Search

Introduction: Over the last few years, a growth in research and interest in medical cannabis (most often referred to as medical marijuana) use have occurred nationally. Medical cannabis has become a treatment option for disease conditions, such as epilepsy, wasting syndrome associated with AIDs, and post-traumatic stress disorder, when traditional medication is ineffective. Objectives: The objectives were to identify knowledge deficits of the medical cannabis program (MCP) in Connecticut among Connecticut pharmacists and the impact of MCP on Connecticut pharmacy practice and concerns Connecticut pharmacists have regarding medical cannabis use. Methods: A cross-sectional survey through an online platform, Google forms, was administered for 2 months (October 15, 2017–December 15, 2017). An e-mail containing the link to the survey was e-mailed to all pharmacists whose e-mail addresses were available from the State of Connecticut's Commission of Pharmacy database (n = 6182). Of those with available e-mail addresses, only 5653 pharmacists received the e-mail; the others were rejected upon receipt of our e-mail. Our survey consists of 16 items related to pharmacist demo- graphic information, knowledge assessment, impact on pharmacists' practice, and concerns stemming from medical cannabis. Results: Only 51 (15.2%) respondents believed that Connecticut MCP would impact their practice. Only 39 (11.6%) respondents selected the two correct requirements for patient registration and correctly identified the wrong choices. Only 81 (24.2%) respondents identified the correct approved dose (maximum allowable monthly amount of 2.5 ounces) of medical cannabis. Sixty-eight (20.2%) respondents correctly identified all three approved conditions and all other incorrect conditions. Sixty-five (19.40%) respondents correctly identified all roles of dispensary pharmacists. Majority of respondents, 243 (72.5%), expressed their concern about federal laws regarding cannabis. A total of 98 (29.3%) respondents thought that they were knowledgeable enough about the side effects of medical cannabis to provide appropriate counseling to patients. Conclusion: Overall, the results of our survey found that Connecticut licensed pharmacists had lack of complete and accurate knowledge regarding the state's MCP. As more states legalize medical cannabis, it will be imperative that education of pharmacists and other health care professionals about the MCP and the clinical use of cannabis occur.

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is diabetes that is diagnosed during the second or third trimester of pregnancy and is not clearly overt diabetes (1). Diagnosis is defined by severity of carbohydrate intolerance. The upper end of the GDM diagnostic glucose range is the same as would be indicative of diabetes outside of pregnancy, whereas the lower end of the GDM range is only slightly above normal and asymptomatic but still associated with increased risk of fetal morbidity (1,2). Diabetes during pregnancy is diagnosed by either a one-step approach involving a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) or a two-step approach starting with a 50-g (nonfasting) screen followed by a 100-g OGTT for those who initially screen positive (1). Glycemic goals for patients with a GDM diagnosis are as follows: preprandial ≤95 mg/dL and either 1-hour postprandial ≤140 mg/dL or 2-hour postprandial ≤120 mg/dL. Hyperglycemia throughout pregnancy carries increased risk for adverse fetal and maternal outcomes (3–8). Treatment of diabetes during pregnancy is aimed at decreasing the risk of perinatal outcomes such as macrosomia, birth trauma, neonatal metabolic abnormalities, and cesarean section (4,9–12). Lifestyle modification is first-line treatment and includes medical nutrition therapy (MNT), exercise, and glucose monitoring (13). Pharmacological therapy generally consists of insulin, glyburide, or metformin, and agents may be used adjunctly to MNT depending on presence and severity of hyperglycemia (13). Insulin is the preferred pharmacological treatment for management of diabetes in pregnancy if lifestyle modification is insufficient in achieving euglycemia (13). The setting of this review is the diabetes clinic located within the Hall County Health Department (HCHD) prenatal clinic in Gainesville, Ga. The population of Gainesville is ∼187,000 and includes a large percentage of Latino immigrants (14). The proportion of Latinos in the diabetes clinic has grown …

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) carries a high prevalence in the United States and worldwide. Therefore, the number of medication classes being developed and studied has grown. The individualized management of diabetes is accomplished by evaluating a medication's efficacy, safety, and cost, along with the patient's preference and tolerance to the medication. Sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors are a new therapeutic class indicated for the treatment of diabetes and have a unique mechanism of action, independent of beta-cell function. The first agent approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) was canagliflozin in March 2013. Two agents - dapagliflozin and empagliflozin - were FDA-approved in January and July 2014, respectively. A clear understanding of the new class is needed to identify its appropriate use in clinical practice. Members of the American College of Clinical Pharmacy Endocrine and Metabolism Practice and Research Network reviewed available literature regarding this therapeutic class. The article addresses the advantages, disadvantages, emerging role, and patient education for sodium glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors. Key limitations for this article include limited access to clinical trial data not published by the pharmaceutical company and limited data on products produced outside the United States.

As currently diagnosed, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects 5–9% of all pregnancies in the United States and is growing in prevalence.1 It is defined as carbohydrate intolerance of variable severity that is first recognized during pregnancy. Although GDM has been recognized for decades, the potential significance of the condition, as well as criteria for screening and diagnosis, remain debatable.1 Historically, GDM has been treated with lifestyle modifications and insulin, and oral antihyperglycemic agents have been used infrequently because of concerns regarding neonatal hypoglycemia and teratogenicity. Most recent studies suggest that oral hypoglycemic agents, specifically metformin, are safe to use during pregnancy (Table 1).2–13 Risk for developing GDM has been noted in women who are overweight before pregnancy, have had GDM in a previous pregnancy, or have a family history of diabetes. Poorer outcomes have been seen in both pregnant women and their developing fetuses, including induction of labor and caesarean delivery in women and death, shoulder dystocia, bone fracture, and nerve palsy in fetuses.1 Moreover, recent studies show that diagnosis and management of this disorder will have beneficial effects on both maternal and neonatal outcomes.14,15 According to the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology, comprehensive screening techniques have been implemented by > 90% of practices in the United States.16 Reasons for the implementation of screening programs were developed from the evidence obtained in the Hyperglycemia and Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes study.17 This large, prospective, observational study found possible adverse effects associated with even mild maternal hyperglycemia. It included a cohort of women with glucose levels at the upper end of the normal range, as well as women with mild GDM. The investigators found a linear correlation between higher levels of maternal glucose and adverse outcomes, including increased birth weight, …