Search

Research explores how internal‐focused cognitions and emotions impact the connection between employees' work–family conflict (WFC) and subsequent behaviours. We offer a complementary view by arguing that employees also attribute WFC to external causes, notably their supervisor. First, we hypothesize that anger directed towards one's supervisor mediates the relationship between WFC and unethical pro‐family behaviours (UPFB), which is supported by the results of a multi‐wave survey study. Second, we expand this view by recognizing employees' experiences of WFC may be beyond the supervisor's control. We examine how the extent to which the employee's WFC is perceived as more (vs. less) controllable by their supervisor conditions this indirect effect. Results from an experimental study show that when WFC is perceived as more controllable by one's supervisor, the positive association between WFC and anger is stronger, reinforcing the indirect effect of WFC on UPFB. However, when WFC is perceived as less controllable by one's supervisor, the indirect effect disappears as anger towards the supervisor dissipates. Taken together, our work synthesizes the work–family and UPFB literatures by addressing the key roles of anger and external attributions in the experience of WFC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study integrates social information processing theory with leadership and climate literature, and aims to produce novel theoretical insights into whether and how spiritual leadership and task uncertainty foster conditions to enhance meaningfulness climate and subsequent team effectiveness in China. Team effectiveness was operationalized as team performance and team organizational citizenship behavior (OCB). Based on data collected at three time points over 12 months from multiple sources of 123 teams in China, we found that spiritual leadership was positively related to team performance and team OCB through meaningfulness climate. Further, the relationship between spiritual leadership and meaningfulness climate was stronger for teams with high task uncertainty than teams with low task uncertainty. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite research suggesting that emotional interactions pervade daily resource exchanges between leaders and members, the leader–member exchange (LMX) literature has predominantly focused on the interplay between general affective experiences and the overall relationship quality. Drawing upon the affect theory of social exchange, we examine why and how discrete exchange imbalance engenders distinct emotions and shapes downstream work behaviors of the members. Results from a preregistered experimental study with 247 participants and an experience sampling study with time‐lagged reports from 79 leaders and 145 members show that a positively imbalanced exchange increases members' subsequent leader‐directed helping via gratitude (but not via shame) and that a negatively imbalanced exchange increases members' subsequent risk‐taking via pride (but not via anger). Moreover, the intensity of such effects hinges upon the average level of resource contributions of leader–member dyads. Our research casts light on the role of transient emotions in dynamic resource exchanges between leaders and members and enriches our knowledge of within‐dyad fluctuations of social exchanges. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: The rankings literature implicitly assumes that rankings success universally benefits organizations. However, in some instances, this assumption may be unwarranted. In this study, we employ a mixed‐methods approach that moves the literature beyond examining whether employees leave, to examine who leaves elite Best Places to Work (BPTW), defined as organizations which place in the top 10 in BPTW rankings perennially (i.e., year after year). In Study 1, examination of elite BPTW organizations shows that proportions of voluntary turnover comprising high performers increase over associated BPTW ranking cycles. Study 2 commences with 40 semistructured interviews among employees in an elite BPTW organization, from which two relevant and explanatory themes emerge. First, some employees interpret BPTW success as restricting opportunities for advancement within the organization, a phenomenon we term "perceived promotion constraint." Second, some employees perceive BPTW success as building their own personal resumes. Integrating our findings from Study 1 and the qualitative portion of Study 2 with the career management literature, we propose and deductively test "perceived promotion constraint" and "perceived resume building" as two potential high performer turnover mechanisms, finding that perceived promotion constraint mediates the relationship between performance status and turnover intentions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite evidence that affect shapes perceptions of workplace relationships, the role of affect in the reciprocal exchange process of leader–member exchange (LMX) theory is often overlooked. We argue that this is likely due to a continued focus on global assessments of LMX quality, rather than examination of the reciprocal, interlocked actions and reactions that take place daily between members of the dyad. A leader's affective state may indeed spark this reciprocal exchange process on a daily level and ultimately shape the state of the leader–follower relationship. In this study, we integrate LMX theory and emotions‐as‐social‐information (EASI) theory to examine how the leader's negative and positive affective states uniquely contribute to the reciprocal exchange process. In doing so, we advance understanding of the distinction of state LMX as well as the unique process for leader's negative affective state within the reciprocal exchange process. Using a 15‐day experience sampling methodology study of 76 leader–follower dyads, we find that a leader's positive and negative affective states transmit effects along the affective and inferential paths posited in EASI theory to influence follower performance on a daily basis. Interestingly, a leader's positive affective state is stronger along the affective path and a leader's negative affective state is stronger along the inferential path. We also find that leaders reciprocate the daily shift in follower performance with OCBI directed toward the follower. Finally, as expected, the reciprocal exchange process alters state LMX (leader rated). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: The authors conduct three studies to systematically examine how avoiding and learning goal orientation (AGO and LGO) influence relationships between perceived demands‐abilities (DA) fit and critical outcomes during three organizational entry stages. Study 1, a multilevel study using a series of mock job advertisements, shows that participant likelihood of applying for jobs for which they perceive higher DA fit increases when AGO is stronger. Study 2 finds a stronger positive relationship between perceived DA fit and internship satisfaction among interns with a stronger AGO. Study 3 finds a stronger positive relationship between perceived DA fit and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) among new organizational entrants with a stronger AGO. Implications and future research directions regarding the importance of goal orientation during job search and organizational entry are discussed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This paper integrates the rapidly growing literatures on the individual and organizational factors that contribute to women’s career equality. We organize studies into three research perspectives: career preference, gender bias, and work-family explanations. These literatures diverge on whether women “opt out” or are “pushed out” of leadership positions in organizations. Further, the interconnectedness of these “pushes” and “pulls” and micro-macro linkages are not well-integrated. This creates a lack of clarity about what scholars should study and what practices organizations should implement. We define women’s career equality as an individual and organizational phenomenon involving the degree to which women (a) have equal access to and participation in career opportunities, and (b) experience equal intrinsic and extrinsic work and nonwork outcomes compared to men. We bridge the interdisciplinary divides by developing an integrative multi-level model of women’s career equality. We propose that individuals’ career perceptions and experiences are embedded in social contexts reflecting the climate for gender inclusion and interact with these contexts to shape women’s career equality outcomes. The climate for gender inclusion has three dimensions: fairness, leveraging talent, and workplace support. We identify coalescing themes to stimulate future research, including attention to national socio-economic influences, improving metrics and measurement of gender inclusion climate, multi-level career equality outcomes, a joint focus on implicit and explicit bias, and designing cross-disciplinary interventions for experiments. In order to foster theory-based research that is linked to practice, we suggest implementing and scientifically evaluating comprehensive workplace interventions that integrate perspectives and levels. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]