paul J

Abstract

In a hyperconnected world, framing and managing biological invasions poses complex and contentious challenges, affecting socioeconomic and environmental sectors. This complexity distinguishes the field and fuels polarized debates. In the present article, we synthesize four contentious issues in invasion science that are rarely addressed together: vocabulary usage, the potential benefits of nonnative species, perceptions shifting because of global change, and rewilding practices and biological invasions. Researchers have predominantly focused on single issues; few have addressed multiple components of the debate within or across disciplinary boundaries. Ignoring the interconnected nature of these issues risks overlooking crucial cross-links. We advocate for interdisciplinary approaches that better integrate social and natural sciences. Although they are challenging, interdisciplinary collaborations offer hope to overcome polarization issues in invasion science. These may bridge disagreements, facilitate knowledge exchange, and reshape invasion science narratives. Finally, we present a contemporary agenda to advance future research, management, and constructive dialogue. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Mining threats in high-level biodiversity conservation policies

Author

Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ecología, Torres, Aurora, zu Ermgassen, Sophus O. S. E., Navarro, Laetitia M., Ferri-Yanez, Francisco, Teixeira, Fernanda Z., Wittkopp, Constanze, Rosa, Isabel M. D., Liu, Jianguo, Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ecología, Torres, Aurora, zu Ermgassen, Sophus O. S. E., Navarro, Laetitia M., Ferri-Yanez, Francisco, Teixeira, Fernanda Z., Wittkopp, Constanze, Rosa, Isabel M. D., and Liu, Jianguo

Abstract

Amid a global infrastructure boom, there is increasing recognition of the ecological impacts of the extraction and consumption of construction minerals, mainly processed as concrete, including significant and expanding threats to global biodiversity. We investigated how high-level national and international biodiversity conservation policies address mining threats, with a special focus on construction minerals. We conducted a review and quantified the degree to which threats from mining these minerals are addressed in biodiversity goals and targets under the 2011–2020 and post-2020 biodiversity strategies, national biodiversity strategies and action plans, and the assessments of the Intergovernmental Science–Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Mining appeared rarely in national targets but more frequently in national strategies. Yet, in most countries, it was superficially addressed. Coverage of aggregates mining was greater than coverage of limestone mining. We outline 8 key components, tailored for a wide range of actors, to effectively mainstream biodiversity conservation into the extractive, infrastructure, and construction sectors. Actions include improving reporting and monitoring systems, enhancing the evidence base around mining impacts on biodiversity, and modifying the behavior of financial agents and businesses. Implementing these measures could pave the way for a more sustainable approach to construction mineral use and safeguard biodiversity.

Published
2024

6. A metric for spatially explicit contributions to science-based species targets

Author

Mair, Louise, Bennun, Leon A., Brooks, Thomas M., Butchart, Stuart H. M., Bolam, Friederike C., Burgess, Neil D., Ekstrom, Jonathan M. M., Milner-Gulland, E. J., Hoffmann, Michael, Ma, Keping, Macfarlane, Nicholas B. W., Raimondo, Domitilla C., Rodrigues, Ana S. L., Shen, Xiaoli, Strassburg, Bernardo B. N., Beatty, Craig R., Gómez-Creutzberg, Carla, Iribarrem, Alvaro, Irmadhiany, Meizani, Lacerda, Eduardo, Mattos, Bianca C., Parakkasi, Karmila, Tognelli, Marcelo F., Bennett, Elizabeth L., Bryan, Catherine, Carbone, Giulia, Chaudhary, Abhishek, Eiselin, Maxime, da Fonseca, Gustavo A. B., Galt, Russell, Geschke, Arne, Glew, Louise, Goedicke, Romie, Green, Jonathan M. H., Gregory, Richard D., Hill, Samantha L. L., Hole, David G., Hughes, Jonathan, Hutton, Jonathan, Keijzer, Marco P. W., Navarro, Laetitia M., Nic Lughadha, Eimear, Plumptre, Andrew J., Puydarrieux, Philippe, Possingham, Hugh P., Rankovic, Aleksandar, Regan, Eugenie C., Rondinini, Carlo, Schneck, Joshua D., Siikamäki, Juha, Sendashonga, Cyriaque, Seutin, Gilles, Sinclair, Sam, Skowno, Andrew L., Soto-Navarro, Carolina A., Stuart, Simon N., Temple, Helen J., Vallier, Antoine, Verones, Francesca, Viana, Leonardo R., Watson, James, Bezeng, Simeon, Böhm, Monika, Burfield, Ian J., Clausnitzer, Viola, Clubbe, Colin, Cox, Neil A., Freyhof, Jörg, Gerber, Leah R., Hilton-Taylor, Craig, Jenkins, Richard, Joolia, Ackbar, Joppa, Lucas N., Koh, Lian Pin, Lacher, Jr, Thomas E., Langhammer, Penny F., Long, Barney, Mallon, David, Pacifici, Michela, Polidoro, Beth A., Pollock, Caroline M., Rivers, Malin C., Roach, Nicolette S., Rodríguez, Jon Paul, Smart, Jane, Young, Bruce E., Hawkins, Frank, and McGowan, Philip J. K.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Mining threats in high‐level biodiversity conservation policies.

Author

Torres, Aurora, zu Ermgassen, Sophus O. S. E., Navarro, Laetitia M., Ferri‐Yanez, Francisco, Teixeira, Fernanda Z., Wittkopp, Constanze, Rosa, Isabel M. D., and Liu, Jianguo

Subjects
BIODIVERSITY conservation, LIMESTONE quarries & quarrying, MINES & mineral resources, BIODIVERSITY, ECOLOGICAL impact, ECOSYSTEMS, SUSTAINABLE construction, ECOSYSTEM services
Abstract

Copyright of Conservation Biology is the property of Wiley-Blackwell and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

