Search

Tyrimo tikslas – išanalizuoti socialinio darbuotojo teikiamą pagalbą asmeniui, vaikystėje patyrusiam psichologinį smurtą. Socialiniai darbuotojai ne tik identifikuoja ir vertina smurto požymius, bet ir naudoja efektyvius metodus bei strategijas, įskaitant terapiją, krizinę intervenciją, įgalinimą ir švietimą, siekdami padėti asmenims įveikti traumą, atkurti saugumą ir skatinti atsigavimą. Įgalinimo metodas yra svarbus ir veiksmingas būdas padėti asmenims, vaikystėje patyrusiems ilgalaikį psichologinį smurtą. Jis remiasi stiprybėmis, tikslais ir įgūdžių plėtra, padedant atkurti pasitikėjimą savimi ir įveikti sunkumus., Research aim - to analyze the assistance provided by a social worker to an individual who has experienced psychological violence in childhood. Social workers not only identify and assess signs of abuse but also employ effective methods and strategies, such as therapy, crisis intervention, empowerment, and education, to help individuals overcome trauma, restore safety, and promote recovery. The empowerment approach is an important and effective way to support individuals who have experienced long-term psychological abuse in childhood. It is based on strengths, goals, and skill development to restore self-confidence and overcome difficulties.

This paper describes a preliminary work aimed at setting a therapeutic support for autistic teenagers using three humanoid robots NAO shared by ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder) subjects. The studied population had attended successfully a first year program, and were observed with a second year program using the robots. This paper focuses on the content and the effects of the second year program. The approach is based on a master puppet concept: the subjects program the robots, and use them as an extension for communication. Twenty sessions were organized, alternating ten preparatory sessions and ten robotics programming sessions. During the preparatory sessions, the subjects write a story to be played by the robots. During the robot programming sessions, the subjects program the motions to be realized to make the robot tell the story. The program was concluded by a public performance. The experiment involves five ASD teenagers aged 12-15, who had all attended the first year robotics training. As a result, a progress in voluntary and organized communication skills of the five subjects was observed, leading to improvements in social organization, focus, voluntary communication, programming, reading and writing abilities. The changes observed in the subjects general behavior took place in a short time, and could be observed from one robotics session to the next one. The approach allowed the subjects to draw the limits of their body with respect to the environment, and therefore helped them confronting the world with less anxiety., {"references":["Jill Boucher, Vicky Lewis, and Glyn Collis. Familiar face and voice\nmatching and recognition in children with autism. Journal of Child\nPsychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39(2), 1998.","John-John Cabibihan, Hifza Javed, Marcelo Ang Jr., and\nSharifah Mariam Aljunied. Why robots? a survey on the roles\nand benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism.\nInternational Journal of Social Robotics, 5(4), 2013.","Kerstin Dautenhahn. I could be you: The phenomenological dimension\nof social understanding. Journal of Cybernetics & Systems, 1997.","Kerstin Dautenhahn. Robots as social actors: Aurora and the case of\nautism. In Third International Cognitive Technology Conference, 1999.","Geraldine Dawson and Larry Galpert. Current Issues in Autism, chapter\n12- A Developmental Model for Facilitating the Social Behavior of\nAutistic Children, pages 237–261. Springer, 1986.","Paul Dickerson, Ben Robins, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. Where the\naction is: A conversation analytic perspective on interaction between a\nhumanoid robot, a co-present adult and a child with an asd. Interaction\nStudies, 14(2), 2013.","David Feil-Seifer, Matt Black, MJ Mataric, and Shrikanth Narayanan.\nDesigning interactive technologies for supporting research in autism\nspectrum disorders. In USC Interaction Lab Technical Report\nCRES-09-001, 2009.","David Feil-Seifer and Maja J Mataric. Using robots to augment (not\nreplace) people in therapeutic settings. In Robotics Science and Systems\nWorkshop on Human-Robot Interaction: Perspectives and Contributions\nto Robotics from the Human Sciences, 2011.","Deborah G. Garfin and Catherine Lord. Current Issues in Autism, chapter\n7- Communication as a Social Problem in Autism, pages 133–151.\nSpringer, 1986.\n[10] Jacques Lacan. Autres E´crits. Seuil, 2001.\n[11] D. J. Ricks and M. B Colton. Trends and considerations in robot-assisted\nautism therapy. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and\nAutomation (ICRA), 2010.\n[12] Ben Robins, Kerstin Dautenhahn, and Janek Dubowski. Does appearance\nmatter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot?\nInteraction Studies, 7(3), 2006.\n[13] Ben Robins, Paul Dickerson, Penny Stribling, and Kerstin Dautenhahn.\nRobot-mediated joint attention in children with autism: A case study in\nrobot-human interaction. Interaction studies, 2004.\n[14] Sophie Sakka, R´enald Gaboriau, Jean Picard, Edwina Redois, Gwena¨elle\nParchantour, Laura Sarfaty, Sonia Navarro, and Annie Barreau.\nRob'autism: how to change autistic social skills in 20 weeks. In 5th\nInternational Workshop on Medical and Service Robots, 2016.\n[15] Brian Scassellati. How social robots will help us to diagnose, treat, and\nunderstand autism. In International Symposium of Robotics Research,\n2005.\n[16] Shamsuddin Syamimi, Yussof Hanafiah, Ismail Luthffi, Hanapiah\nFazah Akhtar, Mohamed Salina, Ali Piah Hanizah, and Zahari\nNur Ismarrubie. Initial response of autistic children in human-robot\ninteraction therapy with humanoid robot nao. In International\nColloquium on Signal Processing and its Applications, 2012.\n[17] Adriana Tapus, Andreea Peca, Amir Aly, Cristina Pop, Lavinia Jisa,\nSebastian Pintea, Alina S. Rusu, and Daniel O. David. Children with\nautism social engagement in interaction with nao, an imitative robot: A\nseries of single case experiments. Interaction Studies, 13(2), 2012.\n[18] Iain Werry and Kerstin Dautenhahn. Applying mobile robot technology\nto the rehabilitation of autistic children. In International Symposium on\nIntelligent Robotic Systems, 1999.\n[19] Iain Werry and Kerstin Dautenhahn. Modeling Biology: Structures,\nBehaviors, Evolution – Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology, chapter\nHuman-Robot Interaction as a Model for Autism Therapy: An\nExperimental Study with Children with Autism, pages 283–299. 2007."]}

