1. Efficacy and safety of memantine in children with autism spectrum disorder: Results from three phase 2 multicenter studies
- Author
-
Rachel Luchini, Robert H. Palmer, Robert L. Hendren, Antonio Y. Hardan, Madhuja Mallick, Jordan Lateiner, Adelaide S. Robb, Rezwanur Rahman, Stephen M. Graham, Michael G. Aman, Sanjida Ali, X. Daniel Jia, Raun D. Melmed, and Kristen A Andersen
- Subjects
Male ,Autism Spectrum Disorder ,school-age children ,Social Responsiveness Scale ,law.invention ,0302 clinical medicine ,Randomized controlled trial ,law ,Developmental and Educational Psychology ,Raw score ,Psychology ,Child ,0303 health sciences ,Minimal clinically important difference ,Memantine ,Headache ,clinical trial ,Irritable Mood ,Treatment Outcome ,embryonic structures ,Early Termination of Clinical Trials ,Specialist Studies in Education ,Cognitive Sciences ,Female ,medication ,medicine.drug ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Fever ,autism spectrum disorders ,Asperger’s disorder ,Developmental & Child Psychology ,Placebo ,03 medical and health sciences ,Double-Blind Method ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Social Behavior ,030304 developmental biology ,Asperger's disorder ,Original Articles ,medicine.disease ,pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified ,Clinical trial ,Nasopharyngitis ,Delayed-Action Preparations ,Autism ,memantine ,Excitatory Amino Acid Antagonists ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,randomized withdrawal - Abstract
Three phase 2 trials were conducted to assess the efficacy and long-term safety of weight-based memantine extended release (ER) treatment in children with autism spectrum disorder. MEM-MD-91, a 50-week open-label trial, identified memantine extended-release treatment responders for enrollment into MEM-MD-68, a 12-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal trial. MEM-MD-69 was an open-label extension trial in which participants from MEM-MD-68, MEM-MD-91, and open-label trial MEM-MD-67 were treated ⩽48 weeks with memantine extended release. In MEM-MD-91, 517 (59.6%) participants were confirmed Social Responsiveness Scale responders at week 12; mean Social Responsiveness Scale total raw scores improved two to three times a minimal clinically important difference of 10 points. In MEM-MD-68, there was no difference between memantine and placebo on the primary efficacy parameter, the proportion of patients with a loss of therapeutic response (defined as ⩾10-point increase from baseline in Social Responsiveness Scale total raw score). MEM-MD-69 exploratory analyses revealed mean standard deviation improvement in Social Responsiveness Scale total raw score of 32.4 (26.4) from baseline of the first lead-in study. No new safety concerns were evident. While the a priori–defined efficacy results of the double-blind trial were not achieved, the considerable improvements in mean Social Responsiveness Scale scores from baseline in the open-label trials were presumed to be clinically important.
- Published
- 2019