1. Esophagectomy for esophageal cancer in patients with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy: a Japanese nationwide retrospective cohort study.
- Author
-
Okamura A, Watanabe M, Okui J, Kuriyama K, Shiraishi O, Kurogochi T, Abe T, Sato H, Miyata H, Kawaguchi Y, Sato Y, Nagano H, Takeno S, Nakajima M, Matsuo K, Murakami K, Takebayashi K, Matsumoto S, Okumura T, Kakeji Y, Kono K, Oridate N, Toh Y, Takeuchi H, and Katori Y
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Retrospective Studies, Aged, Middle Aged, Japan epidemiology, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Postoperative Complications etiology, Neoplasms, Second Primary epidemiology, Reoperation statistics & numerical data, Treatment Outcome, Pneumonia epidemiology, Pneumonia etiology, East Asian People, Esophagectomy adverse effects, Esophagectomy methods, Esophageal Neoplasms surgery, Laryngectomy adverse effects, Laryngectomy methods, Pharyngectomy methods, Pharyngectomy adverse effects, Anastomotic Leak epidemiology, Anastomotic Leak etiology
- Abstract
Background: Second primary esophageal cancer often develops in patients with head and neck cancer, and esophagectomy in patients with a history of total pharyngolaryngectomy (TPL) is challenging. However, the clinical outcomes of these patients have yet to be examined in a multicenter setting., Methods: We evaluated the surgical outcomes of a nationwide cohort of 62 patients who underwent esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with a history of TPL., Results: Ivor-Lewis and McKeown esophagectomies were performed in 32 (51.6%) and 30 (48.4%) patients, respectively. Postoperatively, 23 patients (37.1%) developed severe complications, and 7 patients (11.3%) required reoperation within 30 days. Pneumonia and anastomotic leakage occurred in 13 (21.0%) and 16 (25.8%) patients, respectively. Anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently in the McKeown group than in the Ivor-Lewis group (46.7% vs. 6.2%, P < 0.001). The adjusted odds ratio for anastomotic leakage in the McKeown group was 9.64 (95% confidence intervals (CI), 2.11-70.82, P = 0.008). Meanwhile, the 5-year overall survival rates were comparable between the groups (41.8% for Ivor-Lewis and 42.7% for McKeown), and the adjusted hazard ratio of overall survival was 1.44 (95% CI, 0.64-3.29; P = 0.381; Ivor-Lewis as the reference)., Conclusions: In our cohort, anastomotic leakage occurred more frequently after McKeown than Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, and almost half of patients in the McKeown group experienced leakage. Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy is preferred for decreasing anastomotic leakage when oncologically and technically feasible., (© 2024. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to The Japan Esophageal Society.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF