Search

BackgroundEpidemiological data regarding differences in durability and its determinants of humoral immunity following 2- and 3-dose COVID-19 vaccination are scarce.MethodsWe repeatedly assessed the anti-spike IgG antibody titers of 2- and 3-dose mRNA vaccine recipients among the staff of a medical and research center in Tokyo. Linear mixed models were used to estimate trajectories of antibody titers from 14 to 180 days after the last immune-conferred event (vaccination or infection) and compare antibody waning rates across prior infection and vaccination status, and across background factors in infection-naïve participants.ResultsA total of 6901 measurements from 2964 participants (median age, 35 years; 30% male) were analyzed. Antibody waning rate (per 30 days [95% CI]) was slower after 3-dose (25% [23–26]) than 2-dose (36% [35–37]). Participants with hybrid immunity (vaccination and infection) had further slower waning rates: 2-dose plus infection (16% [9–22]); 3-dose plus infection (21% [17–25]). Older age, male sex, obesity, coexisting diseases, immunosuppressant use, smoking, and alcohol drinking were associated with lower antibody titers, whereas these associations disappeared after 3-dose, except for sex (lower in female participants) and immunosuppressant use. Antibody waning was faster in older participants, females, and alcohol drinkers after 2-dose, whereas it did not differ after 3-dose across except sex.ConclusionsThe 3-dose mRNA vaccine conferred higher durable antibody titers, and previous infection further enhanced its durability. The antibody levels at a given time point and waning speed after 2-dose differed across background factors; however, these differences mostly diminished after 3-dose.

ImportanceInvestigating the role of pre-infection humoral immunity against Omicron BA.5 infection risk and long COVID development is critical to inform public health guidance.ObjectiveTo investigate the association between pre-infection immunogenicity after the third vaccine dose and the risks of Omicron BA.5 infection and long coronavirus disease.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis nested case-control analysis was conducted among tertiary hospital staff in Tokyo, Japan who donated blood samples in June 2022 (1 month before Omicron BA.5 dominant wave onset [July–September 2022]) approximately 6 months after receiving the third dose of the historical monovalent coronavirus disease 2019 mRNA vaccine.ExposuresLive virus-neutralizing antibody titers against Wuhan and Omicron BA.5 (NT50) and anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibody titers with Abbott (AU/mL) and Roche (U/mL) assays at pre-infection.Main Outcomes and MeasuresSymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections during the Omicron BA.5 dominant wave vs. undiagnosed controls matched using a propensity score. Incidence of long COVID (persistent symptoms ≥4 weeks after infection) among breakthrough infection cases.ResultsAnti-spike antibody titers were compared between 243 breakthrough infection cases and their matched controls among the 2360 staff members who met the criteria. Neutralizing antibodies in 50 randomly selected matched pairs were measured and compared. Pre-infection anti-spike and neutralizing antibody titers were lower in breakthrough cases than in undiagnosed controls. Neutralizing antibody titers against Wuhan and Omicron BA.5 were 64% (95% CI: 42–77) and 72% (95% CI: 53–83) lower, respectively, in breakthrough cases than in undiagnosed controls. Individuals with previous SARS-CoV-2 infections were more frequent among undiagnosed controls than breakthrough cases (19.3% vs. 4.1%), and their neutralizing antibody titers were higher than those of infection-naïve individuals. Among the breakthrough cases, pre-infection antibody titers were not associated with the incidence of long COVID.Conclusions and RelevancePre-infection immunogenicity against SARS-CoV-2 may play a role in protecting against the Omicron BA.5 infection, but not in preventing long COVID.Key PointsQuestionDoes pre-infection anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral immunity protect against Omicron BA.5 infection and long-COVID development?FindingsPre-infection neutralizing antibody titers against Omicron BA.5 were lower in subsequent Omicron BA.5 breakthrough infection cases than in matched controls in this nested case-control study of healthcare workers who received the third dose of historical COVID-19 mRNA vaccines approximately 6 months prior. Pre-infection antibody titers could not predict the incidence of long COVID among breakthrough infection cases.MeaningHigher pre-infection humoral immunity approximately 6 months after the third vaccination may correlate with protection against Omicron BA.5 infection but not against long-COVID development.

