Search

Context: Pertrochanteric hip fractures in sportive young adults are mainly caused by a high-energy trauma and treated in the same way as in the older population, using an osteosynthesis immediately followed by a rehabilitation program for several months. The current standard is not to remove osteosynthesis material, similar to the case of older patients. CasePresentation: A 45-year-old male cyclist experienced a right pertrochanteric femoral fracture, treated with cephalomedullary nails. After 9 months of adequate rehabilitation, weakness of the quadriceps musculature and functional complaints persisted, objectified through an isokinetic strength test and a significantly reduced score on the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire. The patient was unable to return to his previous level of cycling performance. Management and Outcome: After exclusion of structural bone complications, nerve injury, and central sensitization, the functional complaints and strength deficiency were hypothesized to be related to the osteosynthesis material. Therefore, the hardware was removed 9 months after the first surgery, and the rehabilitation was continued for another 20 weeks. Very soon after the removal of the hardware, the functional complaints disappeared with a remarkable improvement of the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. The isokinetic strength test showed complete recovery of muscle strength 20 weeks after osteosynthesis removal, and preinjury cycling performance values were obtained 9 months posthardware removal. Conclusion: Despite an adequate rehabilitation following a hip fracture, sporty young adults may fail to reach their previous level of functioning. Osteosynthesis removal may be indicated in this sportive population to reach complete muscle strength and functional recovery. The management of hip fractures in the sportive young adult and the identification of patients who may benefit from removal of the hardware require more research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: The retrograde femoral nailing advanced (RFNA) system (DePuy synthes) is a commonly used implant for the fixation of low distal femur and periprosthetic fractures. There is concern that the rate of distal interlock screw back-out may be higher for the RFNA compared to other nails (ON). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the incidence of interlock screw back-out and associated screw removal for RFNA versus ON, along with associated risk factors. METHODS: A retrospective comparative study of patients who underwent retrograde nailing for a distal femur fracture at an academic level one trauma center was performed. The incidence of distal interlock screw back-out and need for screw removal were compared for RFNA versus a propensity score matched cohort who received other nails. RESULTS: One hundred and ten patients underwent retrograde nailing with the RFNA for a distal femur fracture from 2015 to 2022 (average age: 66, BMI: 32, 52.7% smokers, 54.5% female, 61.8%). There was a significantly higher rate of interlock back-out in the RFNA group compared to the ON (27 patients, 24.5% vs 12 patients, 10.9%, p = 0.01), which occurred 6.3 weeks postoperatively. Screw removal rates for back-out were not significantly different for the RFNA group versus ON (8 patients, 7.3% vs 3 patients, 2.7%, p = 0.12). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective comparative study of distal femur fractures treated with retrograde nailing, the RFNA implant was associated with an increased risk of distal interlock screw back-out compared to other nails.

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PDFF) is increasing as the number of total knee replacements becomes more common. This study compared the demographics, fracture characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of periprosthetic versus native distal femur fractures (NDFF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients ≥ 18 who underwent surgical fixation of NDFF or PDFF from 2012 to 2020 at a level-1 trauma center. The main variables collected included demographics, AO/OTA fracture classification, fixation construct, concomitant fractures, polytrauma rates, bone density, and reduction quality. Primary outcomes were unexpected return to the operating room (UROR), hospital length of stay, and quality of reduction. T-tests, Fishers exact tests, and multivariate analyses were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: 209 patients were identified, including 70 PDFF and 139 NDFF. PDFF patients were elderly females (81%) with isolated (80%) and comminuted (85%) 33 A.3 (71%) fractures. NDFF patients included 53% females, were commonly middle-aged, and displayed comminuted (92%) 33 C.2 fractures. 48% of NDFF patients had concomitant fractures. Intramedullary nailing was the primary fixation for both groups, followed by nail-plate combination (37%) for PDFF and lateral locking plates (21%) for NDFF. NDFF patients experienced significantly longer hospital stays, higher UROR rates, and worse quality of reduction (p

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to describe the outcomes after operative repair of ballistic femoral neck fractures. To better highlight the devastating nature of these injuries, we compared a cohort of ballistic femoral neck fractures to a cohort of young, closed, blunt-injury femoral neck fractures treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF). METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified all patients presenting with ballistic femoral neck fractures treated at three academic trauma centers between January 2016 and December 2021, as well as patients aged ≤50 with closed, blunt-injury femoral neck fractures who received ORIF. The primary outcome was failure of ORIF, which includes the diagnosis of non-union, avascular necrosis, conversion to total hip arthroplasty, and conversion to Girdlestone procedure. Additional outcomes included deep infection, postoperative osteoarthritis, and ambulatory status at last follow-up. RESULTS: Fourteen ballistic femoral neck fractures and 29 closed blunt injury fractures were identified. Of the ballistic fractures, 7 (50%) patients had a minimum of 1-year follow-up or met the failure criteria. Of the closed fractures, 16 (55%) patients had a minimum of 1-year follow-up or met the failure criteria. Median follow-up was 21 months. 58% of patients with ballistic fractures were active tobacco users. Five of 7 (71%) ballistic fractures failed, all of which involved non-union, whereas 8 of 16 (50%) closed fractures failed (p=0.340). No outcomes were significantly different between cohorts. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that ballistic femoral neck fractures are associated with high rates of non-union. Large-scale multicenter studies are necessary to better determine optimal treatment techniques for these fractures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III. Retrospective cohort study.