Search

Your search keyword '"Tang, Pingfen"' showing total 5 results
Start Over Author "Tang, Pingfen" Publication Year Range Last 10 years
5 results on '"Tang, Pingfen"'

3. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool

Author

Le, Cai, Ma, Ke, Tang, Pingfen, Edvardsson, David, Behm, Lina, Zhang, Jie, Yang, Jiqun, Fu, Haiyan, and Ahlström, Gerd

Subjects
China, palliative care, Psychometrics, lcsh:R, Geriatric Medicine, lcsh:Medicine, factor analysis, Reproducibility of Results, Hälsovetenskaper, Translating, older people, Surveys and Questionnaires, Health Sciences, instrument evaluation, Humans, Female, person-centred care
Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to test a Chinese cross-cultural adaptation of the English version of the Person-Centred Care Assessment Tool (P-CAT) and evaluate its psychometric properties. DESIGN: P-CAT was translated/back-translated using established procedures before the psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version was made. SETTING: Two hospitals covering urban and suburban areas of Kunming in the Yunnan province of China. PARTICIPANTS: 152 female hospital staff completed the survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Construct validity and reliability, including internal consistency and test-retest reliability, were assessed among a sample of hospital staff. RESULTS: The factor analysis resulted in a two-component solution that consisted of two subscales. The corrected item-total correlations for all of the items ranged from 0.14 to 0.44, with six items not meeting the cut-off level for item-total correlation (>0.3). The Chinese P-CAT demonstrated strong reliability, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.91-0.94 for the scales and a test-retest reliability coefficient of 0.88 for the overall scale scores. The intraclass correlation was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90 to 0.95). CONCLUSION: P-CAT appears to be a promising measure for evaluating staff perceptions of person-centredness in Chinese hospital environments. The results show that P-CAT can be a useful tool for improving the quality of healthcare in terms of person-centred care in the Chinese context.

Published
2020

4. Psychometric evaluation of the Chinese version of the person-centred climate questionnaire : staff version (PCQ-S)

Author

Cai, Le, Ahlström, Gerd, Tang, Pingfen, Ma, Ke, Edvardsson, David, Behm, Lina, Fu, Haiyan, Zhang, Jie, Yang, Jiqun, Cai, Le, Ahlström, Gerd, Tang, Pingfen, Ma, Ke, Edvardsson, David, Behm, Lina, Fu, Haiyan, Zhang, Jie, and Yang, Jiqun

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a Chinese translation of the English version of the Person-centred Climate Questionnaire - Staff version (PCQ-S) for Chinese palliative care staff in a hospital context. DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional design. The 14-item English PCQ-S was translated and backtranslated using established procedures. Construct validity and reliability including internal consistency and test-retest reliability were assessed among hospital staff. Construct validity was tested using principal component analysis (PCA), internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha, and test-retest reliability was evaluated with the weighted kappa (Kp), Pearson correlation coefficient (r) and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). SETTING: This study was conducted in three hospitals in Kunming, the capital of Yunnan province in south-west China. PARTICIPANTS: A sample of hospital staff (n=163) on duty in the palliative care departments of three hospitals in Kunming consented to participate in the study. RESULTS: The 14-item Chinese PCQ-S consists of the three subscales also present in other language versions. It showed strong internal consistency, with a Cronbach's alpha of 0.94 for the total scale, 0.87 for the safety subscale, 0.90 for the everydayness subscale and 0.88 for the community subscale. The Chinese PCQ-S had high test-retest reliability as evidenced by a high Kp coefficient and a high correlation coefficient for all scales between test and retest scores, on 'a climate of safety' (Kp=0.77, r=0.88, p<0.01), 'a climate of everydayness' (Kp=0.82, r=0.91, p<0.01), 'a climate of community' (Kp=0.75, r=0.79, p<0.01), and on overall scale scores (Kp=0.85, r=0.93, p<0.01). The ICC to evaluate the test-retest reliability was 0.97 (95% CI 0.95 to 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: The Chinese version of the PCQ-S showed satisfactory reliability and validity for assessing staff perceptions of person-centred care

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results