Search

Purpose: To investigate the effect of pre-biopsy rectal swab and urine screening combined with a risk-adapted antibiotic treatment strategy on reducing post-biopsy infections (PBIs) following multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)/ transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) fusion-targeted transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPBx). Methods: 1119 Patients undergoing mpMRI-TRUS fusion TRPBx between June 2017 and February 2024 were included. Patients were screened for rectal extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)/multi-resistant gram-negative (MRGN) and urinary pathogens. Standard-risk patients (rectal non-ESBL/MRGN-carriers) either received Cefuroxime (2017–2020) or Ceftriaxone (2020–2024) intravenously before biopsy. For high-risk patients (rectal ESBL/MRGN-carriers) intravenous Ertapenem was used. Patients with positive urine cultures received oral targeted prophylaxis. PBIs were the primary outcome of the study. We used uni- and multivariable logistic regression analysis (MLRA) to reveal predictors for the main outcome. Results: Rectal ESBL/MRGN prevalence was 5.5%. For standard-risk patients, PBI-rates were 8.1% and 0.24% for Cefuroxime and Ceftriaxone (p < 0.0001), respectively. Only 1.7% of high-risk patients treated with Ertapenem developed PBI. On MLRA, Cefuroxime (OR 38.7, 95%-CI: 10.9–246), oral Ciprofloxacin (OR 103, 95%-CI: 10.8–994), other oral targeted antibiotics (OR 42.7, 95%-CI: 1.86–496) (reference Ceftriaxone, all p < 0.005) were significant predictors for PBI whereas Ertapenem (OR 7.30 95%-CI: 0.34–77.4, p = 0.11) was not. Conclusion: By integrating rectal swab ESBL/MRGN and urine screening, we developed a tailored antibiotic treatment strategy, resulting in low PBI-rates following TRPBx. Carbapenem-based treatment of high-risk patients is crucial. Ceftriaxone should be considered for routine use in standard-risk patients as it offers very low PBI-rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To discern whether reduced infection rates were attributed to antiseptic solutions or mechanical rectal irrigation. Patients and Methods: After receiving ethical approval, the study included patients who underwent transrectal prostate biopsy due to elevated PSA or abnormal digital rectal examination findings, and prostate cancer under active surveillance, at Tepecik Training and Research Hospital between April 2022 and June 2023. Standard antibiotic prophylaxis was administered. Patients were randomized into three equal groups according to the rectal irrigation strategy. Results: Overall complications occurred in 4%. Despite distinct cleaning agents, there was no significant difference in infection rates (p = 0.780) or fever incidence (p = 0.776). Pathological analyses revealed comparable outcomes (p = 0.764). Conclusion: The study challenges the prevailing belief that antiseptic solutions are indispensable for infection prevention, as saline demonstrated similar efficacy. Limitations include data gaps from potential external hospital visits and absent rectal microorganism swab culture. While TRUS-PB remains the gold standard, this study suggests that mechanically cleansing the rectal mucosa with saline—a cost-effective, side-effect-free alternative—may be a viable infection prevention method, particularly beneficial for patients with antiseptic allergies. The findings prompt a reconsideration of the necessity of antiseptic solutions in TRUS-PB, offering an alternative approach to mitigate infectious complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: According to guidelines, transrectal random biopsy of the prostate (TRBP) is performed under antibiotic prophylaxis (AP). Fosfomycin-trometamol (FOS) is not approved in Germany, but TRBP as indication was listed in the product information falsely. The aim was to investigate infectious complications of TRBP under FOS as a single dose. Methods: All TRBPs under FOS 3,000 mg as a single dose between July 1, 2020, and June 30, 2021, at a university institution were recorded. 357 patients (41–85 years old, median 66) were included. 243 received first TRBP, 321 TRBP were MRI-fusionated. 10–22 cores were taken (median 14). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 0.1–1224 ng/mL (median 7.7 ng/mL), prostate volume 5–263 mL (median 50 mL). Analysis was performed using Chi square test or Fisher’s exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, and t test. Results: Four patients suffered an infection (1.1%), without significant difference according to age (p = 0.849), PSA (p = 0.957), number of cores (p = 0.905), and increase in volume (p = 0.456). Limiting is the retrospective character. Conclusion: The complication rate was 1.1%, and FOS single dose therefore represents sufficient AP for TRBP in this collective. FOS as a single dose should be reevaluated in a prospective study to obtain approval in Germany for this indication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: This study aims to determine the effect of virtual reality glasses application on pain, anxiety, and patient satisfaction during a transrectal prostate biopsy. Materials and Methods: The study was conducted with pre-tests, post-tests, and a control group, using a randomized controlled experimental research design. A total of 70 patients (35 in the intervention group and 35 in the control group) were included in the study. The intervention group watched a video with virtual reality glasses during the biopsy process. A Descriptive Information Form, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI-I, STAI-II), Scale of Patient Perception of Hospital Experience with Nursing Care (PPHEN), and Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS) were used for data collection. To evaluate the data, numbers, percentages, mean, standard deviation, chi-square, paired sample t test, independent samples t test, regression analysis, and Cronbach's alpha Reliability Coefficient were used. Results: There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of descriptive and clinical characteristics (p >.05). The mean VAS and STAI post-test scores of the patients in the intervention group were lower than the control group, and the difference between them was statistically significant (p <.05). The mean PPHEN post-test scores of the patients in the intervention group were significantly higher than those in the control group (p <.05). Conclusion: The application of virtual reality glasses during a transrectal prostate biopsy significantly reduced the level of pain and anxiety and increased patient satisfaction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) is a common procedure used to obtain a prostate biopsy. Although generally safe, complications may occur including infection. Preprocedural antimicrobial prophylaxis is recommended to minimize risk of subsequent infection. This study is a retrospective chart review via the computerized patient record system from January 1, 2018 to February 28, 2022. The study included patients who underwent a TRPB at the Western New York, Syracuse, or Albany Stratton Veterans Affairs Healthcare Systems. This study included a total of 932 patients who underwent TRPB. Postoperative infection occurred in 3.2% (n = 30) of patients within 14 days of the TRPB. Of the 30 patients who developed an infection, 30% (n = 9) resulted in bacteremia. For the 932 patients evaluated, 24 different antibiotic regimens were used, none of which followed guideline recommendations. None of the regimens were found to have an impact on rates of subsequent infection. The results of this study suggest a need for guideline adherence. There was no benefit to using the guideline-discordant regimens as they were not associated with a decreased risk of infection, and in many cases exposed patients to unnecessarily broad and prolonged antibiotic regimens. • Antibiotics are overutilized in prophylaxis for transrectal prostate biopsies. • Antibiotic regimens vary greatly and are discordant with AUA recommendations. • Antibiotics were broader and of prolonged duration compared with current guidelines. • There was no difference in rates of infection with antibiotic duration > 1 day. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recently, the German Federal Institute for Medicines and Medical Products restricted the use of fosfomycin in transrectal biopsy of the prostate (TRBP). Accordingly, the need for other antibiotic agents for prophylaxis in TRBP is urgent since antibiotic prophylaxis is mandatory in accordance with these guidelines. After the restriction of the use of ciprofloxacin, and before the use of fosfomycin in Germany was falsely allowed, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was evaluated as an alternative for antibiotic prophylaxis in TRBP. Regarding hospitalization for post-interventional infections, 359 patients at the Department of Urology of the University of Regensburg, at Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center as a single center, underwent TRBP between 2 July 2019 and 30 June 2020. Regarding antibiotic prophylaxis, the post-interventional hospitalization rate due to bacterial complications was relevant. Of the 359 patients, 10 (2.8%) had an infection requiring hospitalization post-TRBP. A total of 349 (97.2%) patients had no infection-related hospitalization. This corresponds to an incidence rate of only 2.8%. Referring to the previous infection rates under the now obsolete ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid can show a similar, if not tendentially even lower, risk of infection, and so this substance can be an alternative for antibiotic prophylaxis in TRBP. Another advantage is that, according to the WHO's AWaRe classification, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid is one of the so-called Access antibiotics. This study is limited as rectal swabs and urine cultures were not performed on every patient before TRBP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: To identify a particular setting of biopsy-naïve patients in which it would be reasonable to offer only cognitive targeted prostate biopsy (PBx) with a transrectal approach. (2) Methods: We designed an observational retrospective pilot study. Patients with a prostatic specific antigen (PSA) level > 10 ng/mL, either a normal or suspicious digital rectal examination (DRE), and a lesion with a PI-RADS score ≥ 4 in the postero-medial or postero-lateral peripheral zone were included. All patients underwent a transrectal PBx, including both systematic and targeted samples. The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) (Gleason Score ≥ 7) was chosen as the primary outcome. We described the detection rate of csPCa in systematic PBx, targeted PBx, and overall PBx. (3) A total of 92 patients were included. Prostate cancer was detected in 84 patients (91.30%) with combined biopsies. A csPCa was diagnosed in all positive cases (100%) with combined biopsies. Systematic PBxs were positive in 80 patients (86.96%), while targeted PBxs were positive in 84 men (91.30%). Targeted PBx alone would have allowed the diagnosis of csPCa in all positive cases; systematic PBx alone would have missed the diagnosis of 8/84 (9.52%) csPCa cases (4 negative patients and 4 not csPCa) (p = 0.011). (4) Conclusions: Cognitive targeted PBx with a transrectal approach could be offered alone to diagnose csPCa in biopsy-naïve patients with PSA ≥ 10 ng/mL, either normal or suspicious DRE, and a lesion with PI-RADS score ≥ 4 in the postero-medial or postero-lateral peripheral zone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recently, the German Federal Institute for Medicines and Medical Products restricted the use of fosfomycin in transrectal biopsy of the prostate (TRBP). Accordingly, the need for other antibiotic agents for prophylaxis in TRBP is urgent since antibiotic prophylaxis is mandatory in accordance with these guidelines. After the restriction of the use of ciprofloxacin, and before the use of fosfomycin in Germany was falsely allowed, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid was evaluated as an alternative for antibiotic prophylaxis in TRBP. Regarding hospitalization for post-interventional infections, 359 patients at the Department of Urology of the University of Regensburg, at Caritas-St. Josef Medical Center as a single center, underwent TRBP between 2 July 2019 and 30 June 2020. Regarding antibiotic prophylaxis, the post-interventional hospitalization rate due to bacterial complications was relevant. Of the 359 patients, 10 (2.8%) had an infection requiring hospitalization post-TRBP. A total of 349 (97.2%) patients had no infection-related hospitalization. This corresponds to an incidence rate of only 2.8%. Referring to the previous infection rates under the now obsolete ciprofloxacin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid can show a similar, if not tendentially even lower, risk of infection, and so this substance can be an alternative for antibiotic prophylaxis in TRBP. Another advantage is that, according to the WHO’s AWaRe classification, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid is one of the so-called Access antibiotics. This study is limited as rectal swabs and urine cultures were not performed on every patient before TRBP.

Prostate cancer is the most common malignant solid tumour in men aged >70 years and is the second most common cause of death from oncological circumstances. To evaluate the effect of different short-term prophylactic antibiotic regimens in transrectal prostate biopsy (PB) on the incidence of infectious complications. Patients who underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided PB between January 2021 and December 2022 were included in the prospective randomized study. According to the regimen of prophylaxis, patients were randomized into three groups: (1) fosfomycin trometamol 3 g, 3 h before the procedure + ciprofloxacin 500 mg, 2 h before the procedure; (2) fosfomycin trometamol 3 g, 3 h before and 24 h after the procedure; (3) ciprofloxacin 500 mg 12, 2 h before the procedure, and 12 h after the procedure. A rectal swab was performed 1–2 weeks before PB to evaluate the culture findings. Complications were evaluated during follow-up visits within one month after PB. In the monitored period, 605 PBs were performed, and 544 patients met the inclusion criteria (184, 161, and 199 in groups 1, 2, and 3). Infectious complications occurred in 10 cases (1.83%), namely 3, 4, and 3 according to patient groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the individual groups. None of the patients required hospitalization and all were free of symptoms of sepsis. Short-term antibiotic prophylaxis in PB using fosfomycin trometamol, ciprofloxacin, or their combination appears to be effective. Fosfomycin trometamol is a suitable alternative to fluoroquinolone antibiotics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: Rectal bleeding is a common complication of transrectal ultrasound‐guided prostate biopsy (TRPB). Massive rectal bleeding after TRPB can be life threatening. We initiated proctoscopy after TRPB to clarify the incidence of rectal bleeding and evaluated the usefulness of proctoscopy for controlling bleeding after TRPB. Materials: Two hundred and fifty six patients who underwent TRPB were included in the study. TRPB was performed under local anesthesia. Post‐biopsy, we performed a proctoscopy to evaluate the degree of rectal bleeding at four levels (G0, no bleeding; G1, traces; G2, venous bleeding requiring hemostasis; and G3, massive venous bleeding or arterial bleeding). Once the bleeding site on the rectal wall was identified, a gauze tampon was placed at the bleeding site and compressed for a few minutes. A second proctoscopy was performed to confirm complete hemostasis, after which the TRPB was terminated. Results: Proctoscopy revealed that the degree of bleeding was G0 in 27 cases, G1 in 104 cases, G2 in 116 cases, and G3 in nine cases. Rectal bleeding that required hemostasis (G2 and G3) was observed in 125 of 256 cases (48.3%). Among the 125 cases, bleeding was stopped by compression in 121 cases; in the remaining four cases, bleeding continued despite compression and was stopped by suturing of the bleeding site. Suturing was performed by urologists, and none of the 256 patients had problematic posterior hemorrhage. Conclusions: Proctoscopy enables precise and effective pressure hemostasis. Moreover, suturing hemostasis under direct vision can be performed in cases in which pressure hemostasis is difficult. Continued proctoscopy allays urologists' fear of post‐TRPB rectal bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Culture-based antibiotic prophylaxis is a plausible strategy to reduce infections after transrectal prostate biopsy (PB) related to fluoroquinolone-resistant pathogens. Objective: To assess the cost effectiveness of rectal culture-based prophylaxis compared with empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. Design, setting, and participants: The study was performed alongside a trial in 11 Dutch hospitals investigating the effectiveness of culture-based prophylaxis in transrectal PB between April 2018 and July 2021 (trial registration number: NCT03228108). Intervention: Patients were 1:1 randomized for empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (oral) or culture-based prophylaxis. Costs for both prophylactic strategies were determined for two scenarios: (1) all infectious complications within 7 d after biopsy and (2) culture-proven Gram-negative infections within 30 d after biopsy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Differences in costs and effects (quality-adjusted life-years [QALYs]) were analyzed from a healthcare and societal perspective (including productivity losses, and travel and parking costs) using a bootstrap procedure presenting uncertainty surrounding the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio in a cost-effectiveness plane and acceptability curve. Results and limitations: For the 7-d follow-up period, culture-based prophylaxis (n = 636) was €51.57 (95% confidence interval [CI] 6.52–96.63) more expensive from a healthcare perspective and €16.95 (95% CI –54.29 to 88.18) from a societal perspective than empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis (n = 652). Ciprofloxacin-resistant bacteria were detected in 15.4%. Extrapolating our data, from a healthcare perspective, 40% ciprofloxacin resistance would lead to equal cost for both strategies. Results were similar for the 30-d follow-up period. No significant differences in QALYs were observed. Conclusions: Our results should be interpreted in the context of local ciprofloxacin resistance rates. In our setting, from a healthcare perspective, culture-based prophylaxis was significantly more expensive than empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis. From a societal perspective, culture-based prophylaxis was somewhat more cost effective against the threshold value customary for the Netherlands (€80.000). Patient summary: Culture-based prophylaxis in transrectal prostate biopsy was not associated with reduced costs compared with empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis.

