Search

It has been suggested that pets play a critical role in the maintenance of methicillin-resistant (MR) and multidrug-resistant (MDR) Staphylococcus spp. in the household. We examined risk factors for carriage of antimicrobial-resistant coagulase-positive staphylococci, with particular attention to Staphylococcus aureus and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius isolated from pets living in households of people diagnosed with methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) skin or soft-tissue infection. We analyzed data collected cross-sectionally from a study conducted in 2012 that evaluated the transmission of MRSA and other staphylococci from humans, their pets and the environment (Pets and Environmental Transmission of Staphylococci [PETS] study). We used unadjusted and adjusted stratified logistic regression analyses with household-clustered standard errors to evaluate the association between demographic, healthcare-related, contact-related and environmental risk factors and MDR Staphylococcus spp. isolated from dogs and cats. Staphylococcal isolates obtained from dogs (n = 63) and cats (n = 47) were included in these analyses. The use of oral or injectable antimicrobials by the pets during the prior year was the main risk factor of interest. Based on our results, 50% (12/24) of S. aureus, 3.3% (1/30) of S. pseudintermedius and 25% (14/56) of other coagulase-positive staphylococci (CPS) were determined to be MDR. S. aureus isolates were more likely to be MDR compared with S. pseudintermedius. We did not find a significant statistical association between the use of oral or injectable antimicrobials in the prior year and the presence of MDR bacteria. The results suggest that drivers of antimicrobial resistance in household staphylococci may vary by bacterial species, which could have implications for one health intervention strategies for staphylococci and inform the investigation of other reverse zoonoses, such as COVID-19., (© 2022 The Authors. Zoonoses and Public Health published by Wiley-VCH GmbH.)

Background: Magnetic growing rods are being utilized more frequently in children with early-onset scoliosis. Many of these children have multiple medical problems and additional medical devices implanted that utilize similar magnetic technology, including vagal nerve stimulator (VNS) devices. There is some concern that the external remote controller (ERC) used to control the magnetic growth rod will interact with these devices during lengthening procedures. We believe there are safe parameters which allow the magnetic growth rod ERC to be utilized in patients with an implanted VNS., Methods: A VNS device was tested in a simulation with the magnetic growth rods ERC to determine if it would activate/inactivate the device during a lengthening procedure. This study consists of 2 simulations. Simulation 1 evaluates placing the VNS adjacent to the ERC in the same coronal plane. Simulation 2 elevates the ERC placement above the device to simulate the thickness of a torso while increasing the distance of the VNS from the ERC in the coronal plane., Results: The time of exposure of the VNS device to the magnetic field had no correlation with activation. Distance had an effect on device activation. In the coronal plane of the device, activation occurred 43% of the time at 0 cm, 71% at 4 cm, and 5% activation at 8 cm. Greater than 10 cm had no activation. In the sagittal plane with the ERC 8 cm above the device, activation occurred 71% at 0 cm distance, 38% at 2 cm, and no activation occurred at a distance of >4 cm., Conclusions: Utilization of the magnetic growth rod ERC can be carried out safely in patients with a VNS. Simulations show that an actuator implanted 4 cm from the VNS device in the coronal plane in a child with >8 cm chest wall thickness will not activate the VNS device. When choosing a rod configuration for implantation, the child's chest wall thickness and the ERC placement should be considered.

Patients with community-onset (CO) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infections contribute to MRSA contamination of the home environment and may be reexposed to MRSA strains from this reservoir. This study evaluates One Health risk factors, which focus on the relationship between humans, animals, and the environment, for the increased prevalence of multiple antimicrobial-resistant MRSA isolates in the home environment. During a trial of patients with CO-MRSA infection, MRSA was isolated from the household environment at the baseline and 3 months later, following randomization of patients and household members to mupirocin-based decolonization therapy or an education control group. Up to two environmental MRSA isolates collected at each visit were tested. MRSA isolates were identified in 68% (65/95) of homes at the baseline ( n = 104 isolates) and 51% (33/65) of homes 3 months later ( n = 56 isolates). The rates of multidrug resistance (MDR) were 61% among isolates collected at the baseline and 55% among isolates collected at the visit 3 months later. At the baseline, 100% (14/14) of MRSA isolates from rural homes were MDR. While antimicrobial use by humans or pets was associated with an increased risk for the isolation of MDR MRSA from the environment, clindamycin use was not associated with an increased risk for the isolation of MDR MRSA. Incident low-level mupirocin-resistant MRSA strains were isolated at 3 months from 2 (5%) of 39 homes that were randomized to mupirocin treatment but none of the control homes. Among patients recently treated for a CO-MRSA infection, MRSA and MDR MRSA were common contaminants in the home environment. This study contributes to evidence that occupant use of antimicrobial drugs, except for clindamycin, is associated with MDR MRSA in the home environmental reservoir. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT00966446.) IMPORTANCE MRSA is a common bacterial agent implicated in skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in both community and health care settings. Patients with CO-MRSA infections contribute to environmental MRSA contamination in these settings and may be reexposed to MRSA strains from these reservoirs. People interact with natural and built environments; therefore, understanding the relationships between humans and animals as well as the characteristics of environmental reservoirs is important to advance strategies to combat antimicrobial resistance. Household interactions may influence the frequency and duration of exposure, which in turn may impact the duration of MRSA colonization or the probability for recurrent colonization and infection. Therefore, MRSA contamination of the home environment may contribute to human and animal recolonization and decolonization treatment failure. The aim of this study was to evaluate One Health risk factors that may be amenable to intervention and may influence the recovery of MDR and mupirocin resistance in CO-MRSA isolates., (Copyright © 2017 American Society for Microbiology.)