Search

Modern out-of-order processors face speculative execution attacks. Despite various proposed software and hardware mitigations to prevent such attacks, new attacks keep arising from unknown vulnerabilities. Thus, a formal and rigorous evaluation of the ability of hardware designs to deal with speculative execution attacks is urgently desired. This paper proposes a formal verification technique called Contract Shadow Logic that can considerably improve RTL verification scalability while being applicable to different defense mechanisms. In this technique, we leverage computer architecture design insights to improve verification performance for checking security properties formulated as software-hardware contracts for secure speculation. Our verification scheme is accessible to computer architects and requires minimal formal-method expertise. We evaluate our technique on multiple RTL designs, including three out-of-order processors. The experimental results demonstrate that our technique exhibits a significant advantage in finding attacks on insecure designs and deriving complete proofs on secure designs, when compared to the baseline and two state-of-the-art verification schemes, LEAVE and UPEC., Comment: This paper has been accepted to ASPLOS 2025

Low-trust architectures work on, from the viewpoint of software, always-encrypted data, and significantly reduce the amount of hardware trust to a small software-free enclave component. In this paper, we perform a complete formal verification of a specific low-trust architecture, the Sequestered Encryption (SE) architecture, to show that the design is secure against direct data disclosures and digital side channels for all possible programs. We first define the security requirements of the ISA of SE low-trust architecture. Looking upwards, this ISA serves as an abstraction of the hardware for the software, and is used to show how any program comprising these instructions cannot leak information, including through digital side channels. Looking downwards this ISA is a specification for the hardware, and is used to define the proof obligations for any RTL implementation arising from the ISA-level security requirements. These cover both functional and digital side-channel leakage. Next, we show how these proof obligations can be successfully discharged using commercial formal verification tools. We demonstrate the efficacy of our RTL security verification technique for seven different correct and buggy implementations of the SE architecture., Comment: 19 pages with appendix

Intellectual Property (IP) theft is a serious concern for the integrated circuit (IC) industry. To address this concern, logic locking countermeasure transforms a logic circuit to a different one to obfuscate its inner details. The transformation caused by obfuscation is reversed only upon application of the programmed secret key, thus preserving the circuit's original function. This technique is known to be vulnerable to Satisfiability (SAT)-based attacks. But in order to succeed, SAT-based attacks implicitly assume a perfectly reverse-engineered circuit, which is difficult to achieve in practice due to reverse engineering (RE) errors caused by automated circuit extraction. In this paper, we analyze the effects of random circuit RE-errors on the success of SAT-based attacks. Empirical evaluation on ISCAS, MCNC benchmarks as well as a fully-fledged RISC-V CPU reveals that the attack success degrades exponentially with increase in the number of random RE-errors. Therefore, the adversaries either have to equip RE-tools with near perfection or propose better SAT-based attacks that can work with RE-imperfections.