Objectives Primary objectives: to determine whether local anaesthetic transperineal prostate (LATP) biopsy improves the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), defined as International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group =2 disease (i.e., any Gleason pattern 4 disease), compared to transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) prostate biopsy, in biopsy-naïve men undergoing biopsy based on suspicion of csPCa. Secondary objectives: to compare (i) infection rates, (ii) health-related quality of life, (iii) patient-reported procedure tolerability, (iv) patient-reported biopsy-related complications (including bleeding, bruising, pain, loss of erectile function), (v) number of subsequent prostate biopsy procedures required, (vi) cost-effectiveness, (vii) other histological parameters, and (viii) burden and rate of detection of clinically insignificant PCa (ISUP Grade Group 1 disease) in men undergoing these two types of prostate biopsy. Patients and Methods The TRANSLATE trial is a UK-wide, multicentre, randomised clinical trial that meets the criteria for level-one evidence in diagnostic test evaluation. TRANSLATE is investigating whether LATP biopsy leads to a higher rate of detection of csPCa compared to TRUS prostate biopsy. Both biopsies are being performed with an average of 12 systematic cores in six sectors (depending on prostate size), plus three to five target cores per multiparametric/bi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging lesion. LATP biopsy is performed using an ultrasound probe-mounted needle-guidance device (either the 'Precision-Point' or BK UA1232 system). TRUS biopsy is performed according to each hospital's standard practice. The study is 90% powered to detect a 10% difference (LATP biopsy hypothesised at 55% detection rate for csPCa vs 45% for TRUS biopsy). A total of 1042 biopsy-naïve men referred with suspected PCa need to be recruited. Conclusions This trial will provide robust prospective data to determine the diagnostic ability of LATP biopsy vs TRUS biopsy in the primary diagnostic setting. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background An increase in infections after transrectal prostate biopsy (PB), related to an increasing number of patients with ciprofloxacin-resistant rectal flora, necessitates the exploration of alternatives for the traditionally used empirical prophylaxis of ciprofloxacin. We compared infectious complication rates after transrectal PB using empirical ciprofloxacin prophylaxis versus culture-based prophylaxis. Methods In this nonblinded, randomized trial, between 4 April 2018 and 30 July 2021, we enrolled 1538 patients from 11 Dutch hospitals undergoing transrectal PB. After rectal swab collection, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive empirical prophylaxis with oral ciprofloxacin (control group [CG]) or culture-based prophylaxis (intervention group [IG]). Primary outcome was any infectious complication within 7 days after biopsy. Secondary outcomes were infectious complications within 30 days, and bacteremia and bacteriuria within 7 and 30 days postbiopsy. For primary outcome analysis, the χ2 test stratified for hospitals was used. Trial registration number: NCT03228108. Results Data from 1288 patients (83.7%) were available for analysis (CG, 652; IG, 636). Infection rates within 7 days postbiopsy were 4.3% (n = 28) (CG) and 2.5% (n = 16) (IG) (P value =.08; reduction: −1.8%; 95% confidence interval, −.004 to.040). Ciprofloxacin-resistant bacteria were detected in 15.2% (n = 1288). In the CG, the presence of ciprofloxacin-resistant rectal flora resulted in a 6.2-fold higher risk of early postbiopsy infection. Conclusions Our study supports the use of culture-based prophylaxis to reduce infectious complications after transrectal PB. Despite adequate prophylaxis, postbiopsy infections can still occur. Therefore, culture-based prophylaxis must be weighed against other strategies that could reduce postbiopsy infections. Clinical Trials Registration. NCT03228108. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Copyright of Revista Chilena de Urologia is the property of Sociedad Chilena de Urologia and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Background: A systematic 12-core transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy is currently recommended for prostate malignancy detection modalities. However, there is limited data about the diagnostic yield of increasing the core number to 18. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of cancer detection and clinical advantages between 12- and 18-core TRUS biopsies. Materials and Methods: The authors conducted a prospective, single-group trial of TRUS biopsies specifically for patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels between 4.0 and 20.0 ng/mL. Sixty-two consecutive patients were enrolled and received a 12- or an 18-core TRUS biopsy under local anaesthesia. The patients and prostate cancer characteristics, such as serum PSA, free PSA, prostate volume, PSA density, D'Amico risk classification, and Gleason grade group were recorded and analysed. Results: The prostate cancer detection rate using 12 cores for the initial TRUS biopsy was 22.6% (14 patients), while using 18 cores was 24.2% (15 patients). The results were not statistically different (p=0.83). Postoperative complications were two cases of gross haematuria and two case of acute urinary retention, which did not require admission. Infection occurred in two patients and no serious morbidities or mortalities. Conclusion: The present study did not find any significant benefit in increasing the number of biopsy cores from 12 to 18 for the diagnosis of prostate cancer in men with serum PSA levels between 4.0 and 20.0 ng/mL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Prostate biopsy is a painful procedure, and the degree of pain is related to the number of core biopsies taken. Objective: To compare the analgesic properties of hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.25% with 0.375% ropivacaine for saddle block in transrectal prostate biopsy. Methods: This was a randomised double-blinded study. Eighty patients with indications for prostate biopsy presenting at the Day-Case Theatre in a Nigerian tertiary facility were randomised into two equal groups: B (Bupivacaine) and R (Ropivacaine). Group B received 1ml of 0.25% bupivacaine, while Group R received 1ml of 0.375% ropivacaine for saddle block, respectively. Pain assessment, home readiness, patients' satisfaction, and time to first analgesic request were assessed and compared between the two groups. Results: The Bupivacaine group had an earlier onset of sensory block (11.90±4.10 minutes vs 23.70±8.65 minutes, p = 0.000), slower sensory block regression (48.73±9.32 minutes vs 24.88±4.21 minutes, p = 0.000), but delayed home readiness (47.23±15.93 minutes vs 29.88±8.58 minutes, p = 0.000), than patients in the Ropivacaine group. The pain scores during, immediately after and 30 minutes post-biopsy were lower in the Bupivacaine group: p = 0.010, p = 0.028 and p = 0.023 respectively. The time to first analgesic request was also longer in the Bupivacaine group (48.73±9.33 minutes) than for those in the Ropivacaine group (24.88±4.21 minutes) with statistical significance (p = 0.000). Conclusion: Intraoperative analgesic properties were better in the Bupivacaine group than in the Ropivacaine group. However, home readiness was earlier in the Ropivacaine group.

