Search

The study analyzed images of patients with acute aortic dissection type A (AADA) to assess sex differences in aortic diameters. Women were found to have smaller aortic diameters at the time of dissection compared to men, with less aortic elongation. However, when indexed for patient height, the sex differences disappeared. Only half of the patients had aortic segments larger than 5 cm, indicating that not all would have met the current threshold for prophylactic surgery. [Extracted from the article]

Background : Despite being the most commonly performed valvular intervention, risk prediction for aortic valve replacement in patients with severe aortic stenosis by currently used risk scores remains challenging. The study aim was to develop a biomarker-based risk score by means of a neuronal network. Methods : In this multicenter study, 3595 patients were divided into test and validation cohorts (70% to 30%) by random allocation. Input variables to develop the ABC-AS score were age, the cardiac biomarker high-sensitivity troponin T, and a patient history of cardiac decompensation. The validation cohort was used to verify the scores' value and for comparison with the Society of Thoracic Surgery Predictive Risk of Operative Mortality score. Results : Receiver operating curves demonstrated an improvement in prediction by using the ABC-AS score compared to the Society of Thoracic Surgery Predictive Risk of Operative Mortality (STS prom) score. Although the difference in predicting cardiovascular mortality was most notable at 30-day follow-up (area under the curve of 0.922 versus 0.678), ABC-AS also performed better in overall follow-up (0.839 versus 0.699). Furthermore, univariate analysis of ABC-AS tertiles yielded highly significant differences for all-cause ( p < 0.0001) and cardiovascular mortality ( p < 0.0001). Head-to-head comparison between both risk scores in a multivariable cox regression model underlined the potential of the ABC-AS score (HR per z-unit 2.633 (95% CI 2.156-3.216), p < 0.0001), while the STS prom score failed to reach statistical significance ( p = 0.226). Conclusions : The newly developed ABC-AS score is an improved risk stratification tool to predict cardiovascular outcomes for patients undergoing aortic valve intervention.

Introduction: Previous analyses have reported the outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) for patients with low-flow, low-gradient (LFLG) aortic stenosis (AS), without stratifying according to the route of access. Differences in mortality rates among access routes have been established for high-gradient (HG) patients and hypothesized to be even more pronounced in LFLG AS patients. This study aims to compare the outcomes of patients with LFLG or HG AS following transfemoral (TF) or transapical (TA) TAVR., Methods: A total of 910 patients, who underwent either TF or TA TAVR with a median follow-up of 2.22 (IQR: 1.22-4.03) years, were included in this multicenter cohort study. In total, 146 patients (16.04%) suffered from LFLG AS. The patients with HG and LFLG AS were stratified according to the route of access and compared statistically., Results: The operative mortality rates of patients with HG and LFLG were found to be comparable following TF access. The operative mortality rate was significantly increased for patients who underwent TA access [odds ratio (OR): 2.91 (1.54-5.48), p  = 0.001] and patients with LFLG AS [OR: 2.27 (1.13-4.56), p  = 0.02], which could be corroborated in a propensity score-matched subanalysis. The observed increase in the risk of operative mortality demonstrated an additive effect [OR for TA LFLG: 5.45 (2.35-12.62), p  < 0.001]. LFLG patients who underwent TA access had significantly higher operative mortality rates (17.78%) compared with TF LFLG (3.96%, p  = 0.016) and TA HG patients (6.36%, p  = 0.024)., Conclusions: HG patients experienced a twofold increase in operative mortality rates following TA compared with TF access, while LFLG patients had a fivefold increase in operative mortality rates. TA TAVR appears suboptimal for patients with LFLG AS. Prospective studies should be conducted to evaluate alternative options in cases where TF is not possible., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (© 2023 Maier, Lambert, Senoner, Dobner, Hoppe, Fellner, Pfeifer, Feuchtner, Friedrich, Semsroth, Bonaros, Holfeld, Müller, Reinthaler, Steinwender and Barbieri.)