17. Monitoring biodiversity change through effective global coordination

Author

Navarro, Laetitia M, Fernández, Néstor, Guerra, Carlos, Guralnick, Rob, Kissling, W Daniel, Londoño, Maria Cecilia, Muller-Karger, Frank, Turak, Eren, Balvanera, Patricia, Costello, Mark J, Delavaud, Aurelie, El Serafy, GY, Ferrier, Simon, Geijzendorffer, Ilse, Geller, Gary N, Jetz, Walter, Kim, Eun-Shik, Kim, HyeJin, Martin, Corinne S, McGeoch, Melodie A, Mwampamba, Tuyeni H, Nel, Jeanne L, Nicholson, Emily, Pettorelli, Nathalie, Schaepman, Michael E, Skidmore, Andrew, Sousa Pinto, Isabel, Vergara, Sheila, Vihervaara, Petteri, Xu, Haigen, Yahara, Tetsukazu, Gill, Mike, and Pereira, Henrique M

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

19. Towards global data products of Essential Biodiversity Variables on species traits

Author

Kissling, W. Daniel, Walls, Ramona, Bowser, Anne, Jones, Matthew O., Kattge, Jens, Agosti, Donat, Amengual, Josep, Basset, Alberto, van Bodegom, Peter M., Cornelissen, Johannes H. C., Denny, Ellen G., Deudero, Salud, Egloff, Willi, Elmendorf, Sarah C., Alonso García, Enrique, Jones, Katherine D., Jones, Owen R., Lavorel, Sandra, Lear, Dan, Navarro, Laetitia M., Pawar, Samraat, Pirzl, Rebecca, Rüger, Nadja, Sal, Sofia, Salguero-Gómez, Roberto, Schigel, Dmitry, Schulz, Katja-Sabine, Skidmore, Andrew, and Guralnick, Robert P.

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

20. Tailoring evidence into action: using a codesign approach for biodiversity information in the Tropical Andes

Author

Valdez, Jose W., primary, Pereira, Henrique M., additional, Morejon, Gustavo Francisco, additional, Acosta-Munoz, Cristina, additional, Bonet Garcia, Francisco Javier, additional, Castro Vergara, Lucia, additional, Claros, Xavier R., additional, Gill, Michael J., additional, Josse, Carmen, additional, Lafuente-Cartagena, Indyra, additional, Langstroth, Robert, additional, Sheppard, Sidney Novoa, additional, Orihuela, Gabriela, additional, Prieto-Albuja, Francisco J., additional, Quillahuaman, Natividad, additional, Teran, Marcos F., additional, Zambrana-Torrelio, Carlos M., additional, Navarro, Laetitia M., additional, and Fernandez, Miguel, additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

21. Tailoring evidence into action: Using a co‐design approach for biodiversity information in the Tropical Andes.

Author

Valdez, Jose W., Pereira, Henrique M., Morejón, Gustavo Francisco, Acosta‐Muñoz, Cristina, Bonet Garcia, Francisco Javier, Castro Vergara, Lucía, Claros, Xavier R., Gill, Michael J., Josse, Carmen, Lafuente‐Cartagena, Indyra, Langstroth, Robert, Sheppard, Sidney Novoa, Orihuela, Gabriela, Prieto‐Albuja, Francisco J., Quillahuaman, Natividad, Terán, Marcos F., Zambrana‐Torrelio, Carlos M., Navarro, Laetitia M., and Fernandez, Miguel

Subjects
BIODIVERSITY, PARTICIPATORY design, BIODIVERSITY conservation, STAKEHOLDER analysis, WORLDVIEW, COOPERATION, VALUES (Ethics)
Abstract

Biodiversity conservation is a complex and transdisciplinary problem that requires engagement and cooperation among scientific, societal, economic, and political institutions. However, historical approaches have often failed to bring together and address the needs of all relevant stakeholders in decision‐making processes. The Tropical Andes, a biodiversity hotspot where conservation efforts often conflict with socioeconomic issues and policies that prioritize economic development, provides an ideal model to develop and implement more effective approaches. In this study, we present a co‐design approach that mainstreams and improves the flow of biodiversity information in the Tropical Andes, while creating tailored outputs that meet the needs of economic and societal stakeholders. We employed a consultative process that brought together biodiversity information users and producers at the local, national, and regional levels through a combination of surveys and workshops. This approach identified priority needs and limitations of the flow of biodiversity information in the region, which led to the co‐design of user‐relevant biodiversity indicators. By leveraging the existing capacities of biodiversity information users and producers, we were able to co‐design multiple biodiversity indicators and prioritize two for full implementation ensuring that the data was findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable based on the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles. This approach helped address limitations that were identified in the stakeholder engagement process, including gaps in data availability and the need for more accessible biodiversity information. Additionally, capacity‐building workshops were incorporated for all producers of biodiversity information involved, which aimed to not only improve the current flow of biodiversity information in the region but also facilitate its future sustainability. Our approach can serve as a valuable blueprint for mainstreaming biodiversity information and making it more inclusive in the future, especially considering the diverse worldviews, values, and knowledge systems between science, policy, and practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

22. Multiscale scenarios for nature futures

Author

Rosa, Isabel M. D., Pereira, Henrique M., Ferrier, Simon, Alkemade, Rob, Acosta, Lilibeth A., Akcakaya, H. Resit, den Belder, Eefje, Fazel, Asghar M., Fujimori, Shinichiro, Harfoot, Mike, Harhash, Khaled A., Harrison, Paula A., Hauck, Jennifer, Hendriks, Rob J. J., Hernández, Gladys, Jetz, Walter, Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Sylvia I., Kim, HyeJin, King, Nicholas, Kok, Marcel T. J., Kolomytsev, Grygoriy O., Lazarova, Tanya, Leadley, Paul, Lundquist, Carolyn J., García Márquez, Jaime, Meyer, Carsten, Navarro, Laetitia M., Nesshöver, Carsten, Ngo, Hien T., Ninan, Karachepone N., Palomo, Maria G., Pereira, Laura M., Peterson, Garry D., Pichs, Ramon, Popp, Alexander, Purvis, Andy, Ravera, Federica, Rondinini, Carlo, Sathyapalan, Jyothis, Schipper, Aafke M., Seppelt, Ralf, Settele, Josef, Sitas, Nadia, and van Vuuren, Detlef

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

24. Participatory scenarios for restoring European landscapes show a plurality of nature values

Author

European Commission, German Research Foundation, Quintero-Uribe, Laura C., Navarro, Laetitia M., Pereira, Henrique M., Fernández, Néstor, European Commission, German Research Foundation, Quintero-Uribe, Laura C., Navarro, Laetitia M., Pereira, Henrique M., and Fernández, Néstor