Wenfeng Li,&ast; Yuanshen Mao,&ast; Yufei Gu, Chao Lu, Xin Gu, Bao Hua, Weixin Pan, Qinghong Xi, Bin Xu Department of Urology, The Ninth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of China&ast;These authors contributed equally to this workCorrespondence: Bin Xu; Qinghong XiDepartment of Urology, The Ninth People’s Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, People’s Republic of ChinaTel +862156691101Email kuangfeng0612@126.com; 13611829161@163.comBackground: Effective pain management is limited for patients during prostate biopsy (PBx). Touch support, such as hand holding, has stress-buffering benefits and effective analgesic effects. We conducted a prospective, single-center randomized clinical trial to assess whether hand holding can reduce patient anxiety, pain, and dissatisfaction during PBx.Methods: Between April 2020 and October 2020, 120 male patients were randomized into three groups: a hand holding with relatives (HR) group, a hand holding with strangers (HS) group and a control group. A visual analog scale (VAS) was used for self-assessments of pain and satisfaction. Anxiety levels were quantified according to the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Hemodynamic changes were also measured.Results: The degree of pain and anxiety in the hand-holding groups was significantly better than that in the control group (P< 0.001), and the patients were more willing to undergo repeat PBx (P=0.017). The anxiety levels in the HR group were significantly lower than those in the HS group (P=0.019). During PBx, the changes in systolic blood pressure and heart rate in the hand-holding groups were more stable than those in the control group (P< 0.01), and the fluctuations in heart rate in the HR group were smaller than those in the HS group (P< 0.01).Conclusion: Hand holding, especially with relatives, can promote incremental reductions in anxiety, pain and dissatisfaction in patients during PBx. Hence, we recommend hand holding with relatives as an effective adjunct during PBx.Keywords: anxiety, transrectal prostate biopsy, hand holding, pain, satisfaction

Objective To investigate the effect of comprehensive nursing in prevention of complications associated with vasovagal reactions (VVRs)following transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy(TRUS-TP). Methods Totally 136 patients undergoing TRUS-TP were randomly divided into the control group and the intervention group, with 68 cases in each group. The control group received routine nursing management, while the intervention group was given comprehensive nursing management. The incidence of postoperative complications associated with VVRs was compared between two groups. Results The incidence rates of complications associated with VVRs such as pale complexion, heart rate reduction, nausea and vomiting were lower in the intervention group than those in the control group (P＜0. 05). Conclusion The comprehensive nursing interventions are effective to prevent complications associated with VVRs, ensure the patient safety during the perioperative period and improve the quality of nursing. (目的 探讨综合护理干预在预防经会阴前列腺穿刺活检术(TRUS-TP)术后血管迷走神经反射(VVRs)并发症中的应用效果。方法 136例超声引导下行TRUS-TP的患者随机分为对照组和干预组, 各68例。对照组予以围术期常规护理, 干预组实施综合护理干预。观察2组术后发生VVRs症候群发生情况。结果 干预组面色苍白和冷汗、心率减慢和血压下降、恶心呕吐相关VVRs症候发生率均低于对照组, 差异有统计学意义(P＜0. 05)。结论 综合护理干预措施可降低TRUS-TP术后VVRs的发生率, 保证围术期护理安全, 有助于提高护理质量和护理效能, 值得推广。)

INTRODUCTION: We aimed to reveal out the relation of the age factor with biopsy results by comparing clinical and histopathological data of the patient who underwent prostate biopsy METHODS: The records of 1213 patients who underwent prostate biopsy between January 2013 and February 2019 in our clinic were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 309 patients were included in the study. Biopsy was performed in patients with PSA> 2.5 ng / dl and / or abnormal rectal examination findings. Group 1; included younger adult patients (

Prostate cancer (PCa) has high prevalence rates in men and is a leading cause of cancer-related death. Transrectal (TR) biopsy has traditionally been the gold standard for diagnosis, but transperineal (TP) biopsy is increasingly favoured due to its lower infection risk. However, debate remains regarding which method has superior cancer detection rates. This review compares the efficacy and safety of the TP as compared to the TR prostate biopsy approach, summarizing the largest body of evidence available to date. A literature search was performed on the PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. We searched from the inception of the databases up to August 2024 for relevant studies comparing the cancer detection rate of TP versus TR prostate biopsy and compared their complication rates. Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. The pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were calculated to evaluate the differences between the TR and TP groups in the PCa detection rate. This meta-analysis included 21 studies (6 randomized control trials and 15 cohort studies) with a total of 13,818 patients (TP = 7917; TR = 5901), who were accrued between 2008 and 2024 and divided into the TR group and the TP group. The analysis revealed no significant difference in prostate cancer detection rates between the TP and TR approaches in both RCTs (OR 1.02, 95% CI (0.74, 1.41), p = 0.90) and cohort studies (OR 1.07, 95% CI (0.85, 1.35), p = 0.36). Complication profiles were largely comparable; TP demonstrated a significantly lower risk of urinary tract infections (OR 0.26, 95% CI (0.11, 0.61)) but no notable differences in acute urinary retention, haematuria, or rectal bleeding. Our findings advocate the TP approach as a safer biopsy alternative where feasible, particularly in infection-sensitive populations, without compromising diagnostic accuracy. MRI should complement biopsy strategies to enhance diagnostic precision. Future research should focus on standardized, large-scale RCTs to further refine and personalize prostate cancer diagnostic pathways., Competing Interests: Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Abdulrasheed et al.)

Introduction Prostate cancer remains the most prevalent cancer among men and continues to present a significant public health challenge globally. The disease's growing prevalence has heightened the demand for skilled professionals capable of obtaining histological samples for accurate diagnosis, as tissue biopsy remains the cornerstone for diagnosing prostate cancer. Surgical care practitioners have become integral to the surgical team, and their roles have expanded to include performing biopsies. This paper evaluates the outcomes of transrectal ultrasound-guided (TRUS) prostate biopsies conducted by a surgical care practitioner (SCP) and explores the implications for resource-poor countries. Methods We retrospectively collated data from 218 patients who underwent TRUS prostate systematic biopsy by a surgical care practitioner between 2020 and 2022. We evaluated the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, MRI Likert score where available, and histological data and determined diagnostic yield and complication rates. Results The mean age and PSA level of the men were 69.7 years and 61.2 ng/ml, respectively; an average of 12 cores were obtained per biopsy. The cancer detection rate was 128/218 (59%), with a mean Gleason grade of 2.8. From available MRI, Likert 3 was the most common finding, 45/103 (43.6%), and prostate cancer was found in 40%. The mean MRI Likert scores for a positive and negative biopsy were 4 and 3.3, respectively. We recorded three complications (1%), all Clavien-Dindo 1 to 2, with no mortality. Conclusion A well-trained, supported, and supervised surgical care practitioner can safely and effectively perform TRUS systematic prostate biopsies and may improve access to prostate cancer diagnosis in developing countries., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Ononye et al.)

