Search

Introduction: To better target stroke awareness efforts (pre and post first stroke) and thereby decrease the time window for help-seeking, this study aims to assess quantitatively whether stroke awareness is associated with appropriate help-seeking at symptom onset, and to investigate qualitatively why this may (not) be the case. Methods: This study conducted in a German regional stroke network comprises a convergent quantitative-dominant, hypothesis-driven mixed methods design including 462 quantitative patient questionnaires combined with qualitative interviews with 28 patients and seven relatives. Quantitative associations were identified using Pearson's correlation analysis. Open coding was performed on interview transcripts before the quantitative results were used to further focus qualitative analysis. Joint display analysis was conducted to mix data strands. Cooperation with the Patient Council of the Department of Neurology ensured patient involvement in the study. Results: Our hypothesis that stroke awareness would be associated with appropriate help-seeking behaviour at stroke symptom onset was partially supported by the quantitative data, i.e. showing associations between some dimensions of stroke awareness and appropriate help-seeking, but not others. For example, knowing stroke symptoms is correlated with recognising one's own symptoms as stroke (r = 0.101; p = 0.030*; N = 459) but not with no hesitation before calling help (r = 0.003; p = 0.941; N = 457). A previous stroke also makes it more likely to recognise one's own symptoms as stroke (r = 0.114; p = 0.015*; N = 459), but not to be transported by emergency ambulance (r = 0.08; p = 0.872; N = 462) or to arrive at the hospital on time (r = 0.02; p = 0.677; N = 459). Qualitative results showed concordance, discordance or provided potential explanations for quantitative findings. For example, qualitative data showed processes of denial on the part of patients and the important role of relatives in initiating appropriate help-seeking behaviour on patients' behalf. Conclusions: Our study provides insights into the complexities of the decision-making process at stroke symptom onset. As our findings suggest processes of denial and inabilities to translate abstract disease knowledge into correct actions, we recommend to address relatives as potential saviours of loved ones, increased use of specific situational examples (e.g. lying on the bathroom floor) and the involvement of patient representatives in the preparation of informational resources and campaigns. Future research should include mixed methods research from one sample and more attention to potential reporting inconsistencies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Telemedical services can be used to complement on‐site services when demand for specialists exceeds supply or when specialists are not evenly distributed across health systems. Using stroke as an example, this study aimed to explore how patients and staff experience telestroke cooperation in a stroke network in Germany. Methods: We conducted a qualitative multi‐method and multi‐centre study combining 32 non‐participant observations at one hub and four spoke hospitals with 26 semi‐structured interviews with hub and spoke staff as well as stroke patients and relatives. Observation protocols and interview transcripts were analysed to identify barriers and facilitators to telestroke cooperation from the perspectives of staff, patients and relatives. Results: In terms of barriers to telestroke cooperation, we found technological problems, providing the treatment for one patient from two sites, competing priorities between telestroke and in‐house duties in the spoke hospitals, as well as difficulties in participating in the teleneurological examination via a videoconferencing system for older and disabled patients. In terms of facilitators, we found an overall very positive perception of telestroke provision by patients, good professional relationships within the network, and sharing of neurological expertise to be experienced as helpful for telestroke cooperation. Conclusions: We recommend better integration of telemedical services into the care pathway, fostering relationships within the network, improved technological support and resources, and more emphasis within networks, in public awareness efforts as well as in academia on the evaluation of telemedical services from the perspectives of patients and relatives, especially older patients and patients with disabilities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In stroke networks, hospitals that do not provide thrombectomy (referring hospitals) refer patients to specialized hospitals (receiving hospitals) for this specific intervention. In order to improve the access and management of thrombectomy, the focus of research needs to be not only on the receiving hospitals but also on the prior stroke care pathways in referring hospitals., Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the stroke care pathways in different referring hospitals as well as the advantages and disadvantages associated with these pathways., Methods: A qualitative multicenter study was carried out in three referring hospitals of a stroke network. Stroke care was assessed and analyzed by using non-participant observations and 15 semi-structured interviews with employees in various health professions., Results: The following aspects were reported as advantageous within the stroke care pathways: (1) a structured and personal prenotification of the patient by the emergency medical service (EMS) members; (2) a more efficiently organized teleneurology workflow; (3) the provision of the secondary referral to thrombectomy by the same EMS members of the primary referral and (4) the integration of external neurologists into in-house structures., Conclusion: The study provides insights into different stroke care pathways of three different referring hospitals of a stroke network. The results can be used to derive potentials for improvement of other referring hospitals; however, this study is too small to provide reliable information about their potential effectiveness. Future studies should investigate whether implementation of these recommendations actually leads to improvements and under which conditions they are successful. To ensure patient-centeredness, the perspectives of patients and relatives should also be included., (© 2023. The Author(s).)