Objectives: Mechanical strain plays a major role in the development of aortic calcification. We hypothesized that (i) valvular calcifications are most pronounced at the localizations subjected to the highest mechanical strain and (ii) calcification patterns are different in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves., Methods: Multislice computed tomography scans of 101 patients with severe aortic stenosis were analysed using a 3-dimensional post-processing software to quantify calcification of tricuspid aortic valves (n = 51) and bicuspid aortic valves (n = 50) after matching., Results: Bicuspid aortic valves exhibited higher calcification volumes and increased calcification of the non-coronary cusp with significantly higher calcification of the free leaflet edge. The non-coronary cusp showed the highest calcium load compared to the other leaflets. Patients with annular calcification above the median had an impaired survival compared to patients with low annular calcification, whereas patients with calcification of the free leaflet edge above the median did not (P = 0.53)., Conclusions: Calcification patterns are different in patients with aortic stenosis with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves. Patients with high annular calcification might have an impaired prognosis., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery.)

Objectives: Immediate surgical repair for type A aortic dissection is gold standard and at most centres is performed by the surgeon on call during night-time and weekends. The objective was to evaluate whether emergency surgery during night-time or weekends has an influence on 30-day mortality., Methods: In 319 patients undergoing surgery for type A aortic dissection, skin incision was documented. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the time point of skin incision (05:00 a.m. to 07:00 p.m. = daytime group; 07:01 p.m. to 04:59 a.m. = night-time group). We also noted whether their surgeries were started on weekdays (Monday 00:00 to Friday 23:59) or weekends (Saturday 00:00 to Sunday 23:59)., Results: The median age was 61 years (interquartile range 49-70) and 69.6% (n = 222) were male. Almost 50% (n = 149) of patients presented in a critical preoperative state. Forty-one percent of patients (n = 131) underwent night-time surgery. There were no differences in baseline data, time from onset of symptoms to surgery or surgical treatment between groups, except from preferred femoral access for arterial cannulation during night-time. Advanced age [odds ratio 1.042, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.014-1.070], preoperative malperfusion syndrome (odds ratio 2.542, 95% CI 1.279-5.051) and preoperative tamponade (odds ratio 2.562, 95% CI 1.215-5.404) emerged as risk factors for 30-day mortality. Night-time or weekend surgery did not have any impact on 30-day mortality when covariates were considered., Conclusions: Based on the natural course of the disease and our results, surgery for type A aortic dissection should be performed as an emergency surgery regardless of time and day., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. All rights reserved.)

Background: Neurologic dysfunction remains an ongoing challenge in the diagnosis of type A aortic dissection (AAD). Our study analyzed the impact of preoperative neurologic dysfunction (PND) on outcome and assessed a potential link between PND and specific patterns of postoperative neurologic injury., Methods: Medical records of 338 patients (70.1% men; mean age, 59.3 ± 13.7 years) undergoing surgical repair for AAD were screened for the presence of PND. Preoperative characteristics, surgical treatment, and hospital and neurologic outcomes were analyzed according to patients with PND (PND+) and without PND (PND-) RESULTS: There were 50 patients (14.8%) admitted with PND. PND+ patients showed significantly higher rates of postoperative neurologic injury (44.4%) than PND- patients (14.3%; P < .001) with a specific pattern of ischemic lesions in accordance with preoperative neurologic status. While PND+ patients suffered mainly from right hemispheric strokes (66.7% vs 32.4% in PND- patients, P = .024), PND- patients more frequently presented with bilateral cerebral ischemia (56.8% vs 13.3% in PND+ patients, P = .004). Multivariable analysis identified presence of PND (odds ratio, 2.977; 95% confidence interval, 1.357-6.545) as an independent predictor for new postoperative neurologic injury. PND was associated with impaired survival (P = .005)., Conclusions: This study identified an association of preoperative neurologic status and specific stroke patterns after surgical repair of AAD. Irrespective of timing of surgery and reperfusion strategies, preoperative neurologic dysfunction is strongly associated with impaired neurologic outcome., (Copyright © 2020 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Hereby, the supplemental data of the research article "Long-Term Prognostic Value of High-Sensitivity Troponin T added to N-Terminal Pro Brain Natriuretic Peptide Plasma Levels before Valve Replacement for Severe Aortic Stenosis" are presented [1]. It offers enhanced input on the predictive value of these biomarkers considering the influence of the presence of concomitant coronary artery disease (CAD) in various severities as well as an additional cox proportional hazard model on cardiovascular mortality. Furthermore, the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves are shown as figures. The material described increases therefore the understanding of the predictive value of these already routinely available biomarkers and reduces the risk of potential bias due to possible confounding factors. It also underlines the urge for a multi-factorial approach in diagnostics to detect the optimal point for referral to valve replacement other than just symptomatic status, an observed reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction or the presence of CAD with the necessity for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) [2]. The data of the 3595 patients were gathered retrospectively at a consortium of four university hospital centers in Austria and combined with prospectively collected data on cardiovascular and all-cause mortality., (© 2020 The Authors.)