A prostate biopsy is essential for prostate cancer diagnosis. However, infections are one of the biopsy-associated complications, and post-biopsy fever is estimated to occur in approximately 1% of all cases. It may thus be beneficial to perform a rectal swab culture before a transrectal prostate biopsy to confirm the presence of resistant bacteria and select preventive antibacterial agents according to the drug susceptibility results. This study aimed to determine whether there is a difference between the drug susceptibility of bacteria detected in the stool of patients who were scheduled to undergo prostate biopsy and the hospital-wide urine antibiogram. Patients suspected of having prostate cancer who underwent transrectal prostate biopsy via transrectal ultrasonography between August 1, 2016, and June 30, 2020, were included in this study. Stool samples were collected and cultured before biopsy. Overall, 99 patients underwent prostate biopsy, and of these, culture results were available for 81 patients (81.8%). Escherichia coli was detected in 74.0% (60 samples) of the stool culture samples, of which 4 samples were extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing types. We found greater susceptibility of Escherichia coli to ampicillin, fluoroquinolones, sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim, and cefixime in the stool culture antibiogram than in the hospital-wide urine antibiogram. We also found a significantly low incidence of ESBL-positive Escherichia coli in the stool culture antibiogram with p-values of 0.009, 0.007, and 0.03 compared to the hospital-wide urine antibiograms for 2017, 2018, and 2019, respectively. Stool culture of prostate cancer patients undergoing biopsy may provide useful information for selecting prophylactic antimicrobial agents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To identify risk factors for major post-biopsy complications under augmented prophylaxis protocol. The risk factors already described mainly comprise outdated antibiotic prophylaxis protocols. Material and methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients that underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies, from 2011 to 2016. All patients had received antibiotic prophylaxis with ciprofloxacin and gentamicin. Patients were grouped according to the presence or absence of post-biopsy complications. Demographic variables and possible risk factors based on routine clinical assessment were registered. Correlation tests, univariate and multivariate analyses were used to identify risk factors for post-biopsy complications. Results: Of the 404 patients that were included, 25 (6.2%) presented 27 post-biopsy complications, distributed as follows: acute urinary retention (n = 14, 3.5%), infections (n = 11, 2.7%) and hemorrhage (n = 2, 0.5%). On univariate analysis, patients who presented complications showed higher body mass index and post-voiding residual volumes. Multivariate analysis identified ethnicity and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density as possible risk factors for biopsy complications. The presence of bacterial resistance identified by rectal swabs did not correlate with the incidence of complications and infections. Conclusions: Non-infectious post-biopsy complications were more frequent than infectious ones in this cohort. Higher post-voiding residual volumes and PSA density, that indicates prostate enlargement, were identified as risk factors and interpreted as secondary to bladder outlet obstruction. The higher body mass index and ethnicity were also identified as risk factors and attributed to the heterogeneity of the patients included. Level of evidence: Not applicable for this multicentre audit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: We aim to document the feasibility, perioperative safety, and the 12-month efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) within 1–3 weeks following transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided prostate biopsy. Methods: Data of the patients who underwent HoLEP following TRUS-guided prostate biopsy between March 2017 and July 2020 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 had undergone HoLEP in the early period after TRUS-guided prostate biopsy, while group 2 patients were biopsy-naive ("control group"). All patients were assessed preoperatively by a physical examination with the digital rectal examination; time from biopsy to HoLEP; measurement of Qmax, postvoiding residual volume, and prostate volume by transabdominal ultrasonography; serum prostate-specific antigen level, the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS); the International Index of Erectile Function-5 questionnaire; and urine analysis. The patients were reevaluated at 3- and 12-month follow-up. Perioperative and postoperative complications were documented according to the modified Clavien-Dindo System. Results: Group 1 comprised 66 patients with a mean age of 67.3 ± 6.7 (range, 53–86) years, and group 2 comprised 114 patients with a mean age of 69.4 ± 9.4 (range, 36–95) years. The operation, enucleation, and morcellation efficiencies were not statistically significant between the groups. Preoperative Qmax and IPSS values were significantly improved after HoLEP surgery in the 3rd and 12th months in all patients. Our complication rates were similar in both groups. Conclusion: High-powered HoLEP using 140 W energy within 1–3 weeks following TRUS-guided prostate biopsy is a feasible procedure with high enucleation efficiency, low perioperative morbidity, and excellent functional outcomes. A recent TRUS-guided prostate biopsy is not a contraindication to HoLEP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to assess the incidence of infection after transrectal prostate biopsy (TRbx). Secondary objectives were to describe infection characteristics, antibiotic resistance patterns, ICD-10 coding, and costs. TRbx carried out at the hospitals of Ängelholm and Helsingborg, Scania, Sweden, between October 2017 and March 2019, were identified based on the NOMESCO Classification of Surgical Procedures code for TRbx, TKE00. All patients received per oral antibiotic prophylaxis, usually 750 mg ciprofloxacin at biopsy. Other preventative measures were not used. Medical care within 30 days of the biopsy was evaluated through a manual retrospective medical chart review. Data on patient and infection characteristics were collected. The costs of infections causing hospitalization were estimated. After 36 (5.4%) of 670 biopsies, the patient developed post-biopsy infection within 30 days after TRbx. Twenty-six patients (3.9%) required hospitalization for an average of 6 days, at an estimated direct cost of USD 9174 (EUR 8031) per patient. Nine patients (1.3%) had a complicated infection leading to intensive care, multiple hospitalizations or emergency department visits. The inpatient care episodes for the 26 hospitalized patients were categorized with 15 different ICD-codes. In 6 episodes no ICD-code related to infection was used. In this study, we found an infection rate of 5.4% after TRbx; 3.9% of the patients were hospitalized for a post-TRbx infection and 1.3% had complicated infections. A specific ICD code for post-TRbx infections would facilitate evaluation and monitoring of this common, costly, and sometimes serious complication. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Transrectal prostate biopsy (TRbx) carries an increasing risk of infection. The Forsvall Needle Prototype (FNP) is a novel biopsy needle that reduces bacterial load brought across the rectum and may therefore reduce infection risk. The objective of this study was to compare biopsy length, quality and patient experience for the FNP Version 2 (FNP2) versus a standard Tru-Cut needle. We conducted a randomized, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial with twenty consecutive patients eligible for TRbx. Participants were randomized to undergo TRbx using either FNP2 or a standard Tru-Cut needle. The primary outcome was difference in mean biopsy lengths measured by the pathologist. FNP2 biopsy lengths ≤1.35 mm of the standard needle length were considered non-inferior. Secondary outcomes were biopsy length in the needle chamber and immediately after removal, biopsy quality, biopsy fragmentation, patient discomfort/pain, and complications (immediate and after 14 and 30 days). Mean pathologist-measured FNP2 biopsy length was non-inferior compared to the standard Tru-Cut needle (0.02 mm longer, 95%CI–0.73 to 0.76 mm). Biopsy length in the needle chamber and immediately after removal were also non-inferior. Biopsy quality and patient discomfort were not significantly different for the FNP2 and the standard Tru-Cut needle. Biopsy fragmentation was more common in the FNP2 group. The FNP2 biopsy needle is non-inferior to the Tru-Cut needle in terms of biopsy length and not significantly different in terms of biopsy quality and patient experience. Future studies will evaluate the Forsvall needle design's effect on post-biopsy infection risk. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Definitive treatment for local prostate cancer recurrence remains controversial. Early recurrences are often from positive surgical margins or nodal metastases, however other explanations should be considered. We present a case of a 79 year-old male with localized prostate cancer and early biochemical persistence after margin-negative robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy. Workup demonstrated a 0.9 cm rectal mass without nodal or distant metastasis, and biopsy revealed prostate adenocarcinoma. A subsequent transanal excision was performed. Post-operatively, his PSA dropped to 0.02 ng/mL. We present a rare case of prostate adenocarcinoma seeding after transrectal prostate biopsy and a review of the literature.