Background While increasing coverage of effective vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), emergent variants raise concerns about breakthrough infection. Data are limited, however, whether breakthrough infection during the epidemic of the variant is ascribed to insufficient vaccine-induced immunogenicity. Methods We describe incident COVID-19 in relation to the vaccination program among workers of a referral hospital in Tokyo. During the predominantly Delta epidemic, we followed 2415 fully vaccinated staff (BNT162b2) for breakthrough infection and selected 3 matched controls. We measured post-vaccination neutralizing antibodies against the wild-type, Alpha (B.1.1.7), and Delta (B.1.617.2) strains using live viruses and anti-spike antibodies using quantitative assays, and compared them using the generalized estimating equation model between the 2 groups. Results No COVID-19 cases occurred 1–2 months after the vaccination program during the fourth epidemic wave in Japan, dominated by the Alpha variant, while 22 cases emerged 2–4 months after the vaccination program during the fifth wave, dominated by the Delta variant. In the vaccinated cohort, all 17 cases of breakthrough infection were mild or asymptomatic and participants had returned to work early. There was no measurable difference between cases and controls in post-vaccination neutralizing antibody titers against the wild-type, Alpha, Delta, and anti-spike antibody titers, while neutralizing titers against the variants were considerably lower than those against the wild-type. Conclusions Post-vaccination neutralizing antibody titers were not decreased among patients with breakthrough infection relative to their controls under the Delta variant outbreak. The result points to the importance of infection-control measures in the post-vaccination era, irrespective of immunogenicity profile.

To describe the trend of cumulative incidence of coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) and undiagnosed cases over the pandemic through the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants among healthcare workers in Tokyo, we analysed data of repeated serological surveys and in-house COVID-19 registry among the staff of National Center for Global Health and Medicine. Participants were asked to donate venous blood and complete a survey questionnaire about COVID-19 diagnosis and vaccine. Positive serology was defined as being positive on Roche or Abbott assay against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid protein, and cumulative infection was defined as either being seropositive or having a history of COVID-19. Cumulative infection has increased from 2.0% in June 2021 (pre-Delta) to 5.3% in December 2021 (post-Delta). After the emergence of the Omicron, it has increased substantially during 2022 (16.9% in June and 39.0% in December). As of December 2022, 30% of those who were infected in the past were not aware of their infection. Results indicate that SARS-CoV-2 infection has rapidly expanded during the Omicron-variant epidemic among healthcare workers in Tokyo and that a sizable number of infections were undiagnosed.

BackgroundData on the role of immunogenicity following the third vaccine dose against Omicron infection and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)-compatible symptoms of infection are limited.MethodsFirst we examined vaccine effectiveness (VE) of the third-dose against the second dose during the Omicron wave among the staff at a tertiary hospital in Tokyo. In a case-control study of a cohort of third vaccine recipients, we compared the pre-infection levels of live-virus neutralizing antibodies (NAb) against Omicron between breakthrough cases and their controls, who had close contact with COVID-19 patients. Among these cases, we examined the association between pre-infection NAb levels and the number of COVID-19-compatible symptoms experienced during the Omicron wave.ResultsAmong the 1456 participants for VE analysis, 60 (4%) breakthrough infections occurred during the Omicron wave (January to March 2022). The third-dose VE for infection, relative to the second dose was 54.6% (95% CI: 14.0–76.0). Among the recipients of the third vaccine, pre-infection NAb levels against Omicron did not significantly differ between the cases and controls. Among the cases, those who experienced COVID-19-compatible symptoms had lower pre-infection NAb levels against Omicron than those who did not.ConclusionsThe third vaccine dose was effective in decreasing the risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection during the Omicron wave compared with the second dose. Among third-dose recipients, higher pre-infection NAb levels may not be associated with a lower risk of Omicron infection. Contrarily, they may be associated with fewer symptoms of infection.SummaryThe third vaccine dose reduced SARS-CoV-2 infection risk during the Omicron wave. Higher neutralizing antibody levels may not reduce Omicron infection risk in third-dose patients. On the contrary, it may be associated with fewer symptoms of infection.