Natriuretic peptide plasma levels help to manage patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS). The role of troponin plasma levels in this patient cohort remains speculative. A consortium of 4 university hospital centers in Austria analyzed retrospectively 3,595 patients admitted for valve replacement because of severe AS since 2007. The aim was to compare the additive preprocedural value of high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) to N-terminal pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) plasma levels in predicting postoperative long-term survival in a large cohort undergoing either surgical (57.8%) or transcatheter (42.2%) aortic valve replacement. During a median follow-up of 2.93 (1.91 to 4.92) years, 919 patients (25.6%) died, in them 556 (15.5%) due to cardiovascular causes. Both normal hsTnT (<14 ng/l) and NT-proBNP (within age- and sex-corrected normal range) plasma levels were found in 481 patients (14.3%, group 1). Normal hsTnT but elevated NT-proBNP plasma levels were found in 748 patients (22.3%, group 2). Elevated hsTnT but normal NT-proBNP plasma levels were found in 258 patients (7.7%, group 3). Both elevated hsTnT and elevated NT-proBNP plasma levels were found in 1,869 patients (55.7%, group 4). Using Log Rank tests for comparison there was a highly significant difference in both cardiovascular mortality (p <0.0001) and all-cause mortality (p <0.0001). All-cause mortality rates after 1, 3, and 5 years were 2.1%, 5.4%, 7.7% in group 1; 4.0%, 7.5%, 11.5% in group 2; 5.8%, 8.9%, 14.0% in group 3; and 12.3%, 22.6%, 28.4% in group 4. In conclusion, hsTnT adds additional impact to NT-proBNP as a routinely available biomarker for risk stratification concerning postoperative survival in patients with severe AS admitted for valve replacement. The present study supports the concept to integrate hsTnT plasma levels in the management of severe AS., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: Despite improvement in operative and cerebral perfusion techniques, cerebral malperfusion and neurological injury remain a dreaded complication of acute type A aortic dissection. We aimed to identify predictors for postoperative stroke and analyse the impact on morbidity, neurological recovery and mid-term survival., Methods: Between 2000 and 2017, 303 (71.9% men, mean age 58.9 ± 13.6 years) patients with acute type A aortic dissection underwent surgical repair. Clinical and imaging data were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were divided into 2 groups depending on the presence of postoperative stroke., Results: Postoperative stroke was detected in 15.8% (n = 48) of the patients. Patients with postoperative stroke showed higher rates of preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation (stroke: 18.8% vs no stroke: 3.5%, P < 0.001) and malperfusion syndrome (stroke: 47.9% vs no stroke: 22.4%, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis identified the presence of bovine aortic arch [odds ratio (OR) 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.086-4.998; P = 0.030], preoperative cardiopulmonary resuscitation (OR 6.483, 95% CI 1.522-27.616; P = 0.011) and preoperative malperfusion (OR 2.536, 95% CI 1.238-5.194; P = 0.011) as independent predictors for postoperative stroke. Postoperative stroke had a strong impact on morbidity and was associated with higher rates of postoperative complications and a significantly longer hospital stay (stroke: 23 ± 16 days vs no stroke: 17 ± 18 days, P = 0.021). Postoperative stroke was not independently associated with in-hospital mortality (adjusted OR 1.382, 95% CI 0.518-3.687; P = 0.518). There was no difference in mid-term survival between patients with stroke and patients without stroke., Conclusions: This study identified independent preoperative predictors for postoperative stroke. Although postoperative stroke was associated with significant morbidity and postoperative complications, significant impairment in mid-term survival could not be confirmed by the data.