Abstract

Large-scale ecological restoration is crucial for effective biodiversity conservation and combating climate change. However, perspectives on the goals and values of restoration are highly diverse, as are the different approaches to restoration e.g. ranging from the restoration of cultural ecosystems to rewilding. We assess how the future of nature is envisioned in participatory scenarios, focusing on which elements of rewilding and nature contributions to people have been considered in scenario narratives across Europe. We used the Nature Futures Framework archetypes as a template to synthesize pluralistic perspectives of nature. We found that different values of nature are often represented as counteracting elements and fail to integrate the plural views of nature. Nature as Culture was the main archetype found in the scenarios, usually associated with positive impacts on the non-material benefits to people. Intrinsic values of nature (i.e., Nature for Nature) were associated with positive impacts on regulating benefits and negative impacts on material benefits, being the only archetype of future associated with positive impacts on all three components of rewilding. Nature for Society was associated with moderate positive impacts on material and regulatory nature contributions to people. Business as usual futures were associated with negative impacts on regulating and non-material benefits to people and on all three components of rewilding. Our results highlight two major gaps in the scenarios that should be addressed in participatory restoration planning and models. Firstly, there is a paucity of spatially explicit approaches, with most studies failing to transform the results of participatory scenario planning into model projections. Secondly, we found scenarios that explored co-benefits between multiple nature perspectives were overall missing from the literature. Novel scenario narratives and approaches that explore synergies among different nature values are n

Published
2022

25. Participatory scenarios for restoring European landscapes show a plurality of nature values

Author

Quintero-Uribe, Laura C., Navarro, Laetitia M., Pereira, Henrique M., Fernández, Néstor, European Commission, and German Research Foundation

Subjects
nature contributions to people, participatory scenarios, rewilding, spatially explicit models, restoration ecology, nature futures
Abstract

Large-scale ecological restoration is crucial for effective biodiversity conservation and combating climate change. However, perspectives on the goals and values of restoration are highly diverse, as are the different approaches to restoration e.g. ranging from the restoration of cultural ecosystems to rewilding. We assess how the future of nature is envisioned in participatory scenarios, focusing on which elements of rewilding and nature contributions to people have been considered in scenario narratives across Europe. We used the Nature Futures Framework archetypes as a template to synthesize pluralistic perspectives of nature. We found that different values of nature are often represented as counteracting elements and fail to integrate the plural views of nature. Nature as Culture was the main archetype found in the scenarios, usually associated with positive impacts on the non-material benefits to people. Intrinsic values of nature (i.e., Nature for Nature) were associated with positive impacts on regulating benefits and negative impacts on material benefits, being the only archetype of future associated with positive impacts on all three components of rewilding. Nature for Society was associated with moderate positive impacts on material and regulatory nature contributions to people. Business as usual futures were associated with negative impacts on regulating and non-material benefits to people and on all three components of rewilding. Our results highlight two major gaps in the scenarios that should be addressed in participatory restoration planning and models. Firstly, there is a paucity of spatially explicit approaches, with most studies failing to transform the results of participatory scenario planning into model projections. Secondly, we found scenarios that explored co-benefits between multiple nature perspectives were overall missing from the literature. Novel scenario narratives and approaches that explore synergies among different nature values are needed to design future large-scale restoration where biodiversity recovery and human well-being are intrinsically linked and fostered., The work was supported by the project TERRANOVA the European Landscape Learning Initiative, which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant agreement no. 813904. The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of iDiv funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG-FZT 118, 202548816).

Published
2022

28. Europa Biodiversity Observation Network: integrating data streams to support policy

Author

Pereira, Henrique M., primary, Junker, Jessi, additional, Fernández, Néstor, additional, Maes, Joachim, additional, Beja, Pedro, additional, Bonn, Aletta, additional, Breeze, Tom, additional, Brotons, Lluís, additional, Bruehlheide, Helge, additional, Buchhorn, Marcel, additional, Capinha, César, additional, Chow, Cher, additional, Dietrich, Karolin, additional, Dornelas, Maria, additional, Dubois, Grégoire, additional, Fernandez, Miguel, additional, Frenzel, Mark, additional, Friberg, Nikolai, additional, Fritz, Steffen, additional, Georgieva, Ivelina, additional, Gobin, Anne, additional, Guerra, Carlos, additional, Haande, Sigrid, additional, Herrando, Sergi, additional, Jandt, Ute, additional, Kissling, W. Daniel, additional, Kühn, Ingolf, additional, Langer, Christian, additional, Liquete, Camino, additional, Lyche Solheim, Anne, additional, Martí, David, additional, Martin, Juliette G. C., additional, Masur, Annett, additional, McCallum, Ian, additional, Mjelde, Marit, additional, Moe, Jannicke, additional, Moersberger, Hannah, additional, Morán-Ordóñez, Alejandra, additional, Moreira, Francisco, additional, Musche, Martin, additional, Navarro, Laetitia M., additional, Orgiazzi, Alberto, additional, Patchett, Robert, additional, Penev, Lyubomir, additional, Pino, Joan, additional, Popova, Gabriela, additional, Potts, Simon, additional, Ramon, Anna, additional, Sandin, Leonard, additional, Santana, Joana, additional, Sapundzhieva, Anna, additional, See, Linda, additional, Shamoun-Baranes, Judy, additional, Smets, Bruno, additional, Stoev, Pavel, additional, Tedersoo, Leho, additional, Tiimann, Liis, additional, Valdez, Jose, additional, Vallecillo, Sara, additional, Van Grunsven, Roy H. A., additional, Van De Kerchove, Ruben, additional, Villero, Dani, additional, Visconti, Piero, additional, Weinhold, Claudia, additional, and Zuleger, Annika M., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

