Search

Iron chelation therapy (ICT) is the mainstay of treatment in patients with thalassemia requiring blood transfusions. This phase 2 JUPITER study evaluated patient preference between film-coated tablet (FCT) and dispersible tablet (DT) in transfusion-dependent thalassemia (TDT) or non-TDT (NTDT) patients treated with both formulations in a sequential manner. The primary endpoint was patient-reported preference for FCT over DT, while secondary outcomes included patient reported outcomes (PROs) evaluated by overall preference, and by age, thalassemia transfusion status, and previous ICT status. Out of 183 patients screened, 140 and 136 patients completed the treatment periods 1 and 2 of the core study, respectively. At week 48, the majority of patients preferred FCT over DT (90.3 vs. 7.5%; difference of percentage: 0.83 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.75-0.89; P < 0.0001]). FCT scored better on secondary PROs and showed less severe gastrointestinal symptoms than DT, except in the change of modified Satisfaction with Iron Chelation Therapy (mSICT) preference scores, which were similar for both the formulations. Patients with TDT had stable ferritin levels, while it showed a downward trend up to week 48 in patients with NTDT on deferasirox treatment. Overall, 89.9% of patients reported ≥ 1 adverse event (AE), of which 20.3% experienced ≥ 1 serious AE. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were proteinuria, pyrexia, urine protein/creatinine ratio increase, diarrhea, upper respiratory tract infections, transaminase increase, and pharyngitis. Overall, this study reinforced the observations from the previous study by showing a distinct patient preference for FCT over DT formulation and further supported the potential benefits of life-long compliance with ICT., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Objective: To determine the cost effectiveness of molecular monitoring in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the chronic phase (CML-CP) compared to no molecular monitoring from a Chinese payer perspective., Methods: Analyses were conducted using a semi-Markov model with a 50-year time horizon. Population data from multicenter registry-based studies of Chinese patients with CML-CP informed the model. Transition probabilities were based on time-to-event data from the literature. Utility values were obtained from published studies and were assumed to be the same for patients with and without molecular monitoring. Costs were based on values commonly used in the Chinese healthcare system, including drug acquisition, drug administration, follow-up, treatment for disease progression, molecular monitoring, and terminal care costs, and were in the local currency (2020 Chinese Yuan RMB [¥]). Outcomes were total life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), lifetime costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio., Results: Molecular monitoring was dominant to no molecular monitoring, with increased LYs (1.52) and QALYs (1.90) and costs savings (¥93,840) over a lifetime compared to no monitoring in discounted analyses. The opportunity of patients that receive molecular monitoring to discontinue treatment during treatment-free remission, an opportunity not afforded to those without molecular monitoring, was the principle driver of this result. Results were similar across multiple clinical scenarios. Particularly, molecular monitoring remained dominant even if the proportion of patients achieving deep molecular response (DMR) was reduced by 10%-30%, or the proportion of patients maintaining DMR for 1 year was reduced by 10%-30% or increased by 10%. Cost savings in these scenarios ranged from ¥62,230 to ¥103,964., Conclusions: Overall, this analysis demonstrates that adherence to guideline recommendations of regular molecular monitoring of patients with CML-CP treated with TKIs provides significant clinical benefit that leads to substantial cost savings compared to no molecular monitoring from the perspective of a Chinese payer. In a time where healthcare systems have limited resources to allocate to optimal patient care, investment in molecular monitoring is an ideal choice for improving patient benefits at a reduced cost., Competing Interests: VKM is an employee of Novartis Healthcare Pvt Ltd. CS, ND, CG and RV are employees and shareholders of Novartis Pharma AG. QY and TX are employees and shareholders of Beijing Novartis Pharma Co., Ltd. YL is an employee of Beijing Novartis Pharma Co., Ltd. PL and LP are employees of EVERSANA. EVERSANA received financial support for manuscript writing and editorial services. EVERSANA consults for a variety of pharmaceutical, medical device, and biotechnology companies. All authors are employees of Novartis Pharma. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Purpose: This study reports the MTD, recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D), and preliminary efficacy of alpelisib or buparlisib used in combination with tamoxifen plus goserelin in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR + ), HER2-negative (HER2 - ) advanced breast cancer (ABC)., Patients and Methods: This study enrolled premenopausal women with HR + , HER2 - ABC. Patients received tamoxifen (20 mg once daily) and goserelin acetate (3.6 mg every 28 days) with either alpelisib (350 mg once daily; n = 16) or buparlisib (100 mg once daily; n = 13) in 28-day cycles until MTD was observed., Results: The criteria for MTD were not met for both alpelisib and buparlisib. The RP2D of alpelisib and buparlisib in combination with tamoxifen and goserelin were 350 mg and 100 mg, respectively. Both combinations met protocol-specified criteria for tolerability. The most common grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAE) were hypokalemia (12.5%), hyperglycemia (6.3%), and rash (6.3%) for alpelisib and alanine aminotransferase increase (30.8%), aspartate aminotransferase increase (23.1%), and anxiety (15.4%) for buparlisib. TEAEs led to treatment discontinuation in 18.8% and 53.8% of alpelisib- and buparlisib-treated patients, respectively. Progression-free survival was 25.2 months in the alpelisib group and 20.6 months in the buparlisib group., Conclusions: The RP2Ds of alpelisib and buparlisib were 350 mg and 100 mg, respectively. No unexpected safety findings were reported. Although an early-phase study, data suggest that alpelisib plus endocrine therapy may be a potentially efficacious treatment that warrants further evaluation for premenopausal patients with HR + , HER2 - ABC. See related commentary by Clark et al., p. 371 ., (©2020 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Despite the availability of guidelines for the management of chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML), various issues may prevent their successful implementation. The TARGET survey examined real-world management of CML patients compared with international recommendations. This online survey was completed in 2017. Results were discussed by a Steering Committee (SC) of eight international haematologists, challenges were identified and practical solutions developed. Of the 1008 haematologists invited (33 countries), 614 completed the survey. Gaps regarding treatment efficacy and molecular monitoring were identified. Half of the physicians did not perform three-monthly testing of during the initial 12 months of treatment, citing cost as the major barrier, although they know it should be done. Treatment-free remission was not considered a primary treatment goal or as a priority factor influencing treatment decisions. European Leukemia Net guidelines interpretation was generally acceptable, but awareness regarding management of persistent adverse events was poor. Practical solutions proposed by the SC were mostly focused on enhancing physician education and awareness, or encouraging hospitals to work with the government, in order to improve the quality of BCR-ABL testing. Gaps in current CML management were identified compared with international recommendations, which the proposed practical solutions would help to address., (© 2020 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Purpose: Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are a heterogeneous group of rare mesenchymal neoplasms, accounting for < 1% of all newly diagnosed malignancies. These tumors can occur in almost any anatomic site though they most frequently occur in the extremities. The objective of the study was to describe the epidemiology, treatment paradigm, and real-world outcomes in the clinical management of metastatic STS (mSTS) in the Middle East and North Africa (MEA) region., Methods: MOON was an observational, multicenter, retrospective patient chart review study which included 200 patients with mSTS in the final analysis. The primary objective of the study is exploratory, so it is presented using descriptive statistics., Results: At the time of presentation, 62.0% patients had metastatic disease, 27.5% had received only their primary diagnosis and 10.0% had experienced a local recurrence. The most frequent STS localizations were lower extremities (74%), trunk (28.5%) and upper extremities (10.5%). Primary tumor was staged as T2b in the majority (60%) of patients. Surgical treatment was performed most often for the primary disease, whereas radiation therapy and chemotherapy were predominantly administered with palliative intent. A total of 38 patients received treatment with pazopanib. Thirteen adverse events (AEs) were attributed to pazopanib in eight patients., Conclusion: Adult patients treated for STS have al most equal gender ratio and mostly are middle aged. The majority of patients have metastatic disease and disease progression, and half of the patients died from the disease during the period of evaluation. This study obtained real-life data on the clinical management of STS in MEA countries which could be shared with the medical community.