Background: Propensity score-matched analysis of the anterolateral minithoracotomy and the partial upper hemisternotomy vs the median sternotomy approach has not been reported to date for isolated aortic valve replacement., Methods: From 2005 to 2013, isolated aortic valve replacement was performed through a partial upper hemisternotomy in 315 patients (38.9%), through a median sternotomy in 328 patients (40.5%), and through an anterolateral minithoracotomy in 167 patients (20.6%). After propensity score-matched analysis, both minimally invasive techniques were independently compared with median sternotomy in 118 matched pairs., Results: In the anterolateral group, conversion to median sternotomy was significantly higher (17 [14.4%]), a second pump run (6 [5.1%]) and second cross clamp (12 [10.2%]) were significantly more often necessary, the median cross-clamp time (94 minutes; range, 43 to 231 minutes) and median perfusion time (141 minutes; range, 77 to 456 minutes) were significantly longer, and more groin complications occurred (17 [14.4%]), all compared with the median sternotomy group. No difference in perioperative results was identified between the partial upper hemisternotomy and the median sternotomy group. There was no significant difference in 1-year survival among the three groups, although a trend of better survival was observed in the partial upper hemisternotomy group., Conclusions: In minimally invasive isolated aortic valve replacement, the partial upper hemisternotomy shows similar perioperative outcome as the median sternotomy, whereas, the anterolateral minithoracotomy is associated with more perioperative complications. Therefore, only the partial upper hemisternotomy should be the preferred surgical technique for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in the daily routine for a broad spectrum of surgeons., (Copyright © 2017 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Paraplegia following spinal cord ischemia represents a devastating complication of both aortic surgery and endovascular aortic repair. Shock wave treatment was shown to induce angiogenesis and regeneration in ischemic tissue by modulation of early inflammatory response via Toll-like receptor (TLR) 3 signaling. In preclinical and clinical studies, shock wave treatment had a favorable effect on ischemic myocardium. We hypothesized that shock wave treatment also may have a beneficial effect on spinal cord ischemia., Methods and Results: A spinal cord ischemia model in mice and spinal slice cultures ex vivo were performed. Treatment groups received immediate shock wave therapy, which resulted in decreased neuronal degeneration and improved motor function. In spinal slice cultures, the activation of TLR3 could be observed. Shock wave effects were abolished in spinal slice cultures from TLR3(-/-) mice, whereas the effect was still present in TLR4(-/-) mice. TLR4 protein was found to be downregulated parallel to TLR3 signaling. Shock wave-treated animals showed significantly better functional outcome and survival. The protective effect on neurons could be reproduced in human spinal slices., Conclusions: Shock wave treatment protects from neuronal degeneration via TLR3 signaling and subsequent TLR4 downregulation. Consequently, it represents a promising treatment option for the devastating complication of spinal cord ischemia after aortic repair., (© 2015 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley Blackwell.)

Background: In aortic valve replacement, a comparison between the anterolateral minithoracotomy and the partial upper hemisternotomy approach has not been reported to date., Methods: From 2006 to 2012, isolated aortic valve replacement was performed in 1,118 consecutive patients. Aortic valve replacement was performed through a anterolateral minithoracotomy in 166 patients (14.9%) and through a partial upper hemisternotomy in 245 patients (21.9%). A propensity score-matched analysis was performed in 160 matched pairs., Results: Conversion to median sternotomy was significantly higher in the anterolateral group (n = 22, 13.1%) than in the hemisternotomy group (n = 7, 4.4%) (p = 0.004). A second cross-clamp was significantly more often necessary in the anterolateral group (n = 14, 8.8%) than in the hemisternotomy group (n =2, 1.3%) (p = 0.003). The median cross-clamp time was significantly longer in the anterolateral group, 93 minutes (range, 43 to 231 minutes) than in the hemisternotomy group, 75 minutes (range, 46 to 137 minutes) (p < 0.0001). The median perfusion time was significantly longer in the anterolateral group, 137 minutes (range, 81 to 456 minutes) than in the hemisternotomy group, 113 minutes (range, 66 to 257 minutes) (p < 0.0001). Significantly more groin adverse events occurred in the anterolateral group (n = 17, 10.8%) than in the hemisternotomy group (n = 0, 0%) (p < 0.0001). No significant difference in 90-day mortality was seen in the anterolateral group (n = 6, 3.8%) than in the hemisternotomy group (n = 2, 1.3%) (p = 0.16)., Conclusions: The anterolateral minithoracotomy is associated with more perioperative adverse events. The partial upper hemisternotomy is an excellent surgical technique for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement in the daily routine for every staff surgeon., (Copyright © 2015 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)