29. Biodiversity post-2020: Closing the gap between global targets and national-level implementation

Author

Perino, Andrea, Pereira, Henrique M., Felipe-Lucia, Maria, Kim, HyeJin, Kühl, Hjalmar S., Marselle, Melissa R., Meya, Jasper N., Meyer, Carsten, Navarro, Laetitia M., van Klink, Roel, Albert, Georg, Barratt, Christopher D., Bruelheide, Helge, Cao, Yun, Chamoin, Ariane, Darbi, Marianne, Dornelas, Maria, Eisenhauer, Nico, Essl, Franz, Farwig, Nina, Förster, Johannes, Freyhof, Jörg, Geschke, Jonas, Gottschall, Felix, Guerra, Carlos, Haase, Peter, Hickler, Thomas, Jacob, Ute, Kastner, Thomas, Korell, Lotte, Kühn, Ingolf, Lehmann, Gerlind U. C., Lenzner, Bernd, Marques, Alexandra, Motivans Švara, Elena, Quintero, Laura C., Pacheco, Andrea, Popp, Alexander, Rouet-Leduc, Julia, Schnabel, Florian, Siebert, Julia, Staude, Ingmar R., Trogisch, Stefan, Švara, Vid, Svenning, Jens-Christian, Pe'er, Guy, Raab, Kristina, Rakosy, Demetra, Vandewalle, Marie, Werner, Alexandra S., Wirth, Christian, Xu, Haigen, Yu, Dandan, Zinngrebe, Yves, Bonn, Aletta, University of St Andrews. School of Biology, University of St Andrews. Centre for Biological Diversity, University of St Andrews. Fish Behaviour and Biodiversity Research Group, and University of St Andrews. Marine Alliance for Science & Technology Scotland

Subjects
GE, restoration, mainstreaming, QH301 Biology, remote responsibility, 580 Plants (Botany), GeneralLiterature_MISCELLANEOUS, scenario, QH301, monitoring, biodiversity change, global biodiversity framework, T-DAS, values, implementation, GE Environmental Sciences
Abstract

This work is based on a workshop funded by iDiv via the German Research Foundation (DFG FZT 118 and 202548816). National and local governments need to step up efforts to effectively implement the post-2020 global biodiversity framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity to halt and reverse worsening biodiversity trends. Drawing on recent advances in interdisciplinary biodiversity science, we propose a framework for improved implementation by national and subnational governments. First, the identification of actions and the promotion of ownership across stakeholders need to recognize the multiple values of biodiversity and account for remote responsibility. Second, cross-sectorial implementation and mainstreaming should adopt scalable and multifunctional ecosystem restoration approaches and target positive futures for nature and people. Third, assessment of progress and adaptive management can be informed by novel biodiversity monitoring and modeling approaches handling the multidimensionality of biodiversity change. Publisher PDF

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

30. Biodiversity post‐2020: Closing the gap between global targets and national‐level implementation

Author

Perino, Andrea, primary, Pereira, Henrique M., additional, Felipe‐Lucia, Maria, additional, Kim, HyeJin, additional, Kühl, Hjalmar S., additional, Marselle, Melissa R., additional, Meya, Jasper N., additional, Meyer, Carsten, additional, Navarro, Laetitia M., additional, van Klink, Roel, additional, Albert, Georg, additional, Barratt, Christopher D., additional, Bruelheide, Helge, additional, Cao, Yun, additional, Chamoin, Ariane, additional, Darbi, Marianne, additional, Dornelas, Maria, additional, Eisenhauer, Nico, additional, Essl, Franz, additional, Farwig, Nina, additional, Förster, Johannes, additional, Freyhof, Jörg, additional, Geschke, Jonas, additional, Gottschall, Felix, additional, Guerra, Carlos, additional, Haase, Peter, additional, Hickler, Thomas, additional, Jacob, Ute, additional, Kastner, Thomas, additional, Korell, Lotte, additional, Kühn, Ingolf, additional, Lehmann, Gerlind U. C., additional, Lenzner, Bernd, additional, Marques, Alexandra, additional, Motivans Švara, Elena, additional, Quintero, Laura C., additional, Pacheco, Andrea, additional, Popp, Alexander, additional, Rouet‐Leduc, Julia, additional, Schnabel, Florian, additional, Siebert, Julia, additional, Staude, Ingmar R., additional, Trogisch, Stefan, additional, Švara, Vid, additional, Svenning, Jens‐Christian, additional, Pe'er, Guy, additional, Raab, Kristina, additional, Rakosy, Demetra, additional, Vandewalle, Marie, additional, Werner, Alexandra S., additional, Wirth, Christian, additional, Xu, Haigen, additional, Yu, Dandan, additional, Zinngrebe, Yves, additional, and Bonn, Aletta, additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

31. Domestic Livestock and Rewilding: Are They Mutually Exclusive?

Author

Gordon, Iain J., Manning, Adrian D., Navarro, Laetitia M., and Rouet-Leduc, Julia

Subjects
ddc:630, rewilding, livestock, Oostvaardersplassen nature reserve, conservation, safe operating space, first nations, ecosystems services
Abstract

Human influence extends across the globe, fromthe tallestmountains to the deep bottom of the oceans. There is a growing call for nature to be protected from the negative impacts of human activity (particularly intensive agriculture); so-called “land sparing”. A relatively new approach is “rewilding”, defined as the restoration of self-sustaining and complex ecosystems, with interlinked ecological processes that promote and support one another while minimising or gradually reducing human intervention. The key theoretical basis of rewilding is to return ecosystems to a “natural” or “self-willed” state with trophic complexity, dispersal (and connectivity) and stochastic disturbance in place. However, this is constrained by context-specific factors whereby it may not be possible to restore the native species that formed part of the trophic structure of the ecosystem if they are extinct (e.g., mammoths, Mammuthus spp., aurochs, Bos primigenius); and, populations/communities of native herbivores/predators may not be able to survive or be acceptable to the public in small scale rewilding projects close to areas of high human density. Therefore, the restoration of natural trophic complexity and disturbance regimes within rewilding projects requires careful consideration if the broader conservation needs of society are to be met. In some circumstances, managers will require a more flexible deliberate approach to intervening in rewilding projects using the range of tools in their toolbox (e.g., controlled burning regimes; using domestic livestock to replicate the impacts of extinct herbivore species), even if this is only in the early stages of the rewilding process. If this approach is adopted, then larger areas can be given over to conservation, because of the potential broader benefits to society from these spaces and the engagement of farmers in practises that are closer to their traditions. We provide examples, primarily European, where domestic and semi-domestic livestock are used by managers as part of their rewilding toolbox. Here managers have looked at the broader phenotype of livestock species as to their suitability in different rewilding systems. We assess whether there are ways of using livestock in these systems for conservation, economic (e.g., branded or certified livestock products) and cultural gains.

