Search

Canonical equations play a pivotal role in various sub-fields of physics and mathematics. However, for complex systems and systems without first principles, deriving canonical equations analytically is quite laborious or might even be impossible. This work is devoted to automatedly distilling the canonical equations solely from random state data. The random state data are collected from stochastically excited, dissipative dynamical systems either experimentally or numerically, while other information, such as the system characterization itself and the excitations, is not needed. The identification procedure comes down to a nested optimization problem, and the explicit expressions of the momentum (density) functions and energy (density) functions are identified simultaneously. Three representative examples are investigated to illustrate its high accuracy of identification, the small requirement for data amount, and high robustness to excitations and dissipation. The identification procedure serves as a filter, filtering out nonconservative information while retaining conservative information, which is especially suitable for systems with unobtainable excitations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Data-driven equation identification for dynamical systems has achieved great progress, which for static systems, however, has not kept pace. Unlike dynamical systems, static systems are time invariant, so we cannot capture discrete data along the time stream, which requires identifying governing equations only from scarce data. This work is devoted to this topic, building a data-driven method for extracting the differential-variational equations that govern static behaviors only from scarce, noisy data of responses, loads, as well as the values of system attributes if available. Compared to the differential framework typically adopted in equation identification, the differential-variational framework, due to its spatial integration and variation arbitrariness, brings some advantages, such as high robustness to data noise and low requirements on data amounts. The application, efficacy, and all the aforementioned advantages of this method are demonstrated by four numerical examples, including three continuous systems and one discrete system. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]