Search

RNA binding proteins (RBPs) regulate nearly all post-transcriptional processes within cells. To fully understand RBP function, it is essential to identify their in vivo targets. Standard techniques for profiling RBP targets, such as crosslinking immunoprecipitation (CLIP) and its variants, are limited or suboptimal in some situations, e.g. when compatible antibodies are not available and when dealing with small cell populations such as neuronal subtypes and primary stem cells. This review summarizes and compares several genetic approaches recently designed to identify RBP targets in such circumstances. TRIBE (targets of RNA binding proteins identified by editing), RNA tagging, and STAMP (surveying targets by APOBEC-mediated profiling) are new genetic tools useful for the study of post-transcriptional regulation and RBP identification. We describe the underlying RNA base editing technology, recent applications, and therapeutic implications. RNA editing regulates the splicing, coding, and metabolic features of RNAs. In this review, Xu et al. highlight how RNA editing enzymes are being used to identify RNA binding protein targets with high sensitivity and specificity and the implications of these technological advances for RNA editing-based therapeutics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Activity-dependent expression of immediate early genes (IEGs) is critical for long-term synaptic remodeling and memory. It remains unknown how IEGs are maintained for memory despite rapid transcript and protein turnover. To address this conundrum, we monitored Arc , an IEG essential for memory consolidation. Using a knockin mouse where endogenous Arc alleles were fluorescently tagged, we performed real-time imaging of Arc mRNA dynamics in individual neurons in cultures and brain tissue. Unexpectedly, a single burst stimulation was sufficient to induce cycles of transcriptional reactivation in the same neuron. Subsequent transcription cycles required translation, whereby new Arc proteins engaged in autoregulatory positive feedback to reinduce transcription. The ensuing Arc mRNAs preferentially localized at sites marked by previous Arc protein, assembling a "hotspot" of translation, and consolidating "hubs" of dendritic Arc. These cycles of transcription-translation coupling sustain protein expression and provide a mechanism by which a short-lived event may support long-term memory. [Display omitted] • Reactivation of transcription drives cycling of the Arc gene in individual neurons • Feedback from new proteins reinduces Arc transcription in the next cycle • Arc mRNAs from later cycles localize to sites marked with previous Arc protein • Repetitive translation in hotspots consolidates dendritic Arc in selective hubs How are short-lived mRNAs and proteins maintained over time to impact long-term memory? Das et al. report that repetitive cycles of transcription and local translation of the immediate early gene Arc amplify a single burst stimulation over time to assemble Arc protein hubs, revealing a molecular mechanism that supports memory consolidation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Learning and memory rely on long-lasting, synapse-specific modifications. Although postsynaptic forms of plasticity typically require local protein synthesis, whether and how local protein synthesis contributes to presynaptic changes remain unclear. Here, we examined the mouse hippocampal mossy fiber (MF)-CA3 synapse, which expresses both structural and functional presynaptic plasticity and contains presynaptic fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein (FMRP), an RNA-binding protein involved in postsynaptic protein-synthesis-dependent plasticity. We report that MF boutons contain ribosomes and synthesize protein locally. The long-term potentiation of MF-CA3 synaptic transmission (MF-LTP) was associated with the translation-dependent enlargement of MF boutons. Remarkably, increasing in vitro or in vivo MF activity enhanced the protein synthesis in MFs. Moreover, the deletion of presynaptic FMRP blocked structural and functional MF-LTP, suggesting that FMRP is a critical regulator of presynaptic MF plasticity. Thus, presynaptic FMRP and protein synthesis dynamically control presynaptic structure and function in the mature mammalian brain. [Display omitted] • Mossy fiber boutons (MFBs) contain ribosomes and synthesize protein locally • Local presynaptic translation is increased by in vitro and in vivo GC activity • MFB structural plasticity relies on de novo protein synthesis • Presynaptic FMRP is required for MF-CA3 structural and functional plasticity Monday, Kharod et al. report that neuronal activity regulates presynaptic FMRP function and the local synthesis of β-actin. In vitro activity and in vivo experience engage the FMRP-dependent spatiotemporal regulation of protein synthesis that is required for presynaptic remodeling and long-term changes in neurotransmitter release. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is a leading cause of inherited intellectual disability and autism. Whereas dysregulated RNA translation in Fmr1 knockout (KO) mice, a model of FXS, is well studied, little is known about aberrant transcription. Using single-molecule mRNA detection, we show that mRNA encoding the AMPAR subunit GluA2 (but not GluA1) is elevated in dendrites and at transcription sites of hippocampal neurons of Fmr1 KO mice, indicating elevated GluA2 transcription. We identify CPEB3, a protein implicated in memory consolidation, as an upstream effector critical to GluA2 mRNA expression in FXS. Increased GluA2 mRNA is translated into an increase in GluA2 subunits, a switch in synaptic AMPAR phenotype from GluA2-lacking, Ca 2+ -permeable to GluA2-containing, Ca 2+ -impermeable, reduced inhibitory synaptic transmission, and loss of NMDAR-independent LTP at glutamatergic synapses onto CA1 inhibitory interneurons. These factors could contribute to an excitatory/inhibitory imbalance-a common theme in FXS and other autism spectrum disorders., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Chromatin remodelers actively target arrays of acetylated nucleosomes at select enhancers and promoters to facilitate or shut down the repeated recruitment of RNA polymerase II during transcriptional bursting. It is poorly understood how chromatin remodelers such as PBAF dynamically target different chromatin states inside a live cell. Our live-cell single-molecule fluorescence microscopy study reveals chromatin hubs throughout the nucleus where PBAF rapidly cycles on and off the genome. Deletion of PBAF's bromodomains impairs targeting and stable engagement of chromatin in hubs. Dual color imaging reveals that PBAF targets both euchromatic and heterochromatic hubs with distinct genome-binding kinetic profiles that mimic chromatin stability. Removal of PBAF's bromodomains stabilizes H3.3 binding within chromatin, indicating that bromodomains may play a direct role in remodeling of the nucleosome. Our data suggests that PBAF's dynamic bromodomain-mediated engagement of a nucleosome may reflect the chromatin-remodeling potential of differentially bound chromatin states., (Copyright © 2022 Biophysical Society. All rights reserved.)