Search

The identification of dominant microbes in anaerobic mercury (Hg) methylation, methylmercury (MeHg) demethylation, and methane oxidation as sulfate-reducing bacteria, methanogens or, probably, anaerobic methanotrophic archaea (ANMEs) is of great interest. To date, however, the interrelationship of bacteria and archaea involved in these processes remains unclear. Here, we demonstrated the dynamics of microorganisms participating in these processes. Anaerobic fixed-bed reactors were operated with swine manure and sludge to produce methane stably, and then, sulfate (reactor C), sulfate and Hg(II) (reactor H), and sulfate and MeHg (reactor M) were added, and the reactors were operated for 120 d, divided equally into four periods, P1–P4. The bacterial compositions changed nonsignificantly, whereas Methanosaeta in reactors H and M decreased significantly, revealing that it was irrelevant for Hg transformation. The abundances of Syntrophomonadaceae , Methanoculleus , Candidatus Methanogranum and Candidatus Methanoplasma increased continuously with time; these species probably functioned in these processes, but further evidence is needed. Desulfocella and Desulfobacterium dominated first but eventually almost vanished, while the dominant archaeal genera Methanogenium , Methanoculleus and Methanocorpusculum were closely related to ANME–1 and ANME–2. PLS-DA results indicated that both bacteria and archaea in different periods in the three reactors were clustered separately, implying that the microbial compositions in the same periods were similar and changed markedly with time. [Display omitted] • Methanosaeta decreased significantly after adding Hg and was unrelated to Hg transformation. • Desulfocella and Desulfobacterium dominated first but finally almost vanished. • The dominant archaeal genera were closely related to ANME–1 and ANME–2. • Microbes in different periods clustered separately, showing a significant change with time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • Methylators were dominating in rice rhizosphere, rather than the bulk soil. • Hg-promoted methylators are key taxa in the rhizosphere at the flowering stage. • In planta demethylation and methylation in rice roots are possible. • Desulfovibrionaceae may play an important role in Hg detoxification of rice. The plant microbiota can affect plant health and fitness by promoting methylmercury (MeHg) production in paddy soil. Although most well-known mercury (Hg) methylators are observed in the soil, it remains unclear how rice rhizosphere assemblages alter MeHg production. Here, we used network analyses of microbial diversity to identify bulk soil (BS), rhizosphere (RS) and root bacterial networks during rice development at Hg gradients. Hg gradients greatly impacted the niche-sharing of taxa significantly relating to MeHg/THg, while plant development had little effect. In RS networks, Hg gradients increased the proportion of MeHg-related nodes in total nodes from 37.88% to 45.76%, but plant development enhanced from 48.59% to 50.41%. The module hub and connector in RS networks included taxa positively (Nitrososphaeracea, Vicinamibacteraceae and Oxalobacteraceae) and negatively (Gracilibacteraceae) correlating with MeHg/THg at the blooming stage. In BS networks, Deinococcaceae and Paludibacteraceae were positively related to MeHg/THg, and constituted the connector at the reviving stage and the module hub at the blooming stage. Soil with an Hg concentration of 30 mg kg−1 increased the complexity and connectivity of root microbial networks, although microbial community structure in roots was less affected by Hg gradients and plant development. As most frequent connector in root microbial networks, Desulfovibrionaceae did not significantly correlate with MeHg/THg, but was likely to play an important role in the response to Hg stress. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Some thiols, such as cysteine (CYS) at moderate concentrations (10–500 µM), can enhance methylmercury (MeHg) formation by Geobacter sulfurreducens PCA, whereas others such as dithiol 2,3-dimercaptopropanesulfonate (DMPS) and 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) abolish mercury [Hg(II)] methylation. Little is known, however, about whether Hg(II) methylation could be enhanced or inhibited by the presence of mixed thiol ligands at low concentrations observed in the environment. Surprisingly we found that mixing CYS (1 µM) with DMPS (0.025–0.5 µM) or DMSA (0.025–1 µM) substantially increased MeHg production by 1.5–3.5-fold, compared to the no-thiol control, whereas complexation with a single DMPS, or DMSA, or CYS (1 µM) strongly inhibited Hg(II) methylation. Pre-equilibration between Hg(II) and thiols before the addition of cells was necessary to observe enhanced methylation. Spectroscopic analyses indicated the formation of mixed or heteroleptic coordinated Hg(II)-S 3 /S 4 complexes, which likely facilitated exchange of Hg(II) with cells and its uptake and internal transfer to the HgcAB proteins required for methylation. These results suggest that the effects of thiols on Hg(II) methylation were more complex than previously thought (using a single thiol) and thus underscore the importance of understanding how mixed thiols and their interactions with Hg(II) may ultimately influence MeHg production in the natural environment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]