Shunta Hori,1 Nobumichi Tanaka,1 Yasushi Nakai,1 Yosuke Morizawa,1 Yoshihiro Tatsumi,1 Makito Miyake,1 Satoshi Anai,1 Tomomi Fujii,2 Noboru Konishi,2 Yoshinori Nakagawa,3 Syuya Hirao,4 Kiyohide Fujimoto1 1Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; 2Department of Pathology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Nara 634-8522, Japan; 3Department of Urology, Yamatotakada Municipal Hospital, Yamatotakada, Nara 635-8501, Japan; 4Department of Urology, Medical Corporation Katsurakai HIRAO Hospital, Kashihara, Nara 634-0076, Japan Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of two different Nara Urological Research and Treatment Group (NURTG) nomograms allocating 6–12 biopsy cores based on age and prostate volume. Materials and methods: From April 2006 to July 2014, a total of 1,605 patients who underwent initial prostate biopsy were enrolled. Based on a nomogram taking the patient’s age and prostate volume into consideration, 6–12 biopsy cores were allocated. Two types of nomogram were used, for the former group (before March 2009) and latter group (March 2009 onward). Cancer detection rates in all patients and those with prostate-specific antigen values in the gray zone (4.0–10 ng/mL) were compared. Predictive parameters for detection of prostate cancer in gray-zone patients were also investigated. Results: The cancer detection rates in all patients and those in the gray zone were 48% and 38% in the former group and 54% and 41% in the latter group, respectively. The cancer detection rate in all patients was significantly higher in the latter group compared with the former group, but detection in gray-zone patients did not show a significant difference between the two groups (P=0.011 and P=0.37, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that age, digital rectal examination, prostate volume, transrectal ultrasonography findings, and volume/biopsy ratio were significant predictive parameters in gray-zone patients. The clinically insignificant cancer detection rate was significantly lower in the latter group compared with the former group (P=0.0008). Conclusion: The latter nomogram provided more acceptable detection rates of clinically significant and insignificant cancer than the former one, and we consider that an initial maximum 12-core transrectal ultrasound-guided needle biopsy may be sufficient for prostate cancer diagnosis. Keywords: age, cancer detection rate, nomogram, prostate cancer, prostate volume, transrectal prostate biopsy

Streptococcus agalactiae, Lancefied sınıflamasına göre B grubuna ait, fakültatif, gram-pozitif koktur. Önceki yıllarda gebe kadınlarda idrar yolu enfeksiyonu etkeni olarak bilinirken, diğer erişkinlerde nadir görülen bir hastalık etkeni idi. Günümüzde ise S. agalactiae, gebe olmayan erişkinlerde özellikle immün sistemi baskılanmışlarda, kronik ve yaşlı hastalarda, kaynağı saptanamayan bakteriyemi, yumuşak doku enfeksiyonları, üst solunum yolu enfeksiyonları, osteoartikuler enfeksiyonlar, peritonit, kardiyak enfeksiyonlar, menenjit ve diğer odak enfeksiyonları gibi invaziv enfeksiyonların bir nedeni olarak giderek daha fazla saptanmaktadır. Literatürde nadir olmakla birlikte, erişkinlerde S. agalactiae’nin neden olduğu osteoartiküler enfeksiyonlar bildirilmiştir. Bu olgu sunumunda, ultrason eşliğinde transrektal prostat iğne biyopsisi sonrası S. agalactiae’ya bağlı iatrojenik spondilodiskit gelişen bir hastanın sunulması amaçlanmıştır.

Objective: To evaluate the clinical and financial implications of a decade of prostate biopsies performed in the UK National Health Service (NHS) through the transrectal (TR) vs the transperineal (TP) route. Methods: We conducted an evaluation of the TR vs the TP biopsy approach in the context of 28 days post‐procedure complications and readmissions. A secondary evaluation of burden of expenditure in NHS hospitals over the entire decade (2008–2019) was conducted through examination of national Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) data. Results: In this dataset of 486 467 prostate biopsies (387 879 TR and 98 588 TP biopsies), rates of infection and sepsis were higher for the TR compared to the TP cohort (0.53% vs 0.31%; P < 0.001, confidence interval 99%). Rates of sepsis have more than doubled for TR biopsies in the last 2 years compared to the previous decade (1.12% vs 0.53%). Infective complications were the main reasons for readmissions in the TR cohort, whereas urinary retention was the predominant reason for readmission in the TP cohort. Over the last decade, non‐elective (NEL) readmissions seem higher for the TP group; however, in the last 2 years these have reduced compared to the TR group (3.54% vs 3.74%). The cost estimates for NEL readmissions for the entire decade were £33,589,527.00 and £7,179,926.00 respectively, for TR and TP cohorts (P < 0.001). Estimated costs per patient readmission were £2,225.00 and £1,758.00 in the TR and TP groups (P < 0.001). Conclusions: Evaluation of nearly half a million prostate biopsies in the NHS over the entire decade gives sufficient evidence for the distinct advantages of the TP route over the TR route in terms of reduced infections and burden of expenditure. In addition, there is a potential for savings both in upstream and downstream costs if biopsy is performed under a local anaesthetic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: There is still an ongoing debate whether a transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) approach for prostate biopsies is associated with higher (infectious) complications rates compared to transperineal biopsies. This is especially of great interests in settings with elevated frequencies of multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO).Materials and Methods: Between 01/2018 and 05/2019 230 patients underwent a TRUS-guided prostate biopsy at the department of Urology at University Hospital Frankfurt. Patients were followed up within the clinical routine that was not conducted earlier than 6 weeks after the biopsy. Among 230 biopsies, 180 patients took part in the follow-up. No patients were excluded. Patients were analyzed retrospectively regarding complications, infections and underlying infectious agents or needed interventions.Results: Of all patients with follow up, 84 patients underwent a systematic biopsy (SB) and 96 a targeted biopsy (TB) after MRI of the prostate with additional SB. 74.8% of the patients were biopsy-naïve. The most frequent objective complications (classified by Clavien-Dindo) lasting longer than one day after biopsy were hematuria (17.9%, n = 32), hematospermia (13.9%, n = 25), rectal bleeding (2.8%, n = 5), and pain (2.2%, n = 4). Besides a known high MDRO prevalence in the Rhine-Main region, only one patient (0.6%) developed fever after biopsy. One patient each (0.6%) consulted a physician due to urinary retention, rectal bleeding or gross hematuria. There were no significant differences in complications seen between SB and SB + TB patients. The rate of patients who consulted a physician was significantly higher for patients with one or more prior biopsies compared to biopsy-naïve patients.Conclusion: Complications after transrectal prostate biopsies are rare and often self-limiting. Infections were seen in

