Search

We have applied bipolar dual-lead spinal cord stimulation (SCS) between two cylinder-type electrodes placed on the ventral and dorsal sides of the spinal cord (dual-VD-SCS). A 36-year-old man suffered from burning pain from his right elbow down to his hand after brachial plexus avulsion. The areas with paresthesia induced by conventional SCS did not include the painful hand area. However, dual-VD-SCS completely induced paresthesia in the painful hand area. We speculate that dual-VD-SCS can be applied to stimulate deeper sites of the dorsal column and dorsal horn than conventional SCS and is useful for pain reduction.

Background Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) is thought to improve the symptoms of selected neurological disorders by modulating activity within dysfunctional brain circuits. To date, there is no evidence that DBS counteracts progressive neurodegeneration in any particular disorder. Objective/Hypothesis We hypothesized that DBS applied to the fornix in patients with Alzheimer's Disease (AD) could have an effect on brain structure. Methods In six AD patients receiving fornix DBS, we used structural MRI to assess one-year change in hippocampal, fornix, and mammillary body volume. We also used deformation-based morphometry to identify whole-brain structural changes. We correlated volumetric changes to hippocampal glucose metabolism. We also compared volumetric changes to those in an age-, sex-, and severity-matched group of AD patients ( n = 25) not receiving DBS. Results We observed bilateral hippocampal volume increases in the two patients with the best clinical response to fornix DBS. In one patient, hippocampal volume was preserved three years after diagnosis. Overall, mean hippocampal atrophy was significantly slower in the DBS group compared to the matched AD group, and no matched AD patients demonstrated bilateral hippocampal enlargement. Across DBS patients, hippocampal volume change correlated strongly with hippocampal metabolism and with volume change in the fornix and mammillary bodies, suggesting a circuit-wide effect of stimulation. Deformation-based morphometry in DBS patients revealed local volume expansions in several regions typically atrophied in AD. Conclusion We present the first in-human evidence that, in addition to modulating neural circuit activity, DBS may influence the natural course of brain atrophy in a neurodegenerative disease.

Twenty-one vegetative state (VS) patients and 10 minimally conscious state (MCS) patients were treated by spinal cord stimulation (SCS) following an electrophysiological evaluation 3 months or more after the onset of brain injury.A flexible four-contact cylindrical electrode was inserted into the epidural space of the cervical vertebrae, and placed at cervical levels C2-C4. Five-hertz stimulation was applied for 5 min every 30 min during the daytime at an intensity that produced muscle twitches of the upper extremities.Both the fifth wave in the auditory brainstem response (ABR) and N20 in the somatosensory evoked potential (SEP) were detected in 8 of the 21 VS patients and 9 of the 10 MCS patients. Of the 3 VS patients and 7 MCS patients who recovered following SCS therapy, all showed a preserved fifth wave in the ABR and N20 in the SEP, and all had received SCS therapy within 9 months after the onset of brain injury. Although the 3 patients who recovered from VS remained in a bedridden state, all 7 patients who recovered from MCS were able to emerge from the bedridden state within 12 months after the start of SCS.Five-hertz cervical SCS caused increased cerebral blood flow (CBF) and induced muscle twitches of the upper extremities, and MCS patients showed a remarkable recovery of consciousness and motor function in the upper extremities compared with the lower extremities. This SCS method could be a new neuromodulation and neurorehabilitation technique, and MCS patients may be good candidates for SCS therapy.

Twenty-one vegetative state (VS) patients and 10 minimally conscious state (MCS) patients were treated by spinal cord stimulation (SCS) following an electrophysiological evaluation 3 months or more after the onset of brain injury.

Objectives Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is not typically recommended for the treatment of central poststroke pain (CPSP). We examined whether the pharmacological evaluation of CPSP is useful for selecting the candidates for SCS. Materials and Methods Changes in visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain following pharmacological evaluation using morphine, thiopental, and ketamine were compared with those following SCS in 22 CPSP patients. Results Twelve of the 22 (54.5%) patients in the ketamine test and thiopental test, and 5 (22.7%) of the 22 patients in the morphine test showed a more than 40% reduction in VAS score and were judged as “sensitive.” Pain relief by SCS was estimated as excellent (≧60% VAS score reduction) in three patients, good (30–59% reduction) in nine patients, and fair (10–29% reduction) in seven patients 24 months after the start of SCS. The remaining 3 patients evaluated as having poor pain relief (

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is a surgical procedure used to treat various neurological disorders such as intractable pain, Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor, dystonia, and other movement disorders. It involves implanting electrodes in the brain, which send electrical impulses to modulate brain activity. This procedure is not considered radical and can significantly improve disabling neurological symptoms. Such symptoms used to commonly require invasive surgeries such as thalamotomy and pallidotomy, which destroy those parts of the brain where abnormal activity has occurred. In recent years, such surgeries have been performed less frequently because of the risk of severe complications and the availability of DBS, which is safer and has fewer complications. Deep brain stimulation allows abnormal brain activity to be regulated without destruction of brain tissue. This means that DBS offers numerous advantages over conventional surgeries as it is reversible and enables the surgeon to modulate and improve specific functions or symptoms. Despite DBS having become widely accepted as an effective therapy for various neurological disorders, its fundamental principles and mechanisms are still not precisely defined.