Search

This report gives an overview of the scientific literature on the migration of undesired substances from packages made from recycled paper & board to foodstuffs with a focus on mineral oils. The knowledge is placed into an independent scientific perspective with regard to analysis, technology, legislation and sources by Wageningen Food & Biobased Research (WFBR) and with regard to exposure, toxicology and risk assessment by TNO (organisation for applied scientific research). Dit rapport geeft een overzicht van de huidige wetenschappelijke kennis op het gebied van de migratie van ongewenste verbindingen uit verpakkingen gemaakt van gerecycleerd papier en karton naar levensmiddelen met een focus op minerale oliën. Deze kennis wordt in een onafhankelijk wetenschappelijk perspectief geplaatst ten aanzien van analyse, technologie, wetgeving en bronnen door Wageningen Food & Biobased Research (WFBR) en ten aanzien van blootstelling, toxicologie en risicobeoordeling door de organisatie voor Toegepast Natuurwetenschappelijk Onderzoek (TNO).

Consumer health risk assessment for feed additives is based on the estimated human exposure to the additive that may occur in livestock edible tissues compared to its hazard. We present an approach using alternative methods for consumer health risk assessment. The aim was to use the fewest possible number of animals to estimate its hazard and human exposure without jeopardizing the safety upon use. As an example we selected the feed flavoring substance piperine and applied in silico modeling for residue estimation, results from literature surveys, and Read-Across to assess metabolism in different species. Results were compared to experimental in vitro metabolism data in rat and chicken, and to quantitative analysis of residues' levels from the in vivo situation in livestock. In silico residue modeling showed to be a worst case: the modeled residual levels were considerably higher than the measured residual levels. The in vitro evaluation of livestock versus rodent metabolism revealed no major differences in metabolism between the species. We successfully performed a consumer health risk assessment without performing additional animal experiments. As shown, the use and combination of different alternative methods supports animal welfare consideration and provides future perspective to reducing the number of animals.

Recently, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) stated that the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) thresholds should not be used for substances that are known or predicted to accumulate. Bioaccumulation of substances is usually considered unfavourable but so far a relation with toxicity at low dose exposure is insufficiently investigated to draw conclusions on the relevance of bioaccumulation at low dose exposure. In this manuscript it is investigated which physical chemical properties are related to bioaccumulation in order to predict accumulating properties of a substance, and is evaluated if the toxicity of known bioaccumulating substances is higher than for non-accumulating substances. Based on the evaluation it is concluded that the current TTC thresholds are derived with a dataset in which bioaccumulating substances are present, whereas the toxicity of the bioaccumulating substances is already taken into account in the TTC thresholds. The authors demonstrated that there is no need to exclude potential bioaccumulating substances from the TTC concept.

To derive an acute TTC threshold, the correlation between Allowable Daily Intakes (ADIs, chronic values) and Acute Reference Doses (ARfDs) of pesticides evaluated in the EU was investigated and their distributions were compared. The correlation between ARfDs and ADIs was significant (p = 0.01), but weak (r(2) = 0.051). Consequently, using this approach to derive acute TTC values does not seem valid. Therefore, the distributions of ARfDs and ADIs were compared directly, in order to extrapolate from chronic to acute TTC values. This comparison made for the combined Cramer structural class II and III pesticides showed a ratio ARfD/ADI of approximately 3 at the fifth percentile of the distributions. Based on these results, it is justified to propose a TTC for acute effects for Cramer III substances by multiplying the Cramer class III TTC threshold of 90 μg/person/day with a factor 3. This leads to an acute TTC threshold based on the Munro dataset for Cramer class III substances of 270 μg/person/day.

There is growing concern regarding the presence of nonintentionally added substances (NIAS) in food contact materials. These substances cannot be excluded from the food contact materials and end-up in our food. Identification thereof is often difficult or in some cases even not possible, which makes it difficult to evaluate their safety upon exposure. This review provides an overview of the current European Regulatory requirements and the latest innovations in the safety assessment of NIAS. Main conclusion is that recently an innovative, pragmatic and scientifically justified approach is published which can be used for prioritization of NIAS, based on their exposure and hazard.

A main challenge in food safety research is to demonstrate that processing of foodstuffs does not lead to the formation of substances for which the safety upon consumption might be questioned. This is especially so since food is a complex matrix in which the analytical detection of substances, and consequent risk assessment thereof, is difficult to determine. Here, a pragmatic novel safety assessment strategy is applied to the production of non-selective extracts (NSEs), used for different purposes in food such as for colouring purposes, which are complex food mixtures prepared from reference juices. The Complex Mixture Safety Assessment Strategy (CoMSAS) is an exposure driven approach enabling to efficiently assess the safety of the NSE by focussing on newly formed substances or substances that may increase in exposure during the processing of the NSE. CoMSAS enables to distinguish toxicologically relevant from toxicologically less relevant substances, when related to their respective levels of exposure. This will reduce the amount of work needed for identification, characterisation and safety assessment of unknown substances detected at low concentration, without the need for toxicity testing using animal studies. In this paper, the CoMSAS approach has been applied for elderberry and pumpkin NSEs used for food colouring purposes.