Search

Fluorometry is an effective research tool in biology and medicine; it is widely used in the study of the photosynthetic pigment apparatus in vivo. This method can be applied to the key plant photoreceptor phytochrome (phy). The fluorescence of phytochrome in plants was recorded for the first time in the group of the author, and a spectrofluorometric technique for its in vivo study was developed. The photophysical and photochemical properties of the pigment were described, and the photoreceptor was shown to be present in plants as two phenomenological types-active (at cryogenic temperatures) and water-soluble (Pr') and inactive and amphiphilic (Pr″). The scheme of the photoreaction explaining their photochemical distinctions was proposed. Phytochrome A was shown to comprise both types (phyA' and phyA″), whereas phytochrome B was only the second type. For phyA', distinct conformers have been detected. phyA' and phyA″ differ by the N-terminus of the molecule, possibly by serine phosphorylation. They mediate, respectively, the very low fluence and high irradiance photoresponses. Light, internal factors (kinase/phosphatase balance, pH), and hormones (jasmonate) were shown to affect the content and functions of the two phyA pools. All this points to the effectiveness of the developed method for invivo investigations of the phytochrome system. The data obtained can be applied in practical terms in agrobiology and light culture, as well as in the use of phytochrome as a new nanotool and a fluorescent probe., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The author declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Phytochrome (phy) system in plants comprising a small number of phytochromes with phyA and phyB as major ones is responsible for acquiring light information in the red-far-red region of the solar spectrum. It provides optimal strategy for plant development under changing light conditions throughout all its life cycle beginning from seed germination and seedling establishment to fruiting and plant senescence. The phyA was shown to participate in the regulation of this cycle which is especially evident at its early stages. It mediates three modes of reactions-the very low and low fluence responses (VLFR and LFR) and the high irradiance responses (HIR). The phyA is the sole light receptor in the far-red spectral region responsible for plant's survival under a dense plant canopy where light is enriched with the far-red component. Its appearance is believed to be one of the main factors of plants' successful evolution. So far, it is widely accepted that one molecular phyA species is responsible for its complex functional manifestations. In this review, the evidence of the existence of two distinct phyA types-major, light-labile and soluble phyA' and minor, relatively light-stable and amphiphilic phyA″-is presented as what may account for the diverse modes of phyA action.

The evolution of oxygenic photosynthesis, respiration and photoperception are connected with the appearance of cyanobacteria. The key compounds, which are involved in these processes, are tetrapyrroles: open chain - bilins and cyclic - chlorophylls and heme. The latter are characterized by their covalent bond with the apoprotein resulting in the formation of biliproteins. This type of photoreceptors is unique in that it can perform important and opposite functions-light-harvesting in photosynthesis with the participation of phycobiliproteins and photoperception mediated by phycochromes and phytochromes. In this review, cyanobacterial phycobiliproteins and phytochrome Cph1 are considered from a comparative point of view. Structural features of these pigments, which provide their contrasting photophysical and photochemical characteristics, are analyzed. The determining factor in the case of energy migration with the participation of phycobiliproteins is blocking the torsional relaxations of the chromophore, its D-ring, in the excited state and their freedom, in the case of phytochrome photoisomerization. From the energetics point of view, this distinction is preconditioned by the height of the activation barrier for the photoreaction and relaxation in the excited state, which depends on the degree of the chromophore fixation by its protein surroundings., (© 2019 American Society for Photobiology.)

The photosynthetic apparatus accomplishes two major functions in plants - solar energy conversion and protection of the plant from photodestruction. Its highly orchestrated formation includes coordinated biosynthesis of chlorophyll (Chl) and of its binding to matrix proteins. Light plays here the central role driving both metabolic and regulatory processes. The regulation is achieved via operation of sophisticated photoreceptor machinery with the phytochrome system as its main component. This review concentrates on Chl a biosynthesis and the role of phytochrome A (phyA) in this process. The mechanism of action of phyA and the specificity of its state in the plant has been described, in particular, the existence of two native types with different modes of action. This review touches upon the dependence of the effects of phyA on tissues and organs of the plant and its species, genetic modifications, and hormonal status.

Phytochrome A (phyA) mediates different photoresponses what may be connected with the existence of its two types, phyA' and phyA'', differing by spectroscopic, photochemical and functional properties. We investigated a role of phyA phosphorylation in their formation turning to transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana (L. Heynh.) phyA or phyAphyB mutants overexpressing rice wild-type phyA (phyA WT) or mutant phyA (phyA SA) with the first 10 serines substituted by alanines. This prevents phyA phosphorylation at these sites and modifies photoresponses. Etiolated seedlings were employed and phyA parameters were evaluated with the use of low temperature fluorescence spectroscopy and photochemistry. Germination of seeds was induced by white light (WL) pre-treatment for 15min or 3h. Emission spectra of rice phyA WT and phyA SA were similar and their total content was comparable. However, the phyA'/phyA'' proportion in phyA WT was high and varied with the duration of the WL pre-treatment, whereas in phyA SA it was substantially shifted towards phyA'' and did not depend on the pre-illumination. This suggests that phyA SA comprises primarily or exclusively the phyA'' pool and supports the notion that the two phyA types differ by the state of serine phosphorylation. phyA'' was also found to be much more effective in the germination induction than phyA'.