Search

Residual inhibition is a well-known phenomenon defined as a temporary reduction of tinnitus loudness after a prolonged exposure to an acoustic stimulus Recently it has been suggested that modulated (in amplitude - AM and frequency - FM) sounds are also effective in reducing the tinnitus loudness. The aim of our study was to test weather amplitude modulated white noise may be more effective in masking tinnitus and producing residual inhibition (RI) than standard, non-modulated stimuli (white noise). We tested 57 patients from two ENT centers, namely the IMERTA Clinic in Marseille (22 patients) and the ENT Clinic in Poznan (35 patients). The mean age of patients in tested population was 51.04 years (SD=16.0), and the mean duration of tinnitus 5.53 years (SD=7.71). We studied the effects of three frequencies of modulation (100% Departmenth), namely 4, 32 and 64 Hz. The minimum masking level (MML) and the minimum residual inhibition level (MRIL) have been assessed from these stimuli. The results indicate that that there is a dependency of the modulation frequency on the MRIL (the higher the frequency of AM, the lower MRIL is), which cannot be inferred from the data for the MML. On average, relatively high frequency modulated signals (64 Hz) are more efficient than unmodulated or low-frequency related signal to mask and produce residual inhibition of tinnitus. We confirm that amplitude modulation of acoustic stimuli can modulate MML and MRIL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Middle ear muscle (MEM) abnormalities have been proposed to be involved in the development of ear-related symptoms such as tinnitus, hyperacusis, ear fullness, dizziness and/or otalgia. This cluster of symptoms have been called the Tonic Tensor Tympani Syndrome (TTTS) because of the supposed involvement of the tensor tympani muscle (TTM). However, the putative link between MEM dysfunction and the symptoms has not been proven yet and the detailed mechanisms (the causal chain) of TTTS are still elusive. It has been speculated that sudden loud sound (acoustic shock) may impair the functioning of the MEM, specifically the TTM, after an excessive contraction. This would result in inflammatory processes, activation of the trigeminal nerve and a change of the MEMs state into a hypersensitive one, that may be associated to the cluster of symptoms listed above. The goal of this study is to provide further insights into the mechanisms of TTTS. The middle ear function of 11 patients who reported TTTS symptoms has been investigated using either admittancemetry and/or measurement of air pressure in the sealed external auditory canal. While the former method measured the middle ear stiffness the latter provides an estimate of the tympanic membrane displacement. Most patients displayed results consistent with phasic contractions of the TTM (n = 9) and/or Eustachian Tube (ET) dysfunction (n = 6). The MEM contraction or ET dysfunction could be evoked by acoustic stimulation (n = 3), somatic maneuvers (n = 3), or pressure changes in the ear canal (n = 3). Spontaneous TTM contraction (n = 1) or ET opening (n = 1) could also be observed. Finally, voluntary contraction of MEM was also reported (n = 5). On the other hand, tonic contraction of the TTM could not be observed in any patient. The implications of these results for the mechanisms of TTTS are discussed., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

It has been suggested that tensor tympani muscle (TTM) contraction may be involved in the development of ear-related pathologies such as tinnitus, hyperacusis and otalgia, called the tonic tensor tympani syndrome (TTTS). However, as there is no precise measure of TTM function under normal and pathological states, its involvement remains speculative. When the TTM or the stapedius muscle (SM) contracts, they both generate an increase of middle ear stiffness that can be measured through middle ear admittance. However, this technique cannot differentiate the contraction between the two muscles. On the other hand, the air pressure measured in a sealed external auditory canal can provide a measure of the eardrum displacement that may be able to differentiate SM from TTM contraction. TTM is attached to the malleus, and its contraction causes a retraction of the eardrum inside the middle ear cavity, while SM can have a small but reversed effect on TTM displacement. To investigate this issue, we compared the middle ear admittance and air pressure in a sealed external ear canal upon auditory stimulation (sMEMC) and voluntary middle ear muscle contraction (vMEMC). In addition, we assessed the perceptual effect of vMEMC, including pitch and loudness matching of the fluttering noise produced by vMEMC and the threshold shifts, were measured. Out of the 14 ears tested, sMEMC was associated with a decrease of admittance in 93% (mean peak average: -0.06 ml, SD:0.04) and an increase of air pressure in 29% of ears (mean peak average: 8.1 Pa, SD:5.1). No decrease in air pressure was found upon sMEMC. For vMEMC (n = 8 ears), decreases were found for both admittance and air pressure in 100% and 88%, with a mean peak average of -0.38 ml, SD: 0.54 and -149 Pa, SD:156, for admittance and pressure respectively. These results suggest that SM and TTM are involved in sMEMC and vMEMC, respectively. In addition, vMEMC was associated with perceptual effects including a low-frequency sound, pitch-matched at ∼30 Hz (>15 dB SL), and a low-frequency hearing loss of at least 10 dB between 20 and 200 Hz. In conclusion, admittance and air pressure recordings provide useful and complementary information on middle ear muscle contraction and can be used to explore the middle ear function., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Tinnitus masking patterns have long been known to differ from those used for masking external sound. In the present study, we compared the shape of tinnitus tuning curves (TTCs) to psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs), the latter using as a target, an external sound that mimics the tinnitus characteristics. A secondary goal was to compare sound levels required to mask tinnitus to those required to mask tinnitus-mimicking sounds. The TTC, PTC, audiometric thresholds, tinnitus pitch, and level matching results of 32 tinnitus patients were analyzed. Narrowband noise maskers were used for both PTC and TTC procedures. Patients were categorized into three groups based on a combination of individual PTC-TTC results. Our findings indicate that in 41% of cases, the PTC was sharp (V shape), but the TTC showed a flat configuration, suggesting that the tinnitus-related activity in that subgroup does not behave as a regular stimulus-induced activity. In 30% of cases, V-shape PTC and TTC were found, indicating that the tinnitus-related activity may share common properties with stimulus-induced activity. For a masker centered at the tinnitus frequency, the tinnitus was more difficult to mask than the mimicking tone in 72% of patients; this was particularly true for the subset with V-shape PTCs and flat TTCs. These results may have implications for subtyping tinnitus and acoustic therapies, in particular those targeting the tinnitus frequency.

Tinnitus masking and residual inhibition (RI) are two well-known psychoacoustic measures of tinnitus. While it has long been suggested that they may provide diagnostic and prognostic information, these measures are still rarely performed in clinics, as they are too time consuming. Given this issue, the main goal of the present study was to validate a new method for assessing these measures. An acoustic sequence made of pulsed stimuli, which included a fixed stimulus duration and interstimulus interval, was applied to 68 tinnitus patients at two testing sites. First, the minimum masking level (MML) was measured by raising the stimulus intensity until the tinnitus was unheard during the stimulus presentation. Second, the level of the stimulus was further increased until the tinnitus was suppressed during the silence interval between the acoustic pulses. This level was called the minimum residual inhibition level (MRIL). The sequential measurement of MML and MRIL from the same stimulus condition offers several advantages such as time efficiency and the ability to compare results between the MRIL and MML. Our study confirms that, from this new approach, MML and MRIL can be easily and quickly obtained from a wide variety of patients displaying either normal hearing or different hearing loss configurations. Indeed, MML was obtained in all patients except one (98.5%), and some level of MRIL was found on 59 patients (86.7%). More so, this approach allows the categorization of tinnitus patients into different subgroups based on the properties of their MRIL.