Search

This study presents an Interval-based Multi-objective Robust Design Optimization (IB-MORDO) algorithm applied to a vehicle dynamic problem. The proposed algorithm optimizes a full 15 degrees-of-freedom (15-DOF) vehicle model, subjected to a double-lane change (DLC) maneuver under random road profiles, to attain driver comfort and safety. This study does not make assumptions about uncertain parameter statistics; instead, the uncertainties are quantified using a non-probabilistic α-cut level interval analysis. These uncertainties are applied to the system parameters and design variables to ensure robust results. After the optimization process, the root mean square (RMS) vertical acceleration at the driver's seat resulted in a robust solution of 1.041 m/s2 and a parameter interval radius (IR) equals to 0.631 m/s2, whereas the RMS lateral acceleration at the driver's seat resulted in a solution of 1.908 m/s2 with an interval radius of 0.168 m/s2. Unlike the Robust Optimization, the algorithm proposed herein considers uncertainties at system parameters and design variables without assuming any statistical data. An Interval-based Robust Multi-objective Optimization procedure is proposed and tested on a 15-DOF vehicle model. Αn α-cut level methodology is used to deal with the uncertainty propagation. Resulted optimal suspension parameters minimize center and interval radius of driver's vertical and lateral accelerations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A new topology optimization methodology for reinforced concrete structures is proposed. The structures are optimized in two iterative loops, where different sensitivity criteria are used to determine the regions to be topologically optimized. For the first loop, the compliance criterion is used to determine the higher compliance elements and, consequently, remove the concrete from the computational domain. In the next loop, only failed concrete regions (Ottosen failure surface) are replaced by reinforcement, ensuring that complies with the von Mises criterion. In the end, the sizing of the reinforcements is obtained based on the principal forces in the steel regions. Results regarding the mechanical behavior, cost, volume, and mass of the optimized structures are presented in this study. A case study indicated that the proposed methodology can lead to volume, mass, and cost reductions of 20%, 21.5%, and 56%, respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]