Published
2021

32. Tracking, targeting, and conserving soil biodiversity

Author

Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ecología, Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio "Ramón Margalef", Guerra, Carlos A., Bardgett, Richard D., Caon, Lucrezia, Crowther, Thomas W., Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel, Montanarella, Luca, Navarro, Laetitia M., Orgiazzi, Alberto, Singh, Brajesh K., Tedersoo, Leho, Vargas-Rojas, Ronald, Briones, Maria J.I., Buscot, François, Cameron, Erin K., Cesarz, Simone, Chatzinotas, Antonis, Cowan, Don A., Djukic, Ika, van den Hoogen, Johan, Lehmann, Anika, Maestre, Fernando T., Marín, César, Reitz, Thomas, Rillig, Matthias C., Smith, Linnea C., de Vries, Franciska T., Weigelt, Alexandra, Wall, Diana H., Eisenhauer, Nico, Universidad de Alicante. Departamento de Ecología, Universidad de Alicante. Instituto Multidisciplinar para el Estudio del Medio "Ramón Margalef", Guerra, Carlos A., Bardgett, Richard D., Caon, Lucrezia, Crowther, Thomas W., Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel, Montanarella, Luca, Navarro, Laetitia M., Orgiazzi, Alberto, Singh, Brajesh K., Tedersoo, Leho, Vargas-Rojas, Ronald, Briones, Maria J.I., Buscot, François, Cameron, Erin K., Cesarz, Simone, Chatzinotas, Antonis, Cowan, Don A., Djukic, Ika, van den Hoogen, Johan, Lehmann, Anika, Maestre, Fernando T., Marín, César, Reitz, Thomas, Rillig, Matthias C., Smith, Linnea C., de Vries, Franciska T., Weigelt, Alexandra, Wall, Diana H., and Eisenhauer, Nico

Published
2021

33. Guiding principles for rewilding

Author

Carver, Steve, primary, Convery, Ian, additional, Hawkins, Sally, additional, Beyers, Rene, additional, Eagle, Adam, additional, Kun, Zoltan, additional, Van Maanen, Erwin, additional, Cao, Yue, additional, Fisher, Mark, additional, Edwards, Stephen R., additional, Nelson, Cara, additional, Gann, George D., additional, Shurter, Steve, additional, Aguilar, Karina, additional, Andrade, Angela, additional, Ripple, William J., additional, Davis, John, additional, Sinclair, Anthony, additional, Bekoff, Marc, additional, Noss, Reed, additional, Foreman, Dave, additional, Pettersson, Hanna, additional, Root‐Bernstein, Meredith, additional, Svenning, Jens‐Christian, additional, Taylor, Peter, additional, Wynne‐Jones, Sophie, additional, Featherstone, Alan Watson, additional, Fløjgaard, Camilla, additional, Stanley‐Price, Mark, additional, Navarro, Laetitia M., additional, Aykroyd, Toby, additional, Parfitt, Alison, additional, and Soulé, Michael, additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

35. Tracking, targeting, and conserving soil biodiversity

Author

Guerra, Carlos A., primary, Bardgett, Richard D., additional, Caon, Lucrezia, additional, Crowther, Thomas W., additional, Delgado-Baquerizo, Manuel, additional, Montanarella, Luca, additional, Navarro, Laetitia M., additional, Orgiazzi, Alberto, additional, Singh, Brajesh K., additional, Tedersoo, Leho, additional, Vargas-Rojas, Ronald, additional, Briones, Maria J. I., additional, Buscot, François, additional, Cameron, Erin K., additional, Cesarz, Simone, additional, Chatzinotas, Antonis, additional, Cowan, Don A., additional, Djukic, Ika, additional, van den Hoogen, Johan, additional, Lehmann, Anika, additional, Maestre, Fernando T., additional, Marín, César, additional, Reitz, Thomas, additional, Rillig, Matthias C., additional, Smith, Linnea C., additional, de Vries, Franciska T., additional, Weigelt, Alexandra, additional, Wall, Diana H., additional, and Eisenhauer, Nico, additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

36. Mapping human pressures on biodiversity across the planet uncovers anthropogenic threat complexes

Author

Bowler, Diana E., primary, Bjorkman, Anne D., additional, Dornelas, Maria, additional, Myers‐Smith, Isla H., additional, Navarro, Laetitia M., additional, Niamir, Aidin, additional, Supp, Sarah R., additional, Waldock, Conor, additional, Winter, Marten, additional, Vellend, Mark, additional, Blowes, Shane A., additional, Böhning‐Gaese, Katrin, additional, Bruelheide, Helge, additional, Elahi, Robin, additional, Antão, Laura H., additional, Hines, Jes, additional, Isbell, Forest, additional, Jones, Holly P., additional, Magurran, Anne E., additional, Cabral, Juliano Sarmento, additional, and Bates, Amanda E., additional

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

37. Biodiversity post‐2020: Closing the gap between global targets and national‐level implementation.

Author

Perino, Andrea, Pereira, Henrique M., Felipe‐Lucia, Maria, Kim, HyeJin, Kühl, Hjalmar S., Marselle, Melissa R., Meya, Jasper N., Meyer, Carsten, Navarro, Laetitia M., van Klink, Roel, Albert, Georg, Barratt, Christopher D., Bruelheide, Helge, Cao, Yun, Chamoin, Ariane, Darbi, Marianne, Dornelas, Maria, Eisenhauer, Nico, Essl, Franz, and Farwig, Nina

Subjects
BIODIVERSITY monitoring, RESTORATION ecology, SUBNATIONAL governments, BIODIVERSITY, FEDERAL government, LOCAL government
Abstract

National and local governments need to step up efforts to effectively implement the post‐2020 global biodiversity framework of the Convention on Biological Diversity to halt and reverse worsening biodiversity trends. Drawing on recent advances in interdisciplinary biodiversity science, we propose a framework for improved implementation by national and subnational governments. First, the identification of actions and the promotion of ownership across stakeholders need to recognize the multiple values of biodiversity and account for remote responsibility. Second, cross‐sectorial implementation and mainstreaming should adopt scalable and multifunctional ecosystem restoration approaches and target positive futures for nature and people. Third, assessment of progress and adaptive management can be informed by novel biodiversity monitoring and modeling approaches handling the multidimensionality of biodiversity change. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