Cette contribution se propose de comprendre la pratique d’« accompagnement thérapeutique » au sein d’un Hôpital de Jour – HdJ - d’une institution hospitalière spécialisée dans le traitement de la maladie chronique urinaire - et d’en analyser les effets sur les soignants – 3 infirmières référentes - et sur les soignés – patients et leur famille. Dans une dimension ethnographique, nous avons recueilli du discours de et sur l’accompagnement à l’occasion d’ateliers d’accompagnement thérapeutique ainsi qu’à partir de traces d’activité. Ce matériau discursif a fait l’objet d’une analyse de contenu (Bardin, 2007) couplée avec une analyse de discours (Charaudeau, 1992 ; Kerbrat-Orecchioni, 2006 ; Haillet, 2007). Nous faisons trois hypothèses : l’accompagnement est une culture d’action professionnelle (Barbier, 2011) ; l’entretien d’accompagnement thérapeutique est utilisé comme un instrument de partage de cette culture d’action et donne lieu à une confrontation de cultures. Cette étude a ainsi permis de mettre en exergue des modèles d’accompagnement (Paul, 2009). Cette confrontation de cultures d’action à partir d’une culture « générique affichée » entre l’ensemble des acteurs a ainsi mis en évidence plusieurs formes « en acte » que nous avons analysées. We propose with this contribution to understand the practice of "therapeutic support" in a day hospital - HdJ - of a universitary healthcare specialized in treating of the urinary chronic disease - and to analyze the effects on the caregivers - 3 designated nurses - and on the carereceivers - patients and their family. In an ethnographical dimension, we collected some speech of and speech on the support during workshops of therapeutic support and also speech from activity signs. This discursive material was analysed by an analysis of contents (Bardin, 2007) coupled with an analysis of speech (Charaudeau, 1992 ; Kerbrat-Orecchioni, 2006 ; Haillet, 2007). We make the three following hypotheses : the support is a culture of a professional action (Barbier, 2011) ; the interview of therapeutic support is used as a tool to share this culture of action and produce a confrontation between cultures. So this study allowed to point models of support (Paul, 2009). This confrontation between cultures of action from a "displayed generic" culture between all the actors produced several forms "in act" which we analyzed.