Search

Unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) remote sensing has become a readily usable tool for agricultural water management with high temporal and spatial resolutions. UAV-borne thermography can monitor crop water status near real-time, which enables precise irrigation scheduling based on an accurate decision-making strategy. The crop water stress index (CWSI) is a widely adopted indicator of plant water stress for irrigation management practices; however, dependence of its efficacy on data acquisition time during the daytime is yet to be investigated rigorously. In this paper, plant water stress captured by a series of UAV remote sensing campaigns at different times of the day (9h, 12h and 15h) in a nectarine orchard were analyzed to examine the diurnal behavior of plant water stress represented by the CWSI against measured plant physiological parameters. CWSI values were derived using a probability modelling, named 'Adaptive CWSI', proposed by our earlier research. The plant physiological parameters, such as stem water potential (ψstem) and stomatal conductance (gs), were measured on plants for validation concurrently with the flights under different irrigation regimes (0, 20, 40 and 100 % of ETc). Estimated diurnal CWSIs were compared with plant-based parameters at different data acquisition times of the day. Results showed a strong relationship between ψstem measurements and the CWSIs at midday (12 h) with a high coefficient of determination (R2 = 0.83). Diurnal CWSIs showed a significant R2 to gs over different levels of irrigation at three different times of the day with R2 = 0.92 (9h), 0.77 (12h) and 0.86 (15h), respectively. The adaptive CWSI method used showed a robust capability to estimate plant water stress levels even with the small range of changes presented in the morning. Results of this work indicate that CWSI values collected by UAV-borne thermography between mid-morning and mid-afternoon can be used to map plant water stress with a consistent efficacy. This has important implications for extending the time-window of UAV-borne thermography (and subsequent areal coverage) for accurate plant water stress mapping beyond midday. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • In asynchronous climates, the forest growth response to rainfall is not well known. • Lagged relationship of forest growth to antecedent rainfall was explored. • Vegetation in the asynchronous climate have a long memory to the rainfall. • The memory of vegetation to rain could indicate soil/rooting depth across the landscape. The out-of-phase rainfall and temperature and deep root system make the sequential connection between past rainfall events, soil water storage, and forest growth response complicated and temporally extended in asynchronous climates with Mediterranean-type settings. Unfortunately, these location-specific deep-soil water stores are rarely measured due to logistic and financial constraints, especially in the forest. Therefore, at a large spatio-temporal scale, forest growth relationship to growth drivers is still unknown in these ecosystems, limiting our knowledge to understand the functioning of these forests and their links with hydrological processes. Although process-based water balance models can analyze vegetation growth response to the input climate forcing, they rely upon some significant assumptions regarding plants access to deep soil water storage. Thus, this study aims to understand how the out-of-phase rainfall events affect the current ecosystem growth response, represented by the observed Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), across the landscape. We have used an empirical approach on long term observed data without any assumption on access to deep-soil water stores. We estimated time lags between forest growth and rainfall events using a lagged correlation analysis applied to monthly anomalies of NDVI and rainfall against their climatological averages over 2002–2018. The study found that the forests in asynchronous climates exhibit unexpectedly long (10–25 months) memory to rain, and this memory has a systematic pattern across the landscape, which we contend has highlighted three things: 1) the forest in the middle aridity (∼3–4.5) range are relatively more sensitive to changes in the short-term rainfall than the forest in lower (<3) and higher (>5) aridity regions, could be due to rapid depletion of relatively small soil water storage in between the storms, 2) the variable memory of forest to rain across the landscape can be an indicator of soil depth/rooting depth, and 3) the variable sized location specific antecedent rainfall windows can explain significant variability in forest growth status in asynchronous climates, thus these rainfall windows can be employed to forecast forest growth with a lead time (>4 months). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]