BackgroundWhile increasing coverage of effective vaccines against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), emergent variants raise concerns about breakthrough infections. Data are limited, however, whether breakthrough infection during the epidemic of the variant is ascribed to insufficient vaccine-induced immunogenicity.MethodsWe described incident COVID-19 in relation to the vaccination program among workers of a referral hospital in Tokyo. During the predominantly Delta epidemic, we followed 2,473 fully vaccinated staff (BNT162b2) for breakthrough infection and selected three matched controls. We measured pre-infection neutralizing antibodies against the wild-type, Alpha (B.1.1.7), and Delta (B.1.617.2) strains using live viruses and anti-spike antibodies using quantitative assays, and compared them using the generalized estimating equation model between the two groups.ResultsNo COVID-19 cases occurred 1–2 months after the vaccination program during the fourth epidemic wave in Japan, dominated by the Alpha variant, while 22 cases emerged 2–4 months after the vaccination program during the fifth wave, dominated by the Delta variant. In the vaccinated cohort, all 17 cases of breakthrough infection were mild or asymptomatic and had returned to work early. There was no measurable difference between cases and controls in pre-infection neutralizing antibody titers against the wild-type, Alpha, and Delta, and anti-spike antibody titers, while neutralizing titers against the variants were considerably lower than those against the wild-type.ConclusionsPre-infection neutralizing antibody titers were not decreased among patients with breakthrough infection under the Delta variant rampage. The result points to the importance of infection control measures in the post-vaccination era, irrespective of immunogenicity profile.

The effect of cetuximab plus mFOLFOX on downsizing of the tumors for curative resection has yet to be assessed for patients with advanced colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). This study aimed to assess the oncologic benefit of cetuximab plus mFOLFOX for wild-type KRAS patients with advanced CRLMs. In this multicenter phase 2 trial, patients with technically unresectable tumor and/or five or more CRLMs harboring wild-type KRAS were treated with mFOLFOX plus cetuximab. The patients were assessed for resectability after 4 treatments, and then every 2 months up to 12 treatments. Patients with resectable disease were offered surgery after a waiting period of 1 month. The primary end point of the study was the R0 resection rate. The secondary end points were safety, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). The study is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network-Clinical Trials Registry Clinical Trials Registry (no. C000007923). Between 2012 and 2015, 50 patients from 13 centers were enrolled in this trial. Two patients were excluded because they had not received induction therapy. The 48 patients had a complete response rate of 0% and a partial response rate of 64.6%. For 26 R0 resections (54.2%) and 5 R1 resections (10.4%), no mortality occurred. During a median follow-up period of 31 months, the median OS for all the patients was calculated to be 41 months (95% confidence interval, 28–not reached). The 3-year OS rate was 59%. For patients with advanced CRLMs harboring wild-type KRAS, cetuximab administered in combination with mFOLFOX yields high response rates, leading to significantly high R0 resection rates and favorable prognoses.

We report the case of a 65-year-old woman who had a high level of serum pepsinogen II. Several months earlier, she had found a mass on the right side of her upper abdomen. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy did not reveal atrophic or inflammatory findings. She had not taken proton pump inhibitors, and there was no indication of renal dysfunction. Imaging tests showed a mass of approximately 80mm in the pancreatic head. We performed pancreatoduodenectomy, and the histopathological examination revealed an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) of gastric type. Serum pepsinogen II levels substantially lowered after surgery. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report on a relationship between IPMN and serum pepsinogen II.