38. Rewilding complex ecosystems

Author

Perino, Andrea, Pereira, Henrique M., Navarro, Laetitia M., Fernández, Néstor, Bullock, James M., Ceaușu, Silvia, Cortés-Avizanda, Ainara, van Klink, Roel, Kuemmerle, Tobias, Lomba, Angela, Pe’er, Guy, Plieninger, Tobias, Rey Benayas, José M., Sandom, Christopher J., Svenning, Jens-Christian, Wheeler, Helen C., Perino, Andrea, Pereira, Henrique M., Navarro, Laetitia M., Fernández, Néstor, Bullock, James M., Ceaușu, Silvia, Cortés-Avizanda, Ainara, van Klink, Roel, Kuemmerle, Tobias, Lomba, Angela, Pe’er, Guy, Plieninger, Tobias, Rey Benayas, José M., Sandom, Christopher J., Svenning, Jens-Christian, and Wheeler, Helen C.

Abstract

The practice of rewilding has been both promoted and criticized in recent years. Benefits include flexibility to react to environmental change and the promotion of opportunities for society to reconnect with nature. Criticisms include the lack of a clear conceptualization of rewilding, insufficient knowledge about possible outcomes, and the perception that rewilding excludes people from landscapes. Here, we present a framework for rewilding that addresses these concerns. We suggest that rewilding efforts should target trophic complexity, natural disturbances, and dispersal as interacting processes that can improve ecosystem resilience and maintain biodiversity. We propose a structured approach to rewilding projects that includes assessment of the contributions of nature to people and the social-ecological constraints on restoration.

Published
2019

39. The geography of biodiversity change in marine and terrestrial assemblages

Author

Blowes, Shane A., primary, Supp, Sarah R., additional, Antão, Laura H., additional, Bates, Amanda, additional, Bruelheide, Helge, additional, Chase, Jonathan M., additional, Moyes, Faye, additional, Magurran, Anne, additional, McGill, Brian, additional, Myers-Smith, Isla H., additional, Winter, Marten, additional, Bjorkman, Anne D., additional, Bowler, Diana E., additional, Byrnes, Jarrett E. K., additional, Gonzalez, Andrew, additional, Hines, Jes, additional, Isbell, Forest, additional, Jones, Holly P., additional, Navarro, Laetitia M., additional, Thompson, Patrick L., additional, Vellend, Mark, additional, Waldock, Conor, additional, and Dornelas, Maria, additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

41. Rewilding complex ecosystems

Author

Perino, Andrea, primary, Pereira, Henrique M., additional, Navarro, Laetitia M., additional, Fernández, Néstor, additional, Bullock, James M., additional, Ceaușu, Silvia, additional, Cortés-Avizanda, Ainara, additional, van Klink, Roel, additional, Kuemmerle, Tobias, additional, Lomba, Angela, additional, Pe’er, Guy, additional, Plieninger, Tobias, additional, Rey Benayas, José M., additional, Sandom, Christopher J., additional, Svenning, Jens-Christian, additional, and Wheeler, Helen C., additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

42. Monitoring biodiversity change through effective global coordination

Author

Navarro, Laetitia M., Fernández, Nestor, Guerra, Carlos, Guralnick, Rob, Kissling, W. Daniel, Londoño, Maria Cecilia, Muller-Karger, Frank, Turak, Eren, Balvanera, Patricia, Costello, Mark J., Delavaud, Aurelie, El Serafy, G. Y., Ferrier, Simon, Geijzendorffer, Ilse, Geller, Gary N., Jetz, Walter, Kim, Eun-Shik, Kim, HyeJin, Martin, Corrine S., McGeoch, Melodie A., Mwampamba, Tuyeni H., Nel, Jeanne L., Nicholson, Emily, Pettorelli, Nathalie, Schaepman, Michael E., Skidmore, Andrew, Sousa Pinto, Isabel, Vergara, Sheila, Vihervaara, Petteri, Xu, Haigen, Yahara, Tetsukazu, Gill, Mike, Pereira, Henrique M., Navarro, Laetitia M., Fernández, Nestor, Guerra, Carlos, Guralnick, Rob, Kissling, W. Daniel, Londoño, Maria Cecilia, Muller-Karger, Frank, Turak, Eren, Balvanera, Patricia, Costello, Mark J., Delavaud, Aurelie, El Serafy, G. Y., Ferrier, Simon, Geijzendorffer, Ilse, Geller, Gary N., Jetz, Walter, Kim, Eun-Shik, Kim, HyeJin, Martin, Corrine S., McGeoch, Melodie A., Mwampamba, Tuyeni H., Nel, Jeanne L., Nicholson, Emily, Pettorelli, Nathalie, Schaepman, Michael E., Skidmore, Andrew, Sousa Pinto, Isabel, Vergara, Sheila, Vihervaara, Petteri, Xu, Haigen, Yahara, Tetsukazu, Gill, Mike, and Pereira, Henrique M.

Abstract

The ability to monitor changes in biodiversity, and their societal impact, is critical to conserving species and managing ecosystems. While emerging technologies increase the breadth and reach of data acquisition, monitoring efforts are still spatially and temporally fragmented, and taxonomically biased. Appropriate long-term information remains therefore limited. The Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON) aims to provide a general framework for biodiversity monitoring to support decision-makers. Here, we discuss the coordinated observing system adopted by GEO BON, and review challenges and advances in its implementation, focusing on two interconnected core components — the Essential Biodiversity Variables as a standard framework for biodiversity monitoring, and the Biodiversity Observation Networks that support harmonized observation systems — while highlighting their societal relevance.

