Search

Purpose: Leptomeningeal enhancement (LME) suggests leptomeningeal dissemination (LMD) of tumor cells, which is a complication of end-stage glioblastoma, and is associated with a poor prognosis. However, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) occasionally indicates the disappearance of peri-brainstem LME after surgical resection of glioblastoma. Since preoperative LMD may affect treatment indications, we aimed to analyze the clinical significance of preoperative LME of the brainstem in glioblastoma. Methods: We retrospectively collected clinical and radiological data from consecutive patients with glioblastoma and preoperative LME of the brainstem, who were treated at our hospital between 2017 and 2020. Results: Among 112 patients with glioblastoma, nine (8%) showed preoperative LME of the brainstem. In comparison with tumors without LME, tumor size was significantly associated with the preoperative LME of the brainstem (p = 0.016). In addition, there was a trend toward significance for a relationship between deep tumor location and preoperative LME of the brainstem (p = 0.058). Notably, among six patients who underwent surgical resection for glioblastoma with LME of the brainstem, four showed significant radiological disappearance of the LME on postoperative MRI. This suggests that the LME did not result from LMD in these cases. Moreover, these four patients lived longer than would be expected from the presence of LMD. However, this LME disappearance was not observed after biopsy or chemoradiotherapy. Conclusions: These findings suggest that preoperative LME does not necessarily indicate the presence of untreatable LMD; moreover, LME may disappear after surgical tumor resection. Thus, transient preoperative LME could be attributed to other mechanisms, including impaired venous flow due to intratumoral arteriovenous shunts, which can be resolved by reducing the tumor burden. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The aim of this study is to assess the effect of super-resolution deep learning-based reconstruction (SR-DLR), which uses k-space properties, on image quality of intracranial time-of-flight (TOF) magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3 T. Methods: This retrospective study involved 35 patients who underwent intracranial TOF-MRA using a 3-T MRI system with SR-DLR based on k-space properties in October and November 2022. We reconstructed MRA with SR-DLR (matrix = 1008 × 1008) and MRA without SR-DLR (matrix = 336 × 336). We measured the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast, and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the basilar artery (BA) and the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) and the sharpness of the posterior cerebral artery (PCA) using the slope of the signal intensity profile curve at the half-peak points. Two radiologists evaluated image noise, artifacts, contrast, sharpness, and overall image quality of the two image types using a 4-point scale. We compared quantitative and qualitative scores between images with and without SR-DLR using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: The SNRs, contrasts, and CNRs were all significantly higher in images with SR-DLR than those without SR-DLR (p < 0.001). The slope was significantly greater in images with SR-DLR than those without SR-DLR (p < 0.001). The qualitative scores in MRAs with SR-DLR were all significantly higher than MRAs without SR-DLR (p < 0.001). Conclusion: SR-DLR with k-space properties can offer the benefits of increased spatial resolution without the associated drawbacks of longer scan times and reduced SNR and CNR in intracranial MRA. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of super-resolution deep learning-based reconstruction (SR-DLR), which utilizes k-space data, on the quality of images and the quantitation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for diffusion-weighted images (DWI) in brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on 34 patients who had undergone DWI using a 3 T MRI system with SR-DLR reconstruction based on k-space data in August 2022. DWI was reconstructed with SR-DLR (Matrix = 684 × 684) and without SR-DLR (Matrix = 228 × 228). Measurements were made of the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in white matter (WM) and grey matter (GM), and the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the septum pellucidum. Two radiologists assessed image noise, contrast, artifacts, blur, and the overall quality of three image types using a four-point scale. Quantitative and qualitative scores between images with and without SR-DLR were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Images with SR-DLR showed significantly higher SNRs and CNRs than those without SR-DLR (p < 0.001). No statistically significant variances were found in the apparent diffusion coefficients (ADCs) in WM and GM between images with and without SR-DLR (ADC in WM, p = 0.945; ADC in GM, p = 0.235). Moreover, the FWHM without SR-DLR was notably lower compared to that with SR-DLR (p < 0.001). Conclusion: SR-DLR has the potential to augment the quality of DWI in DL MRI scans without significantly impacting ADC quantitation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a combined wavelet and deep-learning reconstruction (DLR) method for under-sampled pituitary MRI. Methods: This retrospective study included 28 consecutive patients who underwent under-sampled pituitary T2-weighted images (T2WI). Images were reconstructed using either the conventional wavelet denoising method (wavelet method) or the wavelet and DLR methods combined (hybrid DLR method) at five denoising levels. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) of the CSF, hypothalamic, and pituitary images and the contrast between structures were compared between the two image types. Noise quality, contrast, sharpness, artifacts, and overall image quality were evaluated by two board-certified radiologists. The quantitative and the qualitative analyses were performed with robust two-way repeated analyses of variance. Results: Using the hybrid DLR method, the SNR of the CSF progressively increased as denoising levels increased. By contrast, with the wavelet method, the SNR of the CSF, hypothalamus, and pituitary did not increase at higher denoising levels. There was a significant main effect of denoising methods (p < 0.001) and denoising levels (p < 0.001), and an interaction between denoising methods and denoising levels (p < 0.001). For all five qualitative scores, there was a significant main effect of denoising methods (p < 0.001) and an interaction between denoising methods and denoising levels (p < 0.001). Conclusions: The hybrid DLR method can provide higher image quality for T2WI of the pituitary with compressed sensing (CS) than the wavelet method alone, especially at higher denoising levels. Key Points: •The signal-to-noise ratios of cerebrospinal fluid progressively increased with the hybrid DLR method, with an increase in the denoising level for cerebrospinal fluid in pituitary T2WI with CS. •The signal-to-noise ratios of cerebrospinal fluid using the conventional wavelet method did not increase at higher denoising levels. •All qualitative scores of hybrid deep-learning reconstructions at all denoising levels were higher than those for the wavelet denoising method. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]