Background Local anesthetic transperineal prostate biopsy (LATP) is a widely used diagnostic procedure for prostate cancer. As a diagnostic procedure, it should carry minimal risk. However, morbidity resulting from prostate biopsy is frequent. Prostate biopsy, like any other intervention, carries a significant risk of various infections, ranging from urinary tract infections (UTIs) to potentially life-threatening conditions like sepsis. Aim This study examined the rate of infections following a prostate biopsy at a single center and sought to identify risk factors that could increase the likelihood of developing an infection. Methods A retrospective review was conducted on all 168 patients who underwent LATP biopsy between 01/04/2022 and 01/04/2023. Data were collected from the Clinical Record and Reporting System (CRRS). Patient characteristics, including age, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, prostate volume, the main indication for the biopsy, number of cores taken, antibiotic prophylaxis, and comorbidities were analyzed. The inclusion criteria encompassed all patients receiving this procedure within the specified timeframe, without restrictions on age, underlying health conditions, or medical history. No exclusion criteria were applied, aiming to comprehensively analyze and capture the full spectrum of patient outcomes and characteristics associated with these biopsies during the study period. Results In terms of socio-demographics, all patients were male with an average age (mean) of 65.5 years, a mean PSA level of 13.9 ng/dL, and an average prostate volume of 66.1 mL. On average, 23.2 biopsy cores were taken. All patients received antibiotic prophylaxis, mainly ciprofloxacin. Despite this, 1.78% of patients (n=3) developed post-biopsy infections. Two of these patients had diabetes mellitus, and two had a large prostate volume of 95 mL., Competing Interests: Human subjects: Consent was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. University Hospitals of Coventry and Warwickshire issued approval 9579. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work., (Copyright © 2024, Khalabazyane et al.)

Introduction A transperineal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TPB) under local anaesthetics (LA) after a prostate MRI scan is the gold standard for performing a prostate biopsy in patients with suspected prostate cancer. It has superseded transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSB). Historically, TRUSB by definition was performed in a contaminated environment and was routinely covered with antibiotics to reduce the risks of infection. Despite this, the rate of post-biopsy urosepsis has been documented to be as high as 5% in some series. In the transition from TRUSB to the establishment of a TPB under LA service in our unit, we continued to use a single dose of oral antibiotics for all patients attending for biopsy. The aim of this study is to establish whether the use of single-dose antibiotics has any effect on morbidity rates post-TPB. Methods A retrospective analysis of complications was carried out on 326 consecutive patients, who underwent TPB over a six-month period. One cohort of patients were biopsied with no antibiotic cover (n=149, 45.7%) as compared to another cohort who were given a single dose of oral antibiotics (n=177, 54.3%). Those patients in the group receiving antibiotics received either a single dose of co-amoxiclav or a single dose of ciprofloxacin. Patients with indwelling urethral catheters or with a urinary tract infection (UTI) were excluded from the analyses. All patients were followed- up after a multidisciplinary team meeting discussion (MDT) with either a telephone or a face-to-face consultation. Results A total of 324 (99.4%) patients did not report post-procedural complications. Two patients from the antibiotic group presented with infectious complications (1.1%); one patient was admitted with a prostate abscess and required drainage under general anaesthesia, and another was admitted with urosepsis requiring intravenous antibiotics. In the group who did not receive antibiotics, there were no complications reported, which was not significantly different compared to the antibiotic group (p=0.50). Conclusion Our results demonstrate that the routine use of single-dose antibiotics with TPB does not affect morbidity rates. On the basis of this investigation, we have now stopped using routine antibiotic cover for patients undergoing an LA TPB., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist., (Copyright © 2024, Dryhurst et al.)

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the differences between TRUSguided transrectal prostate biopsy (TR) and transperineal prostate biopsy (TP) in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. The two biopsy methods were evaluated in terms of diagnostic sensitivity and of early and late complications. Methods: This retrospective study was realized through the review of clinical records of 219 men that received a prostate biopsy between 2004 and 2014. The biopsy was performed because of elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA), abnormal digital rectal examination findings (DRE), abnormal transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) findings and symptoms due to prostate diseases. The cohort study was subdivided in two groups: 108 patients received a transrectal biopsy between 2004 and 2006 and 111 received a transperineal biopsy between 2007 and 2014. In both groups, first biopsy was performed with 12 cores scheme whereas second or third biopsy were performed with 18 cores scheme; in this study we excluded patients who underwent to biopsies with different number cores to reduce the bias. Both groups were evaluated on the basis of age, total PSA, PSA ratio (F/T), DRE/TRUS findings, presence/absence of low urinary tracts symptoms (LUTS), presence/absence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), histologic findings of biopsy cores and immediate/postoperative complications. Then, it was evaluated the overall cancer detection rate and the stratified cancer rate on the basis of the previous reported parameters. Finally, we analyzed the early and late complication rate in both groups. U Mann-Whitney test was used to evaluate the quantitative variables and χ2-test or Fisher exact test for qualitative variables. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: 66 cancers were detected in 219 patients of the study; 29 cancers were detected in the TP group and 37 in the TR group. There were no statistically significant differences in the overall cancer rate detected in both groups (26.13% e 34.26% respectively; p = 0.190). However, TP biopsy detected more cancers at first biopsy than TR biopsy (89.7% vs 78.4% respectively; p = 0.021). Moreover, TP biopsy detected more cancers in those patients with low cancer suspect (PSA < 4 ng/ml, F/T > 15%, negative TRUS), instead TR biopsy had more sensitivity in detecting cancer in those patients with high cancer suspect (PSA > 10 ng/ml, F/T < 15%, TRUS with abnormal lesions). The presence of BPH did not influence sensitivity in both cases. There were no significant differences in the early complication rate whereas a statistically significant difference was observed in the late complication rate (4% vs 11% in TP and TR biopsy, respectively; p = 0.019). Conclusions: No statistically significant differences in sensitivity were observed between TP and TR biopsy, but TP biopsy detected more cancers at first time biopsy. Complications rate was lower in the TP group. Therefore, we conclude that the Urologist has the final choice in deciding the most appropriate biopsy technique, considering sensitivity and complications.

Objective: We retrospective reviewed the cases of transrectal prostate biopsy (TRUSPBX) at out-patient department for the relation between febrile urinary tract rate and regimen of antibiotic prophylaxis. Materials and methods: Cases of TRUSPBX at out-patient department since January 2005–December 2013 were reviewed. Relevant data before biopsy was collected. Results: Totally 689 patients with a mean age of 66 years were included for analysis. Among them, 584 cases had single dose of levofloxacin 500 mg as prophylaxis (group 1) and 105 cases had multiple doses/types of prophylactic antibiotics (group 2) were enrolled. The mean age, number of biopsy core, PSA level, total prostate volume, and cancer rate were comparable between groups. Postoperative fever occurred in 4 (0.68%) patients of group 1 and none of group 2 (p = 0.9). Conclusion: Single dose quinolone prophylaxis for out-patient transrectal prostate biopsy may be applicable in Taiwan.