Published
2018

43. Advancing Marine Biological Observations and Data Requirements of the Complementary Essential Ocean Variables (EOVs) and Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) Frameworks

Author

Muller-karger, Frank E., Miloslavich, Patricia, Bax, Nicholas J., Simmons, Samantha, Costello, Mark J., Pinto, Isabel Sousa, Canonico, Gabrielle, Turner, Woody, Gill, Michael, Montes, Enrique, Best, Benjamin D., Pearlman, Jay, Halpin, Patrick, Dunn, Daniel, Benson, Abigail, Martin, Corinne S., Weatherdon, Lauren V., Appeltans, Ward, Provoost, Pieter, Klein, Eduardo, Kelble, Christopher R., Miller, Robert J., Chavez, Francisco P., Iken, Katrin, Chiba, Sanae, Obura, David, Navarro, Laetitia M., Pereira, Henrique M., Allain, Valerie, Batten, Sonia, Benedetti-checchi, Lisandro, Duffy, J. Emmett, Kudela, Raphael M., Rebelo, Lisa-maria, Shin, Yunne-jai, Geller, Gary, Muller-karger, Frank E., Miloslavich, Patricia, Bax, Nicholas J., Simmons, Samantha, Costello, Mark J., Pinto, Isabel Sousa, Canonico, Gabrielle, Turner, Woody, Gill, Michael, Montes, Enrique, Best, Benjamin D., Pearlman, Jay, Halpin, Patrick, Dunn, Daniel, Benson, Abigail, Martin, Corinne S., Weatherdon, Lauren V., Appeltans, Ward, Provoost, Pieter, Klein, Eduardo, Kelble, Christopher R., Miller, Robert J., Chavez, Francisco P., Iken, Katrin, Chiba, Sanae, Obura, David, Navarro, Laetitia M., Pereira, Henrique M., Allain, Valerie, Batten, Sonia, Benedetti-checchi, Lisandro, Duffy, J. Emmett, Kudela, Raphael M., Rebelo, Lisa-maria, Shin, Yunne-jai, and Geller, Gary

Abstract

Measurements of the status and trends of key indicators for the ocean and marine life are required to inform policy and management in the context of growing human uses of marine resources, coastal development, and climate change. Two synergistic efforts identify specific priority variables for monitoring: Essential Ocean Variables (EOVs) through the Global Ocean Observing System (GOOS), and Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) from the Group on Earth Observations Biodiversity Observation Network (GEO BON) (see Data Sheet 1 in Supplementary Materials for a glossary of acronyms). Both systems support reporting against internationally agreed conventions and treaties. GOOS, established under the auspices of the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission (IOC), plays a leading role in coordinating global monitoring of the ocean and in the definition of EOVs. GEO BON is a global biodiversity observation network that coordinates observations to enhance management of the world's biodiversity and promote both the awareness and accounting of ecosystem services. Convergence and agreement between these two efforts are required to streamline existing and new marine observation programs to advance scientific knowledge effectively and to support the sustainable use and management of ocean spaces and resources. In this context, the Marine Biodiversity Observation Network (MBON), a thematic component of GEO BON, is collaborating with GOOS, the Ocean Biogeographic Information System (OBIS), and the Integrated Marine Biosphere Research (IMBeR) project to ensure that EBVs and EOVs are complementary, representing alternative uses of a common set of scientific measurements. This work is informed by the Joint Technical Commission for Oceanography and Marine Meteorology (JCOMM), an intergovernmental body of technical experts that helps international coordination on best practices for observing, data management and services, combined with capacity development expertise. Characterizing bi

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

44. Maintaining Disturbance-Dependent Habitats

Author

Pereira Henrique, M. (ed.), Navarro Laetitia, M. (ed.), Navarro Laetitia, M., Proença, Vânia, Kaplan Jed, O., Pereira Henrique, M., Pereira Henrique, M. (ed.), Navarro Laetitia, M. (ed.), Navarro Laetitia, M., Proença, Vânia, Kaplan Jed, O., and Pereira Henrique, M.

Published
2015

45. Multiscale scenarios for nature futures

Author

Rosa, Isabel M.D., Pereira, Henrique M., Ferrier, Simon, Alkemade, Rob, Acosta, Lilibeth A., Akcakaya, H. Resit, Den Belder, Eefje, Fazel, Asghar M., Fujimori, Shinichiro, Harfoot, Mike, Harhash, Khaled A., Harrison, Paula A., Hauck, Jennifer, Hendriks, Rob J.J., Hernández, Gladys, Jetz, Walter, Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Sylvia I., Kim, Hyejin, King, Nicholas, Kok, Marcel T.J., Kolomytsev, Grygoriy O., Lazarova, Tanya, Leadley, Paul, Lundquist, Carolyn J., García Márquez, Jaime, Meyer, Carsten, Navarro, Laetitia M., Nesshöver, Carsten, Ngo, Hien T., Ninan, Karachepone N., Palomo, Maria G., Pereira, Laura M., Peterson, Garry D., Pichs, Ramon, Popp, Alexander, Purvis, Andy, Ravera, Federica, Rondinini, Carlo, Sathyapalan, Jyothis, Schipper, Aafke M., Seppelt, Ralf, Settele, Josef, Sitas, Nadia, Van Vuuren, Detlef, and Environmental Sciences

Subjects
Ecology, Taverne, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
Abstract

Targets for human development are increasingly connected with targets for nature, however, existing scenarios do not explicitly address this relationship. Here, we outline a strategy to generate scenarios centred on our relationship with nature to inform decision-making at multiple scales.

Published
2017

46. Rewilding: a call for boosting ecological complexity in conservation

Author

Fernández, Néstor, Navarro, Laetitia M., and Pereira, Henrique M.

Subjects
trophic downgrading, megafauna, Biodiversity policy, land‐use change, ecological cascades
Abstract

Rewilding has emerged as an audacious conservation approach aiming at restoring wild species interactions and their regulation of ecosystem processes by focusing on the key role of species that have been extensively extirpated by humans. Rewilding has gained increasing attention from scientists, conservationists and the mass‐media. Yet, it has raised highly divergent perspectives as to which ecological processes and species assemblages should be restored. Here we argue that a pragmatic and immediate approach to rewilding unequivocally focused on preserving and restoring the structural and functional complexity of ecosystems must become a primary component of biodiversity conservation. We propose a process‐oriented formulation of the rewilding hypothesis as a general guide to assess the conservation benefits of reverting defaunation. Finally, we identify the need for a framework where the benefits, risks, and costs of rewilding can be evaluated in relation to restoration baselines and the intensity of interventions required to achieve conservation goals.

