Search

Abstract The study of drug–target interaction plays an important role in the process of drug development. The subject of DTI forecasting has advanced significantly in the last several years, yielding numerous significant research findings and methodologies. Heterogeneous data sources provide richer information and comprehensive perspectives for drug–target interaction prediction, so many existing methods rely on heterogeneous networks, and graph embedding technology becomes an important technology to extract information from heterogeneous networks. These approaches, however, are less concerned with potential noisy information in heterogeneous networks and more focused on the extent of information extraction in those networks. Based on this, a potential DTI predictive network model called FBRWPC is proposed in this paper. It uses a fine-grained similarity selection program to first integrate similarity on similar networks and then a bidirectional random walk graph embedding learning method with restart to obtain an updated drug target interaction matrix. Through the use of similarity selection and fine-grained selection similarity integration, the framework can effectively filter out the noise present in heterogeneous networks and enhance the model's prediction performance. The experimental findings demonstrate that, even after being split up into four distinct types of data sets, FBRWPC can still retain great prediction performance, a sign of the model's resilience and good generalization.

The study of drug–target interaction plays an important role in the process of drug development. The subject of DTI forecasting has advanced significantly in the last several years, yielding numerous significant research findings and methodologies. Heterogeneous data sources provide richer information and comprehensive perspectives for drug–target interaction prediction, so many existing methods rely on heterogeneous networks, and graph embedding technology becomes an important technology to extract information from heterogeneous networks. These approaches, however, are less concerned with potential noisy information in heterogeneous networks and more focused on the extent of information extraction in those networks. Based on this, a potential DTI predictive network model called FBRWPC is proposed in this paper. It uses a fine-grained similarity selection program to first integrate similarity on similar networks and then a bidirectional random walk graph embedding learning method with restart to obtain an updated drug target interaction matrix. Through the use of similarity selection and fine-grained selection similarity integration, the framework can effectively filter out the noise present in heterogeneous networks and enhance the model's prediction performance. The experimental findings demonstrate that, even after being split up into four distinct types of data sets, FBRWPC can still retain great prediction performance, a sign of the model's resilience and good generalization. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The discovery of drug–target interactions (DTIs) is a pivotal process in pharmaceutical development. Computational approaches are a promising and efficient alternative to tedious and costly wet-lab experiments for predicting novel DTIs from numerous candidates. Recently, with the availability of abundant heterogeneous biological information from diverse data sources, computational methods have been able to leverage multiple drug and target similarities to boost the performance of DTI prediction. Similarity integration is an effective and flexible strategy to extract crucial information across complementary similarity views, providing a compressed input for any similarity-based DTI prediction model. However, existing similarity integration methods filter and fuse similarities from a global perspective, neglecting the utility of similarity views for each drug and target. In this study, we propose a Fine-Grained Selective similarity integration approach, called FGS, which employs a local interaction consistency-based weight matrix to capture and exploit the importance of similarities at a finer granularity in both similarity selection and combination steps. We evaluate FGS on five DTI prediction datasets under various prediction settings. Experimental results show that our method not only outperforms similarity integration competitors with comparable computational costs, but also achieves better prediction performance than state-of-the-art DTI prediction approaches by collaborating with conventional base models. Furthermore, case studies on the analysis of similarity weights and on the verification of novel predictions confirm the practical ability of FGS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In silico prediction of drug–target interactions is a critical phase in the sustainable drug development process, especially when the research focus is to capitalize on the repositioning of existing drugs. However, developing such computational methods is not an easy task, but is much needed, as current methods that predict potential drug–target interactions suffer from high false-positive rates. Here we introduce DTiGEMS+, a computational method that predicts Drug–Target interactions using Graph Embedding, graph Mining, and Similarity-based techniques. DTiGEMS+ combines similarity-based as well as feature-based approaches, and models the identification of novel drug–target interactions as a link prediction problem in a heterogeneous network. DTiGEMS+ constructs the heterogeneous network by augmenting the known drug–target interactions graph with two other complementary graphs namely: drug–drug similarity, target–target similarity. DTiGEMS+ combines different computational techniques to provide the final drug target prediction, these techniques include graph embeddings, graph mining, and machine learning. DTiGEMS+ integrates multiple drug–drug similarities and target–target similarities into the final heterogeneous graph construction after applying a similarity selection procedure as well as a similarity fusion algorithm. Using four benchmark datasets, we show DTiGEMS+ substantially improves prediction performance compared to other state-of-the-art in silico methods developed to predict of drug-target interactions by achieving the highest average AUPR across all datasets (0.92), which reduces the error rate by 33.3% relative to the second-best performing model in the state-of-the-art methods comparison. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing have accelerated the accumulation of omics data on the same tumor tissue from multiple sources. Intensive study of multi-omics integration on tumor samples can stimulate progress in precision medicine and is promising in detecting potential biomarkers. However, current methods are restricted owing to highly unbalanced dimensions of omics data or difficulty in assigning weights between different data sources. Therefore, the appropriate approximation and constraints of integrated targets remain a major challenge. In this paper, we proposed an omics data integration method, named high-order path elucidated similarity (HOPES). HOPES fuses the similarities derived from various omics data sources to solve the dimensional discrepancy, and progressively elucidate the similarities from each type of omics data into an integrated similarity with various high-order connected paths. Through a series of incremental constraints for commonality, HOPES can take both specificity of single data and consistency between different data types into consideration. The fused similarity matrix gives global insight into patients' correlation and efficiently distinguishes subgroups. We tested the performance of HOPES on both a simulated dataset and several empirical tumor datasets. The test datasets contain three omics types including gene expression, DNA methylation, and microRNA data for five different TCGA cancer projects. Our method was shown to achieve superior accuracy and high robustness compared with several benchmark methods on simulated data. Further experiments on five cancer datasets demonstrated that HOPES achieved superior performances in cancer classification. The stratified subgroups were shown to have statistically significant differences in survival. We further located and identified the key genes, methylation sites, and microRNAs within each subgroup. They were shown to achieve high potential prognostic value and were enriched in many cancer-related biological processes or pathways.

Recent advances in high-throughput sequencing have accelerated the accumulation of omics data on the same tumor tissue from multiple sources. Intensive study of multi-omics integration on tumor samples can stimulate progress in precision medicine and is promising in detecting potential biomarkers. However, current methods are restricted owing to highly unbalanced dimensions of omics data or difficulty in assigning weights between different data sources. Therefore, the appropriate approximation and constraints of integrated targets remain a major challenge. In this paper, we proposed an omics data integration method, named high-order path elucidated similarity (HOPES). HOPES fuses the similarities derived from various omics data sources to solve the dimensional discrepancy, and progressively elucidate the similarities from each type of omics data into an integrated similarity with various high-order connected paths. Through a series of incremental constraints for commonality, HOPES can take both specificity of single data and consistency between different data types into consideration. The fused similarity matrix gives global insight into patients' correlation and efficiently distinguishes subgroups. We tested the performance of HOPES on both a simulated dataset and several empirical tumor datasets. The test datasets contain three omics types including gene expression, DNA methylation, and microRNA data for five different TCGA cancer projects. Our method was shown to achieve superior accuracy and high robustness compared with several benchmark methods on simulated data. Further experiments on five cancer datasets demonstrated that HOPES achieved superior performances in cancer classification. The stratified subgroups were shown to have statistically significant differences in survival. We further located and identified the key genes, methylation sites, and microRNAs within each subgroup. They were shown to achieve high potential prognostic value and were enriched in many cancer-related biological processes or pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]