Search

Objective: To determine the in-hospital cost implications of an endoscopic expanded endonasal approach (EEEA) for meningioma resection relative to the open transcranial approach. Methods: All anterior skull base meningioma surgeries performed over a period from January 1st, 2015 to October 31th, 2017 were evaluated. The electronic medical record was reviewed for patient factors, tumor characteristics, and cost variables associated with each hospital stay and univariate analysis was performed using R software. All cost data were converted into August 2021-equivalent dollar amounts using the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics consumer price index. Results: Thirty-five patients met study criteria, including 27 patients undergoing an open transcranial approach and 8 undergoing an EEEA. Average length of stay for patients undergoing an open approach was 9.3 days compared to 5.6 within the EEEA group (P =.126). The average total in-hospital cost of patient undergoing an EEEA was $35417.1 compared to $46406.9 among patients undergoing an open transcranial approach (P =.168). On univariate analysis, the cost of an open transcranial approach relative to the EEEA was $10989.8 (P =.411). Conclusions: The open transcranial approach remained the dominant surgical approach to anterior skull base meningiomas over our study time period. However, despite limited patient numbers the EEEA was associated with decreased total in-hospital costs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the in‐hospital cost implications of an expanded endoscopic endonasal approach (EEEA) for craniopharyngioma resection relative to the traditional open transcranial approach. Methods: All craniopharyngioma surgeries performed at a single institution over a period from January 1st 2001 to October 31th 2017 were evaluated. The electronic medical record was reviewed for patient factors, tumor characteristics, and cost variables associated with each hospital stay and univariate regression analysis was performed using R software. Results: Thirty‐six patients met study criteria, including 22 undergoing an open approach and 14 undergoing an EEEA. There was a significantly longer average length of stay among patients undergoing open resection (21.5 vs. 10.6 days, p = 0.024). The average total in‐hospital cost of a patient undergoing an EEEA was $58979.3 compared to $89142.3 for an open approach (p = 0.127). On univariate regression analysis, the total in‐hospital cost for a patient undergoing an open approach relative to an EEEA was $30163.0 (p = 0.127). The open approach was exclusively performed from study onset until April 2010 (16 patients). From April 2010 to August 2013, 6 open approaches and 5 EEEA were performed. The EEEA has been exclusively performed from August 2013 until the conclusion of our study period (9 patients). Conclusions: There has been a shift toward surgical resection of craniopharyngioma via an EEEA approach for amenable tumors. Our study demonstrates that the EEEA has become the preferred surgical approach at our institution, and shows that the EEEA is associated with shorter postoperative length of stay and lower total in‐hospital cost. Laryngoscope, 133:83–87, 2023 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine in-hospital costs associated with performing an EEA to anterior skull base pathology and to identify drivers of cost variability for patients undergoing endoscopic anterior skull base surgery. Methods: All endoscopic anterior skull base surgeries performed over a period from January 1st, 2015 to October 24th, 2017 were evaluated. The electronic medical record was reviewed for patient factors, tumor characteristics, and cost variables associated with each hospital stay and univariate analysis was performed using Stata software. Results: An EEA was associated with an average total in-hospital cost of $44 545. Compared to patients undergoing a transsphenoidal approach to pituitary tumor resection, EEA patients incurred higher in-hospital costs across all variables including a total cost increase of $15 921 (95% confidence interval $5720-26 122, P =.002). Univariate analysis of all endoscopic anterior skull base surgery patients showed a cost increase of $30 616 associated with post-operative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak ($10 420-50 811, P =.004), $14 610 with post-operative diabetes insipidus (DI) ($4610-24 609, P =.004), and $11 522 with African-American patients relative to Caucasian patients ($3049-19 995, P =.008). Conclusions: Patients who undergo endoscopic EEA for resection of anterior skull base tumors typically incur greater in-hospital costs than patients undergoing a standard TSA. Post-operative complications such as CSF leak and DI, as well as ethnicity, are significant drivers of cost-variability. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This article discusses the long-term outcomes of midfacial growth in pediatric patients who underwent expanded endonasal skull base surgery for craniopharyngioma. The study compared the cephalometric measurements of patients who underwent the endoscopic approach with those who underwent an open transcranial approach. The results showed no significant difference in midfacial growth between the two groups, suggesting that the endoscopic approach is safe and efficacious for pediatric patients without concerns for long-term craniofacial growth. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to better understand the long-term clinical implications of pediatric endoscopic skull base surgery. [Extracted from the article]

Objective: To characterize the patient and clinical factors that determine variability in hospital costs following endoscopic transphenoidal pituitary surgery. Methods: All endoscopic transphenoidal pituitary surgeries performed from January 1, 2015, to October 24, 2017, with complete data were evaluated in this retrospective single‐institution study. The electronic medical record was reviewed for patient factors, tumor characteristics, and cost variables during each hospital stay. Multivariate linear regression was performed using Stata software. Results: The analysis included 190 patients and average length of stay was 4.71 days. Average total in‐hospital cost was $28,624 (95% confidence interval $25,094–$32,155) with average total direct cost of $19,444 ($17,136–$21,752) and total indirect cost of $9181 ($7592–$10,409). On multivariate regression, post‐operative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak was associated with a significant increase in all cost variables, including a total cost increase of $40,981 ($15,474–$66,489, P =.002). Current smoking status was associated with an increased total cost of $20,189 ($6,638–$33,740, P =.004). Self‐reported Caucasian ethnicity was associated with a significant decrease in total cost of $6646 (−$12,760 to −$532, P =.033). Post‐operative DI was associated with increased costs across all variables that were not statistically significant. Conclusions: Post‐operative CSF leak, current smoking status, and non‐Caucasian