Background/Objective: This study is aimed at determining if bowel enema further reduces complication rate in Nigerian men undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy. Methods and Materials: A prospective case controlled study conducted in a hospital setting involving patients who met indications for prostate biopsy. Forty patients were equally assigned into two groups of bowel enema and no bowel enema for transrectal prostate biopsy and were discharged home on antibiotics after the procedure. The patients visited the clinic on the 2nd, 7th and 30th day after the procedure where a purpose designed questionaire was administered to measure the complication rate of fever, haemospermia, rectal bleeding, urethral bleeding,acute urinary retention associated with the procedure. Results: There appeared to be no statistically significant difference between bowel enema and no bowel enema in the development of fever (p=0.22), haemospermia (p=1.0), rectal bleeding (p=0.22), prostatic abscess (p=1.0), urethral bleeding (p=0.22), blood transfusion (p=1.0) and acute urinary retention (p=1.0). Conclusion: An overnight fast with antibiotic prophylaxis remains a relatively safe procedure and gives similar outcome as a combination of bowel enema, rectal washout and antibiotic prophylaxis before biopsy. As such, bowel enema and rectal washout before biopsy provides no clinicallysignificant outcome advantage, and potentially increases patient cost and discomfort.

Objectives: To measure needle tip deflection during transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate biopsy and evaluate predictors for needle tip deflection. Materials and Methods: Analysis of 568 prostate biopsies obtained from 51 consecutive patients who underwent a standard 12-core TRUS guided prostate biopsy. TRUS guided prostate biopsies were performed using BK flex500, with a side-fire biplane probe. Each biopsy core image was captured and clinical data were recorded prospectively. The angle between the expected trajectory of the needle and actual needle course was measured using the longitudinal view of the captured image. The distance between expected and actual needle tip was calculated. We measured median and interquartile needle tip deflection rate stratified by side and location (apex, midgland, base). Univariable and multivariable linear regressions analysis were performed. Results: The overall median needle tip deflection was 1.77mm (IQR 1.35-2.47). Location did not significantly alter needle deflection measurements. On multivariable linear regression analysis, higher prostate volume (B = 0.007 95%, CI 0.004, 0.011; p < 0.001) and the right sided biopsy (B = 0.191 95%, CI 0.047, 0.336; p = 0.010) emerged as predictors of higher needle tip deflection. Conclusions: To the best of our knowledge this is the first study to measure needle tip deflection during TRUS guided prostate biopsies. We demonstrated that larger prostate size and biopsy side may affect the accuracy of biopsies. These results may have clinical implication to those performing targeted biopsies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Prostate biopsy is a painful procedure. The aim of this study was to determine which stage of prostate biopsy is most painful and to investigate the effect of intrarectal local anesthetic (IRLA) on the periprostatic nerve block (PNB). Methodology: Two groups were established in this prospective, randomized controlled study. One received ultrasonic gel + prilocaine during PNB (Group UP) and the other received intrarectal lignocaine gel + prilocaine combination (Group IP). Prior to probe insertion, ultrasonic gel only was applied to the patients in Group UP, while the subjects in Group IP were administered 60 mg of lignocaine gel via the rectal route 5 min before the biopsy procedure. In the subsequent stage, 10 ml of 2% prilocaine was infiltrated 4 ml into each prostate-seminal vesicle junction and 2 ml into the apex of the prostate. Pain evaluation during and after biopsy was explained to the patients, and this assessment was performed using a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Results: The mean age of the patients was 63.37 ± 6.61 years. We identified probe insertion as the most painful stage of prostate biopsy. VAS scores during probe insertion were 3.63 ± 0.98 in Group UP and 3.35 ± 0.85 in Group IP (p = 0.001). We observed less pain in patients receiving an IRLA + PNB combination during biopsy (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Probe insertion is the most painful stage in transrectal ultrasonography guided prostate biopsies, and intrarectal local anesthetic significantly reduces probe insertion-related pain. In addition, a combination of intrarectal local anesthetic and periprostatic nerve block causes less pain than ultrasonic gel and periprostatic nerve block during biopsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To determine the optimal antibiotic prophylaxis strategy for transrectal prostate biopsy (TRPB) as a function of the local antibiotic resistance profile.Methods: We developed a decision-analytic model to assess the cost-effectiveness of four antibiotic prophylaxis strategies: ciprofloxacin alone, ceftriaxone alone, ciprofloxacin and ceftriaxone in combination, and directed prophylaxis selection based on susceptibility testing. We used a payer's perspective and estimated the health care costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with each strategy for a cohort of 66-year-old men undergoing TRPB. Costs and benefits were discounted at 3% annually. Base-case resistance prevalence was 29% to ciprofloxacin and 7% to ceftriaxone, reflecting susceptibility patterns observed at the Minneapolis Veterans Affairs Health Care System. Resistance levels were varied in sensitivity analysis.Results: In the base case, single-agent prophylaxis strategies were dominated. Directed prophylaxis strategy was the optimal strategy at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $50,000/QALY gained. Relative to the directed prophylaxis strategy, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of the combination strategy was $123,333/QALY gained over the lifetime time horizon. In sensitivity analysis, single-agent prophylaxis strategies were preferred only at extreme levels of resistance.Conclusions: Directed or combination prophylaxis strategies were optimal for a wide range of resistance levels. Facilities using single-agent antibiotic prophylaxis strategies before TRPB should re-evaluate their strategies unless extremely low levels of antimicrobial resistance are documented. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To determine the predictive value of free and bioavailable testosterone levels on the detection of high-grade prostate cancer proven by histopathological examination of transrectal prostate biopsy specimens. Material and methods: A total of 405 patients who underwent transrectal prostate biopsy due to high prostatic specific antigen (PSA) (>2.5 ng/mL) and/or abnormal findings at digital rectal examination were included in this study. Blood free and bioavailable testosterone levels were calculated by the formula recommended by International Society for the Study of the Aging Male (ISSAM). The patients were stratified according to the D'Amico classification based on PSA levels and histological outcomes of prostate biopsies as benign, low, intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. Patients were also divided into five groups according to the percentage of cancerous cores. Results: Prostate cancer was detected in 160 of 405 (39.5%) patients. Total, free and bioavailable testosterone levels did not differ significantly between the patients with benign or malign histology. However, mean free (6.2 vs. 5.2 ng/dL, p=0.02) and bioavailable (151 vs. 125 ng/dL, p=0.001) testosterone levels were found to be significantly different in men with low-intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer. Moreover, a signifi- cant correlation was found between free, and bioavailable testosterone levels and percentage of cores with cancer (p=0.002 for free and p=0.016 for bioavailable testosterone, respectively). Conclusion: This prospective clinical study demonstrates that reduced levels of calculated blood free and bioavailable testosterone levels are associated with an increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer. Based on these findings blood free and bioavailable testosterone levels may be be thought to be an adjunctive factor in the prediction of high-risk prostate cancer. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignant neoplasms in middle-aged and elderly men. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy is the standard method for diagnosing prostate cancer but is associated with a high incidence of infectious compli-cations. A review of the literature on optimizing the prevention of infectious complications when performing transrectal prostate biopsy is presented. The main risk factors and the common measures to prevent the development of complications are discussed, including a study of using fosfomycin trometamol as the preferred drug for antibacterial prophylaxis. Fosfomycin meets the requirements for empirical prophylaxis, but further clinical studies are needed.