Published
2017

47. Range size predicts the risk of local extinction from habitat loss.

Author

Staude, Ingmar R., Navarro, Laetitia M., Pereira, Henrique M., and Storch, David

Subjects
*HABITATS, *BIOLOGICAL extinction, *GRID cells, *VASCULAR plants, *TIME series analysis, *LAND use
Abstract

Aim: The geographical range size of species is a strong predictor of vulnerability to global extinction. However, it remains unclear whether range size is also a good predictor of extinction risk at much smaller scales. Here, we reconstruct biodiversity time series to ask whether species with small ranges have declined preferentially with habitat loss at the local scale. Location: Global. Time period: 1500–2015. Major taxa studied: Vascular plants. Method: We collated 70 million occurrence records of 180,000 species of vascular plants from three biodiversity data‐sharing networks. We combined these with data on changes in global land use to find locations (0.25° grid cells) with biodiversity data before and after loss of natural habitat. First, we examined the change in community median range size before and after habitat loss. Second, we quantified the probabilities of local persistence of small‐ and large‐ranged species at different levels of habitat loss. Results: Community median range size was higher after habitat loss, on average. Species with small ranges had lower probabilities of persistence than species with large ranges at already moderate habitat loss (≤50%). Main conclusions: The loss of natural habitat has a differential effect on the local extinction risk of species with different range sizes. Given that species with small ranges decline preferentially, habitat loss can create a linkage between temporal and spatial species turnover, in that changes within communities decrease compositional differences between communities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

48. Biodiversity trends are stronger in marine than terrestrial assemblages

Author

Blowes, Shane, primary, Supp, Sarah, additional, Antão, Laura, additional, Bates, Amanda, additional, Bruelheide, Helge, additional, Chase, Jon, additional, Moyes, Faye, additional, Magurran, Anne, additional, McGill, Brian, additional, Myers-Smith, Isla, additional, Winter, Marten, additional, Bjorkman, Anne, additional, Bowler, Diana, additional, Byrnes, Jarrett E.K., additional, Gonzalez, Andrew, additional, Hines, Jes, additional, Isbell, Forest, additional, Jones, Holly, additional, Navarro, Laetitia M., additional, Thompson, Patrick, additional, Vellend, Mark, additional, Waldock, Conor, additional, and Dornelas, Maria, additional

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

49. Advancing Marine Biological Observations and Data Requirements of the Complementary Essential Ocean Variables (EOVs) and Essential Biodiversity Variables (EBVs) Frameworks

Author

Muller-Karger, Frank E., primary, Miloslavich, Patricia, additional, Bax, Nicholas J., additional, Simmons, Samantha, additional, Costello, Mark J., additional, Sousa Pinto, Isabel, additional, Canonico, Gabrielle, additional, Turner, Woody, additional, Gill, Michael, additional, Montes, Enrique, additional, Best, Benjamin D., additional, Pearlman, Jay, additional, Halpin, Patrick, additional, Dunn, Daniel, additional, Benson, Abigail, additional, Martin, Corinne S., additional, Weatherdon, Lauren V., additional, Appeltans, Ward, additional, Provoost, Pieter, additional, Klein, Eduardo, additional, Kelble, Christopher R., additional, Miller, Robert J., additional, Chavez, Francisco P., additional, Iken, Katrin, additional, Chiba, Sanae, additional, Obura, David, additional, Navarro, Laetitia M., additional, Pereira, Henrique M., additional, Allain, Valerie, additional, Batten, Sonia, additional, Benedetti-Checchi, Lisandro, additional, Duffy, J. Emmett, additional, Kudela, Raphael M., additional, Rebelo, Lisa-Maria, additional, Shin, Yunne, additional, and Geller, Gary, additional

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

50. Multiscale scenarios for nature futures

Author

Environmental Sciences, Rosa, Isabel M.D., Pereira, Henrique M., Ferrier, Simon, Alkemade, Rob, Acosta, Lilibeth A., Akcakaya, H. Resit, Den Belder, Eefje, Fazel, Asghar M., Fujimori, Shinichiro, Harfoot, Mike, Harhash, Khaled A., Harrison, Paula A., Hauck, Jennifer, Hendriks, Rob J.J., Hernández, Gladys, Jetz, Walter, Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Sylvia I., Kim, Hyejin, King, Nicholas, Kok, Marcel T.J., Kolomytsev, Grygoriy O., Lazarova, Tanya, Leadley, Paul, Lundquist, Carolyn J., García Márquez, Jaime, Meyer, Carsten, Navarro, Laetitia M., Nesshöver, Carsten, Ngo, Hien T., Ninan, Karachepone N., Palomo, Maria G., Pereira, Laura M., Peterson, Garry D., Pichs, Ramon, Popp, Alexander, Purvis, Andy, Ravera, Federica, Rondinini, Carlo, Sathyapalan, Jyothis, Schipper, Aafke M., Seppelt, Ralf, Settele, Josef, Sitas, Nadia, Van Vuuren, Detlef, Environmental Sciences, Rosa, Isabel M.D., Pereira, Henrique M., Ferrier, Simon, Alkemade, Rob, Acosta, Lilibeth A., Akcakaya, H. Resit, Den Belder, Eefje, Fazel, Asghar M., Fujimori, Shinichiro, Harfoot, Mike, Harhash, Khaled A., Harrison, Paula A., Hauck, Jennifer, Hendriks, Rob J.J., Hernández, Gladys, Jetz, Walter, Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, Sylvia I., Kim, Hyejin, King, Nicholas, Kok, Marcel T.J., Kolomytsev, Grygoriy O., Lazarova, Tanya, Leadley, Paul, Lundquist, Carolyn J., García Márquez, Jaime, Meyer, Carsten, Navarro, Laetitia M., Nesshöver, Carsten, Ngo, Hien T., Ninan, Karachepone N., Palomo, Maria G., Pereira, Laura M., Peterson, Garry D., Pichs, Ramon, Popp, Alexander, Purvis, Andy, Ravera, Federica, Rondinini, Carlo, Sathyapalan, Jyothis, Schipper, Aafke M., Seppelt, Ralf, Settele, Josef, Sitas, Nadia, and Van Vuuren, Detlef

Published
2017

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results