Search

Background and study aims We developed an e-learning program for endoscopic diagnosis of invasion depth of early gastric cancer (EGC) using a simple diagnostic criterion called non-extension sign, and the contribution of self-study quizzes to improvement of diagnostic accuracy was evaluated. Methods We conducted a prospective randomized controlled study that recruited endoscopists throughout Japan. After completing a pretest, the participants watched video lectures and undertook post-test 1. The participants were then randomly allocated to either the self-study or non-self-study group, and participants in the first group completed the self-study program that comprised 100-case quizzes. Finally, participants in both groups undertook post-test 2. The primary endpoint was the difference in post-test 2 scores between the groups. The perfect score for the tests was set as 100 points. Results A total of 423 endoscopists completed the pretest and were enrolled. Post-test 1 was completed by 415 endoscopists and 208 were allocated to the self-study group and 207 to the non-self-study group. Two hundred and four in the self-study group and 205 in the non-self-study group were included in the analysis. Video lectures improved the mean score of post-test 1 from 72 to 77 points. Participants who completed the self-study quizzes showed significantly better post-test 2 scores compared with the non-self-study group (80 vs. 76 points, respectively, P

Background and study aims It is important to examine the pharynx during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Pharyngeal anesthesia using topical lidocaine is generally used as pretreatment. In Japan, lidocaine viscous solution is the anesthetic of choice, but lidocaine spray is applied when the former is considered insufficient. However, the relationship between the extent of pharyngeal anesthesia and accuracy of observation is unclear. We compared the performance of lidocaine spray alone versus lidocaine spray combined with lidocaine viscous solution for pharyngeal observation during transoral endoscopy. Patients and methods In this prospective, double-blinded, randomized clinical trial conducted between January and March 2015, 327 patients were randomly assigned to lidocaine spray alone (spray group, n = 157) or a combination of spray and viscous solution (combination group, n = 170). We compared the number of pharyngeal observable sites (non-inferiority test), pain by visual analogue scale, observation time, and the number of gag reflexes between the two groups. Results The mean number of images of suitable quality taken at the observable pharyngeal sites in the spray group was 8.33 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 7.94 – 8.72) per patient, and 8.77 (95 % CI: 8.49 – 9.05) per patient in the combination group. The difference in the number of observable pharyngeal sites was – 0.44 (95 % CI: – 0.84 to – 0.03, P = 0.01). There were no differences in pain, observation time, or number of gag reflexes between the 2 groups. Subgroup analysis of the presence of sedation revealed no differences between the two groups for the number of pharyngeal observation sites and the number of gag reflexes. However, the number of gag reflexes was higher in the spray group compared to the combination group in a subgroup analysis that looked at the absence of sedation. Conclusions Lidocaine spray for pharyngeal anesthesia was not inferior to lidocaine spray and viscous solution in terms of pharyngeal observation. It was considered that lidocaine viscous solution was unnecessary for pharyngeal observation. UMIN000016073

Background The clip-and-snare method using the pre-looping technique (CSM-PLT) was developed as a traction method for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) of gastric neoplasia. However, its usefulness has not been clearly established; thus, we aimed to assess the efficacy of CSM-PLT in gastric ESD. Methods In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, patients with gastric adenoma or carcinoma with absolute or expanded indications for ESD were randomized into conventional ESD and CSM-PLT groups, using the minimization method based on operator experience, tumor location, tumor size, and excision device. The primary endpoint was ESD procedure time. Secondary endpoints were en bloc and R0 resection rates, and complications. Results We enrolled 402 patients between July 2017 and February 2020. After excluding patients with deviations from the protocol, we finally analyzed the data of 192 and 186 patients in the conventional and CSM-PLT groups, respectively. The procedure time was significantly shorter in the CSM-PLT group than in the conventional group (58.0 vs. 69.7 min; P=0.009). All lesions were resected en bloc. The R0 resection rate tended to be higher in the CSM-PLT group (P=0.09). No significant differences in complications were observed between the 2 groups. Conclusions CSM-PLT is beneficial for gastric ESD when compared with the conventional technique. CSM-PLT significantly reduced procedure times and improved R0 resection rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]