Search

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk is lower in females than males. It has been reported that females have greater pancreatic 훽‐cell function than males, which may at least in part contribute to the T2D risk in females. 훽‐cell function is influenced by exercise training; however, previous trials comparing 훽‐cell function between the sexes have not included participants matched for training status. Furthermore, the acute effects of different modes of exercise on 훽‐cell function, and whether sex inherently influences these effects, are largely unexamined. Males and females (12/sex) completed a 120‐min oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at rest (CON) and following acute bouts of high‐intensity interval exercise (HIIE), moderate intensity continuous (MIC) exercise, and low‐load high‐repetition (LLHR) resistance exercise to assess whether sex inherently influences baseline and/or post‐exercise pancreatic function in the absence of pathology. We found no sex differences in basal pancreatic 훽‐cell function. Females had greater basal insulin clearance following MIC exercise compared to males (p = 0.01) and males tended to have a higher potentiation ratio following HIIE (p = 0.07). Females also had lower glucose sensitivity following MIC exercise compared to HIIE (p = 0.007) and LLHR (p = 0.003). Insulin clearance during the OGTT was greater following HIIE as compared with CON and MIC exercise (p = 0.02). 2‐H oral glucose insulin sensitivity was greater following LLHR compared to CON (p = 0.01). Acute bouts of different modes of exercise do not differentially influence 훽‐cell function but do influence insulin clearance and insulin sensitivity. Therefore, sex and exercise mode interact to differentially influence insulin clearance and glucose sensitivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Multiple studies support the efficacy of combining a glucagon‐like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP‐1RA) with basal insulin in people with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on dual/triple oral therapy. Fixed‐ratio combinations of basal insulin + GLP‐1RA represent a further advance to facilitate management. We assessed the impact of fixed‐ratio combination basal insulin + GLP‐1RA treatment on β‐cell function. Materials and Methods: We analysed data from 351 participants in the LixiLan‐G trial (NCT02787551) randomized to receive iGlarLixi (insulin glargine 100 U/ml + lixisenatide) or to continue daily/weekly GLP‐1RA, both on top of metformin. Participants received a 2‐h meal tolerance test before randomization and at study end (26 weeks), with timed plasma glucose and C‐peptide determinations. β‐cell function parameters were resolved using mathematical modelling. Results: In the GLP‐1RA group (n = 162), both body weight and glycated haemoglobin decreased at week 26, yet none of the insulin secretion/β‐cell function parameters changed significantly. In contrast, in the iGlarLixi group (n = 189), glycated haemoglobin decreased significantly more than in the GLP‐1RA group (p <.0001) despite an increase in body weight (+1.7 ± 3.9 kg, p <.0001). Fasting and stimulated insulin secretion decreased at Week 26 (both p <.0001 vs. GLP‐1RA), while β‐cell glucose sensitivity increased by a median 35% (p =.0032 vs. GLP‐1RA). The incremental meal tolerance test glucose area showed a larger reduction with iGlarLixi versus GLP‐1RA (p <.0001). Conclusions: In people with type 2 diabetes on metformin, 26‐week treatment with iGlarLixi resulted in a marked improvement in β‐cell function concomitant with sparing of endogenous insulin release and a reduction in meal absorption. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]