ethnicity were associated with significantly increased costs. Understanding of cost drivers of endoscopic transphenoidal pituitary surgery is critical for future cost control and value creation initiatives. Level of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:760–764, 2021 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Surgical resection of skull base tumors in children is increasingly accomplished through an expanded endonasal approach (EEA). We aim to evaluate the potential effect of the EEA on midfacial growth as a result of iatrogenic damage to nasal growth zones.Methods: We performed a retrospective review of children undergoing craniopharyngioma resection via an open transcranial or EEA. Pre- and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging was evaluated for growth in four midfacial measurements based on established cephalometric landmarks: anterior midface height, posterior midface height, palatal length, and sella-nasion distance. Statistical analysis was conducted using a mixed-effects linear regression model.Results: Twenty-two patients underwent an EEA (n = 12) or open transcranial approach (n = 10) for tumor resection with 3 years of imaging follow-up. There was no difference in midfacial growth between groups for each measurement. Compared to the open group, patients undergoing EEA demonstrated relative anterior midface height growth of -0.42 mm (P = 0.880), posterior midface height growth of -0.44 mm (P = 0.839), palatal length growth of 0.35 mm (P = 0.894), and sella-nasion distance growth of -2.16 (P = 0.365).Conclusion: We found no difference in midfacial growth measurements between patients undergoing craniopharyngioma resection via an EEA and the open transcranial route after 3 years of imaging follow-up. Preliminary results on midfacial growth demonstrate that the EEA is a safe alternative to traditional transcranial approaches for the pediatric population. Further investigation with larger sample size and longer duration of follow-up is warranted to more thoroughly investigate the long-term implications of the EEA to the skull base.Level Of Evidence: 3 Laryngoscope, 130:338-342, 2020. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives/hypothesis: Currently, due to the rarity of pathology, there are limited data surrounding outcomes of pediatric skull base surgery. Traditionally, surgeons have proceeded with caution when electing endonasal endoscopic transsellar/transplanum approaches to the skull base in pediatric patients due to poor sphenoid pneumatization. In this study, we review outcomes of endoscopic pediatric skull base surgery based on sphenoid pneumatization patterns.Study Design: Retrospective chart review.Methods: A review of all cases of pediatric (age < 18 years) craniopharyngioma managed via an endoscopic endonasal approach at a tertiary academic medical center.Results: A total of 27 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 8 years. Nineteen (70%) patients were male. Presellar, sellar/postsellar, and conchal sphenoid pneumatizations were found in 6, 11, and 10 patients, respectively. There was no significant association between sphenoid pneumatization pattern and extent of resection (gross vs. subtotal, P = .414), postoperative cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak (P = .450), intraoperative estimated blood loss (P = .098), total operative time (P = .540), and length of stay (P = .336). On multivariate analysis, after accounting for age, sex, preoperative cranial nerve involvement, and cavernous sinus invasion, there remained no significant association between sphenoid pneumatization pattern and extent of resection (P = .999) and postoperative CSF leak (P = .959).Conclusions: Sphenoid pneumatization pattern does not appear to affect outcomes in endoscopic skull base surgery in the pediatric population. Importantly, lack of sphenoid pneumatization does not impede gross total resection or increase complications. Thorough knowledge of the anatomy during the endoscopic approach is critical to optimize outcomes.Level Of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 129:832-836, 2019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Improvement in sinonasal quality of life (QoL) following sinus surgery has been well‐documented across the literature. To our knowledge, only one series has evaluated long‐term QoL in patients undergoing tumor resection, and that study demonstrated no improvement in rhinologic QoL following malignant tumor resection at 2‐year follow‐up. The objective of the present study was to evaluate QoL in the 2 years following endoscopic malignant tumor resection. Methods: A prospective cohort study was performed, including patients with both malignant and benign sinonasal tumors in a tertiary academic medical center. Patients undergoing endoscopic tumor resection who had completed Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT‐22) questionnaires were included in the cohort. SNOT‐22 questionnaires were administered preoperatively and over a 2‐year follow‐up period at clinic visits. Longitudinal linear mixed‐effects regression was used to compare preoperative QoL to QoL over the 2 years following surgery. Results: Among 145 patients included in this study, 64 had malignant tumors. There was a statistically significant improvement in SNOT‐22 score from baseline to 2 years for patients with both malignant tumors (37.0, 95% confidence Interval [CI] 32.0–42.1 at baseline; 26.5 95% CI 20.8–32.2 at 2 years; P < 0.001) and benign tumors (26.5, 95% CI 21.4–30.4 at baseline; 12.9 95% CI 7.6–18.2 at 2 years; P < 0.001). Conclusion: In contrast to previously reported series, in this cohort endoscopic resection of sinonasal tumors appears to be followed by an improvement in QoL, which is sustained over a 2‐year period. Level of Evidence: 2b. Laryngoscope, 128:789–793, 2018 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Leiomyosarcoma is a rare neoplasm of the head and neck. The purpose of this study was to present our single‐institution case series of head and neck leiomyosarcoma and a review of cases in the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB). Methods: Patients with head and neck leiomyosarcoma at the University of Pennsylvania and in the NCDB were identified. Demographic characteristics, tumor factors, treatment paradigms, and outcomes were evaluated for prognostic significance. Results: Nine patients with head and neck leiomyosarcoma from the institution were identified; a majority had high‐grade disease and cutaneous leiomyosarcoma, with a 5‐year survival rate of 50%. Two hundred fifty‐nine patients with leiomyosarcoma were found in the NCDB; macroscopic positive margins and high‐grade disease were associated with poor prognosis (P < .01), and positive surgical margins were related to adjuvant radiation (P < .001). Conclusion: Head and neck leiomyosarcoma presents at a high grade and is preferentially treated with surgery. Several demographic and tumor‐specific factors are associated with outcomes and prognosis. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]